https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65458
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #35051|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65464
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65455
--- Comment #11 from Jens Gustedt jens.gustedt at inria dot fr ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #10)
On Wed, 18 Mar 2015, jens.gustedt at inria dot fr wrote:
(Perhaps gcc interprets _Generic as you say, but even the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60851
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65240
--- Comment #15 from Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: meissner
Date: Thu Mar 19 22:37:33 2015
New Revision: 221524
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221524root=gccview=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2015-03-19 Michael Meissner
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62109
--- Comment #8 from David gccbugzilla at limegreensocks dot com ---
(In reply to Kai Tietz from comment #7)
The first code block in comment #6 is what is in the code now. As you can see,
it already has the #define you are describing. I don't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65479
Bug ID: 65479
Summary: sanitizer stack trace missing frames past #0 on
powerpc64
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65443
--- Comment #6 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
After looking into it a bit further, I think what we're trying to get is:
...
bb x:
goto bb y;
bb 4:
i_17 = (int) ivtmp_y;
_7 = (long unsigned int) i_17;
_8 = _7 * 4;
_9 = pretmp_24
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65467
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot
com ---
The issue is that someone needs to go through all the parsing for OpenMP
constructs, and figure out exactly where to add calls to
convert_lvalue_to_rvalue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65478
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |ipa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65481
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
contrib/gcc_update --touch is usually used to fix this problem.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65464
--- Comment #8 from Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Alan told me that you can work around it by configuring with
--enable-targets=powerpcle-linux --disable-multilib
to still have the -m32 option recognized.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65466
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot
com ---
On Thu, 19 Mar 2015, manu at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
(If I was re-doing that patch again, I will try to overload inform(), because
inform_with_flags is just
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65474
--- Comment #2 from wmi at google dot com ---
Created attachment 35069
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35069action=edit
microbench
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60939
--- Comment #6 from Zoltan Hidvegi zoltan at hidvegi dot com ---
gcc collect2 links the programs twice, first it links just all the object and
archive files passed, then it parses the output and if necessary creates a
source file that contains
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65240
Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65480
Bug ID: 65480
Summary: libstdc++-prettyprinters/libfundts.cc test failures on
powepc64
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65479
--- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor msebor at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The same problem is causing failures in the following tests on these targets:
c-c++-common/asan/misalign-2.c
c-c++-common/asan/null-deref-1.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65474
--- Comment #3 from wmi at google dot com ---
Thanks. You are right. I wrote a microbenchmark (attached), and tested it on
different intel microarchitectures.
westmere:
1.gcc.out:19.42
1.llvm.out: 19.32
sandybridge:
1.gcc.out:18.61
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65481
Bug ID: 65481
Summary: _Pragma GCC dependency broken on powerpc64
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65478
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mjambor at suse
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65466
--- Comment #3 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #2)
On Thu, 19 Mar 2015, manu at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
(If I was re-doing that patch again, I will try to overload
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65455
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59526
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65465
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65235
--- Comment #10 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Thu Mar 19 09:58:42 2015
New Revision: 221511
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221511root=gccview=rev
Log:
[simplify-rtx] PR 65235: Calculate element size correctly
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65400
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65400
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Mar 19 10:12:34 2015
New Revision: 221512
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221512root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/65400
* tsan.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56636
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65455
--- Comment #13 from Jens Gustedt jens.gustedt at inria dot fr ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #12)
What does clang differently wrt _Generic?
Arrays. I don't recall which way around, but one of gcc and clang converts
array types to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59760
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60595
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sshannin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65467
Bug ID: 65467
Summary: [libgomp] sorry, unimplemented: '_Atomic' with OpenMP
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60595
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65470
Bug ID: 65470
Summary: regex_search corrupts matches when haystack is
destroyed
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65455
--- Comment #14 from Jens Gustedt jens.gustedt at inria dot fr ---
Perhaps we should end the discussion here, this goes too far for a bug report,
and we should push for a solution of this type of questions by the C committee.
Perhaps you could
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60595
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59702
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59729
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59739
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65469
Bug ID: 65469
Summary: ICE on bad code
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62051
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65358
--- Comment #17 from Honggyu Kim hong.gyu.kim at lge dot com ---
(In reply to ktkachov from comment #16)
I'm working on a patch btw.
This bug is only shown in arm code so maybe the bug is in gcc/config/arm
directory.
I was trying to fix it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64265
--- Comment #27 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Mar 19 07:55:22 2015
New Revision: 221509
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221509root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/64265
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59686
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com ---
Mainline properly rejects this. I'm adding the testcase and closing the bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65358
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62051
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59950
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65449
--- Comment #2 from ma.jiang at zte dot com.cn ---
(In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #1)
Hi Richard,
the invalid/different code for -O2 -fstrict-volatile-bitfields will be
fixed with my proposed patch, because the misalignedness of mm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65358
--- Comment #18 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Honggyu Kim from comment #17)
(In reply to ktkachov from comment #16)
I'm working on a patch btw.
