https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44563
--- Comment #16 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
callgrind shows the cgraph_edge_hasher quite high in the profile (via
redirect_all_calls). I suppose as the large main is a single BB walking
all stmts over-and-over is quite
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65335
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65238
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||emsr at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65346
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43660
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
(In reply to comment #0)
[Note that the same issue exists with other ways of invoking using the
generator (e.g., a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64446
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65270
--- Comment #33 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Mar 9 13:54:28 2015
New Revision: 221281
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221281root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-03-09 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65353
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65342
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64351
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64467
--- Comment #17 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Mar 9 12:47:51 2015
New Revision: 221279
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221279root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/64467
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65270
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65338
Thomas Schwinge tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||openacc,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65337
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64467
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65330
Bug 65330 depends on bug 65270, which changed state.
Bug 65270 Summary: [5 regression] issues with merging memory accesses from
different code paths
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65270
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65270
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65341
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65351
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65349
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65361
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65292
--- Comment #8 from John Marino gnugcc at marino dot st ---
As a final follow up, webkit-qt5 built on a March 8 version of gcc5 with no
changes from my previous attempt.
Good news, thanks for the patch!
John
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65338
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.0 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65321
--- Comment #10 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Thanks, looks good to me too FWIW.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65361
Bug ID: 65361
Summary: [5 Regression] LTO: tree check: expected tree that
contains ‘decl minimal’ structure, have ‘tree_binfo’
in add_type_duplicate, at ipa-devirt.c:1509
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65361
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34990
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34990action=edit
two.ii
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64715
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65269
Andrew Sutton andrew.n.sutton at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65222
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65121
--- Comment #5 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ramana
Date: Mon Mar 9 15:19:20 2015
New Revision: 221282
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221282root=gccview=rev
Log:
Fix PR number for 65121 in Changelog.
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44563
--- Comment #18 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #17)
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #16)
callgrind shows the cgraph_edge_hasher quite high in the profile (via
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65361
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
Untested fix
Thanks! It looks good for the the original two unreduced files. Also, I have
finally been able again to compile the full
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65349
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65361
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lto/pr65361_0.C.jj2015-03-09 16:43:42.720534781
+0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lto/pr65361_0.C2015-03-09 16:47:00.325356410 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+//
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65353
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65355
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65121
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65323
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65361
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65177
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65361
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65362
Bug ID: 65362
Summary: OpenACC compilation on Tegra K1 (ARM)
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libgomp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44563
--- Comment #17 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #16)
callgrind shows the cgraph_edge_hasher quite high in the profile (via
redirect_all_calls). I suppose as the large main is a single
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53927
--- Comment #21 from Pierre-Marie de Rodat derodat at adacore dot com ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #18)
I think this is worth investigating though because it's conceptually
much simpler than adding yet another indirection. And
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53927
--- Comment #22 from Pierre-Marie de Rodat derodat at adacore dot com ---
(In reply to Tom Tromey from comment #20)
Yeah. There wasn't much point submitting it when it wouldn't work anyhow :}
Also see the README.archer file. It explains some
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65342
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65242
--- Comment #8 from Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I'm going to start looking at this. I suspect the issue is we need more checks
about the offset in TOC references. In particular, the 64-bit GPR load/store
instruction (ld,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65024
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65121
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65121
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62630
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P2
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65045
Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65341
--- Comment #16 from Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org ---
As I can see there are several issues/whatever.
1) Each of the _ARCH_PWRn is cumulative, so if you say -mcpu=power8 for
instance, it defines _ARCH_PWR4, _ARCH_PWR5,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64317
--- Comment #23 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com ---
So with a functional prototype in place, I can get good code for this test.
However, deeper testing of that prototype is proving difficult simply because
the postreload-gcse.c code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65345
--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot
com ---
Or e.g.
