https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65293
Bug ID: 65293
Summary: improve error message on static_casting incomplete
types.
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65289
Mikhail Maltsev maltsevm at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maltsevm at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65294
--- Comment #1 from Peter Åstrand astrand at cendio dot se ---
Created attachment 34933
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34933action=edit
Activate parts of darwin_default_min_version() even when not cross
The attached patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65263
Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64317
--- Comment #17 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com ---
Thanks Vlad, that patch helped. Prior to your patch we had 15 reloads of the
PIC register from memory, after your patch we have just 9. However, several
of the remaining 9 seem to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65287
Alex Velenko Alex.Velenko at arm dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Alex.Velenko
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65291
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65299
--- Comment #4 from Im ieee ieee at bk dot ru ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3)
My initial reaction is that GCC and ICC/EDG are correct. Name lookup is
performed for operator++ and if a name is found in two different base
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63175
--- Comment #27 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The vector alignment cost varies with processor implementation, not defined by
the architecture. Bill has a patch that adjusts unaligned vector cost for
POWER8, which may affect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65300
Bug ID: 65300
Summary: If one more constructor is defined, default params on
using not passed from parent class
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65289
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53927
--- Comment #20 from Tom Tromey tromey at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Yeah. There wasn't much point submitting it when it wouldn't work anyhow :}
Also see the README.archer file. It explains some changes that are needed.
Also I remember thinking
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53927
--- Comment #19 from Tom Tromey tromey at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Pierre-Marie de Rodat from comment #17)
(In reply to Tom Tromey from comment #16)
I'm curious if you tried it on the test case in this PR.
I did not, but it looks
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65301
Bug ID: 65301
Summary: gcc can't detect some uninit reads in ctor init lists
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65135
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65270
howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||howarth at bromo dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65294
Bug ID: 65294
Summary: No easy way of setting default Mac OS X target -
darwin_minversion not enough
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65287
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65287
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65087
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Mar 3 09:21:56 2015
New Revision: 221133
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221133root=gccview=rev
Log:
Fix PR ipa/65087.
PR ipa/65087
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65295
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65293
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52321
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chengniansun at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65296
Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65296
Bug ID: 65296
Summary: [avr] fix various issues with specs file generation
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53927
--- Comment #18 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Jason suggested to change DW_AT_frame_base in order to make it equal to the
address of the FRAME object. I was not sure:
1) how to do it: location descriptions for all
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65296
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: gjl
Date: Tue Mar 3 11:03:16 2015
New Revision: 221141
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221141root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/
Fix various problems with specs file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64331
--- Comment #6 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: gjl
Date: Tue Mar 3 11:09:30 2015
New Revision: 221142
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221142root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/64331
* config/avr/avr.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65282
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64453
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Preud'homme thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: thopre01
Date: Tue Mar 3 09:32:44 2015
New Revision: 221135
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221135root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-01-23 Thomas Preud'homme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65287
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34935
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34935action=edit
Suggested patch
Following patch skips all alias variables. This condition was part of my
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65291
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64058
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65278
Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56183
Bug 56183 depends on bug 49491, which changed state.
Bug 49491 Summary: Superfluous move because of unnecessary spill for 2-operand
insn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49491
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65301
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I pointed out other similar cases in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18016#c9 when fixing the simple
case of args(args)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65300
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Sigh, I still got it wrong, sorry!
The default ctor is suppressed, because you declared:
C(int c1, int c2, int c3) : A(c1, c2) {}
The solution is still to declare it explicitly:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65300
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
[class.inhctor]/3:
For each non-template constructor in the candidate set of inherited
constructors other than a constructor having no parameters or a copy/move
constructor having a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64099
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65302
Bug ID: 65302
Summary: [5 Regression] LTO: ICE internal compiler error:
verify_flow_info failed
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65263
--- Comment #14 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 65278 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63572
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63175
--- Comment #29 from Bill Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #26)
it makes sense. Note that we seem to prefer optimized re-alignment loads
over misaligned loads (even if double-word aligned) - the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65301
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Yes, this is well known and a dup of another bug, maybe several.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65144
--- Comment #2 from Zaak zbeekman at gmail dot com ---
Try this:
program test3
INTEGER,PARAMETER :: ucs4 = selected_char_kind(ISO_10646)
CHARACTER(3,UCS4),PARAMETER ::
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65291
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65302
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34939
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34939action=edit
two.ii
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61578
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65295
Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64971
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49491
Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64081
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63175
--- Comment #28 from Bill Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I agree with Richi's assessment that this isn't a regression because of the
change in default for cost modeling.
