https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53118
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #5)
-feliminate-dwarf2-dups has been disabled for C++ (see PR46102). However,
as noted by Ian in the thread in #c1, there are better ways
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65256
--- Comment #5 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2015-03-02 3:56 PM, law at redhat dot com wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65256
--- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com ---
Certainly possible. We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65278
Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65285
Bug ID: 65285
Summary: __asan_describe_address crashes when used with global
variable
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58158
--- Comment #18 from Aaro Koskinen aaro.koskinen at iki dot fi ---
(In reply to Steve Ellcey from comment #17)
Updated patch posted to gcc-patches.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-03/msg00106.html
Thanks - always good to get rid of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65285
--- Comment #3 from Peter Wu peter at lekensteyn dot nl ---
GCC 4.9.2 cannot include the headers, it blows up on lines such as:
In file included from
/usr/lib/clang/3.5.1/include/sanitizer/common_interface_defs.h:16:0,
from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65277
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
get_untransformed_body should turn itself into noop in !in_lto_p compilation as
all function bodies have DECL_RESULT. (it probably deserves comment, but that
way we check if the body
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65283
Bug ID: 65283
Summary: [SH] lds fpscr not put in delay slot
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65285
--- Comment #2 from Kostya Serebryany kcc at gcc dot gnu.org ---
and for gcc:
% ~/gcc-inst/bin/g++ -fsanitize=address -static-libasan d.cc ./a.out
0x0134f900 is located 0 bytes inside of global variable 'foo' defined in
'd.cc:2:5'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65285
--- Comment #1 from Kostya Serebryany kcc at gcc dot gnu.org ---
What happens if you properly include sanitizer/asan_interface.h?
This is what I see with fresh clang:
% cat d.cc
#include sanitizer/asan_interface.h
int foo[10];
int main(void) {
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65138
Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #34923|0 |1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65263
--- Comment #10 from Paul Pluzhnikov ppluzhnikov at google dot com ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #9)
Paul, I fixed similar bug yesterday, so please check if it works now
I just built at current SVN trunk (r221126).
Filed PR 65287
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65233
--- Comment #19 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com ---
Right. That's the last step for updating the CFG for a series of jump threads.
It's certainly the case that the redirections can leave unreachable blocks.
But the first thing that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65130
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65138
Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65256
--- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com ---
Damn, while I was away, the one thing that came to mind was to ask you for the
preprocessed source so that the issue could be analyzed with a cross compiler.
If indeed this is fixed by
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65284
Bug ID: 65284
Summary: [5 Regression] ICE (segfault) on arm-linux-gnueabihf
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65263
Paul Pluzhnikov ppluzhnikov at google dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65138
--- Comment #8 from Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34925
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34925action=edit
Revised patch #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58158
Steve Ellcey sje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sje at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65263
--- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Paul, I fixed similar bug yesterday, so please check if it works now for you
and if not, please make new PR with a preprocessed source.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65286
Bug ID: 65286
Summary: When building on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu,
--disable-multilib must be used
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63731
--- Comment #30 from Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com ---
The problem mentioned in comment #20 has nothing to do with gccgo. To get
around that problem, use the -installsuffix option. See
http://golang.org/issue/9344 . Note that the docker
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63731
--- Comment #29 from boger at us dot ibm.com ---
Yohei noted in comment 20 that this is also broken with gc in 1.4 when using
static linking. That was a while ago -- is that no longer a problem?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65285
--- Comment #4 from Kostya Serebryany kcc at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Peter Wu from comment #3)
GCC 4.9.2 cannot include the headers, it blows up on lines such as:
In file included from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65287
Bug ID: 65287
Summary: Current trunk ICE in address_matters_p, at
symtab.c:1908
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65278
Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |aldyh at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65285
--- Comment #6 from Kostya Serebryany kcc at gcc dot gnu.org ---
How does your GCC behave with the test case? The sanitizer code in GCC is
imported from Clang, I believe, so it probably does not crash either?
I get this:
~/gcc-inst/bin/gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65285
--- Comment #5 from Peter Wu peter at lekensteyn dot nl ---
(In reply to Kostya Serebryany from comment #4)
I think I know what your problem is.
In C, the globals by default have common linkage and asan does not
instrument them at all and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65289
--- Comment #1 from Matt Hargett matt at use dot net ---
Also reproducible with -O2 -fgraphite-identity .
I use both of these optimizations regularly to help get the most out of
prefetch on the embedded ARM targets I work on.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65263
--- Comment #11 from Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com ---
Martin, your patch passes bootstrap and regression testing on powerpc64-linux.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65288
Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65242
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor msebor at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Unable to reproduce with either test case and either stage1 or a fully
bootstrapped 5.0.0 20150302 on ppc64le.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65288
Bug ID: 65288
Summary: [5 Regression] ICE (in address_matters_p, at
symtab.c:1908) on powerpc64le-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65278
Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65138
--- Comment #10 from Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: meissner
Date: Tue Mar 3 00:59:56 2015
New Revision: 221132
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221132root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-03-02 Michael Meissner
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65242
--- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor msebor at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Although the error is different, similarly to pr65278, unable to reproduce with
a stage1 compiler. Will try after bootstrapping.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65289
Bug ID: 65289
Summary: [5.0 regression] ICE when compiling libjpegturbo with
-floop-nest-optimize
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65287
--- Comment #1 from Paul Pluzhnikov ppluzhnikov at google dot com ---
Created attachment 34928
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34928action=edit
c-reduce'd test case
A much shorter test:
const int __new_sys_siglist[] = {};
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65287
Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58158
--- Comment #19 from Steve Ellcey sje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: sje
Date: Tue Mar 3 00:07:19 2015
New Revision: 221128
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221128root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-03-02 Steve Ellcey sell...@imgtec.com
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65292
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Why do you think this is an issue?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65278
--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz ---
The offending insn gets created in rs6000_output_mi_thunk, but without the
patch there are no thunks, so this function doesn't even get called.
