http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60169
Joey Ye joey.ye at arm dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43622
Paul A. Bristow pbristow at hetp dot u-net.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pbristow
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60386
Bug ID: 60386
Summary: [C++11] Crash on a template class containing array
initialized in-class
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60387
Nistor, Mihail-Marian m_nistor at yahoo dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|blocker
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60387
Bug ID: 60387
Summary: The gcc compiler for the ppc architecture is not
compatible with PPC ABI and DWARF standards.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43622
--- Comment #13 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---
It looks like emit_support_tinfos (rtti.c) should go through
registered_builtin_types (hidden in c-common.c) in addition to the hardcoded
fundamentals list.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60387
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|blocker |normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60367
--- Comment #1 from rob.desbois at gmail dot com ---
...having realised that this might look like I just don't grok move
construction I expanded my test - adding copy move constructors assignment
operators to foo and re-running the test still
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2316
--- Comment #50 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #49)
large pieces of my patch as nonsense). Fixing this particular issue should
not be too hard, there must be a place in the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60371
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Дилян Палаузов from comment #3)
Indeed, adding
z (const z x) { var = strdup (x.var); }
solves the problem. However, I don't understand how that y.clear();
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60367
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Possibly the same issue as Bug 59713
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43622
Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|no C++ typeinfo for |no C++ typeinfo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60236
--- Comment #8 from edlinger at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: edlinger
Date: Sun Mar 2 18:06:49 2014
New Revision: 208257
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208257root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-03-02 Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55181
--- Comment #9 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The first if (...) b++; is transformed to a bit extraction (right shift +
and), because the result is either b = 0 or b = 1.
The second if (...) b++ uses an and + zero-compare + branch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60376
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60341
--- Comment #11 from Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mikael
Date: Sun Mar 2 18:36:42 2014
New Revision: 208258
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208258root=gccview=rev
Log:
fortran/
PR fortran/60341
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60388
Bug ID: 60388
Summary: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0xb7fb62ff in __pthread_create_2_1
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60388
Sreenath U S sree.gooogle at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60341
--- Comment #12 from Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mikael
Date: Sun Mar 2 18:49:18 2014
New Revision: 208259
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208259root=gccview=rev
Log:
fortran/
PR fortran/60341
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55181
--- Comment #10 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #9)
Maybe if-convert could be taught to transform the second if (...) to a
zero_extract as well. But probably it's better to catch this
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60341
Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60388
--- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com ---
User error. s/pthread_create(tid,/pthread_create(tid1[i],/g fixes it, as
gcc's warnings correctly identified.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58842
Eric Gallager egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egall at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59778
John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|hppa-unknown-linux-gnu |hppa*-*-*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60388
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52466
--- Comment #9 from jbeniston at gcc dot gnu.org jbeniston at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: jbeniston
Date: Sun Mar 2 19:58:24 2014
New Revision: 208260
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208260root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR bootstrap/48230
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50927
--- Comment #4 from jbeniston at gcc dot gnu.org jbeniston at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: jbeniston
Date: Sun Mar 2 19:58:24 2014
New Revision: 208260
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208260root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR bootstrap/48230
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48230
--- Comment #1 from jbeniston at gcc dot gnu.org jbeniston at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: jbeniston
Date: Sun Mar 2 19:58:24 2014
New Revision: 208260
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208260root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR bootstrap/48230
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46898
--- Comment #17 from jbeniston at gcc dot gnu.org jbeniston at gcc dot
gnu.org ---
Author: jbeniston
Date: Sun Mar 2 19:58:24 2014
New Revision: 208260
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208260root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR bootstrap/48230
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60033
--- Comment #6 from Adam Butcher abutcher at gcc dot gnu.org ---
A further reduced testcase:
// PR c++/60033
// { dg-options -std=c++1y }
template typename... T
auto f(T... ts)
{
return sizeof...(ts);
}
template typename... T
auto g(T... ts)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60033
--- Comment #7 from Adam Butcher abutcher at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Adam Butcher from comment #6)
return [] (int v) {
return f(ts...);
};
Should have been:
return [] (auto v) {
return f(ts...);
};
The 'int' version
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55113
--- Comment #17 from pmatos at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Patch submitted to gcc-patches.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60306
