https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65231
Roman Proskuryakov humbug at deeptown dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65150
--- Comment #24 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I beleive so, at least I can bootstrap w/o the aliases.
Hi,
the problem is that darwin output profiler after prologue.
With ACCUMULATE_OUTGOING_ARGS we leave stack pointer aligned to boundary - 4
(for return pointer) without we leave it aligned.
I guess it is possible to compensate this in FUNCTION_PROFILER, but I am not
convinced this will work
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64812
--- Comment #8 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Also happens with gcc-5 when linking two different LibreOffice libraries.
(libscfiltlo.so and libooxlo.so)
The undefined symbol is:
x4 ~ # c++filt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65232
Bug ID: 65232
Summary: [5 Regression] bootstrap failure (ICE in
change_symbol_block, at varasm.c:1230) on
arm-linux-gnueabihf, in libstdc++ stage1
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65231
Bug ID: 65231
Summary: Dead link in man page to the status of C99 features
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65231
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65088
--- Comment #3 from Marat Zakirov m.zakirov at samsung dot com ---
I think this has been discussed on the gcc mailing list
Marek could you please share some resuting conclusion at least for x86
platform?
Why didn't x86 GCC RTL fold these
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63890
--- Comment #12 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz ---
Hi,
the problem is that darwin output profiler after prologue.
With ACCUMULATE_OUTGOING_ARGS we leave stack pointer aligned to boundary - 4
(for return pointer) without we leave it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63892
Bug 63892 depends on bug 65150, which changed state.
Bug 65150 Summary: [5 Regression] r220875 causes bootstrap failure on x86_64
darwin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65150
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65150
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65120
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65228
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65220
--- Comment #6 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34886
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34886action=edit
corrected patch
I cheated and looked at test results before bootstrap. There I found
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65220
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65221
Bug ID: 65221
Summary: typedef-name identifier not resolved in static member
instantiation
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64997
alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65220
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
We hit
rtx
allocate_dynamic_stack_space (rtx size, unsigned size_align,
unsigned required_align, bool cannot_accumulate)
{
...
/* ???
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65175
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65224
Bug ID: 65224
Summary: fprofile-reorder-functions reorders using expand order
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65112
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65225
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35330
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65202
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64432
--- Comment #31 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I have generated a test case that includes all possible combinations and found
some issues with the patch related to Real (KIND 10). I am working this now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65225
Bug ID: 65225
Summary: [AArch64] Various aarch64_rtx_costs improvements
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64999
--- Comment #32 from Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com ---
I don't think it is a good idea to add code in multiple places to fix up the
pc values after calling runtime.Callers. That seems prone to error and
confusing for future updates
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64367
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64999
--- Comment #33 from boger at us dot ibm.com ---
(In reply to Ian Lance Taylor from comment #32)
I don't think it is a good idea to add code in multiple places to fix up
the pc values after calling runtime.Callers. That seems prone to error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55993
--- Comment #12 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to splinterofchaos from comment #11)
I still get an error with 4.9 when using one of the less reduced cases,
although not when using the test cases in that patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65223
Bug ID: 65223
Summary: Regresion on elemental type-bound procedure's passed
object with INTENT(OUT)
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55993
splinterofchaos at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||splinterofchaos at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46102
--- Comment #12 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Thu Feb 26 15:31:52 2015
New Revision: 221016
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221016root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR debug/46102
* dwarf2out.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65038
--- Comment #2 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Suggested patch send at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-02/msg01615.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64570
--- Comment #3 from David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
Fails everywhere, 4.6 rejects the testcase. Looks more like a C++ frontend
issue to me.
Still goes wrong over a month later with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64999
--- Comment #31 from Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com ---
Why is it important to be able to map a file:line to a single PC?
The problem is that the Go code in the runtime/pprof package assumes that it
can take a single PC value and map that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65202
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Thu Feb 26 15:03:23 2015
New Revision: 221015
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221015root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/65202
* constexpr.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65220
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34884
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34884action=edit
gcc5-pr65520.patch
Untested patch for the i386.md change.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64946
--- Comment #9 from vekumar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This match.pd pattern vectorizes the PR but works only with -fwrapv.
