https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54000
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54000
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63679
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64979
Bug ID: 64979
Summary: S/390: va_list overflow area pointer is not setup due
to stdarg optimization
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64982
--- Comment #2 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
Actually reverting...
Author: hubicka
Date: Sun Feb 8 21:04:41 2015
New Revision: 220520
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220520root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR ipa/63566
* i386.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64978
--- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
IPA lattices after constant propagation, before gcc_unreachable:
Lattices:
Node: void {anonymous}::C::m_fn3(A, unsigned int, const int*, int)/10:
param [0]: TOP
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64984
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I'll have a look tomorrow.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61309
--- Comment #3 from Kai-Uwe Eckhardt kuehro at gmx dot de ---
Hello John,
FYI, this is still happening.
So if/when DragonFly features libgcc_s from 5.0 in base, these errors will go
away?
To be honest I am not quite sure, but I think it is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64377
--- Comment #20 from Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Can I please ask someone to confirm that the patch works and mark this issue as
resolved?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64959
Andrea Azzarone andrea.azzarone at canonical dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64928
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64979
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Feb 9 17:01:36 2015
New Revision: 220543
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220543root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/64979
* tree-stdarg.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64948
--- Comment #2 from Andrea Azzarone andrea.azzarone at canonical dot com ---
(In reply to Andrea Azzarone from comment #1)
Created attachment 34705 [details]
Proposed fix to allow the use of enable_if for UDLs.
Sorry this patch was for a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64928
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63572
--- Comment #10 from Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
As Cary Countant wrote me, gold's ICF has never implemented support for call
site tables in GDB. Moreover, when Jakub designed the new call site tags, the
design hasn't been changed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64377
Joel Sherrill joel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64670
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #6)
Created attachment 34628 [details]
Updated test case (part 2/2): [aux file]
Missed to state:
This file 'implements' the class
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64984
Bug ID: 64984
Summary: [5 Regression] ICE in check_noexcept_t with ubsan
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64693
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #6)
A patch is posted at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-01/msg02108.html
Hello.
I've just finished more sensitive patch for the issue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64326
--- Comment #7 from tbsaunde at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #6)
Hmm, the ICE seems to not reproduce for me :(
I can reproduce with r220551, nothing special x86_64-linux-gnu with ./cc1 -O3
test.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64076
tbsaunde at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43378
amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60335
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60198
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61419
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60354
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60528
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60634
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64196
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64362
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64076
--- Comment #3 from tbsaunde at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: tbsaunde
Date: Tue Feb 10 02:23:11 2015
New Revision: 220561
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220561root=gccview=rev
Log:
Tolerate different definitions of symbols in lto
gcc/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61114
--- Comment #12 from collison at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: collison
Date: Tue Feb 10 02:23:40 2015
New Revision: 220562
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220562root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-02-09 Michael Collison michael.colli...@linaro.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43378
--- Comment #1 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: amker
Date: Tue Feb 10 02:34:41 2015
New Revision: 220563
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220563root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/43378
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr43378.c:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64992
Bug ID: 64992
Summary: More optimize opportunity
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59765
--- Comment #16 from Alipasha alipasha.celeris at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #15)
This is one and the same as PR64932 for which I have just posted a fix.
Thanks to Dominique for noticing this.
Since it is a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57822
--- Comment #2 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Tue Feb 10 02:49:58 2015
New Revision: 220564
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220564root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-02-09 Jerry DeLisle
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60269
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60217
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60198
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tau at eidos
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61286
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64839
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64994
Bug ID: 64994
Summary: [5 Regression] Firefox build error: ICE: in
cxx_eval_call_expression, at cp/constexpr.c:1353
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61889
--- Comment #23 from tbsaunde at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: tbsaunde
Date: Tue Feb 10 03:40:20 2015
New Revision: 220566
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220566root=gccview=rev
Log:
Support gcov-tool without ftw.h
gcc/
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60366
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This is ICEing while trying to print out about the lambda.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60366
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64993
Bug ID: 64993
Summary: Missed ccmp optimization with simple code
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64713
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|aarch64-linux
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57284
--- Comment #3 from Lorenz Hüdepohl bugs at stellardeath dot org ---
Any progress on this one? 4.9.2 still produces the error:
~/sys/stow/gcc-4.9.2/bin/gfortran --version
GNU Fortran (GCC) 4.9.2
Copyright (C) 2014 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64978
--- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Reduced testcase for comment 4:
trippels@gcc20 test % cat VTableBuilder.ii
class A {
public:
A(int, int);
};
class B {
public:
void m_fn1(bool, const int *, int );
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64980
--- Comment #5 from Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #4)
This cures it:
Another way to cure it:
Index: trans-expr.c
===
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64984
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63205
--- Comment #12 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com ---
Reopening, something is wrong with the testcase:(In reply to Paul Thomas from
comment #11)
Fixed on trunk, aka 5.0.0
The added testcase fails with valgrind due to memory errors,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63492
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63492
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|normal
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64982
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
Actually reverting...
Author: hubicka
Date: Sun Feb 8 21:04:41 2015
New Revision: 220520
...
eliminates the ICEs in g++.dg/abi/covariant2.C at -m32 on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53770
--- Comment #3 from petschy at gmail dot com ---
Tried now w/ g++ 4.9.1 (Debian 4.9.1-19), and single stepping is still wrong.