This bug is only shown in arm code so maybe the bug is in gcc/config/arm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60583
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65455
--- Comment #16 from Jens Gustedt jens.gustedt at inria dot fr ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #15)
Usually such bugs are SUSPENDED with reference to the DR and when the DR is
resolved, the bug is resolved accordingly.
Here the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62109
--- Comment #7 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I agree that we change it to
#define __GTHR_W32_InterlockedCompareExchange InterlockedCompareExchange
not sure if we actually should error out here at all. We might want to remove
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65455
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65468
Bug ID: 65468
Summary: Optimize static schedule with chunk_size one
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65072
--- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Here, we SEGV in build_class_member_access_expr, called recursively:
tree anonymous_union;
anonymous_union = lookup_anon_field (TREE_TYPE (object),
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65072
--- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(Just bailing out of build_class_member_access_expr if MEMBER is null fixes the
ICE, but in view of the unclarity above I don't think it's the right fix.)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59550
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65467
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This is indeed just a big hammer approach.
The OpenMP standard only supports C up to C99 and C++ up to C++98 at this
point, for _Atomic it is non-trivial to figure out how it should
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65468
--- Comment #1 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Using the patch submitted for gomp-4_0-branch at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-07/msg01881.html, we get a simple loop:
...
bar._omp_fn.0 (struct .omp_data_s.0 restrict .omp_data_i)
{
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65455
--- Comment #17 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jens Gustedt from comment #16)
Here the situation is a bit more complicated, since __typeof__ is an
extension to C, so no DR will directly say something about this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65400
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Mar 19 07:53:38 2015
New Revision: 221508
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221508root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/65400
* ipa-split.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59686
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Mar 19 08:57:01 2015
New Revision: 221510
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221510root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-03-19 Paolo Carlini
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65465
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50025
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59579
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59686
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59729
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60180
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60687
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52659
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com ---
This is fixed for 5.0. I'm adding the testcase and closing the bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52659
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56636
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52659
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Mar 19 11:02:47 2015
New Revision: 221513
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221513root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-03-19 Paolo Carlini
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65470
--- Comment #1 from aral at gmx dot de ---
AFAICT the same bug is applicable to the regex_match function. Sorry for the
copy paste error in the very last comment.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64715
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
So, given that you promoted this to P1, what are we going to do with this?
This indeed started with r214941, and from objsz POV, in *.original, while it
changed from:
- strcpy
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64715
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I do think that the gimplifiers folding is premature. All propagators know
to apply the trick internally. This premature folding is probably to avoid
regressions with removing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63230
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64715
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
For the option of not folding this to MEM_REFs before objsz pass, I'd note this
could be just about the MEM_REF cases, if there is an actual memory access, so
we aren't taking the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65483
Bug ID: 65483
Summary: bzip2 bsR/bsW should be auto-inlined
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ipa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65449
--- Comment #4 from ma.jiang at zte dot com.cn ---
Hi Bernd,
Thanks for your apply.
(In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #3)
Yes, but that is not the fault of the strict volatile code path any more.
// Sure,I agree with you. The
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65482
Bug ID: 65482
Summary: -mno-allow-movmisalign undocumented
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: driver
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64432
Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65483
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenther at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65475
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The following should help:
Index: ipa-devirt.c
===
--- ipa-devirt.c(revision 221528)
+++ ipa-devirt.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64164
--- Comment #22 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com ---
Let's try to stay focused. Killing copyrename seems like a fine thing to do as
long as the resulting debug info is good. But that's independent of this BZ.
I still find myself
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65483
--- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Benchmarking build with -O3 -flto -Ofast -funroll-loops
For mainline I get (running on input.graphic)
real0m35.673s
user0m35.556s
sys 0m0.133s
and setting
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65484
Bug ID: 65484
Summary: FAIL: g++.dg/vect/pr36648.cc on powerpc64
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65478
Bug ID: 65478
Summary: crafty performance regression
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65464
--- Comment #7 from Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com ---
On x86_64-linux you can run 32-bit binaries. On powerpc64le-linux you can't.
It's that simple. -m32 support in powerpc64le gcc, by default, doesn't make
sense until we have
- supported
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65456
--- Comment #7 from Anton Blanchard anton at samba dot org ---
Thanks Martin.
Bill: the swaps pass isn't catching our vectorised copy, I guess because of the
adds in the loop:
lxvd2x 0,9,4
addi 28,1,-48
add 6,9,10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65466
--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot
com ---
On Thu, 19 Mar 2015, manu at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65466
--- Comment #3 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65465
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: marxin
Date: Thu Mar 19 17:35:52 2015
New Revision: 221518
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221518root=gccview=rev
Log:
Fix for PR ipa/65465.
PR ipa/65465
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65380
Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65046
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Mar 19 19:31:48 2015
New Revision: 221521
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221521root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/65046
Automatically propagate ABI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59739
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65475
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65470
--- Comment #5 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com ---
(In reply to aral from comment #3)
I don't argue that it might be a misunderstanding of the user, hence my
suggestion 1) - however, I disagree with your wording
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65046
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65476
Bug ID: 65476
Summary: Long_Float array does not byte swap correctly when set
to Scalar_Storage_Order with High Order First
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
1 - 100 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
