https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65464
--- Comment #9 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #7)
On x86_64-linux you can run 32-bit binaries. On powerpc64le-linux you
can't. It's that simple. -m32 support in powerpc64le gcc,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65464
--- Comment #10 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
And even with !IA32_EMULATION the kernel build uses -m16 a few times on x86_64.
Please note that we're talking about -ffreestanding target here.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65477
--- Comment #1 from Pavel Zhukov pavel at zhukoff dot net ---
This patch works for me:
Build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9275707
Patch:
diff --git a/gcc/ada/gcc-interface/Makefile.in
b/gcc/ada/gcc-interface/Makefile.in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65485
Bug ID: 65485
Summary: Use openmp in dynamic library but not in calling
program causes segfault at the end of execution
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60851
--- Comment #11 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Fri Mar 20 06:07:30 2015
New Revision: 221529
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221529root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/60851
* recog.c (constrain_operands):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65347
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65486
Bug ID: 65486
Summary: ICE: in type_natural_mode, at config/i386/i386.c:6646
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65487
Bug ID: 65487
Summary: fdump-passes uses random function as context
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: other
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65487
--- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
patch approved for stage1:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-03/msg01054.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65470
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Your program's invalid for other reasons too, you can't mix strdup and delete.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65488
--- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Another way of dealing with this is to add a TODO_nodump or TODO_earlyout:
...
@@ -2395,7 +2408,7 @@ unsigned
pass_parallelize_loops::execute (function *fun)
{
if (number_of_loops (fun) = 1)
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65478
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65102
--- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
gnat-style.texi part approved:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-02/msg01337.html
requested approval for fdl.texi part from docs co-maintainer:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65451
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Fri Mar 20 10:15:33 2015
New Revision: 221531
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221531root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR ada/65451
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65451
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65489
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65489
Bug ID: 65489
Summary: [5.0 Regression] Testcase for PR 65427 ICEs at -Os on
arm-none-eabi in hoist pass
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59739
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65486
--- Comment #3 from David Abdurachmanov david.abdurachmanov at gmail dot com
---
Forgot this is on x86_64. Also tested with Clang 3.5, which worked fine.
It seems to that it's also ICE'ing on AArch64, but in expr.c if a single long
double is in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65474
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65475
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65072
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65490
Bug ID: 65490
Summary: terminals.c:1266:21: warning: argument to ‘sizeof’ in
‘bzero’ call is the same expression as the destination
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65477
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65072
--- Comment #9 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Likely started with r151360 -- which doesn't reveal much, this rev was a part
of LTO merge, dealing with gimplification of types and symbols.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65487
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65487
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65487
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #2 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65454
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65470
--- Comment #8 from aral at gmx dot de ---
I agree that updating the documentation exceeds the responsibility of this bug
reporting system, and if the behavior is intended, it is not a bug. The
severity was referring to the case had the behavior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65486
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65491
Bug ID: 65491
Summary: [aarch64] ICE: in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:3609
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61275
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65491
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65072
--- Comment #11 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #10)
Actually, sorry for the error, it really started with r151529.
Thanks -- I think I have a fix now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65470
Sergey Zubkov cubbi at cubbi dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cubbi at cubbi dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62109
--- Comment #9 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to David from comment #8)
(In reply to Kai Tietz from comment #7)
The first code block in comment #6 is what is in the code now. As you can
see, it already has the #define
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65469
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65469
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65485
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65454
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65475
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Unfortunately, there is another problem with applied patch:
$ cat 1.ii
namespace std {
class exception {};
class runtime_error : exception {
virtual char m_fn1();
} a;
}
$ cat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65500
--- Comment #1 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2015-03-20, at 5:00 PM, danglin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
FAIL: 17_intro/headers/c++2014/all_attributes.cc (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64366
Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65076
--- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Concerning Comment #7, I do not think the sreal refactoring screwed things up.
sreals are not high on profile and the code generated is not worse (performance
wise). It is not better,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60939
--- Comment #8 from Zoltan Hidvegi zoltan at hidvegi dot com ---
How about using -bkeepfile: for all linked .o objects, that would create a very
similar semantics to other platforms, all .o objects are included, and only
objects that resolve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60939
--- Comment #7 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I had not noticed the lack of a reference to any symbol in the file, so missing
the static constructor. -bexpfull probably would work around that problem but
likely cause another.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64715
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Mar 20 12:39:32 2015
New Revision: 221532
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221532root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-03-20 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61275
--- Comment #7 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
First sentence of F2008, 7.1.12 is:
A constant expression is an expression with limitations that make it
suitable for use as a kind type parameter, *initializer*, or named
constant. It
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65493
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65493
--- Comment #1 from sophana ml-gnubugzilla at worldspot dot net ---
Forgot to say that the result is the same on all tested gcc versions on various
targets. All work with -O1 and not with -O3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65494
Bug ID: 65494
Summary: [5.0 Regression] Loop is not vectorized because of
operand canonicalization.
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61275
--- Comment #6 from Antony Lewis antony at cosmologist dot info ---
Not sure about that - 7.1.12 of 2008 is about constants, but in the example the
type instance is not a constant? The example is fine in ifort (and used in
cosmomc?).
