[Bug target/65351] [5 Regression] ld: absolute addressing (perhaps -mdynamic-no-pic) used in _byte_common_op_match_null_string_p from ../libiberty/pic/libiberty.a(regex.o) not allowed ... on powerpc-a

2015-03-08 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65351 Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc-apple-darwin9 |m32

[Bug ada/62205] GNAT does not accept class types for Default_Iterator

2015-03-08 Thread porton at narod dot ru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62205 Victor Porton porton at narod dot ru changed: What|Removed |Added Version|4.9.1 |4.9.2 --- Comment

[Bug preprocessor/51776] fixincludes hacks around a C++ deficiency

2015-03-08 Thread bkorb at gnu dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51776 Bruce Korb bkorb at gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug go/65353] [5 Regression] unknown ptrSize for $GOARCH arm64 on aarch64-linux-gnu

2015-03-08 Thread michael.hudson at canonical dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65353 Michael Hudson-Doyle michael.hudson at canonical dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug ada/62236] built-in: error: aggregate value used where an integer was expected

2015-03-08 Thread porton at narod dot ru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62236 --- Comment #3 from Victor Porton porton at narod dot ru --- It does not work also with GANT 4.9.2.

[Bug middle-end/61207] [4.9 Regression] Win64 gcc 4.9.0: ICE in in expand_expr_addr_expr_1 at -Os compiling some C++ code

2015-03-08 Thread yroux at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61207 Yvan Roux yroux at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug ipa/64896] [5 Regression] ICE in get_address_mode, at rtlanal.c:5442

2015-03-08 Thread yroux at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64896 Yvan Roux yroux at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mingw.android at

[Bug libstdc++/65352] arrayT,0::begin()/end() etc. forms a null reference and breaks on clang+ubsan

2015-03-08 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65352 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- Oops, that should be: --- a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/array +++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/array @@ -58,9 +58,9 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_CONTAINER { struct _Type { }; -

[Bug c++/65354] New: Converting lambda to pointer results in double destruction

2015-03-08 Thread charlie at charliedyson dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65354 Bug ID: 65354 Summary: Converting lambda to pointer results in double destruction Product: gcc Version: 4.8.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/65352] New: arrayT,0::begin()/end() etc. forms a null reference and breaks on clang+ubsan

2015-03-08 Thread rs2740 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65352 Bug ID: 65352 Summary: arrayT,0::begin()/end() etc. forms a null reference and breaks on clang+ubsan Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug go/65353] [5 Regression] unknown ptrSize for $GOARCH arm64 on aarch64-linux-gnu

2015-03-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65353 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Matthias Klose from comment #1) patch by Michael Hudson posted at https://launchpad.net/bugs/1361946 --- a/libgo/go/cmd/cgo/main.go +++ b/libgo/go/cmd/cgo/main.go

[Bug ada/62235] segmentation fault on Ada 2012 code

2015-03-08 Thread porton at narod dot ru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62235 --- Comment #4 from Victor Porton porton at narod dot ru --- Also does not work with GNAT 4.9.2.

[Bug target/65351] [5 Regression] ld: absolute addressing (perhaps -mdynamic-no-pic) used in _byte_common_op_match_null_string_p from ../libiberty/pic/libiberty.a(regex.o) not allowed ... on powerpc-a

2015-03-08 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65351 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- Patch posted at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-02/msg00017.html.

[Bug go/65353] New: [5 Regression] unknown ptrSize for $GOARCH arm64 on aarch64-linux-gnu

2015-03-08 Thread doko at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65353 Bug ID: 65353 Summary: [5 Regression] unknown ptrSize for $GOARCH arm64 on aarch64-linux-gnu Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/65352] arrayT,0::begin()/end() etc. forms a null reference and breaks on clang+ubsan

2015-03-08 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65352 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug go/65353] [5 Regression] unknown ptrSize for $GOARCH arm64 on aarch64-linux-gnu

2015-03-08 Thread doko at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65353 --- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org --- patch by Michael Hudson posted at https://launchpad.net/bugs/1361946 --- a/libgo/go/cmd/cgo/main.go +++ b/libgo/go/cmd/cgo/main.go @@ -133,6 +133,7 @@ 386: 4,

[Bug target/64785] [5 Regression][SH] and|or|xor #imm not used

2015-03-08 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64785 --- Comment #7 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #6) I like your pre-RA pass even if it's a too big hammer for this specific problem. It should wait the next stage1, though. It seems

