[Bug debug/59575] [4.9 regression] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2239

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59575 --- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Ryan Mansfield from comment #18) (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #17) Can I ask for preprocessed source + options again? $ cat ~/conftest.c void bar ();

[Bug sanitizer/55309] gcc's address-sanitizer 66% slower than clang's

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55309 --- Comment #58 from Kostya Serebryany kcc at gcc dot gnu.org --- FTR, here are the new numbers; except for 464.h264ref looks good. clang r199888, gcc r207025 flags: -O2 -fsanitize=address machine: Dell 3500 (Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU W3690 @ 3.47GHz)

[Bug sanitizer/55309] gcc's address-sanitizer 66% slower than clang's

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55309 Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/59952] -march=core-avx2 should not enable RTM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59952 --- Comment #2 from Thiago Macieira thiago at kde dot org --- The Ks and the Rs don't have it. The plain 4770 as well as 4770S do have it. I guess we were too eager with TSX when the announcement came out 2 years ago: it sounded like all Haswell

[Bug target/59952] -march=core-avx2 should not enable RTM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59952 --- Comment #3 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- There are also Haswells that lack BMI2. I updated our dynamic binary instrumentation engine for AVX2 about a year ago, but while our Haswell box at the time had AVX2 it didn't

[Bug c/59953] New: Improve the warning message for unsigned_expression = 0UL

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59953 Bug ID: 59953 Summary: Improve the warning message for unsigned_expression = 0UL Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug c++/59954] New: ice in execute with -Wall

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59954 Bug ID: 59954 Summary: ice in execute with -Wall Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee:

[Bug sanitizer/59733] [4.9 Regression] bootstrap-asan failed to bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59733 Kostya Serebryany kcc at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/59954] ice in execute with -Wall

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59954 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug preprocessor/59935] [4.9 Regression] Firefox build fails with: built-in: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59935 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dcb314 at hotmail

[Bug c++/59954] ice in execute with -Wall

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59954 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/59529] fix experimental/string_view end-of-string edge cases

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59529 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/59530] Incorrect check on string_view operator[]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59530 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/59531] string_view overrun in copy operation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59531 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/59951] bootstrap comparison failure with -O3 for a week

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59951 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug c++/59955] New: G++ 4.8 internal compiler error: Segmentation fault on (re?)defining a struct template as function template, when inside a struct tempate

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59955 Bug ID: 59955 Summary: G++ 4.8 internal compiler error: Segmentation fault on (re?)defining a struct template as function template, when inside a struct tempate Product: gcc

[Bug c++/59955] G++ 4.8 internal compiler error: Segmentation fault on (re?)defining a struct template as function template, when inside a struct tempate

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59955 Wouter van Ooijen wouter at voti dot nl changed: What|Removed |Added Target||ARM

[Bug c++/59916] [4.9 Regression] constructors and destructors can cause control reaches end of non-void function warnings with -Os

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59916 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at

Status on c++ bug 27557

Hi, I'm trying to find out information on the current state of bug 27557 (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27557) I've currently had not response from people monitoring the bugzilla. Basically I'd like to know what still needs to be done to fix this bug, since it is directly affecting

[Bug c++/51219] [4.7/4.8/4.9 regression] ICE with empty bit-fields

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51219 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/37140] type inherited from base class not recognized

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37140 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #10 from

[Bug c++/59956] New: internal compiler error: unexpected expression ‘P_S’ of kind template_parm_index

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59956 Bug ID: 59956 Summary: internal compiler error: unexpected expression ‘P_S’ of kind template_parm_index Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/59957] New: ICE in read_line_num when re-#define-ing a -DVAR=...

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59957 Bug ID: 59957 Summary: ICE in read_line_num when re-#define-ing a -DVAR=... Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal

[Bug sanitizer/59733] [4.9 Regression] bootstrap-asan failed to bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59733 Kostya Serebryany kcc at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/59956] internal compiler error: unexpected expression ‘P_S’ of kind template_parm_index

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59956 Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug sanitizer/59733] [4.9 Regression] bootstrap-asan failed to bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59733 --- Comment #26 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Kostya Serebryany from comment #25) Even with this workaround asan is almost unusable with the buggy kernel. I suspect that when a process has too many mappings it gets

[Bug fortran/59941] [4.7 Regression] [OOP] ICE with polymorphic types

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59941 --- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to janus from comment #6) Somewhat reminds me of PR 58007. Unfortunately r207119 does not seem to fix it on the 4.7 branch. Apparently it's a different problem after all ...

