https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65494
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Mar 23 12:47:54 2015
New Revision: 221592
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221592root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-03-23 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57221
--- Comment #9 from Maxim Kuvyrkov mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Hi Bero,
I'm working on reproducing this. How do you build the android toolchain? Is
it manual or do you have this scripted?
In particular, do you use a pre-generated sysroot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65504
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24196
Bug 24196 depends on bug 24882, which changed state.
Bug 24882 Summary: [meta-bug] Non-refcounted, moveable basic_string
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24882
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16612
Bug 16612 depends on bug 24882, which changed state.
Bug 24882 Summary: [meta-bug] Non-refcounted, moveable basic_string
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24882
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21334
Bug 21334 depends on bug 24882, which changed state.
Bug 24882 Summary: [meta-bug] Non-refcounted, moveable basic_string
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24882
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19495
Bug 19495 depends on bug 24882, which changed state.
Bug 24882 Summary: [meta-bug] Non-refcounted, moveable basic_string
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24882
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24882
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65522
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65522
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||charlet at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64931
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65504
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 35108
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35108action=edit
gcc5-pr65504.patch
Patch I'm going to bootstrap/regtest now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65522
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21334
--- Comment #51 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This is no longer an issue when using the new non-reference-counted std::string
implementation in GCC 5.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65456
--- Comment #11 from Bill Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to David Edelsohn from comment #10)
I believe that the choice to scalarize is based on the vector cost model.
Hm, that would be interesting. The applied patch changes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65522
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Ah, except ada_demangle is also exported from libgnat*.so - wonder why the
RTS is built with IN_GCC.
This is explained in gcc-interface/Makefile.in.
In that case, guess the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64570
--- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #4)
Seems ok with trunk dated 20150322.
No, it still fails. You're probably using an --enable-checking=release
compiler...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60255
--- Comment #9 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Mon Mar 23 11:58:49 2015
New Revision: 221591
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221591root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
2015-03-23 Andre Vehreschild
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64570
--- Comment #4 from David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com ---
Seems ok with trunk dated 20150322.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64952
--- Comment #7 from Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com from comment #6)
Thanks for finishing the job.
I have yet to fix 4.9 as well, as you suggested. In a week or so.
Will you post a message
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64570
--- Comment #6 from David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #5)
No, it still fails. You're probably using an --enable-checking=release
compiler...
Indeed I am, sorry for the false alarm.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65473
--- Comment #2 from Louis Dionne ldionne.2 at gmail dot com ---
Does the standard specify which headers should define those macros? If not,
then it's a QOI issue that could easily be solved. In all cases, does stdcxx
document which headers must
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65519
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This boils down to:
with Ada.Strings.Unbounded; use Ada.Strings.Unbounded;
with Interfaces;use Interfaces;
package P is
type Arr is array (Unsigned_32 range ) of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65523
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65522
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65504
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65518
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Mar 23 14:59:57 2015
New Revision: 221595
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221595root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-03-23 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65518
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65521
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Mar 23 15:17:20 2015
New Revision: 221596
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221596root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR ipa/65521
* ipa-icf.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65521
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65521
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65521
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 35105
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35105action=edit
gcc5-pr65521.patch
This fixes this for me. But I haven't done any in-depth analysis
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65502
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65506
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65506
--- Comment #4 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2015-03-23 10:05 AM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
Indeed, have verified this with the cross-compiler and the attached patch
should cure this.
I have applied the patch for testing but hit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65524
Arnaud Charlet charlet at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65522
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #35109|0 |1
is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59254
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65500
--- Comment #3 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2015-03-23 10:02 AM, redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
3) Use fixincludes to change either the definition of __LWP_RWLOCK_VALID to
(short)0x8c91 or change the definition of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65494
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65523
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65047
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bkoz at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59256
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009
--- Comment #56 from clyon at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: clyon
Date: Mon Mar 23 13:43:22 2015
New Revision: 221593
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221593root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-03-23 Christophe Lyon christophe.l...@linaro.org
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65506
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 35111
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35111action=edit
gcc5-pr65506.patch
Indeed, have verified this with the cross-compiler and the attached
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65519
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org ---
It's forwprop4 propagating an abnormal SSA name:
bb 5:
[...]
I.3_30(ab) = I.3_1 + 1;
_31 = (interfaces__unsigned_32) I.3_30(ab);
[...]
bb 13:
_43 = v.P_ARRAY;
_45
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21494
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65047
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65524
Bug ID: 65524
Summary: gnatbind generates decrementing the unexisting
elab-counter into finalize_library
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009
--- Comment #57 from clyon at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Cherry-picked r230324 and committed in GCC as r221593, to fix aarch64 problems.
I'm not sure whether the old arm and hppa problems have been fixed?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65504
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65500
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to dave.anglin from comment #1)
At one time, GCC was permissive about system header issues, particularly
when they aren't
really a problem. Is this still the case?