The only difference is that it doesn't stop on ++f in line 30 after breaking
out from the loop. However, all the other
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64987
Bug ID: 64987
Summary: alignas(N) (and __attribute__(__aligned__(N))) ignored
on enum specifiers
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64988
Bug ID: 64988
Summary: [5 Regression] ICE: verify_cgraph_node failed: Alias
and target's comdat groups differs with
-fdeclone-ctor-dtor
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62631
--- Comment #33 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #31)
The test also fails on PowerPC, the 2 IVs are kept by ivopts.
On targets like ARM, the biv(i) is eliminated with biv(p). PowerPC is
different, it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63566
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Even with all the committed patches I don't see any change on the #c5 testcase,
which in 4.9 used regparm(3) calling convention e.g. for f1 and f2, but with
current trunk still uses
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64894
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64460
--- Comment #13 from collison at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: collison
Date: Tue Feb 10 07:53:23 2015
New Revision: 220570
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220570root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-02-10 Michael Collison michael.colli...@linaro.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61889
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64011
--- Comment #5 from collison at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: collison
Date: Tue Feb 10 07:31:25 2015
New Revision: 220568
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220568root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-02-10 Michael Collison michael.colli...@linaro.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64986
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63205
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64986
Bug ID: 64986
Summary: class_to_type_4.f90: valgrind error: Invalid
read/write of size 8
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64982
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Hmm, I see. The problem is that asm_out.can_output_mi_thunk now needs to walk
alias to know what ABI the callee function uses and aliases are not analyzed at
this point. I solved
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64813
--- Comment #20 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
Full regtesting just completed. Unless pr64982 and
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-02/msg00550.html are masking some
latent bug introduced by the patch, it does not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60244
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64985
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63513
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63652
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Hasn't this been fixed or at least the patch submitted to fix them?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64985
Bug ID: 64985
Summary: Default Scalar Storage Order Fails when an address is
associated with a record
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60159
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||i?86-*-*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64978
--- Comment #10 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Tue Feb 10 00:38:46 2015
New Revision: 220557
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220557root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR ipa/64978
* ipa-cp.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64956
--- Comment #3 from Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I found this snippet in one of the xapian headers.
#ifdef __GNUC__
#if __GNUC__ 3 || (__GNUC__ == 3 __GNUC_MINOR__ == 0)
#error Xapian no longer supports GCC 3.1
#else
#if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57822
--- Comment #3 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Tue Feb 10 03:34:19 2015
New Revision: 220565
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220565root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-02-10 Jerry DeLisle
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63566
--- Comment #16 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
It is because I forgot to commit last part of series disabling the ipa-icf
workaround :) It should work well now. Shall we keep the bug open (and
downgrade prioirty) for the debug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64982
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Possible fix posted at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-02/msg00566.html
Does it fix the ICEs and keeps the diagnostics sane?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64989
Bug ID: 64989
Summary: constant-initialization of self-referencing array
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63347
--- Comment #12 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com ---
Right. I know we've got the SCHED_GROUP_P handling in prune_ready_list, but
it's not sufficient.
This is a regression with the trunk.
Take the code from c#0 and run it through a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64899
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61309
--- Comment #4 from John Marino gnugcc at marino dot st ---
I suspect the reason it works on FreeBSD is found on libgcc/config.host,
specifically the inclusion of t-freebsd in tmake_file definition.
t-freebsd for i386 add the symbol map
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64989
Bug 64989 depends on bug 64899, which changed state.
Bug 64899 Summary: Illegal dynamic initialization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64899
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64978
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63256
Segher Boessenkool segher at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63566
--- Comment #15 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Mon Feb 9 20:45:04 2015
New Revision: 220548
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220548root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR ipa/63566
* ipa-icf.c (set_local):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61548
--- Comment #30 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Mon Feb 9 21:06:35 2015
New Revision: 220549
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220549root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR ipa/61548
* tree-emutls.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61548
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64978
--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
My changes pushed the following two symbols local (which they are). How that
affect ipa-prop's propagation is bit behind my current understanding...
_ZN12_GLOBAL__N_11CC1Ev/2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64921
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.0 |4.9.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64434
--- Comment #19 from Yuri Rumyantsev ysrumyan at gmail dot com ---
Andrew!
Could you please try modified test-case (test1.c) which is attached.
Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64434
--- Comment #20 from Yuri Rumyantsev ysrumyan at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 34700
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34700action=edit
another test-case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64858
Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63679
--- Comment #26 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I'd say it is a bug in the backend, if you want to override some expansion,
you'd better add some target hook for that, rather than messing up with
MOVE_BY_PIECES and setting it to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64980
Bug ID: 64980
Summary: [5.0 regression] ICE in trans-expr.c
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64813
--- Comment #17 from Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34702
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34702action=edit
Suggested patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64978
--- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
trippels@gcc2-power8 makeconv % cat msgfmt.ii
typedef enum
{
} UErrorCode;
class A
{
virtual A *m_fn1 () const;
};
class B : A
{
B (const B );
A *m_fn1 () const;
1 - 100 of 178 matches
Mail list logo