[Bug c/59958] New: alpha does not deal with non-aligned returns from malloc() when doing byte wise access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59958 Bug ID: 59958 Summary: alpha does not deal with non-aligned returns from malloc() when doing byte wise access Product: gcc Version: 4.8.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/59957] libcpp: ICE in read_line_num when re-#define-ing a -DVAR=...

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59957 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ICE in read_line_num when |libcpp: ICE in

[Bug c/59957] libcpp: ICE in read_line_num when re-#define-ing a -DVAR=...

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59957 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug preprocessor/59935] [4.9 Regression] Firefox build fails with: built-in: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59935 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc

[Bug gcov-profile/58602] .gcno files not truncated at gcov_close

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58602 --- Comment #8 from Laurent Aflonsi laurent.alfonsi at st dot com --- Jeffrey, As you asked for, I have performed much more testing on that fix. I am far from having done as many tests as Jakub in 2004. In particular, I have not been able to

[Bug c++/59224] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] std::uncaught_exception returns true while constructing exception.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59224 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Mon Jan 27 13:57:39 2014 New Revision: 207129 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207129root=gccview=rev Log: Core DR 475 PR c++/41174 PR c++/59224

[Bug libstdc++/41174] uncaught_exception always returns true

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41174 --- Comment #15 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Mon Jan 27 13:57:39 2014 New Revision: 207129 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207129root=gccview=rev Log: Core DR 475 PR c++/41174 PR c++/59224

[Bug c++/58965] [4.8/4.9 Regression] [c++11] ICE with member initializer in static union

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58965 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Mon Jan 27 13:58:42 2014 New Revision: 207130 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207130root=gccview=rev Log: PR c++/58965 * mangle.c

[Bug libstdc++/41174] uncaught_exception always returns true

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41174 --- Comment #16 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Mon Jan 27 13:58:48 2014 New Revision: 207131 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207131root=gccview=rev Log: Core DR 475 PR c++/41174 PR c++/59224

[Bug c++/59224] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] std::uncaught_exception returns true while constructing exception.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59224 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Mon Jan 27 13:58:48 2014 New Revision: 207131 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207131root=gccview=rev Log: Core DR 475 PR c++/41174 PR c++/59224

[Bug c++/58965] [4.8/4.9 Regression] [c++11] ICE with member initializer in static union

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58965 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/59224] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] std::uncaught_exception returns true while constructing exception.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59224 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/41174] uncaught_exception always returns true

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41174 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/59224] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] std::uncaught_exception returns true while constructing exception.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59224 Bug 59224 depends on bug 41174, which changed state. Bug 41174 Summary: uncaught_exception always returns true http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41174 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/59959] [Regression 4.9] LRA ICEs on a fortran case(Suspected to be similar to pr59915)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59959 --- Comment #1 from Tejas Belagod belagod at gcc dot gnu.org --- My aarch64-none-linux-gnu-gfortran is configrued with: /src/gcc/configure --target=aarch64-none-linux-gnu --prefix= --with-sysroot=/aarch64-none-linux-gnu/libc

[Bug c++/58812] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE initializing an r-value reference with an initializer list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58812 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug fortran/59959] [Regression 4.9] LRA ICEs on a fortran case(Suspected to be similar to pr59915)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59959 --- Comment #2 from Tejas Belagod belagod at gcc dot gnu.org --- Looks like the same LRA issues are causing libgomp.fortran tests to ICE: /aarch64-none-linux-gnu/obj/gcc4/gcc/xgcc -B/aarch64-none-linux-gnu/obj/gcc4/gcc/

[Bug c++/59097] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE with invalid statement expression as array size

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59097 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug fortran/59959] New: [Regression 4.9] LRA ICEs on a fortran case(Suspected to be similar to pr59915)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59959 Bug ID: 59959 Summary: [Regression 4.9] LRA ICEs on a fortran case(Suspected to be similar to pr59915) Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/58837] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] [c++11] ICE using invalid condition in static_assert

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58837 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/58965] [4.8/4.9 Regression] [c++11] ICE with member initializer in static union

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58965 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- *** Bug 58701 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/58616] [meta-bug] nsdmi

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58616 Bug 58616 depends on bug 58701, which changed state. Bug 58701 Summary: [4.9 Regression] [c++11] ICE initializing member of static union http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58701 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/58701] [4.9 Regression] [c++11] ICE initializing member of static union

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58701 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/58651] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE with invalid initializer list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58651 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/58814] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE with volatile and attribute vector_size

