http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60113
Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60117
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55762
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
For the record the test uses invalid recursive I/O, hence hangs on darwin (see
pr30617).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60116
--- Comment #11 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com ---
OK, confirmed using -Os -m32 with
gcc version 4.9.0 20140207 (experimental) [trunk revision 207597] (GCC)
on CentOS 5.10.
It looks like a fault in the combine pass.
Before combine,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60116
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |rtl-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49847
--- Comment #25 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #24)
This is a mess.
As noted in the other comments, we're considering a cc0-setter as a
potentially trapping insn. As a result the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49636
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60120
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60120
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60062
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work|4.8.3 |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60062
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 60120 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60116
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60115
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60115
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Known
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60131
Bug ID: 60131
Summary: RTL check fail in rhs_regno
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60131
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60107
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Does solaris properly align its stack on the entry of main?
0xb5aedf64 + 0x10 isn't aligned for paddd.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60128
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jb at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60107
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Well, this isn't about main alignment (and, after all, main realigns the stack
anyway), but about stack alignment upon entering pthread_create callbacks.
If the Solaris libraries don't
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60129
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60132
Bug ID: 60132
Summary: C++11: lack of is_trivially_copy_constructible
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60128
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
With the patch in comment 2, the test gfortran.dg/edit_real_1.f90 fails for the
outputs #5, 6, and 13
5 12.873E+03z
6 12.344E-06z
13999.999E+00z
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60115
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The issue is that tree_could_trap_p, while handling
case ARRAY_REF:
base = TREE_OPERAND (expr, 0);
if (tree_could_trap_p (base))
return true;
if
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60133
Bug ID: 60133
Summary: [4.8 / 4.9 Regression] wrong multiarch name on
aarch64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60074
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60128
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
The regression reported in comment 3 disappears with the following patch
--- ../_clean/libgfortran/io/write_float.def2014-01-21 08:30:57.0
+0100
+++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60133
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59992
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Untested hack to generate somewhat smaller recog_* functions by dynamically
lowering the threshold if we'd see too big functions. With this patch we get
149 recog_* functions instead
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59992
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 32096
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32096action=edit
insn-recog.ii.bz2
Preprocessed source for
-fpreprocessed insn-recog.ii -m32 -mtune=generic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60134
Bug ID: 60134
Summary: runtime_unmarkspan panics with unaligned pointer
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59992
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I think the issue for that is probably
./cc1plus -quiet t.ii -O2 -ftime-report -m32 -Wdisabled-optimization
../../gcc/config/i386/sync.md: In function ‘int recog_102(rtx, rtx,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59992
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Bumping to --param max-gcse-memory=400 * 1024 * 1024 fixes that and we get
(as expected from non-RTL checking -ftime-report)
CPROP : 4.82 ( 3%) usr 0.57 (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60115
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Feb 10 13:51:23 2014
New Revision: 207656
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207656root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-02-10 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60115
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60101
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60131
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59903
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60115
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Feb 10 15:20:30 2014
New Revision: 207659
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207659root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-02-10 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59903
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Feb 10 15:20:30 2014
New Revision: 207659
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207659root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-02-10 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59990
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Backporting this to 4.8 regresses
//-m32
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr49168-1.c scan-assembler movdqu[\t ]*%xmm[0-9]+,[^,]*
flt128_va:
.LFB0:
.cfi_startproc
movl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59990
--- Comment #16 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
seems to be TARGET_SSE_TYPELESS_STORES tuning dependent (and that was changed
on trunk for generic).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60115
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60060
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60131
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Reduced testcase for -O2:
struct A { short a; };
int **b;
unsigned long c;
bool foo ();
unsigned bar (unsigned i);
extern void baz () __attribute__((noreturn));
int *
test (unsigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56824
--- Comment #12 from Magnus Reftel magnus.reftel at gmail dot com ---
Works fine on trunk (tested version 96c7d4b1727c5f9ddcbb02fb69f727a0f2f3572e).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52306
--- Comment #29 from Jeffrey A. Law law at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: law
Date: Mon Feb 10 16:25:44 2014
New Revision: 207662
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207662root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/52306
* reload1.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52306
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.8/4.9 regression] ICE in |[4.8 regression]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60135
Bug ID: 60135
Summary: add option to warn if ctor/conversion declared
implicit
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60116
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59691
--- Comment #10 from bviyer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: bviyer
Date: Mon Feb 10 16:56:54 2014
New Revision: 207664
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207664root=gccview=rev
Log:
Fix for PR target/59691.
