https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63731
--- Comment #25 from Tatsushi Inagaki e29253 at jp dot ibm.com ---
What is the most recommended way when we want to use the net package in a
statically linked binary? My impression is that a statically linked binary also
should call dlopen() (and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65235
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.0 |4.8.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65241
Bug ID: 65241
Summary: [5 Regression] ICE (in
remove_local_expressions_from_table, at
tree-ssa-dom.c:1081) on powerpc64le-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65237
--- Comment #10 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Fri Feb 27 16:56:57 2015
New Revision: 221065
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221065root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR ipa/65237
* gcc.dg/attr-noinline.c:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65242
Peter Bergner bergner at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65237
--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz ---
FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-cp-1.c scan-ipa-dump cp Alignment 2
FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-cp-2.c scan-ipa-dump cp Alignment 8, misalignment 4
Sorry, these was unintentinal commits, I will revert
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65238
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65244
--- Comment #1 from Ulf Magnusson ulfalizer at gmail dot com ---
This warning did not occur for GCC 4.8.2 (or whatever the most recent GCC
version is on Ubuntu 14.04) by the way.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65242
Bug ID: 65242
Summary: [5 Regression] ICE (in gen_add2_insn, at
optabs.c:4761) on powerpc64le-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65244
Bug ID: 65244
Summary: Bogus -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning with
posix_memalign() and -Og
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65240
Bug ID: 65240
Summary: [5 Regression] ICE (insn does not satisfy its
constraints) on powerpc64le-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65243
Bug ID: 65243
Summary: [5 Regression] lto1 ICE (segfault) on
powerpc64le-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65237
--- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz ---
On Darwin we also see:
gcc.dg/attr-noinline.c (all cases fail)
Didin't Martin analyze this failure as the test case just needing /* {
dg-require-alias } */?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65038
--- Comment #6 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Fri Feb 27 13:19:38 2015
New Revision: 221059
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221059root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/65038
* config.in:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65228
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Fri Feb 27 12:18:57 2015
New Revision: 221056
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221056root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c/65228
* c-decl.c (start_decl):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65236
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34889
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34889action=edit
RTL dumps with ICF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65038
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65087
--- Comment #7 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
-fno-ipa-icf fixes the issue from comment 6.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65235
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65038
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65236
Bug ID: 65236
Summary: [5 Regression]: IPA ICF causes miscompilation in
Chromium built with -Os
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65236
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34888
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34888action=edit
RTL dumps without ICF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64812
--- Comment #10 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Michael Stahl from comment #9)
interesting ... you are building LO 4.4.1.1 or older?
4.4.1.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65040
--- Comment #19 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Fri Feb 27 14:11:53 2015
New Revision: 221061
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221061root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c/65040
* doc/invoke.texi: Update
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65228
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Fri Feb 27 12:24:02 2015
New Revision: 221057
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221057root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c/65228
* c-decl.c (start_decl):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65237
Bug ID: 65237
Summary: [5 Regression] r221040 caused many regressions
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ipa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65101
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43701
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65238
Bug ID: 65238
Summary: [5 Regression] __has_attribute is not handled properly
with -traditional-cpp.
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64812
Michael Stahl mstahl at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dtardon at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65223
--- Comment #2 from John jwmwalrus at gmail dot com ---
Changing the ELEMENTAL attribute to PURE produces the same error. If that's the
intended behavior, then that's the same as saying type-bound procedures cannot
be pure.
The thread mentioned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64955
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65228
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65235
Bug ID: 65235
Summary: [4.8, 4.9, 5 Regression] Simplifying vec_select of
vec_concat miscompiles when first element of
vec_concat is const_int
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65237
Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65032
--- Comment #8 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Fri Feb 27 14:15:02 2015
New Revision: 221062
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221062root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-02-27 Vladimir Makarov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65032
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64955
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65228
--- Comment #8 from Jan Kratochvil jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com ---
Great, thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65040
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65048
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Feb 27 14:34:18 2015
New Revision: 221063
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221063root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/65048
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65242
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org ---
shorter testcase from another package:
$ g++ -c -g -O3 -Wno-write-strings Channel.ii
Channel.ii: In member function 'void C::m_fn2()':
Channel.ii:46:1: internal compiler error: in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65234
Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65233
Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65245
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34893
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34893action=edit
Suggested patch
I've been testing following patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65128
--- Comment #3 from Shawn Landden shawn at churchofgit dot com ---
Created attachment 34892
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34892action=edit
remove legacy includes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65245
Bug ID: 65245
Summary: [5 Regression] internal compiler error: in
address_matters_p, at symtab.c:1908
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65223
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65238
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65237
howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||howarth at bromo dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65237
--- Comment #6 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3)
(In reply to howarth from comment #2)
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #1)
On Darwin we also see:
gcc.dg/attr-noinline.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65237
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
Yes, I think the test should be decoared with dg-require-alias.
