[Bug fortran/55574] [4.8 Regression] C binding access to c_ptr type

2014-07-11 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55574 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/56079] [4.8 Regression] ICE with C_PTR renaming and TRANSFER

2014-07-11 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56079 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/56378] [4.8 Regression] ICE with C_LOC

2014-07-11 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56378 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug target/56858] alpha looks for NOTE_INSN_EH_REGION notes that cannot exist

2014-07-11 Thread uros at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56858 --- Comment #16 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Fri Jul 11 07:42:50 2014 New Revision: 212449 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212449root=gccview=rev Log: PR target/56858 * config/alpha/alpha.c: Include

[Bug middle-end/61776] [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed: control flow in the middle of basic block with -fprofile-generate

2014-07-11 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61776 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug target/61561] arm gcc internal error

2014-07-11 Thread mzakirov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61561 --- Comment #4 from mzakirov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: mzakirov Date: Fri Jul 11 09:02:39 2014 New Revision: 212450 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212450root=gccview=rev Log: gcc/ 2014-07-11 Marat Zakirov m.zaki...@samsung.com

[Bug c++/61288] valgrind finds problem in build_conditional_expr_1

2014-07-11 Thread kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61288 Kostya Serebryany kcc at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug target/61561] arm gcc internal error

2014-07-11 Thread m.zakirov at samsung dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61561 Marat Zakirov m.zakirov at samsung dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/61288] valgrind finds problem in build_conditional_expr_1

2014-07-11 Thread kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61288 --- Comment #2 from Kostya Serebryany kcc at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 33107 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33107action=edit 61288.cc Somewhat minimized reproducer: cc1plus -mtune=generic -march=x86-64

[Bug c++/61288] valgrind finds problem in build_conditional_expr_1

2014-07-11 Thread kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61288 Kostya Serebryany kcc at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason

[Bug lto/41606] Not all types are fixed up

2014-07-11 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41606 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/61778] New: inaccurate conversion of floating constants with the IBM long double format

2014-07-11 Thread vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61778 Bug ID: 61778 Summary: inaccurate conversion of floating constants with the IBM long double format Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug tree-optimization/61757] [4.10 Regression] genmodes failure with enable-checking

2014-07-11 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61757 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Bug middle-end/61473] register sized memmove not inlined

2014-07-11 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61473 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Jul 11 13:42:55 2014 New Revision: 212452 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212452root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-07-11 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de

[Bug libstdc++/58962] Pretty printers use obsolete Python syntax

2014-07-11 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58962 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: redi Date: Fri Jul 11 13:43:07 2014 New Revision: 212453 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212453root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-07-11 Samuel Bronson naes...@gmail.com

[Bug tree-optimization/59611] std::copy performs worse than naive implementation when copying a single known byte

2014-07-11 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59611 Bug 59611 depends on bug 61473, which changed state. Bug 61473 Summary: register sized memmove not inlined https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61473 What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/61473] register sized memmove not inlined

2014-07-11 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61473 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/61619] Benefits from -ftree-vectorize lost easily when changing unrelated code

2014-07-11 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61619 Bug 61619 depends on bug 61473, which changed state. Bug 61473 Summary: register sized memmove not inlined https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61473 What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/61757] [4.10 Regression] genmodes failure with enable-checking

2014-07-11 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61757 --- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- For the record: Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gfcp COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/opt/gcc/gcc4.10p-212433/libexec/gcc/x86_64-apple-darwin13.3.0/4.10.0/lto-wrapper Target:

[Bug tree-optimization/61757] [4.10 Regression] genmodes failure with enable-checking

2014-07-11 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61757 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|aarch64-linux, x86, ia64|aarch64-linux, x86,

[Bug libstdc++/58962] Pretty printers use obsolete Python syntax

2014-07-11 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58962 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/61757] [4.10 Regression] genmodes failure with enable-checking

2014-07-11 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61757 --- Comment #14 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org --- Perhaps the m68k test failure can still provide an easier hint.