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58814 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug target/59952] -march=core-avx2 should not enable RTM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59952 --- Comment #4 from Thiago Macieira thiago at kde dot org --- (In reply to Mikael Pettersson from comment #3) There are also Haswells that lack BMI2. I updated our dynamic binary instrumentation engine for AVX2 about a year ago, but while our

[Bug bootstrap/59934] Bootstrap fail since r206941: expmed.h:252:33: error: array subscript is above array bounds

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59934 Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/59231] [4.8/4.9 Regression] gcc misses [-Werror=sign-compare] when inside a template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59231 --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #6) However, what Jason suggested at the time was ANOTHER job for c_inhibit_evaluation_warning (emphasis mine). In my mind that was important

[Bug bootstrap/59934] Bootstrap fail since r206941: expmed.h:252:33: error: array subscript is above array bounds

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59934 --- Comment #15 from Jeffrey A. Law law at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: law Date: Mon Jan 27 16:33:39 2014 New Revision: 207137 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207137root=gccview=rev Log: PR bootstrap/59934 * expmed.h

[Bug c++/59960] New: accepts ill-formed 'auto a1 = t1, a2 = t2;' where t1 and t2 have different template types

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59960 Bug ID: 59960 Summary: accepts ill-formed 'auto a1 = t1, a2 = t2;' where t1 and t2 have different template types Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug other/59920] [4.9 Regression] build doesn't terminate (at least after an hour)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59920 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 31963 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31963action=edit gcc49-pr59920.patch Ok, started hacking on this. I think I have the tree-cfg.c side of

[Bug c++/58701] [4.9 Regression] [c++11] ICE initializing member of static union

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58701 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|NEW

[Bug c++/58616] [meta-bug] nsdmi

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58616 Bug 58616 depends on bug 58701, which changed state. Bug 58701 Summary: [4.9 Regression] [c++11] ICE initializing member of static union http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58701 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/58632] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE reusing template parameter name as class name

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58632 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/58639] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE on self-referential struct member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58639 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug libstdc++/59215] tsan: warning in shared_ptr_base.h

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59215 --- Comment #21 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: redi Date: Mon Jan 27 17:56:40 2014 New Revision: 207147 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207147root=gccview=rev Log: PR libstdc++/59215 *

[Bug libgcc/59936] undefined reference to gfortran

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59936 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/59215] tsan: warning in shared_ptr_base.h

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59215 --- Comment #22 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- Fixed on trunk so far.

[Bug testsuite/59897] FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/use-after-return-1.c -O* output pattern test, is 1: 0x2285020

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59897 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/59960] accepts ill-formed 'auto a1 = t1, a2 = t2;' where t1 and t2 have different template types

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59960 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug fortran/59910] ICE in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:5327

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59910 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug libgcc/59936] undefined reference to gfortran

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59936 --- Comment #2 from Benyahia.N benyahia-nezha at hotmail dot fr --- Salam Dominique d'Humieres Thanks for your response, that's so kind of you,fortunately, i have solved this problem only by using the command 'gfortran band-3c.for' unstead of

[Bug target/59952] -march=core-avx2 should not enable RTM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59952 --- Comment #5 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Thiago Macieira from comment #4) (In reply to Mikael Pettersson from comment #3) There are also Haswells that lack BMI2. I updated our dynamic binary

[Bug c++/58606] [4.8/4.9 Regression] [c++11] ICE with specialization in variadic template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58606 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug target/59952] -march=core-avx2 should not enable RTM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59952 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Prerelease samples shouldn't count, people using those just can avoid using -march=haswell and use -march=ivybridge -mavx2 or similar instead. Can anyone from Intel verify if all

[Bug c++/58504] [4.7/4.8/4.9 regression] ICE with type trait as default template parameter

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58504 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c/59961] New: Use of size_t in leading term of computation with subtraction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59961 Bug ID: 59961 Summary: Use of size_t in leading term of computation with subtraction Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/59952] -march=core-avx2 should not enable RTM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59952 --- Comment #7 from Thiago Macieira thiago at kde dot org --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6) Prerelease samples shouldn't count, people using those just can avoid using -march=haswell and use -march=ivybridge -mavx2 or similar

[Bug target/59952] -march=core-avx2 should not enable RTM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59952 --- Comment #8 from Thiago Macieira thiago at kde dot org --- (In reply to Thiago Macieira from comment #7) (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6) Prerelease samples shouldn't count, people using those just can avoid using -march=haswell

[Bug c/59958] alpha does not deal with non-aligned returns from malloc() when doing byte wise access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59958 --- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot com --- The response to C90 DR#075 said memory from malloc must be suitably aligned for all types, not just those fitting in space of the given size, and nothing