[Bug c++/65354] Converting lambda to pointer results in double destruction

2015-03-08 Thread daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65354 Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug ipa/65334] [5 Regression] r221099 caused: FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/in-pack.f90 execution, -O2 -ftree-vectorize -msse2

2015-03-08 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65334 Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug ipa/65334] [5 Regression] r221099 caused: FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/in-pack.f90 execution, -O2 -ftree-vectorize -msse2

2015-03-08 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65334 --- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hubicka Date: Sun Mar 8 23:12:25 2015 New Revision: 221268 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221268root=gccview=rev Log: PR ipa/65334 * cgraph.h (symtab_node):

[Bug lto/65316] [5 Regression] LTO: Uninitialized memory / ICE with -g -fno-lto-odr-type-merging: in types_same_for_odr, at ipa-devirt.c:465

2015-03-08 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65316 --- Comment #12 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hubicka Date: Mon Mar 9 00:29:14 2015 New Revision: 221275 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221275root=gccview=rev Log: PR lto/65316 * ipa-utils.h

[Bug middle-end/28628] Not forcing alignment of arrays in structs with -fsection-anchors

2015-03-08 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28628 Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc

[Bug c/65357] New: aggressive loop optimization not correct

2015-03-08 Thread weiming at ms1 dot url.com.tw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65357 Bug ID: 65357 Summary: aggressive loop optimization not correct Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug target/62251] FAIL: gfortran.dg/quad_2.f90 execution test

2015-03-08 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62251 --- Comment #8 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: danglin Date: Sun Mar 8 22:58:52 2015 New Revision: 221267 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221267root=gccview=rev Log: PR target/62251 *

[Bug target/62247] [5 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/abi/anon3.C -std=c++98 scan-assembler .weak(_definition)

2015-03-08 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62247 --- Comment #10 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: danglin Date: Sun Mar 8 23:46:34 2015 New Revision: 221271 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221271root=gccview=rev Log: PR target/62247 *

[Bug tree-optimization/65355] New: [4.8/4.9 Regression] vectorizer increase alignment of symbols already placed in anchors

2015-03-08 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65355 Bug ID: 65355 Summary: [4.8/4.9 Regression] vectorizer increase alignment of symbols already placed in anchors Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ipa/64253] IPA inline analysis processes a code transform operation

2015-03-08 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64253 Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[5 Regression] IPA inline |IPA inline

[Bug lto/65316] [5 Regression] LTO: Uninitialized memory / ICE with -g -fno-lto-odr-type-merging: in types_same_for_odr, at ipa-devirt.c:465

2015-03-08 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65316 Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/62251] FAIL: gfortran.dg/quad_2.f90 execution test

2015-03-08 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62251 John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/65356] New: [meta-bug] Port tail-merge fixes to 4.9

2015-03-08 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65356 Bug ID: 65356 Summary: [meta-bug] Port tail-merge fixes to 4.9 Product: gcc Version: 4.9.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/63743] Thumb1: big regression for float operators by r216728

2015-03-08 Thread thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63743 --- Comment #9 from Thomas Preud'homme thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: thopre01 Date: Mon Mar 9 01:31:42 2015 New Revision: 221276 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221276root=gccview=rev Log: 2015-03-09 Thomas Preud'homme

[Bug c/65357] aggressive loop optimization not correct

2015-03-08 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65357 Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/65357] aggressive loop optimization not correct

2015-03-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65357 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- That is addlist goes one past the end of the array tlist.

[Bug c/65357] aggressive loop optimization not correct

2015-03-08 Thread weiming at ms1 dot url.com.tw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65357 --- Comment #3 from Weiming Shih weiming at ms1 dot url.com.tw --- I see. Thank you.

[Bug target/65358] New: parameter passing bug with tail call optimization on arm

2015-03-08 Thread hong.gyu.kim at lge dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65358 Bug ID: 65358 Summary: parameter passing bug with tail call optimization on arm Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: critical

[Bug fortran/65347] New: Final subroutine are not called

2015-03-08 Thread eddyg_61-bugzilla at yahoo dot it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65347 Bug ID: 65347 Summary: Final subroutine are not called Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug target/59828] Broken assembly on ppc* with two -mcpu= options

2015-03-08 Thread dje at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59828 --- Comment #1 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: dje Date: Sun Mar 8 13:40:42 2015 New Revision: 221263 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221263root=gccview=rev Log: Add missing PR target/59828 to ChangeLog entry.

