https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50385
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64999
--- Comment #26 from boger at us dot ibm.com ---
(In reply to Ian Lance Taylor from comment #25)
To which code in libgcc are you referring? I don't see it.
Here is the code I was referring to, but I was wrong when I thought it fixed
the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61397
--- Comment #11 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com ---
Would you prefer RESOLVED/NOTABUG? Always happy to do that! Your call.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65058
--- Comment #6 from haubi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: haubi
Date: Tue Feb 24 20:19:54 2015
New Revision: 220947
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220947root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/65058: Drop unused variable.
PR target/65058
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65192
Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65148
Martin Sebor msebor at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61142
Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #34839|0 |1
is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47602
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65196
Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65196
Bug ID: 65196
Summary: avr_adjust_insn_length uses recog_memoized on invalid
insn
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-checking
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61397
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63630
Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5.0 Regression] internal |[5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61397
--- Comment #10 from Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org ---
However, before I made the changes that finished the implementation of upper
regs support, the option was not functional for anything other than
power8-ldst.c. It could not be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63890
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65010
Martin Sebor msebor at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60082
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58315
Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65154
Mikhail Maltsev maltsevm at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maltsevm at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65167
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65167
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ysrumyan at gmail
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58315
--- Comment #20 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 23 Feb 2015, aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58315
Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65187
Bug ID: 65187
Summary: Bogus error with ASSOCIATE and deferred-length
CHARACTER
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65048
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65040
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I'd also say that warnings for formats that do not have a signed form are
useless,
thus for %o, %x and %X. But I guess you beg to differ.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65040
--- Comment #18 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
And it was just mentioned that the diagnostic should print
[-Wformat-signedness]
not
[-Wformat=]
(or both)
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com
Target: x86_64-linux-gnu
class C { public: void f() {} } c;
int main() { return c.f.a; }
-Wall
g++ (GCC) 5.0.0 20150224
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60851
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||uros at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58315
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65170
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63890
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rth at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65167
--- Comment #1 from Ilya Enkovich enkovich.gnu at gmail dot com ---
For call arguments we usually store bounds passed in bounds tables and then
fill bounds passed in registers. But with -fschedule-insns we have order
changed and all hard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65040
--- Comment #16 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Ok, I can fix the integer constant case as well.
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #15)
I'd also say that warnings for formats that do not have a signed form are
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65138
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dje at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61397
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60315
--- Comment #21 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
So, what still needs to be done here? This certainly isn't a compile-time-hog
on the trunk and the testcase is optimized into return 0; as it should.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65170
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Feb 24 08:07:10 2015
New Revision: 220931
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220931root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/65170
* wide-int.cc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65186
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dodji at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65040
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61021
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65015
--- Comment #24 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Feb 24 09:09:11 2015
New Revision: 220935
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220935root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-02-24 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65015
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.9.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65023
David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65023
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65040
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
IMHO the warning is completely useless, but perhaps some people disagree.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56145
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65189
Bug ID: 65189
Summary: Malformed (C++) class-hierarchy dump on abstract class
(in comparission to GCC 4.6.x)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65178
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||63278
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65167
--- Comment #4 from Ilya Enkovich enkovich.gnu at gmail dot com ---
ix86_function_arg_regno_p doesn't recognize bnd registers as args. Also
avoid_func_arg_motion doesn't work for BNDSTX because it is not a single set.
This patch works for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65190
Bug ID: 65190
Summary: libreoffice build failure with lto and graphite flags
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56273
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56456
Bug 56456 depends on bug 56273, which changed state.
