[Bug c/60838] bugos warning: initializer element is not a constant expression: int test = (0 ? (1,0) : 0) + 1;

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60838 --- Comment #1 from ilya potrepa...@asc-ural.ru --- Another testcase: main.c - int test1 = (0 ? 0 : 0) + 1; int test2 = (0 ? (3, 0) : 0) + 1; int test3[(0 ? 0 : 0) + 1]; int test4[(0 ? (3, 0) : 0) + 1]; int main( void ) { return

[Bug c++/60836] [4.7/4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] invalid PHI argument and ICE in verify_gimple

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60836 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug plugins/59335] Plugin doesn't build on trunk

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59335 --- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- So, comparing the headers we have in gcc/{,c/,cp/,c-family/}*.h with what we install shows: for i in *.h {c,cp,c-family}/*.h; do [ -f

[Bug bootstrap/60644] [4.9/4.10 Regression] Build of i686-pc-linux-android is broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60644 --- Comment #9 from Alexander Ivchenko aivchenk at gmail dot com --- Confirm fixing

[Bug tree-optimization/60172] [4.9/4.10 Regression] ARM performance regression from trunk@207239

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60172 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.1

[Bug testsuite/60806] libstdc++ abi check should ignore missing TLS symbols

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60806 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.10.0

[Bug tree-optimization/59817] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE in extract_affine_chrec with -O2 -ftree-loop-linear

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59817 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Apr 14 08:09:06 2014 New Revision: 209355 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209355root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-04-14 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de

[Bug tree-optimization/60453] ICE when building chromium with -O2 and graphite

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60453 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Apr 14 08:09:06 2014 New Revision: 209355 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209355root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-04-14 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de

[Bug tree-optimization/55022] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] air.f90 is miscompliled with -m64 -O2 -fgraphite-identity after revision 190619

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55022 --- Comment #25 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Apr 14 08:11:08 2014 New Revision: 209356 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209356root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-04-14 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de

[Bug tree-optimization/59817] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE in extract_affine_chrec with -O2 -ftree-loop-linear

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59817 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.10.0

[Bug tree-optimization/60453] ICE when building chromium with -O2 and graphite

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60453 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/59859] [meta-bug] GRAPHITE issues

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59859 Bug 59859 depends on bug 60453, which changed state. Bug 60453 Summary: ICE when building chromium with -O2 and graphite http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60453 What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/59817] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE in extract_affine_chrec with -O2 -ftree-loop-linear

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59817 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sergamena at

[Bug lto/59626] [4.8 Regression] /usr/include/bits/unistd.h:173:1: error: inlining failed in call to always_inline 'readlinkat': recursive inlining

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59626 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.9.0

[Bug middle-end/52372] [4.7 Regression] gcc.target/mips/mips16-attributes{,-4}.c SEGV in dwf_regno

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52372 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug lto/60720] clisp fails to build with -flto: internal compiler error: tree check: expected array_type, have record_type in array_ref_low_bound, at expr.c:6941

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60720 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Apr 14 08:35:22 2014 New Revision: 209359 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209359root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-04-14 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de

[Bug lto/60720] clisp fails to build with -flto: internal compiler error: tree check: expected array_type, have record_type in array_ref_low_bound, at expr.c:6941

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60720 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/60836] [4.7/4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] invalid PHI argument and ICE in verify_gimple

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60836 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/60832] add pretty-printer code for double-int/wide-int

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60832 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug bootstrap/60830] [4.9 Regression] ICE on bootstrapping on cygwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build

[Bug bootstrap/60830] [4.9 Regression] ICE on bootstrapping on cygwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Btw, the usual suspicious one is gmp which in older versions used to abort () on impossible CPU kinds in its CPU detection code (at least trips on qemu default configs for example)

[Bug other/60828] Compile time speedups when using tcmalloc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60828 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Well, it's useful to point out the main offenders of malloc/free that might better use a more suitable allocation strathegy like obstacks for example. 7.7 22.6% 22.6%

[Bug fortran/60834] [OOP] ICE with ASSOCIATE construct (gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:1721)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60834 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug fortran/60813] [Coarray] substrings mishandled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60813 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug bootstrap/60830] [4.9 Regression] ICE on bootstrapping on cygwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830 --- Comment #5 from Denis Excoffier g...@denis-excoffier.org --- Created attachment 32591 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32591action=edit top level config.log

