[Bug c++/65646] [5 Regression] ICE in invalid syntax

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65646 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug target/42159] unwinding issues on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42159 --- Comment #32 from Pierre Ossman ossman at cendio dot se --- (In reply to Jack Howarth from comment #31) You might check out the original posting on this issue... http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2009-September/025900.html I

[Bug rtl-optimization/64164] [4.9/5/6 Regression] one more stack slot used due to one less inlining level

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64164 --- Comment #34 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #33) On 03/31/2015 05:25 AM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64164 --- Comment #30

[Bug target/65644] Assembler errors on Solaris 10 x86-64: `(%eXX)' is not a valid 64 bit base/index expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65644 --- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2) impossible, and the addr32 pieces in e.g. ix86_decompose_address would need to be disabled based on some configure macro. In this case, a

[Bug ipa/65076] [5 Regression] 16% tramp3d-v4.cpp compile time regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65076 --- Comment #51 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #48) Maybe we regressed optimizing GCC itself? (does not bootstrapping but compiling gcc 5 with gcc 4.9 improve things?) No,

[Bug c++/65646] New: ICE in invalid syntax

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65646 Bug ID: 65646 Summary: ICE in invalid syntax Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee:

[Bug target/42159] unwinding issues on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42159 --- Comment #33 from Pierre Ossman ossman at cendio dot se --- Created attachment 35198 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35198action=edit Remove unwinder on OS X

[Bug target/65644] Assembler errors on Solaris 10 x86-64: `(%eXX)' is not a valid 64 bit base/index expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65644 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug ipa/65076] [5 Regression] 16% tramp3d-v4.cpp compile time regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65076 --- Comment #48 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 31 Mar 2015, trippels at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65076 --- Comment #46 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc

[Bug ipa/65076] [5 Regression] 16% tramp3d-v4.cpp compile time regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65076 --- Comment #49 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- I did some experiments about the increase of early inlining insns: - Early optimizers of both 4.9 and mainline process 9819 functions. - At release_ssa time, the statement count

[Bug target/65644] Assembler errors on Solaris 10 x86-64: `(%eXX)' is not a valid 64 bit base/index expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65644 --- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Daniel Richard G. from comment #0) No such error occurs when I compile this source on a Linux system, so this may have to do with the Solaris assembler. This is

[Bug c++/65646] [5 Regression] ICE in invalid syntax

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65646 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Started with r213641. Reducing.

[Bug c++/65646] [5 Regression] ICE in invalid syntax

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65646 --- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Started with r213641.

[Bug ipa/65076] [5 Regression] 16% tramp3d-v4.cpp compile time regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65076 --- Comment #47 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 31 Mar 2015, hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65076 --- Comment #42 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/65648] New: [5 Regression] Bad code due to IRA fails to recognize the clobber in parallel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65648 Bug ID: 65648 Summary: [5 Regression] Bad code due to IRA fails to recognize the clobber in parallel Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug sanitizer/61978] implement blacklist for sanitizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61978 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc

[Bug target/65647] New: [5 Regression] GCC won't stop when compile for armv6-m with -Os

=328, tfirst=17825, tfreq=328)... The gcc version is gcc version 5.0.0 20150401 (experimental) (GCC). The issue happens after this commit: commit e0d2c8640c504ecd83291c4e008cb91d17df3e0d Author: rsandifo rsandifo@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4 Date: Fri May 30 07:35:47 2014 + gcc/ ira.c

[Bug target/65647] [5 Regression] GCC won't stop when compile for armv6-m

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65647 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug debug/65549] [5 Regression] crash in htab_hash_string with -flto -g

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65549 --- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Lambda functions aren't really nested functions in the tree-nested.c sense, but still are so closely related to the functions they are nested in that IMHO it would be desirable not

[Bug rtl-optimization/65651] Redundant cmp with zero instruction in loop for x86 target.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65651 --- Comment #2 from Yuri Rumyantsev ysrumyan at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 35203 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35203action=edit test-case to reproduce

Re: [Bug target/65648] New: [5 Regression] Bad code due to IRA fails to recognize the clobber in parallel

On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 5:44 PM, terry.guo at arm dot com gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65648 Bug ID: 65648 Summary: [5 Regression] Bad code due to IRA fails to recognize the clobber in parallel