[Bug target/61561] arm gcc internal error

2014-07-11 Thread rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61561 Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.10.0

[Bug preprocessor/61389] libcpp diagnostics shouldn't talk about ISO C99 for C++ input files

2014-07-11 Thread schwab at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61389 --- Comment #10 from Andreas Schwab schwab at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: schwab Date: Fri Jul 11 14:49:27 2014 New Revision: 212457 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212457root=gccview=rev Log: PR preprocessor/61389 * gcc.dg/cpp/macsyntx.c:

[Bug tree-optimization/61757] [4.10 Regression] genmodes failure with enable-checking

2014-07-11 Thread pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61757 Pat Haugen pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pthaugen at gcc

[Bug c/61779] New: gcc -Og fails with impossible constraint on legal C code

2014-07-11 Thread zeccav at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61779 Bug ID: 61779 Summary: gcc -Og fails with impossible constraint on legal C code Product: gcc Version: 4.9.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/61779] gcc -Og fails with impossible constraint on legal C code

2014-07-11 Thread zeccav at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61779 --- Comment #1 from Vittorio Zecca zeccav at gmail dot com --- I forgot to say that gcc 4.9.0 fails but compiles correctly on gcc 4.8.3.

[Bug fortran/61780] New: [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] Wrong code when shifting elements of a multidimensional array

2014-07-11 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61780 Bug ID: 61780 Summary: [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] Wrong code when shifting elements of a multidimensional array Product: gcc Version: 4.10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/61780] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] Wrong code when shifting elements of a multidimensional array

2014-07-11 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61780 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug middle-end/61781] New: Overflow of signed integer causing incorrect execution of a program

2014-07-11 Thread geir at cray dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61781 Bug ID: 61781 Summary: Overflow of signed integer causing incorrect execution of a program Product: gcc Version: 4.8.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/61781] Overflow of signed integer causing incorrect execution of a program

2014-07-11 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61781 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/61781] Overflow of signed integer causing incorrect execution of a program

2014-07-11 Thread geir at cray dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61781 --- Comment #2 from Geir Johansen geir at cray dot com --- Longer version of the test case, along with notes from the original user. T I believe you have an overaggressive optimizer. Which I have turned into the following somewhat block of

[Bug tree-optimization/61757] [4.10 Regression] genmodes failure with enable-checking

2014-07-11 Thread matz at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61757 Michael Matz matz at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||matz at gcc dot

[Bug libfortran/59513] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] Fortran runtime error: Sequential READ or WRITE not allowed after EOF marker, possibly use REWIND or BACKSPACE

2014-07-11 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59513 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.8/4.9 Regression]

[Bug tree-optimization/61757] [4.10 Regression] genmodes failure with enable-checking

2014-07-11 Thread matz at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61757 --- Comment #17 from Michael Matz matz at gcc dot gnu.org --- The testsuite failure on m68k is indeed caused by r212352. In particular this hunk: @@ -1641,8 +1609,7 @@ record_equality (tree x, tree y) long as we canonicalize on one value.

[Bug web/61782] New: always_inline incorrectly documented

2014-07-11 Thread daniel.santos at pobox dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61782 Bug ID: 61782 Summary: always_inline incorrectly documented Product: gcc Version: 4.8.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: web

[Bug tree-optimization/61783] New: [4.10 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20030922-2.c scan-tree-dump-times dom1 if 2

2014-07-11 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61783 Bug ID: 61783 Summary: [4.10 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20030922-2.c scan-tree-dump-times dom1 if 2 Product: gcc Version: 4.10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/61757] [4.10 Regression] genmodes failure with enable-checking

2014-07-11 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61757 --- Comment #18 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org --- The testsuite failure is now bug 61783.

[Bug target/61784] New: Little endian PowerPC does aborts if you use long double constants

2014-07-11 Thread meissner at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61784 Bug ID: 61784 Summary: Little endian PowerPC does aborts if you use long double constants Product: gcc Version: 4.10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/61739] __builtin_printf optimization conflicts with POSIX semantics

2014-07-11 Thread bugdal at aerifal dot cx
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61739 --- Comment #5 from Rich Felker bugdal at aerifal dot cx --- I reopened this, but now that I'm reporting a new symptom that's independent of the original symptom, I'm wondering whether I should file a separate bug report for it, or continue the

[Bug target/61784] Little endian PowerPC does aborts if you use long double constants

2014-07-11 Thread meissner at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61784 Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug target/61784] Little endian PowerPC aborts if you use long double constants

2014-07-11 Thread meissner at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61784 Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/59760] use_thunk internal error on default destructor declarations

2014-07-11 Thread gaba at freemail dot hu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59760 --- Comment #5 from gaba gaba at freemail dot hu --- This bug fixed in gcc 4.8.3, please close it.

