https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61440
vekumar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vekumar at gcc dot gnu.org
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61440
--- Comment #4 from Jacek Sieka ---
This looks very similar to 62077 btw.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64146
--- Comment #2 from Alan Modra ---
Yes. First thing I checked. :) -fpic actually.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60643
--- Comment #14 from Andrew Pinski ---
Most likely fixed by:
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commitdiff;h=9fcfed2eb95fea03d967dfcadd1eec9cbab4a744
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64146
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Are you compiling with -fPIC?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64146
Bug ID: 64146
Summary: [5 Regression] ipa-icf breaks gold dynamic_test_2 test
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60643
hongxu jia changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|WORKSFORME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64003
--- Comment #7 from dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
A more minimal reproducer:
$ cat get-attr-length-i386.c
int test_pr64003 (int p)
{
if (p == 0)
return 5;
if (p == 1)
return 7;
return 0;
}
$ valgrind ./cc1 get-attr-length-i386.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64115
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61440
Jacek Sieka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arnetheduck at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62251
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin ---
Test fails at line 58:
if (str3 /= " 1.41421356237309504880168872420969798") call abort()
_gfortrani_compare_string (len1=len1@entry=80,
s1=0x83fffdff0b90 " 1.4142135623730950488016
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #89 from Kazumoto Kojima ---
Created attachment 34159
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34159&action=edit
a reduced c++ test case (-O2 -std=gnu++11)
Here is related lines of lra-constraints.c:
4906 save = emi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64145
--- Comment #3 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
Also, if -fdump-tree-graphite-all alone is supposed to trigger graphite usage,
what exact level graphite optimization is to be expected (as we currently don't
enable any graphite features at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64145
--- Comment #2 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
Noticing that this bug seems similar to that fixed in
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-07/msg00450.html, I puzzled out that
the following change allows the gcc.dg/graphite/isl-codegen-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59278
--- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo ---
Fixed for 5.0. I'd like to leave the PR open for a while, though. In case
there are any fallouts.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59278
--- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Mon Dec 1 23:53:12 2014
New Revision: 218251
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218251&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
testsuite/
PR rtl-optimization/59278
* gcc.target/sh/pr59278.c: New
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59278
--- Comment #1 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Mon Dec 1 23:48:26 2014
New Revision: 218250
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218250&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/59278
combine (reg_dead_at_p): Consider
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55351
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64043
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60898
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64145
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
...
Executing on host: /sw/src/fink.build/gcc50-5.0.0-1000/darwin_objdir/gcc/xgcc
-B/sw/src/fink.build/gcc50-5.0.0-1000/darwin_objdir/gcc/
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc50-5.0.0-1000/gcc-5-20141201/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/graphite/isl-codegen-loop-dumping.c
-fno-diagnostics-show-caret -fdiagnostics-color=never -O2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63957
--- Comment #5 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to vries from comment #4)
> Created attachment 34154 [details]
> tentative patch
Minimal c build + regression test ok on x86_64. I'll bootstrap and reg-test.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64115
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64138
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64138
--- Comment #3 from david ---
(In reply to david from comment #0)
> Hi,
>
>I have created a complex number module:
>
>module complex_number_module
> implicit none
>
> integer, parameter :: loc_real_precision = 8
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64138
--- Comment #2 from david ---
Created attachment 34158
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34158&action=edit
a small code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64144
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64113
--- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Created attachment 34157
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34157&action=edit
Proposed patch
Patch in testing.
Using this patch, I was able to compile systemd-217 that otherwise failed to
co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64113
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64144
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Oops, that test is always going to deadlock, I meant this:
#include
std::future fut;
struct A {
~A() { fut.wait_for(std::chrono::milliseconds(1)); }
};
thread_local A a;
void f() { (void)&a; }
int
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64139
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka ---
Well, that assert is there because I was mostly curious if it is possible to
construct valid C++ program doing so. I will figure out if the context passed
seems legit and probably just remove the assert.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64144
Bug ID: 64144
Summary: std::async can deadlock during thread exit
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64139
--- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor ---
And by the way, neither ipa-cp nor ipa-prop invents anything funny
here. It feeds ipa-devirt exactly the same context that it created in
ipa_compute_jump_functions_for_edge (i.e. that the constructor created
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64017
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus ---
Author: burnus
Date: Mon Dec 1 19:07:37 2014
New Revision: 218247
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218247&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-12-01 Tobias Burnus
Jack Howarth
PR middle
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64017
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60859
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60859
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Dec 1 18:52:05 2014
New Revision: 218244
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218244&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2014-12-01 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/60859
* decl.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64018
dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64018
--- Comment #2 from dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Mon Dec 1 18:47:31 2014
New Revision: 218243
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218243&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR jit/64018: Add description of error-handling to the JIT
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63661
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64020
--- Comment #7 from dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to dmalcolm from comment #5)
> (In reply to dmalcolm from comment #4)
> > Am testing a candidate patch for this
>
> Patch posted as:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-11/msg032
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64020
--- Comment #6 from dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Mon Dec 1 18:23:37 2014
New Revision: 218240
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218240&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR jit/64020: Fixes to handling of builtins
PR jit/64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64137
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64139
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|mjambor at suse dot cz |hubicka at gcc dot
gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64143
Bug ID: 64143
Summary: Add option -felide-aliases
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: other
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64142
--- Comment #1 from Ryan Nicholl ---
The option would be -felide-copies, incase the title needs to be changed later.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64142
Bug ID: 64142
Summary: Add option, -felide-copies
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: c++
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64141
Bug ID: 64141
Summary: Add option, -Wextra-copy
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Ass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63854
--- Comment #24 from dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Mon Dec 1 17:40:03 2014
New Revision: 218234
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218234&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR jit/63854: Fix leaks in toyvm.c
gcc/jit/ChangeLog:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64139
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64140
Bug ID: 64140
Summary: match_results.prefix() returns an incorrect result if
regex_iterator holds a zero-length match
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63854
--- Comment #23 from dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Mon Dec 1 17:28:28 2014
New Revision: 218233
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218233&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR jit/63854: Fix leak in real.c for i386:init_ext_80387_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64138
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63854
--- Comment #22 from dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Mon Dec 1 17:22:19 2014
New Revision: 218231
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218231&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR jit/63854: Fix leak within jit-builtins.c
gcc/jit/Cha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63854
--- Comment #21 from dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Mon Dec 1 17:16:04 2014
New Revision: 218230
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218230&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR jit/63854: Fix leak in tree-ssa-math-opts.c
gcc/Chang
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63779
--- Comment #3 from Richard PALO ---
Well, apparently this was affecting many using gcc 4.9.x and a workaround was
given here https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=999496
I tested it and now have (as with 4.8.x):
>richard@omnis:/tmp/pkgsr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64128
--- Comment #4 from Eelis ---
Yeah, I noticed that tcmalloc is also way faster, and since tcmalloc barely
over-allocates for the sizes requested by vector, there is no benefit to using
malloc_usable_size (which it also supports) there.