Perhaps either Honza or David can
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65292
--- Comment #2 from Khem Raj raj.khem at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
Why do you think this is an issue?
there is another file in same library where this file object resides which uses
this function and reports
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65291
Bug ID: 65291
Summary: protected using constructor default arguments not
recognized
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65291
--- Comment #1 from webmatematika at hotmail dot com ---
Here is compile error output:
(I added in c.cpp line 4 public: in class C)
voja@vojaws:~/coding$ gcc c.cpp -std=c++11
c.cpp: In constructor ‘C::C()’:
c.cpp:5:11: error: no matching
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65274
Mikhail Maltsev maltsevm at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maltsevm at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65290
Bug ID: 65290
Summary: [C++11] operator new(std::size_t, const
std::nothrow_t) should call operator new(std::size_t)
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65201
Mikhail Maltsev maltsevm at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maltsevm at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63175
--- Comment #24 from Martin Sebor msebor at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #16)
Why is the loop bound to i != 16 / sizeof *s?
The upper bound is intended to make the copied sequence fit into one vector
register,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65292
Bug ID: 65292
Summary: Template function not emitted
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65256
--- Comment #3 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2015-03-02 3:21 PM, John David Anglin wrote:
r220868 was ok and r220883 bad.
My guess is that the problem was introduced in r220875.
Dave
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65130
--- Comment #13 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Mon Mar 2 20:31:21 2015
New Revision: 221124
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221124root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR ipa/65130
* ipa-inline.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65241
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
---
: posix
gcc version 5.0.0 20150302 (experimental) [trunk revision 221099] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk -O1 small.c; a.out
$ gcc-4.9.2 -Os small.c; a.out
$
$ gcc-trunk -Os small.c
$ ./a.out
Aborted (core dumped)
$
---
int a[2];
static int *b = a[0], *c = a[1];
int
main
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65256
--- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com ---
Certainly possible. We ought to be able to see the problem at the assembly
level with a cross compiler, which will help greatly with debugging :-)
I wonder if the ICF framework
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65277
Bug ID: 65277
Summary: ice in get_untransformed_body with -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53927
--- Comment #16 from Tom Tromey tromey at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Pierre-Marie de Rodat from comment #15)
(In reply to Pierre-Marie de Rodat from comment #13)
[1] This patch teaches GDB how to use DW_AT_static_link in order to find
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65270
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
In theory comparing the object alignment with sth like
unsigned int align1, align2;
unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT tem;
get_object_alignment_1 (t1, align1, tem);
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65240
--- Comment #5 from Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org ---
reduced test case for filters.i:
double a, b, d, e;
c, f, g;
double fn1() {
double t;
if (t 0.0)
t = -t;
if (t 1.0)
return 1.0 - t;
t = -t;
if (t .5)
return
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65240
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65263
Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65276
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65277
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65270
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Mar 2 14:31:46 2015
New Revision: 221117
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221117root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-03-02 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53927
--- Comment #15 from Pierre-Marie de Rodat derodat at adacore dot com ---
(In reply to Pierre-Marie de Rodat from comment #13)
[1] This patch teaches GDB how to use DW_AT_static_link in order to find the
frame corresponding to the lexically
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65270
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65258
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34921
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34921action=edit
untested patch
Patch to add additional asserts and to better handle UNDEFINED in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63175
--- Comment #16 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #15)
Btw, first of all unaligned stores are not supported according to the targets
vectorization hook, thus you'd need to peel the loop
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65277
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65006
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63175
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Btw, first of all unaligned stores are not supported according to the targets
vectorization hook, thus you'd need to peel the loop to make the store aligned
which for some reason
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65261
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65262
--- Comment #2 from Goswin von Brederlow goswin-v-b at web dot de ---
The linker script is only there because the default script combines all .text.*
into one hiding the effect. One could use different section names that the
default script does
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65130
--- Comment #12 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I confirm that bug is fixed with that patch. Only for the case that trying to
link with objects created with prior revision will still fail. Later might be
acceptable.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63546
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65271
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65240
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65243
Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65243
--- Comment #3 from Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34917
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34917action=edit
object file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65275
Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65276
Bug ID: 65276
Summary: [5 Regression] LTO: ICE add_type_duplicate, at
ipa-devirt.c:1462
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65258
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
There are of course two issues here - one VRP not optimizing away the dead code
and unrolling creating the dead code in the first place (thus number of
iteration
analysis being not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65276
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34920
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34920action=edit
File two.ii - compile with -O2 (g++ -w -c -flto -O2 -std=c++11 two.ii)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65264
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc64*-*-* |
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65274
Bug ID: 65274
Summary: Internal compiler error: should die in combat
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65240
--- Comment #4 from Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34918
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34918action=edit
preprocessed source
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65240
Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65242
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65248
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65243
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65252
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65184
--- Comment #1 from ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Mon Mar 2 10:47:54 2015
New Revision: 221106
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221106root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/65184
* gcc/config/i386/i386.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65275
Bug ID: 65275
Summary: Disappearing -Wsequence-point warning
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61916
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64212
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||timothygu99 at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65183
--- Comment #1 from ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Mon Mar 2 10:41:09 2015
New Revision: 221105
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221105root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/65183
* tree-chkp.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65263
--- Comment #6 from Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com ---
rev 221098 plus the patch segfaults on the testcase in
cgraph_node::function_symbol. node-callees is NULL.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65241
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65236
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
1 - 100 of 166 matches
Mail list logo