[Bug bootstrap/60830] [4.9 Regression] ICE on bootstrapping on cygwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830 --- Comment #6 from Denis Excoffier g...@denis-excoffier.org --- Created attachment 32592 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32592action=edit i686-pc-cygwin/libgcc/config.log

[Bug middle-end/52372] [4.7 Regression] gcc.target/mips/mips16-attributes{,-4}.c SEGV in dwf_regno

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52372 --- Comment #10 from Arseny Solokha asolokha at gmx dot com --- It still fails, but indeed for different targets: PR60102, PR57933. I'm not sure whether these are actually duplicates, though.

[Bug bootstrap/60830] [4.9 Regression] ICE on bootstrapping on cygwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830 --- Comment #7 from Denis Excoffier g...@denis-excoffier.org --- Here are the config.log found at top level and the config.log at i686-pc-cygwin/libgcc level (see attachments). What do you need more specifically? I have to say that i use

[Bug tree-optimization/59586] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] [graphite] Segmentation fault with -Ofast -floop-parallelize-all -ftree-parallelize-loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59586 Mircea Namolaru mircea.namolaru at inria dot fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug target/60822] Index register overwritten on m68k/coldfire

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60822 --- Comment #4 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- Switching gcc 4.10 to use LRA instead does not fix this wrong-code.

[Bug plugins/59335] Plugin doesn't build on trunk

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59335 --- Comment #21 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Reduced list of new headers that weren't in 4.8 (subset of the previous list): attribs.h calls.h cfgexpand.h cilk.h diagnostic-color.h gcc-symtab.h gimple-builder.h gimple-low.h

[Bug middle-end/52372] [4.7 Regression] gcc.target/mips/mips16-attributes{,-4}.c SEGV in dwf_regno

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52372 --- Comment #11 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Arseny Solokha from comment #10) It still fails, but indeed for different targets: PR60102, PR57933. I'm not sure whether these are actually

[Bug target/60826] inefficient code for vector xor on SSE2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60826 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug plugins/59335] Plugin doesn't build on trunk

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59335 --- Comment #22 from PaX Team pageexec at gmail dot com --- some notes: 1. there're *.def files as well needed for certain headers 2. there're target specific headers and .def files installed/needed from gcc/config/*/ as well 3. it's hard to tell

[Bug tree-optimization/60823] [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE in gimple_expand_cfg, at cfgexpand.c:5644

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60823 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug plugins/59335] Plugin doesn't build on trunk

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59335 --- Comment #23 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 32593 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32593action=edit gcc49-pr59335.patch So, let's add the headers added in 4.9 and other stuff shouldn't be a

[Bug libstdc++/60793] Add target *-*-dragonfly* to dg-options on 172 libstdc++ tests

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60793 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to John Marino from comment #4) For the matter of this particular PR, NetBSD is also a target so it's not a big stretch to imagine it's needed for all the BSD targets (and

[Bug c/60069] Different warning messages for -Wconversion with different optimization levels

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60069 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c/60838] bugos warning: initializer element is not a constant expression: int test = (0 ? (1,0) : 0) + 1;

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60838 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug libstdc++/60793] Add target *-*-dragonfly* to dg-options on 172 libstdc++ tests

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60793 --- Comment #6 from John Marino gnugcc at marino dot st --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #5) It's not that I don't believe you that it's needed, it's that we want to avoid that clutter for a target that doesn't even build. You're

[Bug libstdc++/60793] Add target *-*-dragonfly* to dg-options on 172 libstdc++ tests

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60793 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc

[Bug target/60821] gcc 4.8 on MacOS fails depending on -arch order

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60821 --- Comment #6 from a.h.jaffe at gmail dot com --- Thanks for the comprehensive info. It would certainly be nice to get the driverdriver into the main code-base. However, one thing still puzzles me: 5. We do accept -arch on x86: -arch i386

[Bug libstdc++/60793] Add target *-*-dragonfly* to dg-options on 172 libstdc++ tests

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60793 --- Comment #8 from John Marino gnugcc at marino dot st --- (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #7) But this is something that everybody has to do! It is a trade-off, does it take more effort to keep the patches up-to-date or to get