It
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65504
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.9/5 Regression] select |[4.9 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65518
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65496
--- Comment #3 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
Richard, any thoughts what to do about this? Avoid scheduling frame related
instructions across conditional jumps? Something else?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64967
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Looks reasonable.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65522
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Mar 23 15:49:02 2015
New Revision: 221599
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221599root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR bootstrap/65522
* ipa-devirt.c: Remove
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65522
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65519
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The problematic statement is created by the gimple-match stuff:
Applying pattern match.pd:761, gimple-match.c:1727
Applying pattern match.pd:625, gimple-match.c:1525
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65504
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Mar 23 15:31:59 2015
New Revision: 221597
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221597root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/65504
* config/i386/i386.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62051
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60851
--- Comment #14 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #13)
In 4.9 branch, the check is located in three different places throughout
constrain_operands. There was a big cleanup by Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64967
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
Or drop the gnu-versioned-namespace support altogether.
I'd like to do that ... maybe for GCC 6 though. It seems a bit late now to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65523
Bug ID: 65523
Summary: ICE: in gimple_op, at gimple.h:2270 with
-fcheck-pointer-bounds -mmpx
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65531
Bug ID: 65531
Summary: ICE: symtab_node::verify failed: Two symbols with same
comdat_group are not linked by the same_comdat_group
list. with -fcheck-pointer-bounds -mmpx
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65532
Bug ID: 65532
Summary: [5 Regression] Unexpected error with legacy code
(D1MACH)
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56226
Joel Matz joel.matz at horizonbtc dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||joel.matz at
when compiled with
-std=c++14;
// -std=c++11 compiles fine.
// g++ -std=c++14 test.cpp
// Tested with:
// g++ (GCC) 5.0.0 20150308 (experimental)
// g++ (GCC) 5.0.0 20150323 (experimental)
struct A
{
int x;
char y; // Actually, short and bool (types smaller than int?) trigger this
ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60408
Jim Wilson wilson at tuliptree dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wilson at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60408
--- Comment #3 from Jim Wilson wilson at tuliptree dot org ---
Even if we could fix the vec_extract constraints, we still end up with 3
instructions, as the optimizer can't do anything interesting with the
vec_extract RTL.
For a 32-bit SFmode
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64967
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65147
--- Comment #3 from Alexey Lapshin alexey.lapshin at oracle dot com ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #2)
This does seem like a bug.
What is a proper behavior for G++ in this case ?
should it always align std::atomic object of size 8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64967
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Mar 23 16:47:18 2015
New Revision: 221600
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221600root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/64967
* acinclude.m4: Disable
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65515
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This is from:
644 else if (TREE_CODE (expr) == FUNCTION_TYPE
645 || TREE_CODE (expr) == METHOD_TYPE)
646DFS_follow_tree_edge (TYPE_ARG_TYPES (expr));
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65528
Bug ID: 65528
Summary: [mpx] internal compiler error: in
expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:7761
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65530
Bug ID: 65530
Summary: [meta-bug] -mmpx -fcheck-pointer-bounds failures
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59256
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65523
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Mar 23 20:03:50 2015
New Revision: 221606
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221606root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/65523
* tree-chkp.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65506
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Mar 23 20:04:43 2015
New Revision: 221607
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221607root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-03-23 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65506
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65523
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65505
Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65529
Bug ID: 65529
Summary: [5 Regression][SH] gcc.dg/pr29215.c failing
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65475
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Mar 23 19:51:51 2015
New Revision: 221605
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221605root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR ipa/65475
* g++.dg/lto/pr65475_0.C: Use
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65521
--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 35104
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35104action=edit
testcase for x86_64
Also happens on x86_64:
% gcc -c -fcompare-debug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65521
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64952
--- Comment #6 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com paul.richard.thomas
at gmail dot com ---
Dear Mikael,
The pureness is also confused by the C pure, which is whiter than
white pure. I agree with your last remark about the standards
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65521
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
struct socket {
int sk;
};
selinux_task_getioprio(struct task_struct *p) {
return current_has_perm(p, 256UL);
}
selinux_task_getscheduler(struct task_struct *p) {
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65519
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63587
--- Comment #16 from Yvan Roux yroux at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: yroux
Date: Mon Mar 23 09:50:33 2015
New Revision: 221589
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221589root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/
2015-03-23 Yvan Roux yvan.r...@linaro.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64952
--- Comment #5 from Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mikael
Date: Mon Mar 23 07:53:31 2015
New Revision: 221586
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221586root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-03-23 Paul Thomas pa...@gcc.gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65504
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64813
--- Comment #23 from Yvan Roux yroux at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: yroux
Date: Mon Mar 23 09:55:34 2015
New Revision: 221590
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221590root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-03-23 Yvan Roux yvan.r...@linaro.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65520
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65521
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #35105|0 |1
is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65238
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65521
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8270
--- Comment #57 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to doug mcilroy from comment #56)
(In reply to Kai Tietz from comment #55)
Comment #55 overlooks the Standard's translation phase 1, which replaces an
implementation-defined
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65515
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65494
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
1 - 100 of 146 matches
Mail list logo