[Bug c/59961] Use of size_t in leading term of computation with subtraction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59961 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org --- -100 is not the same as -s1. The latter is SIZE_MAX + 1 - 100, a big number, depending on the size of size_t. If s1 is declared as unsigned short or unsigned char, it will be promoted

[Bug c++/59838] [4.7 Regression] ICE with an enum using an incomplete type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59838 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cas43 at cs dot

[Bug target/59952] -march=core-avx2 should not enable RTM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59952 --- Comment #9 from Yukhin Kirill kirill.yukhin at intel dot com --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6) Prerelease samples shouldn't count, people using those just can avoid using -march=haswell and use -march=ivybridge -mavx2 or

[Bug c++/57946] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault in int_fits_type_p

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57946 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/54652] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE with -g

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54652 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/59956] internal compiler error: unexpected expression ‘P_S’ of kind template_parm_index

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59956 --- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org --- Maybe a dup a PR58466?

[Bug libstdc++/59829] Calling vector::data() occurs undefined behavior when the vector is empty

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59829 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- proposed fix: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-01/msg01719.html

[Bug target/59952] -march=core-avx2 should not enable RTM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59952 --- Comment #10 from Thiago Macieira thiago at kde dot org --- (In reply to Yukhin Kirill from comment #9) I am checking and will get back to. I though all AVX2 parts had BMI1/2 The evidence seems to support that. I did check with a few

[Bug c++/59823] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] conversion operator to const X causes copy-construction of temporary

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59823 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug sanitizer/59962] New: --with-build-config=bootstrap-asan doesn't work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59962 Bug ID: 59962 Summary: --with-build-config=bootstrap-asan doesn't work Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug middle-end/58555] [4.9 Regression] Floating point exception in want_inline_self_recursive_call_p

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58555 Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot

[Bug c/59961] Use of size_t in leading term of computation with subtraction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59961 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/58555] [4.9 Regression] Floating point exception in want_inline_self_recursive_call_p

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58555 --- Comment #17 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com --- Nevermind, I've got it failing now.

[Bug middle-end/58555] [4.9 Regression] Floating point exception in want_inline_self_recursive_call_p

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58555 Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/58007] [4.7/4.9 Regression] [OOP] ICE in free_pi_tree(): Unresolved fixup - resolve_fixups does not fixup component of __class_bsr_Bsr_matrix

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58007 --- Comment #20 from Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: mikael Date: Mon Jan 27 21:23:16 2014 New Revision: 207152 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207152root=gccview=rev Log: fortran/ PR fortran/58007 *

[Bug middle-end/58555] [4.9 Regression] Floating point exception in want_inline_self_recursive_call_p

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58555 --- Comment #19 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com --- That part is pretty obvious. What I wanted to look at is how we got there and did it make any sense to be in that code with a caller frequency of zero.

[Bug preprocessor/58580] [4.8 Regression] preprocessor goes OOM with warning for zero literals

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58580 Pat Haugen pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pthaugen at gcc

[Bug middle-end/58555] [4.9 Regression] Floating point exception in want_inline_self_recursive_call_p

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58555 --- Comment #20 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz --- That part is pretty obvious. What I wanted to look at is how we got there and did it make any sense to be in that code with a caller frequency of zero. Recursive inliner will happily

[Bug target/52125] Problems with LO16 asm operands on MIPS

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52125 Steve Ellcey sje at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sje at gcc dot

[Bug middle-end/58555] [4.9 Regression] Floating point exception in want_inline_self_recursive_call_p

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58555 --- Comment #21 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com --- Right, I'd been speculating that we were calling want_inline_self_recursive_call_p for all self-recursive calls and that maybe the hot edge or other heuristic was doing something

[Bug target/52125] Problems with LO16 asm operands on MIPS

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52125 --- Comment #6 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Yeah, got the same thing in overnight mipsisa64-sde-elf testing but hadn't had chance to look at it. Adding -mno-gpopt is fine.

[Bug tree-optimization/59920] [4.9 Regression] build doesn't terminate (at least after an hour)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59920 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #31963|0 |1 is

[Bug c/59961] Use of size_t in leading term of computation with subtraction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59961 --- Comment #3 from Olaf olaf at robots dot ox.ac.uk --- Well... naive me found it quite surprising and unexpected that the following two lines produce grossly different results: double result1 = -s1*d1 + s2*d2; double result2 = s2*d2 - s1*d1;

  1   2   >