[Bug target/65648] [5 Regression] Bad code due to IRA fails to recognize the clobber in parallel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65648 --- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com pinskia at gmail dot com --- On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 5:44 PM, terry.guo at arm dot com gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65648 Bug ID: 65648

[Bug target/42159] unwinding issues on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42159 --- Comment #34 from Jack Howarth howarth.at.gcc at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Pierre Ossman from comment #32) I can understand that. But in that case why keep the gcc unwinder on OS X? Mainly inertia. The more important issue is weaning

[Bug tree-optimization/23331] FIXME from tree-ssa-ccp: dealing with a[3]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23331 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/65650] CCP does not propgate copies

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65650 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/65650] New: CCP does not propgate copies

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65650 Bug ID: 65650 Summary: CCP does not propgate copies Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/65646] [5 Regression] ICE in invalid syntax

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65646 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug ipa/65557] ICE: SIGSEGV in hash_table::find_slot_with_hash() with -fdevirtualize -fipa-cp -fipa-icf-functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65557 Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/21791] ccp and copy-prop print out too much garbage with -fdump-tree-ccp/copy-details

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21791 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug target/65576] ICE in gcc.c-torture/compile/pr33855.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65576 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug rtl-optimization/65651] Redundant cmp with zero instruction in loop for x86 target.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65651 --- Comment #1 from Yuri Rumyantsev ysrumyan at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 35202 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35202action=edit test-case to reproduce Need to compile with -O2 flag only.

[Bug rtl-optimization/65651] New: Redundant cmp with zero instruction in loop for x86 target.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65651 Bug ID: 65651 Summary: Redundant cmp with zero instruction in loop for x86 target. Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/65652] New: defaulted default constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65652 Bug ID: 65652 Summary: defaulted default constructor Product: gcc Version: 4.8.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug target/65649] New: gcc generates overlarge constants for microblaze-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65649 Bug ID: 65649 Summary: gcc generates overlarge constants for microblaze-linux-gnu Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/44669] ccp or similar passes aren't run after cunroll

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44669 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/65642] [C++11] GCC rejects valid constant expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65642 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug target/65649] gcc generates overlarge constants for microblaze-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65649 --- Comment #2 from dhowells at redhat dot com dhowells at redhat dot com --- gcc was based on the gcc-5.0.0-20150319 tarball generated from the gcc branch redhat/gcc-5-branch plus the patches for the Fedora rawhide gcc and cross-gcc.

[Bug target/65624] ICE in aarch64-builtins.c when expanding 4-argument aarch64 intrinsic.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65624 --- Comment #6 from Maxim Ostapenko chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: chefmax Date: Wed Apr 1 11:18:03 2015 New Revision: 221807 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221807root=gccview=rev Log: 2015-04-01 Max Ostapenko

[Bug target/65649] gcc generates overlarge constants for microblaze-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65649 --- Comment #1 from dhowells at redhat dot com dhowells at redhat dot com --- Created attachment 35201 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35201action=edit Assembler output from larger reduced case Here is the assembler output

[Bug c++/65554] ICE: verify_gimple failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65554 --- Comment #10 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Could anyone please reduce the original testcase again (but please make sure that cc1plus has the r221808 fix)? If not, I'll try to get to that tomorrow.

[Bug target/65644] Assembler errors on Solaris 10 x86-64: `(%eXX)' is not a valid 64 bit base/index expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65644 --- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- (%edi) etc. in 64-bit mode should be assembled as addr32 (0x67) prefix on the

[Bug c++/65554] ICE: verify_gimple failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65554 --- Comment #9 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: mpolacek Date: Wed Apr 1 13:08:05 2015 New Revision: 221808 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221808root=gccview=rev Log: PR c++/65554 * class.c

[Bug c++/65652] defaulted default constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65652 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/65651] Redundant cmp with zero instruction in loop for x86 target.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65651 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug rtl-optimization/65651] Redundant cmp with zero instruction in loop for x86 target.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65651 --- Comment #4 from Yuri Rumyantsev ysrumyan at gmail dot com --- Jakub, Thanks for your comments. We will try to fix this issue ourselves. Best regards. Yuri. P.S. Note that icc does not produce such redundant cmp with zero. 2015-04-01

[Bug target/65648] [5 Regression] Bad code due to IRA fails to recognize the clobber in parallel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65648 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||arm

[Bug c++/65554] ICE: verify_gimple failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65554 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Reducing...