[Bug fortran/60898] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] model compile error with gfortran 4.7 and gcc 4.9

2015-03-08 Thread mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60898 --- Comment #23 from Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: mikael Date: Sun Mar 8 11:52:51 2015 New Revision: 221262 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221262root=gccview=rev Log: PR fortran/60898 fortran/ *

[Bug target/65341] [5 Regression] glibc build failure on ppc64le: setcontext.S:367: Error: junk at end of line: `1,0'

2015-03-08 Thread dje at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65341 --- Comment #12 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org --- The assembly file should start with .machine power4 which is the lowest level ISA supported on PPC64 Linux, GLIBC and mtfsf. If one invokes GCC with multiple -m options, it is

[Bug target/59828] Broken assembly on ppc* with two -mcpu= options

2015-03-08 Thread dje at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59828 David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc*-*-*

[Bug preprocessor/65238] [5 Regression] __has_attribute is not handled properly with -traditional-cpp.

2015-03-08 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65238 Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktietz at gcc dot

[Bug middle-end/65346] New: [5 Regression] glibc make check failures since r214941

2015-03-08 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65346 Bug ID: 65346 Summary: [5 Regression] glibc make check failures since r214941 Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug middle-end/65346] [5 Regression] glibc make check failures since r214941

2015-03-08 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65346 --- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 34984 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34984action=edit unreduced testcase

[Bug target/65341] [5 Regression] glibc build failure on ppc64le: setcontext.S:367: Error: junk at end of line: `1,0'

2015-03-08 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65341 --- Comment #13 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org --- It starts with: .machine altivec instead. But we are talking about powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu here. And -mpower8 is always right in this case, no?

[Bug tree-optimization/63960] [meta-bug] Port tail-merge fixes to 4.8

2015-03-08 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63960 --- Comment #1 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- - Fix PR64091 https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-11/msg03397.html

[Bug tree-optimization/64091] [5 Regression] ICE in update_debug_stmt, at tree-ssa-tail-merge.c:1620

2015-03-08 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64091 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/65341] [5 Regression] glibc build failure on ppc64le: setcontext.S:367: Error: junk at end of line: `1,0'

2015-03-08 Thread dje at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65341 --- Comment #15 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org --- GCC is not magic black box for invoking every other part of the toolchain with the correct options. If the assembly code uses POWER6 (ISA 2.05) instructions, it should set the ISA

[Bug lto/65243] [5 Regression] lto1 ICE (segfault) on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

2015-03-08 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65243 Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc

[Bug libstdc++/65348] New: libstdc++ gdb pretty printer: Use relative imports

2015-03-08 Thread mustrumr97 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65348 Bug ID: 65348 Summary: libstdc++ gdb pretty printer: Use relative imports Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug libstdc++/65246] [5 Regression] libstdc++ pretty printers don't work anymore with Python3

2015-03-08 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65246 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mustrumr97 at

[Bug libstdc++/65348] libstdc++ gdb pretty printer: Use relative imports

2015-03-08 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65348 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug go/65349] New: [5 Regression] go tool crashes, can't compile go code on 32bit linux systems

2015-03-08 Thread doko at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65349 Bug ID: 65349 Summary: [5 Regression] go tool crashes, can't compile go code on 32bit linux systems Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/65341] [5 Regression] glibc build failure on ppc64le: setcontext.S:367: Error: junk at end of line: `1,0'

2015-03-08 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65341 --- Comment #14 from Martin Sebor msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- I'm confused: I thought gcc defining the _ARCH_PWR6 macro in response to -mcpu=power6 or some such implied that the target was power6. Shouldn't gcc then also invoke the assembler

[Bug c/65350] New: [C++14] operator new[] should not be called if # of initializer elements exceeds # of elements

2015-03-08 Thread kariya_mitsuru at hotmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65350 Bug ID: 65350 Summary: [C++14] operator new[] should not be called if # of initializer elements exceeds # of elements Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/65350] [C++14] operator new[] should not be called if # of initializer elements exceeds # of elements

2015-03-08 Thread kariya_mitsuru at hotmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65350 --- Comment #1 from Mitsuru Kariya kariya_mitsuru at hotmail dot com --- Created attachment 34985 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34985action=edit g++ -v

[Bug target/65351] New: [5 Regression] ld: absolute addressing (perhaps -mdynamic-no-pic) used in _byte_common_op_match_null_string_p from ../libiberty/pic/libiberty.a(regex.o) not allowed ... on powe

2015-03-08 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65351 Bug ID: 65351 Summary: [5 Regression] ld: absolute addressing (perhaps -mdynamic-no-pic) used in _byte_common_op_match_null_string_p from