https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65351
Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc-apple-darwin9 |m32
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62205
Victor Porton porton at narod dot ru changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.9.1 |4.9.2
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51776
Bruce Korb bkorb at gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65353
Michael Hudson-Doyle michael.hudson at canonical dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62236
--- Comment #3 from Victor Porton porton at narod dot ru ---
It does not work also with GANT 4.9.2.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61207
Yvan Roux yroux at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64896
Yvan Roux yroux at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mingw.android at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65352
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Oops, that should be:
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/array
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/array
@@ -58,9 +58,9 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_CONTAINER
{
struct _Type { };
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65354
Bug ID: 65354
Summary: Converting lambda to pointer results in double
destruction
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65352
Bug ID: 65352
Summary: arrayT,0::begin()/end() etc. forms a null reference
and breaks on clang+ubsan
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65353
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Matthias Klose from comment #1)
patch by Michael Hudson posted at https://launchpad.net/bugs/1361946
--- a/libgo/go/cmd/cgo/main.go
+++ b/libgo/go/cmd/cgo/main.go
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62235
--- Comment #4 from Victor Porton porton at narod dot ru ---
Also does not work with GNAT 4.9.2.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65351
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
Patch posted at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-02/msg00017.html.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65353
Bug ID: 65353
Summary: [5 Regression] unknown ptrSize for $GOARCH arm64 on
aarch64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65352
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65353
--- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org ---
patch by Michael Hudson posted at https://launchpad.net/bugs/1361946
--- a/libgo/go/cmd/cgo/main.go
+++ b/libgo/go/cmd/cgo/main.go
@@ -133,6 +133,7 @@
386: 4,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64785
--- Comment #7 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #6)
I like your pre-RA pass even if it's a too big hammer for
this specific problem. It should wait the next stage1, though.
It seems
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65354
Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65334
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65334
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Sun Mar 8 23:12:25 2015
New Revision: 221268
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221268root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR ipa/65334
* cgraph.h (symtab_node):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65316
--- Comment #12 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Mon Mar 9 00:29:14 2015
New Revision: 221275
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221275root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR lto/65316
* ipa-utils.h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28628
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65357
Bug ID: 65357
Summary: aggressive loop optimization not correct
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62251
--- Comment #8 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sun Mar 8 22:58:52 2015
New Revision: 221267
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221267root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/62251
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62247
--- Comment #10 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sun Mar 8 23:46:34 2015
New Revision: 221271
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221271root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/62247
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65355
Bug ID: 65355
Summary: [4.8/4.9 Regression] vectorizer increase alignment of
symbols already placed in anchors
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64253
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5 Regression] IPA inline |IPA inline
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65316
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62251
John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65356
Bug ID: 65356
Summary: [meta-bug] Port tail-merge fixes to 4.9
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63743
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Preud'homme thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: thopre01
Date: Mon Mar 9 01:31:42 2015
New Revision: 221276
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221276root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-03-09 Thomas Preud'homme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65357
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65357
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
That is addlist goes one past the end of the array tlist.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65357
--- Comment #3 from Weiming Shih weiming at ms1 dot url.com.tw ---
I see. Thank you.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65358
Bug ID: 65358
Summary: parameter passing bug with tail call optimization on
arm
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65347
Bug ID: 65347
Summary: Final subroutine are not called
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59828
--- Comment #1 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dje
Date: Sun Mar 8 13:40:42 2015
New Revision: 221263
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221263root=gccview=rev
Log:
Add missing PR target/59828 to ChangeLog entry.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60898
--- Comment #23 from Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mikael
Date: Sun Mar 8 11:52:51 2015
New Revision: 221262
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221262root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR fortran/60898
fortran/
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65341
--- Comment #12 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The assembly file should start with
.machine power4
which is the lowest level ISA supported on PPC64 Linux, GLIBC and mtfsf.
If one invokes GCC with multiple -m options, it is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59828
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc*-*-*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65238
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65346
Bug ID: 65346
Summary: [5 Regression] glibc make check failures since r214941
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65346
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34984
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34984action=edit
unreduced testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65341
--- Comment #13 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
It starts with: .machine altivec instead.
But we are talking about powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu here.
And -mpower8 is always right in this case, no?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63960
--- Comment #1 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
- Fix PR64091
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-11/msg03397.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64091
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65341
--- Comment #15 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
GCC is not magic black box for invoking every other part of the toolchain with
the correct options. If the assembly code uses POWER6 (ISA 2.05) instructions,
it should set the ISA
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65243
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65348
Bug ID: 65348
Summary: libstdc++ gdb pretty printer: Use relative imports
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65246
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mustrumr97 at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65348
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65349
Bug ID: 65349
Summary: [5 Regression] go tool crashes, can't compile go code
on 32bit linux systems
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65341
--- Comment #14 from Martin Sebor msebor at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I'm confused: I thought gcc defining the _ARCH_PWR6 macro in response to
-mcpu=power6 or some such implied that the target was power6. Shouldn't gcc
then also invoke the assembler
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65350
Bug ID: 65350
Summary: [C++14] operator new[] should not be called if # of
initializer elements exceeds # of elements
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65350
--- Comment #1 from Mitsuru Kariya kariya_mitsuru at hotmail dot com ---
Created attachment 34985
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34985action=edit
g++ -v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65351
Bug ID: 65351
Summary: [5 Regression] ld: absolute addressing (perhaps
-mdynamic-no-pic) used in
_byte_common_op_match_null_string_p from
56 matches
Mail list logo