[Bug fortran/61775] Allocatable array initialized by implied-do loop array constructor gives invalid memory reference

2014-07-11 Thread mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61775 Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikael at gcc

[Bug c++/61288] valgrind finds problem in build_conditional_expr_1

2014-07-11 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61288 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/53159] Missing narrowing check

2014-07-11 Thread paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53159 --- Comment #6 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Fri Jul 11 21:53:59 2014 New Revision: 212469 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212469root=gccview=rev Log: /cp 2014-07-11 Paolo Carlini

[Bug c++/53159] Missing narrowing check

2014-07-11 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53159 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/61785] New: Sigsegv with enabled optimize -Os , -O2 in sample_format_size

2014-07-11 Thread dirkneukirchen at web dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61785 Bug ID: 61785 Summary: Sigsegv with enabled optimize -Os , -O2 in sample_format_size Product: gcc Version: 4.8.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/61785] Sigsegv with enabled optimize -Os , -O2 in sample_format_size

2014-07-11 Thread dirkneukirchen at web dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61785 --- Comment #1 from dirkneukirchen at web dot de --- Created attachment 33110 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33110action=edit preprocessed file that triggers the bug

[Bug c++/61785] Sigsegv with enabled optimize -Os , -O2 in sample_format_size

2014-07-11 Thread dirkneukirchen at web dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61785 --- Comment #2 from dirkneukirchen at web dot de --- an automatic compile log for the whole mpd was generated with additional -v -save-temps options but is quite large (6mb) and probably contains many unneeded information a package buildlog with

[Bug tree-optimization/61757] [4.10 Regression] genmodes failure with enable-checking

2014-07-11 Thread pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61757 --- Comment #19 from Pat Haugen pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org --- Tracked down the problem in 176.gcc to a difference in the generated code for benchmark source toplev.c:exact_log2_wide(). Following compiled with -O3 -mcpu=power7. int

[Bug c++/57644] [C++1y] Cannot bind bitfield to lvalue reference

2014-07-11 Thread emsr at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57644 --- Comment #4 from emsr at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: emsr Date: Sat Jul 12 01:41:30 2014 New Revision: 212477 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212477root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-07-11 Edward Smith-Rowland 3dw...@verizon.net PR

[Bug c++/57644] [C++1y] Cannot bind bitfield to lvalue reference

2014-07-11 Thread emsr at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57644 emsr at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/20416] Incorrect lifetime for temporary with static const reference

2014-07-11 Thread shri314 at yahoo dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20416 shri314 at yahoo dot com shri314 at yahoo dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug lto/61786] New: wrong code by LTO on x86_64-linux-gnu

2014-07-11 Thread su at cs dot ucdavis.edu
4.10.0 20140711 (experimental) [trunk revision 212447] (GCC) $ $ gcc-trunk -O0 -c fn1.c $ gcc-trunk -O0 -c main.c $ gcc-trunk -O1 fn1.o main.o $ a.out $ $ gcc-4.9 -flto -O0 -c fn1.c $ gcc-4.9 -flto -O0 -c main.c $ gcc-4.9 -flto -O1 fn1.o main.o $ a.out $ $ gcc-trunk -flto -O0 -c fn1.c $ gcc

[Bug lto/61786] wrong code by LTO on x86_64-linux-gnu

2014-07-11 Thread su at cs dot ucdavis.edu
++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib Thread model: posix gcc version 4.10.0 20140711 (experimental) [trunk revision 212447] (GCC) $ $ gcc-trunk -Os small.c; a.out $ gcc-trunk -O3 small.c; a.out $ gcc-4.9 -O2 small.c; a.out $ gcc-trunk -flto -O2 small.c; a.out $ $ gcc-trunk -O2 small.c $ a.out ^C

[Bug tree-optimization/61787] New: wrong code at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu

2014-07-11 Thread su at cs dot ucdavis.edu
version 4.10.0 20140711 (experimental) [trunk revision 212447] (GCC) $ $ gcc-trunk -O1 small.c; a.out $ gcc-trunk -O2 small.c; a.out $ gcc-4.9 -Os small.c; a.out $ $ gcc-trunk -Os small.c; a.out Aborted (core dumped) $ - unsigned int a = 1; int fn1 () { char b

[Bug middle-end/61558] [4.10 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault

2014-07-11 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61558 Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|