Once my patch lands after GCC 5 releases, and gets backported
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65299
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
[over.match.oper] says c++ does name lookup for operator++ using qualified
lookup for C::operator++ and unqualified lookup for operator++ (and the
built-in candidates, which aren't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65303
Bug ID: 65303
Summary: Tracking bug for ICF issues
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65287
Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15212
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65297
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65277
Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65277
Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65297
Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65298
Bug ID: 65298
Summary: [5 Regression] lto1: ICE: in operator[], at vec.h:736
during LTO/PGO Firefox build
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65277
Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65288
Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65300
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65144
--- Comment #3 from Zaak zbeekman at gmail dot com ---
Similarly if I try to use a substring in an if statement:
program test3
INTEGER,PARAMETER :: ucs4 = selected_char_kind(ISO_10646)
CHARACTER(3,UCS4),PARAMETER ::
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65138
--- Comment #11 from Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: meissner
Date: Tue Mar 3 17:04:01 2015
New Revision: 221155
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221155root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-03-03 Michael Meissner
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65304
Bug ID: 65304
Summary: [4.9] [ARM] incorrect asm operand has impossible
constraints error
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65291
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
We could potentially add a note saying that the default constructor is
suppressed by the presence of another user-declared constructor, but that's
unrelated to inheriting
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65304
--- Comment #1 from cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34941
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34941action=edit
automatically reduced test case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65270
--- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de ---
On March 3, 2015 4:08:17 PM CET, howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65270
howarth at bromo dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65295
Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65298
--- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
ix=1 and m_vecpfx.m_num=1 in this case.
Let me know what other debugging info may be useful to you.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64797
--- Comment #7 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #6)
I think this is probably a bug in the test. I was expecting Stop\\xff\\xff
to cause a conversion error, but it is successfully converted to a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65138
Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5 Regression] testsuite|testsuite ICEs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61831
--- Comment #44 from Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34942
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34942action=edit
Better patch
I'm not working on this, so I'm attaching the current patch in my work
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60367
Václav Zeman vhaisman at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vhaisman at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65138
Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65300
--- Comment #4 from webmatematika at hotmail dot com ---
Thanks for time and explanation.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64883
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65284
Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48188
Zdenek Sojka zsojka at seznam dot cz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65295
Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60367
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Václav Zeman from comment #13)
This bug appears to be affecting 4.7.x series as well. Is there a chance to
get this fixed for 4.7 as well?
No, the 4.7 branch is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64797
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
No, I'm switching the test to use either char16_t or char32_t instead of
wchar_t, because that definitely causes a conversion error (instead of
depending on the native character set
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65144
--- Comment #4 from Zaak zbeekman at gmail dot com ---
My apologies, I responded too quickly to Dominique... I thought we were talking
about: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65125 and failed to realize
that this was something
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65298
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz ---
ix=1 and m_vecpfx.m_num=1 in this case.
Let me know what other debugging info may be useful to you.
This is primarily Martin Jambor's area, so he may beat me. I will try to take
a look
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65298
--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
amdfam10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65270
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61886
--- Comment #35 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Zack,
happy to hear from you again! Indeed the problem back was quite sloppy and we
kind of mixed up symbols, assembler names and declarations in not well defined
way.
I think the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65233
Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65295
--- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Tue Mar 3 18:14:24 2015
New Revision: 221161
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221161root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/65295
* constexpr.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64883
--- Comment #29 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Mar 3 18:14:20 2015
New Revision: 221160
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221160root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-03-03 Iain Sandoe i...@codesourcery.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65138
--- Comment #13 from Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I'm preparing the patches for the back ports to GCC 4.8/4.9. Once those are
committed, I will close the PR.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65305
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64317
--- Comment #18 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com ---
Sigh...
reload_cse_regs doesn't help us because of the CODE_LABEL at the start of block
C in the mini-cfg referenced in c#17. In essence it's using the same extended
block definition
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65298
--- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(gdb) p *jfunc
$10 = {
agg = {
items = 0x0,
by_ref = false
},
alignment = {
known =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65240
--- Comment #8 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Comment #7 means that it fails with -mcpu=power8.
What feature really exposes the problem? -mcpu=power7? -mcpu=power6?
-mcpu=power5?
Thanks, David
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49150
Zaak zbeekman at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009
--- Comment #54 from clyon at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34944
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34944action=edit
compiler-rt-r230324
1 - 100 of 174 matches
Mail list logo