--- Comment #10 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Sun Mar 2 20:51:48 2014
New Revision: 208261
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208261root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR ipa/60306
Revert:
2013-12-14
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58477
--- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Sun Mar 2 20:51:48 2014
New Revision: 208261
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208261root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR ipa/60306
Revert:
2013-12-14 Jan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60389
Bug ID: 60389
Summary: [4.8/4,9 Regression] ICE with inheriting constructors
and wrong usage of constexpr
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60389
Volker Reichelt reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60376
Volker Reichelt reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|error-recovery
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60390
Bug ID: 60390
Summary: [c++1y] ICE with declaring function with auto
parameter as friend
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60391
Bug ID: 60391
Summary: [c++1y] ICE with auto parameter for operator
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: error-recovery, ice-on-invalid-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48230
Sebastien Bourdeauducq lekernel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60392
--- Comment #1 from Alexander Vogt a.vogt at fulguritus dot com ---
Created attachment 32243
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32243action=edit
Sample code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60392
Bug ID: 60392
Summary: Problem with TRANSPOSE and CONTIGUOUS dummy arguments
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50927
Sebastien Bourdeauducq lekernel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60377
Volker Reichelt reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52466
Sebastien Bourdeauducq lekernel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60393
Bug ID: 60393
Summary: [c++1y] ICE with with invalid functions with auto
parameters
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: error-recovery,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46898
Sebastien Bourdeauducq lekernel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43807
Sebastien Bourdeauducq lekernel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50996
Sebastien Bourdeauducq lekernel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54176
Sebastien Bourdeauducq lekernel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60243
--- Comment #11 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 32244
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32244action=edit
WIP patch
this patch cuts some redundant work on estimating size of functions that will
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60150
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Sun Mar 2 22:19:37 2014
New Revision: 208262
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208262root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR ipa/60150
* ipa.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58733
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60306
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60150
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60367
--- Comment #3 from rob.desbois at gmail dot com ---
Adding a destructor didn't fix it for me - though it was destroyed for the same
address as the constructed object.
constructed foo @ 0x7fffa012e5ef
default argument is at 0x7fffa012e5d0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58733
--- Comment #12 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Forgot to mention, I think the ICE is solved by the following patch:
2014-02-14 Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz
* lto-partition.c (add_symbol_to_partition_1,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59543
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60382
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60394
Bug ID: 60394
Summary: LTO link fails when -fno-builtin is specified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60395
Bug ID: 60395
Summary: LTO link fails when -fno-builtin is specified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60395
--- Comment #1 from Patrick Oppenlander patrick at motec dot com.au ---
Created attachment 32245
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32245action=edit
Test cases
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60396
Bug ID: 60396
Summary: Missing time_get::get() functions
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60155
--- Comment #9 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
Something like this?
--
John David Anglindave.ang...@bell.net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60394
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60395
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 60394 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60395
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Related to bug 58203 (or even a dup of that bug).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60397
Bug ID: 60397
Summary: The value of char16_t u'\u' is 0xdfff instead of
0x
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59873
--- Comment #10 from Wesley J. Landaker wjl at icecavern dot net ---
Created attachment 32248
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32248action=edit
u.c++ -- program that shows this problem, and bug #60397's problem
I opened new
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60354
Jan Engelhardt jengelh at inai dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jengelh at inai
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60175
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Mar 3 07:25:50 2014
New Revision: 208267
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208267root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/60175
* function.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59308
--- Comment #4 from Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org ---
It's not as simple as updating the target selector. LONSC_P depends on
BRANCH_COST, which can vary depending on the specific micro-architecture for
the target system.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59308
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
So the test can then be improved for ARM by testing GCC predefined macros or
something similar, to make check_effective_target_logical_op_short_circuit
more precise. Are you sure
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58733
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60175
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
75 matches
Mail list logo