Antony
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65456
--- Comment #8 from Bill Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Pish, those adds shouldn't be the least bit relevant. I'll have a look.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65493
Bug ID: 65493
Summary: bug with 64/32 division sign related to various
factors (-O3)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65492
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65493
sophana ml-gnubugzilla at worldspot dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65459
renlin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |renlin at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65492
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Unrolling of the inner loop accounts for the rest (both conditional moves
with if-conversion applied and the branchy code if not seems to put a too
heavy load on the branch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65492
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61275
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
module A
Type T
character(LEN=:), allocatable :: S
end type
character(len=6), parameter :: str = 'string'
Type(T) :: TestObj = T(str)
end module
is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65494
--- Comment #1 from Yuri Rumyantsev ysrumyan at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 35072
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35072action=edit
test-case to reproduce
The following options are used to reproduce: -Ofast
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65072
--- Comment #12 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Fri Mar 20 14:56:53 2015
New Revision: 221535
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221535root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/65072
* typeck.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65072
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65459
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64715
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 35073
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35073action=edit
WIP patch
So, on top of what you've committed, here is my unfinished attempt to disable
--without-ppl
Thread model: posix
gcc version 5.0.0 20150320 (experimental) (GCC)
Tested revisions:
r221530 - ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65502
Bug ID: 65502
Summary: pure-const should play well with clobbers.
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ipa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65076
--- Comment #10 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I can re-confirm the 16% compile time regression. I went through some compare.
$ wc -l *.ssa
299231 tramp3d-v4.ii.015t.ssa
$ wc -l ../5/*.ssa
331115 ../5/tramp3d-v4.ii.018t.ssa
so
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65436
--- Comment #7 from David gccbugzilla at limegreensocks dot com ---
While I don't yet see a case here to justify making this change generally, it
may be useful to change this for private builds of gcc. For those cases,
change this line in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61275
--- Comment #5 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Completely right, the initial test is still not compilable. But this is because
assigning to an allocatable component in an initializer is not allowed by the
standards:
F2003, 7.1.7 (3) and also in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65492
Bug ID: 65492
Summary: Bad optimization in -O3 on SSE intrinsics
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65492
--- Comment #1 from Allan Jensen linux at carewolf dot com ---
Created attachment 35070
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35070action=edit
main
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65492
--- Comment #2 from Allan Jensen linux at carewolf dot com ---
Created attachment 35071
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35071action=edit
vector union test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65492
--- Comment #3 from Allan Jensen linux at carewolf dot com ---
The -O3 regression seems to go back a long way, but has become lesser over
time.
With gcc 4.6 and older it runs at 3.1s with -O3, and still at 1.8s with -O2.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65239
--- Comment #1 from Jana Saout jana at saout dot de ---
Mmmh, the issue disappeared in the gcc of today. (so it was probably fixed
sometime between March 16th and March 20th)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65239
--- Comment #2 from Jana Saout jana at saout dot de ---
No, sorry, ignore that last one... my mistake - it's still there.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65500
Bug ID: 65500
Summary: [5 Regression] FAIL:
17_intro/headers/c++2014/all_attributes.cc (test for
excess errors)
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65462
--- Comment #6 from boger at us dot ibm.com ---
I decided that you meant the gofrontend so here it is (just did the hg mail)
https://codereview.appspot.com/213570043/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65147
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ABI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65475
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz ---
Hmm, yeah, in one unit base is virutal and in other it is not. Perhaps just
dropping
that sanity check or restricting it to non-odr-violation-reported
Honza
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61977
David Rivshin drivshin at allworx dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc-eabi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65475
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Fri Mar 20 18:19:18 2015
New Revision: 221542
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221542root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR ipa/65475
* ipa-devirt.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65443
--- Comment #7 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 35078
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35078action=edit
WIP patch
WIP patch, works on included testcase only.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65443
--- Comment #9 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 35080
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35080action=edit
parloops dump with -ftry
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65492
--- Comment #8 from Allan Jensen linux at carewolf dot com ---
You can remove the branches in the inner loop and still reproduce the issue.
There were no branches in the original code, I only added them to the reduced
case because I was using a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65478
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz ---
Thre regression seems to be visible at
http://gcc.opensuse.org/SPEC/CINT/sb-frescobaldi.suse.de-ai-64/186_crafty_big.png
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65443
--- Comment #8 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 35079
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35079action=edit
parloops dump with -fno-try
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64589
--- Comment #2 from Damian Rouson damian at sourceryinstitute dot org ---
Any updates on this bug report?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65481
Martin Sebor msebor at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48324
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Mar 20 17:26:32 2015
New Revision: 221539
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221539root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-03-20 Paolo Carlini
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48324
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65496
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65498
Bug ID: 65498
Summary: ICE in cxx_eval_call_expression when using __func__
inside dependent context
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65499
Bug ID: 65499
Summary: Missing using namespace literals::chrono_literals in
std::chrono
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65478
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz ---
Which options (LTO?)? I can't see the regression on our testers.
-Ofast -flto -funroll-loops
Honza
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65483
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz ---
Testcase? I suppose you are talking about the loops in the bsNEEDR/W macros?
bzip2 is quite small by itself, but I will take a look later today. Yes, it is
bsNEEDR/W macros
that gets
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51817
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52963
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48453
--- Comment #9 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com ---
(In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #8)
This is now in C++14. Time to add the testcase and close the bug.
I agree.
1 - 100 of 145 matches
Mail list logo
