https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64350
Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64286
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 14 20:24:05 2015
New Revision: 219614
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219614root=gccview=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2015-01-13 Jakub
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64602
--- Comment #1 from Joel Sherrill joel at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34451
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34451action=edit
Preprocessed source of libssp/ssp.c that trips error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64598
--- Comment #1 from hayder.alkhalissi at googlemail dot com ---
Hi,
I am trying to create cross compiler by using gcc-4.9.1.
During the procdure, I got this error:
/crosstool-ng-1.20.0/.build/src/gcc-4.9.1/gcc/var-tracking.c:5824:1: internal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 58777, which changed state.
Bug 58777 Summary: Taking address of variant/union member is not always a
constant expression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58777
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64520
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
20150114 (experimental)
Last hash per git: commit d4cbe45aae70e38c12f3cd7430427c98289d7882
The fix for 64460 is in place.
Attached test case compiles at -Os but not -O1 or -O2.
-O2 without -mcpu=xscale also works.
arm-rtems4.11-gcc --pipe -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I..
-I../../cpukit/../../../gumstix
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: joel at gcc dot gnu.org
$ arm-rtems4.11-gcc --version
arm-rtems4.11-gcc (GCC) 5.0.0 20150114 (experimental)
Last hash per git: commit d4cbe45aae70e38c12f3cd7430427c98289d7882
The fix for 64460 is in place.
Attached test case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64599
Joel Sherrill joel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64600
--- Comment #2 from Joel Sherrill joel at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 64599 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64563
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 14 20:21:49 2015
New Revision: 219612
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219612root=gccview=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2015-01-12 Jakub
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64598
--- Comment #4 from hayder.alkhalissi at googlemail dot com ---
Created attachment 34448
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34448action=edit
configuration file for crosstoll-ng-1.20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64598
--- Comment #2 from hayder.alkhalissi at googlemail dot com ---
Created attachment 34447
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34447action=edit
Screen shot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64350
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64598
--- Comment #5 from hayder.alkhalissi at googlemail dot com ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
What options are you using to configure GCC? What target are you trying to
compile for? What version of GCC are you starting with?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64598
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
What options are you using to configure GCC? What target are you trying to
compile for? What version of GCC are you starting with?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64598
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64572
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64601
Bug ID: 64601
Summary: Missed PRE on std::vector move assignment
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64600
--- Comment #3 from Joel Sherrill joel at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Joel Sherrill from comment #1)
Created attachment 34450 [details]
Preprocessed RTEMS source which produces the error
Attached test case compiles at -Os but not -O1 or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64586
--- Comment #5 from Aaron Sawdey acsawdey at linux dot vnet.ibm.com ---
This is also fixed by 219556.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64356
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64600
--- Comment #1 from Joel Sherrill joel at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34450
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34450action=edit
Preprocessed RTEMS source which produces the error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64528
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 14 20:22:47 2015
New Revision: 219613
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219613root=gccview=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2015-01-13 Jakub
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64598
Bug ID: 64598
Summary: var-tracking.c has internal compiler error
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64572
--- Comment #13 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #8)
=== libffi Summary for unix/-m32 ===
# of expected passes 1870
# of unexpected failures 20
# of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64578
paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com
changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64602
Bug ID: 64602
Summary: h8300 ICE building libssp/ssp.c ICE, in
maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2308
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64603
Bug ID: 64603
Summary: [5 Regression] bogus error no matching function for
call to ... with templates
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58777
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64604
Bug ID: 64604
Summary: [5 Regression] r212194 causes zsh miscompilation
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53988
--- Comment #5 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Wed Jan 14 23:46:34 2015
New Revision: 219623
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219623root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/53988
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64607
Bug ID: 64607
Summary: [5 Regression] Multilib test stops working in libffi
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64607
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64603
Ville Voutilainen ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64572
--- Comment #18 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
What about the other files used by darwin?
darwin.S is also unchanged.
Those are files specific to darwin, but I don't think they are the only one
used to build libffi.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64608
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
But @ and $ aren't part of the basic source character set. See 2.3
[lex.charset].
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63522
tbsaunde at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tbsaunde at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59994
Bug 59994 depends on bug 58671, which changed state.
Bug 58671 Summary: [c++11] ICE with thread_local and self-referential variable
initialization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58671
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58671
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64608
Bug ID: 64608
Summary: Raw string delimiter fails to allow @ or $
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44982
tbsaunde at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tbsaunde at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17836
--- Comment #7 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Wed Jan 14 21:51:09 2015
New Revision: 219616
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219616root=gccview=rev
Log:
Correct target selector in -mfentry tests
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64513
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 14 22:04:49 2015
New Revision: 219618
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219618root=gccview=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2015-01-12 Jakub
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58671
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Jan 14 22:28:07 2015
New Revision: 219621
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219621root=gccview=rev
Log:
/cp
2015-01-14 Paolo Carlini
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64606
Bug ID: 64606
Summary: multiple warnings in arm target code
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64300
--- Comment #4 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I think this has been addressed with r218760 by Makarov. Can we
close this as resolved?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64572
--- Comment #17 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #15)
What about the other files used by darwin?
darwin.S is also unchanged.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64572
--- Comment #15 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
Running target unix-m64
ERROR: couldn't load description file for unix-m64
I think it is pr64607.