(simplify
( convert (abs (convert@1 @0)))
( if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type)
/* We check for type compatibility between @0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64999
--- Comment #30 from boger at us dot ibm.com ---
I don't think it is a good idea to add code in multiple places to fix up the pc
values after calling runtime.Callers. That seems prone to error and confusing
for future updates to the code.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46102
Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53118
Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61634
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Feb 26 13:28:48 2015
New Revision: 221006
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221006root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-02-26 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65048
--- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com ---
Fixed by Sebastain's change on the trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65048
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65038
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65217
--- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Thu Feb 26 14:17:06 2015
New Revision: 221010
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221010root=gccview=rev
Log:
Add a testcase for PR target/65217
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63509
Richard W.M. Jones rjones at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rjones at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65222
Bug ID: 65222
Summary: [5 Regression] -mtune= or -march=: Not all options not
documented: slm, knl, shanghai, istanbul
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65171
--- Comment #7 from Bill Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Yes, this is unrelated and not really a problem. Something has caused us to
recently start spilling a couple of nonvolatile vector registers to the stack
for this test case,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65193
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I already get
./xg++ -B. -nostdlib -fPIC -flto -shared t.ii -O2 -g
t.ii: In function ‘float_next_imp’:
t.ii:33:7: error: address taken, but ADDRESSABLE bit not set
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65221
--- Comment #1 from Philipp Ittershagen gcc-bugzilla at mail dot shgn.de ---
$ g++ -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=g++
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.9/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-linux-gnu
Configured with:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61634
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65048
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law law at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: law
Date: Thu Feb 26 13:56:39 2015
New Revision: 221007
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221007root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/65048
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65220
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43701
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64374
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57647
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49748
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65171
--- Comment #8 from Bill Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Thu Feb 26 17:43:03 2015
New Revision: 221022
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221022root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-02-26 Bill Schmidt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65171
Bill Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63420
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35330
--- Comment #12 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org ---
issue seems to be that in declare_weak we don't check that DECL is actually
either a function, or a variable declaration.
Fix would be to add an error-message in declare_weak ().
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58288
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64999
--- Comment #34 from Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com ---
You're right, we could just change runtime_callers. Or, simpler still, just
change callback in libgo/runtime/go-callers.c. Good point.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58942
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65088
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65226
Bug ID: 65226
Summary: hgcc-plugin.h is unusable when GCC was build with
non-system or in-tree GMP
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65227
--- Comment #2 from Bert Wesarg Bert.Wesarg at googlemail dot com ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
You should always include gcc-plugin.h first when compiling plugins.
But the documentation in gcc/doc/plugins.texi only reads:
FAIL: gcc (GCC) 5.0.0 20150226 (experimental)
PATH=/home/jkratoch/redhat/gcchead-root/bin:$PATH
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/jkratoch/redhat/gcchead-root/lib64
/home/jkratoch/redhat/gdb-clean/gdb/gdb -nx gdb -ex start -ex 'compile code -r
__auto_type qwe = def'
gdb command line:1:19: error: ‘def
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64693
Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64693
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: marxin
Date: Thu Feb 26 20:21:38 2015
New Revision: 221031
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221031root=gccview=rev
Log:
Fix PR ipa/64693
PR ipa/64693
* ipa-icf.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65228
Jan Kratochvil jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|other |c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65192
Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65227
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |normal
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65220
Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65008
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Thu Feb 26 18:59:50 2015
New Revision: 221025
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221025root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR ipa/65008
* ipa-inline.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65227
Bug ID: 65227
Summary: Plugin headers are unusable when included after
inttypes.h
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65192
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: gjl
Date: Thu Feb 26 19:43:54 2015
New Revision: 221029
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221029root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/65192
* config/avr/avr-protos.h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61142
--- Comment #6 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Thu Feb 26 19:14:23 2015
New Revision: 221026
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221026root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/61142
* config/sh/sh.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65008
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65061
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65215
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65228
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65216
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65216
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Feb 26 21:03:14 2015
New Revision: 221034
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221034root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/65216
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65215
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Feb 26 21:01:59 2015
New Revision: 221033
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221033root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/65215
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65228
--- Comment #3 from Jan Kratochvil jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com ---
Interesting that FSF GCC r220934 which should be gcc-5.0.0-0.16.fc23.x86_64
still crashes while that Fedora GCC does not crash.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65216
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65202
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65202
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65154
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63175
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34878
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34878action=edit
patch
I am testing the following (further testing appreciated).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65215
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34879
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34879action=edit
gcc5-pr65215.patch
Untested fix. There are still issues left, e.g. I can't understand
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65215
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I mean something like:
unsigned int
foo (unsigned char *p)
{
return ((unsigned int) p[0] 24) | (p[1] 16) | (p[2] 8) | p[3];
}
on strict align big endian machines, let me add
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63175
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64959
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57982
Jean-Pierre Flori jpflori at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jpflori at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65215
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #34879|0 |1
is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65215
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
Created attachment 34879 [details]
gcc5-pr65215.patch
Untested fix. There are still issues left, e.g. I can't understand the
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