[Bug c++/65646] [5 Regression] ICE in invalid syntax

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65646 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug target/65647] [5 Regression] GCC won't stop when compile for armv6-m

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65647 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ra

[Bug target/65644] Assembler errors on Solaris 10 x86-64: `(%eXX)' is not a valid 64 bit base/index expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65644 Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug preprocessor/61977] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] powerpc preprocessor breaks on lines that end with vector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61977 --- Comment #9 from David Rivshin drivshin at allworx dot com --- I think the extra newline is the result of maybe_print_line() being invoked when trying to peek past a newline in the input. #0 maybe_print_line_1 (src_loc=134,

[Bug c++/65646] [5 Regression] ICE in invalid syntax

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65646 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug go/63731] Fallback to netgo does not work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63731 --- Comment #34 from boger at us dot ibm.com --- Created a codereview: https://codereview.appspot.com/217620043

[Bug fortran/65541] [5 Regression] namelist regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65541 --- Comment #8 from John jwmwalrus at gmail dot com --- Hi, It seems that some testing was required after all. With the latest gcc snapshot from Debian (20150329-1) I still get the same output from the test code: $ ll `which gfortran-5.0 `

[Bug ipa/65478] [5 regression] crafty performance regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65478 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW ---

[Bug c/65653] cilkplus reducer ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65653 --- Comment #1 from tprince at computer dot org --- Created attachment 35205 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35205action=edit pre-processed C source

[Bug fortran/65541] [5 Regression] namelist regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65541 --- Comment #9 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to John from comment #8) Hi, It seems that some testing was required after all. With the latest gcc snapshot from Debian (20150329-1) I still get the same output

[Bug c++/65554] ICE: verify_gimple failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65554 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- namespace std { struct B { enum { __value }; }; template typename _Iterator struct C { static _Iterator _S_base (_Iterator p1) { return p1; } }; template typename using

[Bug ipa/65654] New: [5 Regression] 447.dealII in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65654 Bug ID: 65654 Summary: [5 Regression] 447.dealII in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build with LTO Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/65624] ICE in aarch64-builtins.c when expanding 4-argument aarch64 intrinsic.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65624 Maxim Ostapenko chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/65541] [5 Regression] namelist regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65541 --- Comment #10 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org --- For the record, my results with trunk: $ gfc pr65541.f90 $ ./a.out $ cat some.dat SOME A%T2%T1%I= 0, A%T2%J= 0, A%K= 0, /

[Bug target/65581] [5 Regression] testsuite lto issue: multiple definition of `main', undefined reference to `WinMain'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65581 --- Comment #7 from Rainer Emrich rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de --- (In reply to Kai Tietz from comment #6) As far as I understand this issue does LTO now handle stuff used from object file different to prior versions. I add Jan. He might be able

[Bug c/65653] cilkplus reducer ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65653 --- Comment #2 from tprince at computer dot org --- runs well with Intel C++ Windows/linux

[Bug c/65653] New: cilkplus reducer ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65653 Bug ID: 65653 Summary: cilkplus reducer ICE Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee:

[Bug preprocessor/61977] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] powerpc preprocessor breaks on lines that end with vector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61977 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Please see: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-04/msg4.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-04/msg5.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-04/msg00013.html

[Bug middle-end/61118] Spurious -Wclobbered warning generated by gcc 4.9.0 for pthread_cleanup_push

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61118 --- Comment #2 from Daniel Pouzzner douzzer at mega dot nu --- Alas still there in 4.9.1 as bundled with Ubuntu 14.10.