Bug 56273 Summary: [4.8 regression] Bogus -Warray-bounds warning
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56273
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65187
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60458
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65150
--- Comment #14 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #13)
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #8)
On I also see
FAIL: c-c++-common/attr-used.c -std=gnu++(11|14|98)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65186
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63958
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45325
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65167
--- Comment #5 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Ilya Enkovich from comment #4)
ix86_function_arg_regno_p doesn't recognize bnd registers as args. Also
avoid_func_arg_motion doesn't work for BNDSTX because it is not a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65191
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61018
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65015
--- Comment #27 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Feb 24 11:27:43 2015
New Revision: 220938
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220938root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-02-24 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65015
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65191
Bug ID: 65191
Summary: keep interesting core files and remove others
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65191
--- Comment #1 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34854
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34854action=edit
Demonstrator patch
Run with f.i. gfortran.dg/block_6.f08 to see that the core is cleaned up.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64950
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
|RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Cannot reproduce with grahite enabled 4.9.3 20150224.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65191
--- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
I don't see why the dejagnu or the testsuite should care. If dumping
everything under core filename is not what you want, then perhaps use
different
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65150
--- Comment #13 from Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #8)
On I also see
FAIL: c-c++-common/attr-used.c -std=gnu++(11|14|98) scan-assembler
function_declaration_before
or
FAIL:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63888
--- Comment #39 from Yury Gribov y.gribov at samsung dot com ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #36)
(In reply to Yury Gribov from comment #35)
(In reply to Kostya Serebryany from comment #34)
Frankly, I am not at all motivated to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60315
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.9.0, 5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65189
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64277
--- Comment #22 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Feb 24 12:49:11 2015
New Revision: 220939
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220939root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-02-24 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56273
--- Comment #24 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Feb 24 12:49:11 2015
New Revision: 220939
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220939root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-02-24 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59124
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Feb 24 12:49:11 2015
New Revision: 220939
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220939root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-02-24 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61591
Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62251
--- Comment #7 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2015-02-21 1:56 PM, dave.anglin at bell dot net wrote:
The current code now uses the libcall, _U_Qfsqrt, in libm.
The change from sqrtl to _U_Qfsqrt occurred in r214211:
2014-08-20 Joost
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63844
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65161
Yuri Rumyantsev ysrumyan at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ysrumyan at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63844
--- Comment #19 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Feb 24 15:09:00 2015
New Revision: 220941
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220941root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-02-24 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58315
--- Comment #21 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at redhat dot com ---
On 02/24/2015 12:39 AM, rguenther at suse dot de wrote:
But yes, we have multiple such assignments to 'this' at the (possible
assembler) location of a single statement which of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 63844, which changed state.
Bug 63844 Summary: [4.8 Regression] open mp parallelization prevents
vectorization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63844
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56145
--- Comment #16 from Mircea Namolaru mircea.namolaru at inria dot fr ---
Right, the NULL check fixed this for previous versions of GCC.
For the current version, it works without these NULL checks (the NULL paths are
not followed). The relevant
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65134
--- Comment #5 from boger at us dot ibm.com ---
(In reply to Tatsushi Inagaki from comment #0)
Created attachment 34813 [details]
Example to reproduce the constructor problem
Gccgo ignores a C-function with the constructor attribute in a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65161
--- Comment #3 from Yuri Rumyantsev ysrumyan at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 34856
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34856action=edit
possible patch
Add check on selective scheduling to not perform instruction
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58315
--- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #21)
Let me see if I understood this correctly. We need a DSE/DCE pass right
before var-tracking that would eliminate the redundant
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65194
Bug ID: 65194
Summary: Compiler warns of maybe-uninitialized
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64495
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Feb 24 14:05:46 2015
New Revision: 220940
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220940root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-02-24 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64493
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Feb 24 14:05:46 2015
New Revision: 220940
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220940root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-02-24 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64999
boger at us dot ibm.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||boger at us dot ibm.com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64199
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Feb 24 14:05:46 2015
New Revision: 220940
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220940root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-02-24 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65192
Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65149
--- Comment #2 from Alexey Lapshin alexey.lapshin at oracle dot com ---
The similar test case for C does not fail. gcc aligns this 8-bytes structure at
8-bytes so inlined lock-free code is working correctly.
Another thing is that this bug exist
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65193
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.8.4,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65193
Bug ID: 65193
Summary: [4.9 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault with -g -flto
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64374
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34855
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34855action=edit
gcc5-pr64374.patch
Untested fix.
Unfortunately I really can't reproduce it now, so
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64495
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64199
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64493
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56145
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||5.0
minimized the testcase maybe more than appropriate, it was in fact:
class D { public: int a; } d;
class C { public: D f() { return d; } } c;
int main() { return c.f.a; }
g++ (GCC) 5.0.0 20150224 (experimental)
---
10.C
1 - 100 of 156 matches
Mail list logo