So I thin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64139
Bug ID: 64139
Summary: ice in possible_polymorphic_call_targets, at
ipa-devirt.c:2410
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63957
--- Comment #4 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34154
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34154&action=edit
tentative patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60859
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64115
Ulrich Weigand changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dje.gcc at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63854
--- Comment #20 from dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Mon Dec 1 16:13:29 2014
New Revision: 218227
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218227&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR jit/63854: Add support for running "make check-jit" un
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63969
--- Comment #7 from dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Mon Dec 1 15:58:11 2014
New Revision: 218226
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218226&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR jit/63969: Fix segfault in error-handling when driver i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63969
dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64121
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64121
--- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Mon Dec 1 15:37:55 2014
New Revision: 218222
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218222&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/64121
* ubsan.c (instrument_object_size): Stop sea
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63956
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63956
--- Comment #13 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Mon Dec 1 15:29:11 2014
New Revision: 218221
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218221&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/63956
* ubsan.c (is_ubsan_builtin_p): Check also
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64138
Bug ID: 64138
Summary: gfortran interface issue
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60845
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60845
--- Comment #1 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Dec 1 14:58:01 2014
New Revision: 218218
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218218&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2014-12-01 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/60845
* typeck.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58107
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64115
Ulrich Weigand changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14541
--- Comment #16 from Richard Biener ---
(for logfn (BUILT_IN_LOGF BUILT_IN_LOG BUILT_IN_LOGL)
expfn (BUILT_IN_EXPF BUILT_IN_EXP BUILT_IN_EXPL)
(simplify
(logfn (expfn @0))
(if (flag_unsafe_math_optimizations)
@0)))
with the still so
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15826
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Which boils down to the premature fold-const.c:optimize_bit_field_compare
which creates this BIT_FIELD_REF (fold_truth_andor_1 does similar stupid
stuff).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63551
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61176
--- Comment #13 from Andrew Macleod ---
gcc-plugin.h has had a number of includes added to ease the pain of flattening
basic-block.h and cgraph.h this release. If there are still issues with tree.h
or others, submit a patch which adds the requir
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63840
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Dec 1 13:49:20 2014
New Revision: 218215
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218215&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/63840
* include/std/functional (function::function(c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63840
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.4
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64102
--- Comment #4 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to ktkachov from comment #3)
> Hmm...
> Trying to bootstrap 4.9 with the same configuration and -mapcs results in an
> ICE in stage2 when compiling haifa-sched.c
> $SRC/gcc/haifa-sched.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64111
--- Comment #21 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Dec 1 13:48:21 2014
New Revision: 218214
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218214&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-12-01 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/64111
* tree.c (in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64111
--- Comment #20 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Dec 1 13:47:11 2014
New Revision: 218213
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218213&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-12-01 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/64111
* tree.c (in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64137
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64111
--- Comment #19 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Dec 1 13:42:45 2014
New Revision: 218212
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218212&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-12-01 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/64111
* tree.c (in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64136
--- Comment #4 from Eddie C. Dost ---
Andrew,
thank you very much, you are correct and I was blind. I now see the problem
from gcc's optimizer view and it makes sense to remove the second condition.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64137
Bug ID: 64137
Summary: Fortran FE builds invalid GENERIC
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63957
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15346
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Dec 1 13:13:28 2014
New Revision: 218211
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218211&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-12-01 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/15346
* Make
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15346
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64121
--- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek ---
Yup, that works. Testing in progress. Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64126
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Dec 1 13:08:10 2014
New Revision: 218210
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218210&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-12-01 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/64126
* match.pd: A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63661
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||5.0
Summary|[4.9/5 Regression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64136
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Swap around the conditions that you have and it will work correctly.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64136
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63957
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64121
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Ah, indeed. So perhaps better replace the:
1565base = gimple_assign_rhs1 (def_stmt);
line in the loop with
{
tree rhs1 = gimple_assign_rhs1 (def_stmt);
if (TREE_CODE (rhs1) == SSA_NAME && SSA_NAM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64136
--- Comment #1 from Eddie C. Dost ---
Created attachment 34153
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34153&action=edit
bug.i cunrolli dump
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64136
Bug ID: 64136
Summary: gcc tree optimization removes basic block containing
break condition
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64121
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
Unfortunately, that doesn't seem to help.
1 - 100 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
