https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61900
--- Comment #2 from Vittorio Zecca zeccav at gmail dot com ---
This happens when I build gcc itself with option -fsanitize=undefined,
at build time, in directory x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/32/libgcc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61942
--- Comment #2 from Vittorio Zecca zeccav at gmail dot com ---
This is what I get on x86-64 with a sanitized version of gcc:
~/local/gcc-4.9.1-sanitized/bin/gcc -S gccerr12.c -funroll-loops -O3
../../gcc-4.9.1/gcc/loop-iv.c:2272:24: runtime
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62270
--- Comment #10 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #9)
Is a brand new warning ready for the prime time of -Wall ?
The warning existed for some time already before it's been added to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61942
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I tried trunk again and still nothing, so maybe only 4.9 is affected.
But both 4.9/trunk contain the nmax = INTVAL (mmax) - INTVAL (mmin); line...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63193
Bug ID: 63193
Summary: omp_set_dynamic memory leak
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libgomp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63193
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63171
--- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Sat Sep 6 10:04:44 2014
New Revision: 214989
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214989root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR middle-end/63171
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63171
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57703
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60690
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57703
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48947
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57530
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63189
Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61360
--- Comment #11 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to GGanesh from comment #9)
Patch that fixes this issue has been submitted
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-08/msg02179.html
The idea is to prohibit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63194
Bug ID: 63194
Summary: [4.9/5 Regression] ICE in
maybe_explain_implicit_delete, at cp/method.c:1552
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63194
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.8.3,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62255
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63195
Bug ID: 63195
Summary: [5.0 regression] stage3 build/gengtype miscompiled
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build, wrong-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63195
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
$ ../gcc/configure --prefix=/usr --build=powerpc64-linux
--enable-checking=release --enable-shared --with-system-zlib 'CFLAGS=-O2 -g'
'CXXFLAGS=-O2 -g' --with-cpu-64=power4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61158
John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danglin at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61158
--- Comment #9 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
It looks like the test fails because HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT is
32 on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11. As a result, the fold optimization
doesn't occur.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57821
--- Comment #11 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Backtrace at ICE:
Breakpoint 1, _Z12tree_to_uhwiPK9tree_node (t=0x7ae68b58)
at ../../gcc/gcc/tree.c:7024
7024 gcc_assert (tree_fits_uhwi_p (t));
(gdb) p debug_tree
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63196
Bug ID: 63196
Summary: [5.0 regression] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr57140.C -O3
-fomit-frame-pointer (internal compiler error)
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63197
Bug ID: 63197
Summary: tc-m68k.c: Wrong warning array subscript is below
array bounds
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63195
Segher Boessenkool segher at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56194
--- Comment #4 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sat Sep 6 21:45:53 2014
New Revision: 214996
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214996root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR testsuite/56194
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56194
--- Comment #5 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sat Sep 6 21:50:40 2014
New Revision: 214997
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214997root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR testsuite/56194
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56194
--- Comment #6 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sat Sep 6 21:53:14 2014
New Revision: 214998
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214998root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR testsuite/56194
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56194
John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63156
--- Comment #8 from Carrot carrot at google dot com ---
(In reply to Steven Bosscher from comment #7)
(In reply to Carrot from comment #6)
Since it is intentionally to remove flag DF_REF_READ_WRITE on use,
Ah, but I don't think that was the
31 matches
Mail list logo