+2014-02-10 Balaji V. Iyer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59248
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60116
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
And the place where we first change insn 39 is when simplifying the comparison
that feeds it, in simplify_set:
/* If we are setting CC0 or if the source is a COMPARE, look for the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60101
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Aha, checking=release is where the difference is evident.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60101
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The difference I see is not that dramatic.
float.c
real10m5.540s
user10m0.678s
sys0m0.172s
double.c:
real7m54.983s
user7m50.344s
sys0m0.384s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59691
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60114
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Patch posted: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-02/msg00592.html, it
will probably need to wait for GCC 5.0.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60114
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60101
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60080
--- Comment #3 from edlinger at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: edlinger
Date: Mon Feb 10 18:19:01 2014
New Revision: 207668
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207668root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-02-10 Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60116
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60132
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Yes, this is known and documented:
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/manual/status.html#status.iso.2011
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59603
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Even if swapping an object with itself is well-defined it's a waste of time, so
we shouldn't do it.
There's a discussion happening now with the C++ library working group to
resolve
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60131
--- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com ---
The problem here is we first have the following candidate and defining insn:
gdb) p debug_rtx (cand-insn)
(insn 24 23 25 6 (set (reg:DI 0 ax [orig:100 D.2269 ] [100])
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60113
--- Comment #8 from lmat dartmetrash at gmail dot com ---
After I uploaded all these files, I thought, I probably should have compressed
that -- I bet the ratio would have been really good...
Unfortunately, ubuntu repos don't hold 4.7, etc.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60060
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iains at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60136
Bug ID: 60136
Summary: indexing an 8-element array with a long long results
in bad results
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60101
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60060
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #0)
warning: invalid DWARF generated by the compiler: DIE 0x01f0 has
multiple AT_calling_convention attributes in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60136
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60137
Bug ID: 60137
Summary: Code fails with -mcpu=power8 -O3 -mno-vsx
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60137
Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60138
Bug ID: 60138
Summary: superh single/double precision fpu mode setting is
backwards and unusable
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49636
Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60103
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57936
--- Comment #2 from Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com ---
No, cancel comment #1, I was fooled by version skew between the unpatched and
the patched compiler. The testcase doesn't ICE on recent versions of gcc.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59598
--- Comment #51 from Denis Kolesnik denis.v.koles...@safe-mail.net ---
I will set as unconfirmed each time it will be changed, because I have no
ability to download from internet the version 4.6.1 from MinGW official
source(and the version I have
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59927
--- Comment #8 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Kai Tietz from comment #7)
One side-note I have about this patch. Due this allow drap-register for
x64, we seem to need to enable eax_live for this target, too.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59598
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59598
Denis Kolesnik denis.v.koles...@safe-mail.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59598
--- Comment #54 from Denis Kolesnik denis.v.koles...@safe-mail.net ---
please do not close this issue untill I will have the abilitz to prove whether
it is a bug or not.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42863
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59598
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60139
Bug ID: 60139
Summary: Imprecise column number for -pedantic on
non-computable initializer element
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59468
--- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The ICE is already fixed by my reorg of gimple_get_virt_method_for_vtable.
I am experimenting with patch that adds a warning.
Honza
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60140
Bug ID: 60140
Summary: Cross compiler i386 atom fails - divtf3.c
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57936
--- Comment #3 from Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com ---
The testcase doesn't ICE since 206639. That wasn't an rs6000 patch so we
probably still have the underlying issue in the rs6000 backend.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60141
Bug ID: 60141
Summary: ICE in i386.c distance_non_agu_define_in_bb
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59927
--- Comment #9 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rth
Date: Tue Feb 11 01:12:38 2014
New Revision: 207677
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207677root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/59927
* calls.c (expand_call):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40454
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
89 matches
Mail list logo
