https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63356
--- Comment #13 from fiesh at zefix dot tv ---
Are there any news on this bug? At least for us, this keeps production code
from being able to work with any boost 1.55, which is becoming an increasingly
bigger issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63321
--- Comment #6 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The shll/shlr insns effectively perform two operations:
T = zero_extract single bit 0 / 31 from reg
reg = reg 1 / reg 1.
The other shift insns as in comment #5 perform only a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58256
--- Comment #13 from Chen Gang gang.chen.5i5j at gmail dot com ---
For gcc version 5.0.0 20150109 (experimental) (GCC), can not find this issue
again. So at present, we can close it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64560
Bug ID: 64560
Summary: [5 Regression] building libstdc++ with -fno-rtti fails
in new cxx11-shim-facets.cc file
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64560
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58256
Chen Gang gang.chen.5i5j at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34574
--- Comment #4 from Igor Pashev pashev.igor at gmail dot com ---
I can reploduce it with Debian/amd64 and gcc4.9:
Thread 3 (Thread 0x7f43f8764700 (LWP 16318)):
#0 __lll_lock_wait () at
../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/lowlevellock.S:135
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64559
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37131
Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64560
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
--- a/libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/cxx11-shim_facets.cc
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/cxx11-shim_facets.cc
@@ -768,9 +768,11 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
{
using namespace
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58023
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: janus
Date: Sun Jan 11 19:13:24 2015
New Revision: 219439
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219439root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-01-11 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
PR fortran/58023
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58023
--- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I have finally committed the patch in comment 2 (sorry that it took so long).
The ICE on comment 0 is still there, but for consistency one should do a bit
more than shown in comment 5. Will take
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64508
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: janus
Date: Sun Jan 11 17:31:22 2015
New Revision: 219431
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219431root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-01-11 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
PR fortran/64508
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63724
--- Comment #4 from Yvan Roux yroux at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: yroux
Date: Sun Jan 11 18:36:42 2015
New Revision: 219433
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219433root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/
2015-01-11 Yvan Roux yvan.r...@linaro.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64508
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64508
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Fixed with r219431. Closing.
--enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 5.0.0 20150111 (experimental) [trunk revision 219429] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk -Os -c small.c
$ gcc-4.9 -Wall -Wextra -Os -c small.c
small.c: In function ‘fn1’:
small.c:7:14: warning: comparison between signed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51615
--- Comment #3 from Igor Pashev pashev.igor at gmail dot com ---
I managed to work around this issue by disabling multithreaded compilation in
ECJ:
---
ecj-3.10.1.orig/src/org.eclipse.jdt.core/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/compiler/batch/Main.java
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63733
--- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: janus
Date: Sun Jan 11 22:00:06 2015
New Revision: 219440
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219440root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-01-11 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
PR fortran/63733
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64491
--- Comment #5 from joona.kiiski at gmail dot com ---
Thanks for confirming the problem, Joost!
* The original reporter stated that also 4.9 branch is affected, but I
haven't tested this myself. No idea about 4.8 branch.
* Latest gcc stable
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64561
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ubizjak at gmail dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64562
Bug ID: 64562
Summary: Member functions with r-value reference for *this and
deduced return type incorrectly rejected as ambiguous
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.3
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64561
Bug ID: 64561
Summary: [5 Regression] HAVE_LD_PIE_COPYRELOC is defined to 1
for broken linker
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63470
--- Comment #10 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: trippels
Date: Mon Jan 12 07:48:50 2015
New Revision: 219445
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219445root=gccview=rev
Log:
ipa/63470 add testcase
2015-01-11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63470
--- Comment #8 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
---
Possibly fixed by (?) :
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-01/msg00640.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63470
--- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The ICE still reproduces for me even though at different place now. I am
looking ito it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64043
--- Comment #16 from Igor Zamyatin izamyatin at gmail dot com ---
Hi, Honza!
I still see that performance degradations for spec2006 tests. Could you please
check those on your side?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64491
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63470
--- Comment #11 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Oh, well. I will revert the addition of the testcase.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64368
Igor Zamyatin izamyatin at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||izamyatin at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63470
--- Comment #12 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The other bug is double ajdusting of call_stmt_size when the call is turned
direct. Fixed thus:
Index: ipa-prop.c
===
31 matches
Mail list logo