Well, then you'll have to figure out what else could have changed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64581
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64572
--- Comment #16 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
This may be a dup of PR 64607 or PR 64581.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64605
Bug ID: 64605
Summary: [5 Regression] ERROR: (DejaGnu) proc
libatomic_target_compile lto1738.c lto1738.o object
additional_flags=-flto does not exist.
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64607
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64218
Lars Gullik Bjønnes larsbj at gullik dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||larsbj at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64314
--- Comment #2 from Lars Gullik Bjønnes larsbj at gullik dot net ---
I still see this, but with current gcc5 the call stack has become a bit
deeper, instead of 5 calls to walk_tree_1 I now see 9 calls.
(with -std=gnu++14 in this case.)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61933
--- Comment #3 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu Jan 15 03:51:16 2015
New Revision: 219630
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219630root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-01-14 Jerry DeLisle
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64068
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64559
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61632
Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64068
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||su at cs dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64572
--- Comment #19 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #18)
Those are files specific to darwin, but I don't think they are the only one
used to build libffi.
99%.
Anyway, it doesn't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61933
--- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu Jan 15 04:06:02 2015
New Revision: 219632
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219632root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-01-14 Jerry DeLisle
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61933
--- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu Jan 15 03:57:29 2015
New Revision: 219631
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219631root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-01-14 Jerry DeLisle
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64593
--- Comment #3 from Jacek Sieka arnetheduck at gmail dot com ---
I've run a few more tests, and it turns out the culprit is profiledbootstrap.
'make profiledbootstrap' fails even when bootstrap-lto is taken out from the
configure line.
Plain
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61933
Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64597
Bug ID: 64597
Summary: ICE when optimizing with AutoFDO annotation
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64509
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64528
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64340
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
ISTR that preloading pid_t was necessary for ada (basically all types required
from some builtins are required to be preloaded).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24161
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
EDG gives the same error as GCC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64353
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Note the testcase is bogus because xx is clearly loading from global memory and
thus should be pure only.
Of course we should still not ICE here and treat xx as if it were const.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64595
--- Comment #4 from Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com ---
To invoke cgo, put this code in a file foo.go and type go run foo.go (or go
build foo.go ./foo).
package main
// #include stdio.h
// void cprintln(const char *s) { puts(s); }
import
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64415
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64498
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64515
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24161
Cameron cameron314 at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cameron314 at gmail
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64609
Bug ID: 64609
Summary: No -Wbool-compare warning on (a = 0 0) = 4
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64609
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||49706
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64610
Bug ID: 64610
Summary: No -Wbool-compare warning on (0 != a) = 0
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64300
Jan Kratochvil jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53987
--- Comment #9 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Another related issue is this example function:
unsigned char h (unsigned char a, int b)
{
return (unsigned char)(a + b);
}
compiling with -O2 -mrenesas (which allows undefined
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64572
--- Comment #21 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
One potential issue could be that src/x86/ffitarget.h has changed
FFI_TRAMPOLINE_SIZE from 10 to 12 for X86_DARWIN which is used in darwin.S...
#define RAW_CLOSURE_CIF_OFFSET
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64559
--- Comment #3 from Zhendong Su su at cs dot ucdavis.edu ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #2)
Seems to be fixed by same patch as PR64068
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 64068 ***
Jan, strictly speaking, this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63870
--- Comment #6 from cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org ---
There is still a lot to do. I have patches in progress for Aarch64 loads and
stores. Aarch64 shifts still need doing, and everything for ARM.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63870
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64353
--- Comment #7 from Ilya Enkovich enkovich.gnu at gmail dot com ---
Right, wrong const attribute causes no VUSE for calls to the function which
leads to # VUSE .MEM generated for added loads and requires SSA update.
We may actually call
closing this one. The following shows my
compiler version and compiling the original test case.
Thanks.
$ arm-rtems4.11-gcc --version
arm-rtems4.11-gcc (GCC) 5.0.0 20150114 (experimental)
Copyright (C) 2015 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64498
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
Should be fixed now.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 64415 ***
I can confirm that it works for me.
Thanks,
Martin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64592
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz ---
accumulate-outgoing-args default setting change?
Nope, 4.9 already had -mno-accumulate-outgoing-args with -Os.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64545
--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Curious it happens only with FDO... I am looking into that now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62066
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64592
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
With help of Jakub we managed to figure out that on my setup it is because GCC
5.0 defaults to no .cfi directives, while GCC 4.9 uses them.
This seems to be because cfi working
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58597
--- Comment #4 from Volker Reichelt reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The ICE disappered on the 4.9 branch in GCC 4.9.2.
But the testcase still crashes trunk with a different stack trace:
bug.cc:6:12: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64591
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64589
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64545
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
1653 int old_hints_est = estimate_edge_hints (edge);
old_hints_est = 288
estimate_edge_hints (edge) = 32
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64545
--- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
1660 gcc_assert (old_hints_est == estimate_edge_hints (edge));
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64545
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Hmm, that is same_scc hint. It would be great to have smaller testcase. I will
look into that tomorrow morning.
Honza
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64590
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64591
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
1 - 100 of 166 matches
Mail list logo