Well, the test used to pass.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65235
Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65235
--- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org ---
--target ??
Could you post a preprocessed source code?
Hmmm... fine line, but maybe this isn't a regression?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65150
--- Comment #25 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
Bootstrap completed at r221041 on x86_64-apple-darwin14 for
c,c++,fortran,lto,objc,obj-c++,java language set.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65237
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to howarth from comment #2)
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #1)
On Darwin we also see:
gcc.dg/attr-noinline.c (all cases fail)
Didin't Martin analyze this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65235
--- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #1)
Hi. The known to work field is empty. Is this a regression?
I can't reproduce on a cross build to --target=aarch64-linux by running cc1.
What
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65235
--- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
gah, sorry, the field is not wide enough to show the output of git blame
properly...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65236
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
There's generated assembly:
0045faa0
_ZNK6google8protobuf11MessageLite24SerializePartialAsStringEv:
45faa0:53 push %rbx
45faa1:48 89 fb
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65235
--- Comment #5 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34891
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34891action=edit
Self-contained testcase
Here's a testcase with the relevant parts of arm_neon.h extracted.
This
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65220
--- Comment #9 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Fri Feb 27 15:01:57 2015
New Revision: 221064
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221064root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/65220
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60296
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39438
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65237
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65220
Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65239
Bug ID: 65239
Summary: typeinfo / VTT for some classes not visibile in shared
library when LTO is used
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65235
--- Comment #6 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Hmmm... fine line, but maybe this isn't a regression?
I guess it isn't a regression in the release branches, but it is wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65237
--- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org ---
((In reply to howarth from comment #2)
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #1)
On Darwin we also see:
gcc.dg/attr-noinline.c (all cases fail)
Didin't Martin analyze this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65244
howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||howarth at bromo dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65245
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz ---
Hi,
why do you try to merge aliases? Those should be filtered out - it is enough to
merge the actual definitions (with a body)
Honza
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65244
--- Comment #6 from Ulf Magnusson ulfalizer at gmail dot com ---
Comment on attachment 34894
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34894
-Wmaybe-uninitialized-warning with -Og with GCC 4.9.1
void exit(int __status) __attribute__
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65244
--- Comment #8 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
I wonder if this is the same issue as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63748 which was fixed in trunk by
r217317...
2014-11-10 Patrick Palka ppa...@gcc.gnu.org
gcc/
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65244
--- Comment #7 from Ulf Magnusson ulfalizer at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 34895
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34895action=edit
Headerless version
Sorry -- thought my previous action would edit the attachment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65246
Bug ID: 65246
Summary: [5 Regression] libstdc++ pretty printers don't work
anymore with Python3
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65244
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65244
--- Comment #5 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Ulf Magnusson from comment #4)
Created attachment 34894 [details]
-Wmaybe-uninitialized-warning with -Og with GCC 4.9.1
The testcase was in the comment. I'm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65233
--- Comment #7 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org ---
FWIW, I also ran valgrind on cc1plus just for good measure, to see if we were
hitting some uninitialized memory issues, but I came out empty handed:
reynosa:/dev/shm/t/gcc$ valgrind
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65244
--- Comment #4 from Ulf Magnusson ulfalizer at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 34894
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34894action=edit
-Wmaybe-uninitialized-warning with -Og with GCC 4.9.1
The testcase was in the comment.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65237
Pat Haugen pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bergner at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65237
Pat Haugen pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pthaugen at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61960
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65244
--- Comment #9 from Ulf Magnusson ulfalizer at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 34897
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34897action=edit
Reduce testcase using __builtin_posix_memalign().
The warning goes away with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65245
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65245
--- Comment #3 from Steve Ellcey sje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1)
Created attachment 34893 [details]
Suggested patch
I've been testing following patch.
FYI: I tested this patch on MIPS and it works for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64317
--- Comment #16 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Fri Feb 27 22:02:05 2015
New Revision: 221070
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221070root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-02-27 Vladimir Makarov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65244
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This works in GCC 5.0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65236
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65230
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65226
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63175
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Code quality regression fixed for trunk(?). Testcase is of course still
bogus
(wrong scan-dump, doesn't really test the code quality).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63175
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Feb 27 08:37:51 2015
New Revision: 221043
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221043root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-02-27 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64999
--- Comment #35 from Dominik Vogt vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com ---
I'd like to bring back to attention the fact that the code that deducts six
from the pc (s390x) in pprof.go is broken regardless of what patches are made
to the runtime code.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65224
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65193
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65193
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Feb 27 08:41:26 2015
New Revision: 221044
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221044root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-02-27 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52357
Dominik Vogt vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vogt at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65233
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65232
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65227
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||documentation
1 - 100 of 137 matches
Mail list logo