_Atomic int i = 5;
int j = sizeof (i + 1);
which is valid code not involving _Generic. And, similarly:
_Atomic int i = 5;
int j = sizeof (i = 0);
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65363
Bug ID: 65363
Summary: trivial redundant code reordering makes code less
optimal
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65345
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
FWIW, my testcase was
/* PR c/65345 */
/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options } */
_Atomic int i = 3;
int g1 = sizeof (i + 1) + sizeof (-i);
int g2 = __builtin_constant_p (i +
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65364
Bug ID: 65364
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-19.c (test for warnings, line 22)
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65222
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65341
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65120
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Mar 9 18:26:52 2015
New Revision: 221284
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221284root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c/65120
* c-typeck.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65364
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
See https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-02/msg00557.html for a patch and
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-02/msg00737.html for some analysis for
darwin.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63958
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Mar 9 18:25:28 2015
New Revision: 221283
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221283root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/63958
Reapply:
2014-10-14
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65364
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65345
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #4)
Or e.g.
_Atomic int i = 5;
int j = sizeof (i + 1);
which is valid code not involving _Generic. And, similarly:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64999
--- Comment #40 from boger at us dot ibm.com ---
Created attachment 34995
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34995action=edit
Proposed fix
Here is my proposed fix to correct the problem on Power, and mostly fix it for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65310
Pat Haugen pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pthaugen at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65365
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63504
Bug 63504 depends on bug 63988, which changed state.
Bug 63988 Summary: heap-buffer-overflow in combine.c on ppc64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63988
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25672
Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65242
Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #34994|0 |1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65366
Bug ID: 65366
Summary: gdbhooks.py is incompatible with Python3
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65242
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65367
Bug ID: 65367
Summary: indefinite loop occurs with sanitize enabled and
certain optimization options
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63988
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65242
Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #34996|0 |1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64999
--- Comment #41 from Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com ---
I really don't want libbacktrace to be processor-dependent. That makes all
uses of it more complex for no significant gain. Maybe we should change
libbacktrace, but definitely not by
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64807
Bug 64807 depends on bug 63988, which changed state.
Bug 63988 Summary: heap-buffer-overflow in combine.c on ppc64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63988
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60780
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
Is 40958 a duplicate of this PR or is there something else lurking?
AFAIU pr40958 comment 13, Janne was anticipating possible exponential behaviors
from a rather theoretical
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63958
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63958
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Fixed for GCC 5 now, but the problem will likely reappear during next merge :(.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65365
Bug ID: 65365
Summary: false positive signed negation
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: sanitizer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65339
Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65284
Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60780
Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65361
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65361
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Mar 9 20:19:34 2015
New Revision: 221286
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221286root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR lto/65361
* ipa-devirt.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65339
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65364
--- Comment #3 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2015-03-09 2:08 PM, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65364
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
See
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65339
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Mar 9 19:59:54 2015
New Revision: 221285
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221285root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/65339
* call.c: Don't call
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65242
--- Comment #9 from Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34994
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34994action=edit
Proposed patch to fix the problem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63988
Martin Sebor msebor at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65286
--- Comment #4 from Alan Modra amodra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: amodra
Date: Mon Mar 9 23:19:19 2015
New Revision: 221289
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221289root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/65286
* config.gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65286
--- Comment #3 from Alan Modra amodra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: amodra
Date: Mon Mar 9 23:18:57 2015
New Revision: 221288
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221288root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/65286
* config.gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65286
--- Comment #5 from Alan Modra amodra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: amodra
Date: Mon Mar 9 23:19:44 2015
New Revision: 221290
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221290root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/65286
* config.gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64382
Adam Butcher abutcher at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61636
Adam Butcher abutcher at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lh_mouse at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61636
--- Comment #12 from Adam Butcher abutcher at gcc dot gnu.org ---
If the containing context is made a template (as per pr64382 and pr64466) or if
the patch below is made to lambda.c, the synthesized default 'this' looks to
get captured OK, but
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65368
Bug ID: 65368
Summary: _bzhi_u32 intrinsic generates incorrect code when -O1
or above is specified and index is an immediate
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65370
Bug ID: 65370
Summary: [5 Regression] rejects valid code on
powerpc64le-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
1 - 100 of 156 matches
Mail list logo