https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49340
--- Comment #2 from Mike Frysinger vapier at gentoo dot org ---
seems to work with gcc-4.9 at least ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63691
--- Comment #9 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
You don't need a link test, you only need to check whether there is a reference
to abort.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63705
Bug ID: 63705
Summary: [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] function template
specialization outside namespace rejected with C++11
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63706
Bug ID: 63706
Summary: stl_heap.h:make_heap()'s worst time complexity doesn't
conform with C++ standard
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63705
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63705
--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
See also:
https://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/forum/#!topic/std-discussion/ZCRb8iZwtos
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59888
--- Comment #13 from Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Might this be related with PR63622 (and thus PR63580)?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63691
--- Comment #10 from Aaro Koskinen aaro.koskinen at iki dot fi ---
(In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #9)
You don't need a link test, you only need to check whether there is a
reference to abort.
A simple test:
$ cat pr63691.c
void foo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63651
Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63705
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56846
--- Comment #10 from npl at chello dot at ---
Hi,
thanks for the fix, any chance of adding this to 4.9 and 4.8 aswell?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63691
John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63705
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
PR 56480 ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63705
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56480
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56480
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63656
--- Comment #2 from Arkadiusz Miskiewicz arekm at maven dot pl ---
Hm, isn't it already selected properly?
--- gcc-4.9.2/gcc/ada/gcc-interface/Makefile.in~2014-11-01
15:07:27.0 +0100
+++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63573
--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz ---
There is a pasto in the previous patch. This is what I am testing.
Index: calls.c
===
--- calls.c(revision 216942)
+++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63671
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63707
Bug ID: 63707
Summary: Brace initialization of array sometimes fails if no
copy constructor
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63707
--- Comment #1 from John Lindgren john.lindgren at aol dot com ---
Created attachment 33860
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33860action=edit
Test case 2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63707
--- Comment #2 from John Lindgren john.lindgren at aol dot com ---
Created attachment 33861
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33861action=edit
Test case 3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63707
--- Comment #3 from John Lindgren john.lindgren at aol dot com ---
Created attachment 33862
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33862action=edit
Test case 4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63707
John Lindgren john.lindgren at aol dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #33860|0 |1
is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63708
Bug ID: 63708
Summary: [5.0 Regression] FAIL: cxf3002
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62235
simon at pushface dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||simon at pushface dot org
/xgcc -B/tmp/gcc/./gcc/
-B/usr/local/gcc-msp430-elf-dev-20141101/msp430-elf/bin/
-B/usr/local/gcc-msp430-elf-dev-20141101/msp430-elf/lib/ -isystem
/usr/local/gcc-msp430-elf-dev-20141101/msp430-elf/include -isystem
/usr/local/gcc-msp430-elf-dev-20141101/msp430-elf/sys-include-g -O2 -mlarge
-O2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61534
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
28 matches
Mail list logo