[Bug target/65647] [5 Regression] GCC won't stop when compile for armv6-m

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65647 Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug target/65576] [5 Regression] ICE in gcc.c-torture/compile/pr33855.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65576 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added URL|

[Bug tree-optimization/65658] New: Jump threading too pessimistic when optimizing for size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65658 Bug ID: 65658 Summary: Jump threading too pessimistic when optimizing for size Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/65581] [5 Regression] testsuite lto issue: multiple definition of `main', undefined reference to `WinMain'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65581 Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc

[Bug target/65576] [5 Regression] ICE in gcc.c-torture/compile/pr33855.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65576 --- Comment #6 from Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com --- The patch does appear to fix the problem for non-power7, but introduces an ICE on power7 for pr33855.c. gcc.c-torture/compile/pr33855.c:27:1: error: unrecognizable insn: } ^ (insn 124

[Bug ipa/65076] [5 Regression] 16% tramp3d-v4.cpp compile time regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65076 --- Comment #52 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- $ time /aux/hubicka/trunk-install/bin/g++ -Ofast -fpermissive --param large-function-insns=1 tramp3d-v4.ii -w ; ./a.out -n 3 real0m34.232s user0m33.729s sys 0m0.532s i

[Bug target/65648] [5 Regression] Bad code due to IRA fails to recognize the clobber in parallel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65648 Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot

[Bug target/65648] [5 Regression] Bad code due to IRA fails to recognize the clobber in parallel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65648 Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c++/65646] [5 Regression] ICE in invalid syntax

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65646 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Wed Apr 1 16:36:50 2015 New Revision: 221810 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221810root=gccview=rev Log: PR c++/65646 * decl.c (grokvardecl): Don't

[Bug sanitizer/65655] New: [5 Regression][UBSAN] ICE in speculative_call_info, at cgraph.c:1151

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65655 Bug ID: 65655 Summary: [5 Regression][UBSAN] ICE in speculative_call_info, at cgraph.c:1151 Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug ipa/65478] [5 regression] crafty performance regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65478 --- Comment #23 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz --- Seems to be a regression with -flto only? I also see EON regressing without -flto. Yes, the inlining is cross file. http://gcc.opensuse.org/SPEC/CINT/sb-megrez-head-64/index.html

[Bug ipa/65655] [5 Regression] ICE in speculative_call_info, at cgraph.c:1151

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65655 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Started with r221707 or r221706.

[Bug c++/65656] New: __builtin_constant_p should be constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65656 Bug ID: 65656 Summary: __builtin_constant_p should be constexpr Product: gcc Version: 4.8.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug target/65657] New: [avr] read from __memx address space tramples argument to following function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65657 Bug ID: 65657 Summary: [avr] read from __memx address space tramples argument to following function Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug rtl-optimization/65628] valgrind error in improve_allocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65628 --- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #1) Can you take a look Vladimir? There are also PR65629, PR65617 and PR65613, which might be dups. Hi, Markus. I've looked at

[Bug c++/65646] [5 Regression] ICE in invalid syntax

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65646 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug sanitizer/65655] [5 Regression][UBSAN] ICE in speculative_call_info, at cgraph.c:1151

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65655 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug rtl-optimization/65613] valgrind error in find_call_crossed_cheap_reg

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65613 Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/65617] new valgrind error in update_costs_from_copies

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65617 Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/65629] valgrind error in move_spill_restore

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65629 Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/65628] valgrind error in improve_allocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65628 Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/56100] spurious -Wshadow warning with local variable in template class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56100 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/65576] [5 Regression] ICE in gcc.c-torture/compile/pr33855.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65576 Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/56100] spurious -Wshadow warning with local variable in template class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56100 --- Comment #6 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Wed Apr 1 21:27:55 2015 New Revision: 221814 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221814root=gccview=rev Log: /cp 2015-04-01 Paolo Carlini

[Bug c++/65646] [5 Regression] ICE in invalid syntax

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65646 --- Comment #5 from Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de --- gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog missing?

[Bug ipa/65655] [5 Regression] ICE in speculative_call_info, at cgraph.c:1151

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65655 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code

[Bug rtl-optimization/65628] valgrind error in improve_allocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65628 --- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org --- OK, thanks. I also cannot reproduce them with today's gcc. I will build an --enable-checking=valgrind compiler and double check. If this turns up nothing I will close all

[Bug target/65657] [avr] read from __memx address space tramples argument to following function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65657 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Creekmore jonathan.creekm...@synapse-wireless.com --- Apparently, PR target/52484 covered one of the cases in avr.md, but not the general case of a call to __xload_{1,2,3}. I think adding (clobber (reg:MOVMODE 22))

[Bug c++/65625] [5 Regression] ICE in make_typename_type, at cp/decl.c:3499

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65625 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/65625] [5 Regression] ICE in make_typename_type, at cp/decl.c:3499

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65625 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5) Not error-recovery - P1. I would think P2, since the testcase is ill-formed.