[Bug c/60819] dse1 removing not-dead insn (aliasing issue?)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60819 --- Comment #14 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Apr 14 11:49:42 2014 New Revision: 209365 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209365root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-04-14 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de

[Bug c/50459] alignof doesn't work on plain old constant, works with expressions containing it

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50459 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 32594 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32594action=edit pr50459 Yeah. This is regtested patch that covers even other attributes. If this

[Bug c/60819] dse1 removing not-dead insn (aliasing issue?)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60819 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug libstdc++/60793] Add target *-*-dragonfly* to dg-options on 172 libstdc++ tests

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60793 --- Comment #9 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- And for sure you will need to ping the patches several times, there are very few reviewers and they are doing also 99% of the work, so they miss patches all the time.

[Bug c/50459] alignof doesn't work on plain old constant, works with expressions containing it

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50459 --- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org --- Creating a function definitely makes sense, I should have done it when I touched the default_conversion calls. Do you think your function could also handle the call to

[Bug c/59301] Please enable -Wstrict-overflow as part of -Wextra

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59301 Vincent Lefèvre vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug target/60821] gcc 4.8 on MacOS fails depending on -arch order

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60821 --- Comment #7 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to a.h.jaffe from comment #6) Thanks for the comprehensive info. It would certainly be nice to get the driverdriver into the main code-base. indeed, patches always welcome

[Bug c/59301] Please enable -Wstrict-overflow as part of -Wextra

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59301 Joerg Wunsch j at uriah dot heep.sax.de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c/59301] Please enable -Wstrict-overflow as part of -Wextra

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59301 Joerg Wunsch j at uriah dot heep.sax.de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED ---

[Bug other/60828] Compile time speedups when using tcmalloc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60828 --- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org --- I've looked at more profiles during the weekend and bitmaps always showed up on top. As Honza said on IRC, bitmaps go into obstacks and obstacks weren't optimized since the

[Bug c/50459] alignof doesn't work on plain old constant, works with expressions containing it

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50459 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug target/60034] invalid expression as operand in aarch64 inline asm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60034 Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/60793] Add target *-*-dragonfly* to dg-options on 172 libstdc++ tests

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60793 --- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to John Marino from comment #6) I was too indirect. My apprehension is that I'm afraid I'll generate a bunch of patches that will just be ignored / not evaluated, and

[Bug tree-optimization/60042] vectorizer still does too many dependence tests for himeno:jacobi

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60042 --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Apr 14 13:57:00 2014 New Revision: 209374 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209374root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-04-14 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de

[Bug libstdc++/60793] Add target *-*-dragonfly* to dg-options on 172 libstdc++ tests

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60793 --- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #9) Because I interpret a full bootstrap to mean every major platform that gcc supports. That would be impossible for the majority

[Bug bootstrap/60830] [4.9 Regression] ICE on bootstrapping on cygwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug c/36750] -Wmissing-field-initializers relaxation request

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36750 nightstrike nightstrike at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nightstrike at

[Bug bootstrap/60830] [4.9 Regression] ICE on bootstrapping on cygwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830 --- Comment #9 from Denis Excoffier g...@denis-excoffier.org --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8) I guess for start, it would be nice to see backtrace from the debugger about where the segfault and/or abort happened. See attachment

[Bug c/36750] -Wmissing-field-initializers relaxation request

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36750 --- Comment #7 from Alexander Monakov amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Nightstrike, is there a particular reason you want C++ warning behavior be adjusted? Note that unlike C, in C++ you get zero-initialization by default, so you don't need to

[Bug bootstrap/60830] [4.9 Regression] ICE on bootstrapping on cygwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830 --- Comment #10 from Denis Excoffier g...@denis-excoffier.org --- Created attachment 32595 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32595action=edit gdb session catching signal SIGABRT

[Bug c++/60829] Illegal access to private base of public base granted.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60829 Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at

[Bug target/60839] New: PowerPC: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2154

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60839 Bug ID: 60839 Summary: PowerPC: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2154 Product: gcc Version: 4.8.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/60497] unique_ptrT tries to complete its type T even though it's not required to be a complete type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60497 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: redi Date: Mon Apr 14 15:32:58 2014 New Revision: 209381 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209381root=gccview=rev Log: PR libstdc++/60497 * include/std/tuple (get):

[Bug c++/60840] New: avr-g++: Incorrect avr assembler code generation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60840 Bug ID: 60840 Summary: avr-g++: Incorrect avr assembler code generation Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: critical Priority: P3

[Bug target/60826] inefficient code for vector xor on SSE2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60826 --- Comment #2 from Dan Gohman sunfish at mozilla dot com --- A little more detail: I think I have seen GCC use a spill + movsd reload as a method of zeroing the non-zero-index vector elements of an xmm register, however that's either not what's

[Bug target/60827] Inconsistent optimize_function_for_speed_p in *fixuns_truncmode_1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60827 --- Comment #1 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Mon Apr 14 16:49:24 2014 New Revision: 209383 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209383root=gccview=rev Log: Check optimize_insn_for_speed_p in

[Bug c/60841] gcc: internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1) in gcc 4.9.0 RC 2014-04-11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60841 Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||trippels

[Bug target/60827] Inconsistent optimize_function_for_speed_p in *fixuns_truncmode_1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60827 --- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Mon Apr 14 17:01:03 2014 New Revision: 209385 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209385root=gccview=rev Log: Revert the last change on *fixuns_truncmode_1

[Bug bootstrap/60830] [4.9 Regression] ICE on bootstrapping on cygwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830 --- Comment #11 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Denis Excoffier from comment #10) Created attachment 32595 [details] gdb session catching signal SIGABRT Thanks for the debug-log. Could you please attach the backtrace

[Bug c/60841] gcc: internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1) in gcc 4.9.0 RC 2014-04-11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60841 Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug c/60841] [4.9/4.10 Regression] gcc: internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1) out of memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60841 --- Comment #3 from Mike Vermeulen mike at vermeulen dot com --- dmesg does confirm it was killed by OOM. Relevant entries: [27546] 0 27546271161 4 0 0 bash [27578] 0 27578260847 13 0

[Bug c++/60842] New: In-class initializer causes a strange error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60842 Bug ID: 60842 Summary: In-class initializer causes a strange error Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/60840] avr-g++: Incorrect avr assembler code generation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60840 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c/60841] [4.9/4.10 Regression] gcc: internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1) out of memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60841 Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth

[Bug lto/60820] [4.9/4.10 Regression] ice in ctor_for_folding, at varpool.c:291

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60820 --- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hubicka Date: Mon Apr 14 17:53:34 2014 New Revision: 209389 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209389root=gccview=rev Log: PR lto/60820 * varpool.c

[Bug sanitizer/60275] [UBSAN] Add -f[no-]sanitize-recover/-fsanitize-undefined-trap-on-error to make UBSAN's runtime errors fatal

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60275 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 32597 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32597action=edit gcc410-pr60275.patch Untested fix. Marek, sorry for hacking this up, but I'd like to

[Bug bootstrap/60830] [4.9 Regression] ICE on bootstrapping on cygwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830 --- Comment #12 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Denis Excoffier from comment #10) Created attachment 32595 [details] gdb session catching signal SIGABRT Some comments here: - it might be helpful to install proper

[Bug c++/60842] In-class initializer causes a strange error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60842 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- This looks very similar to PR51666

[Bug c++/60842] In-class initializer causes a strange error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60842 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- N.B. the simplest workaround is: Jint, N::I j{};

[Bug tree-optimization/60841] [4.9/4.10 Regression] gcc: internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1) out of memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60841 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug target/60827] Inconsistent optimize_function_for_speed_p in *fixuns_truncmode_1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60827 --- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com --- As said in [1], the predicates for expanders and insns can be different. The insn can be moved from hot BB to cold BB and vice versa, so the insn predicate shouldn't depend on BB type.

[Bug target/60827] Inconsistent optimize_function_for_speed_p in *fixuns_truncmode_1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60827 Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/60834] [OOP] ICE with ASSOCIATE construct (gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:1721)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60834 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/57926] Atomic functions broken with C++ but not C?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57926 lailavrazda1979 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c/36750] -Wmissing-field-initializers relaxation request

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36750 --- Comment #8 from nightstrike nightstrike at gmail dot com --- Are you sure C++ works like that? I thought that member variables in a struct would get default initialized to indeterminate values, as seen here: