[Bug fortran/65792] allocation of scalar elemental function with structure constructor fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65792 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- Created attachment 35352 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35352action=edit Cumulated patch for PR61831 and 65792 Can you post a testcase for the remaining

[Bug fortran/59678] [F03] Segfault on equalizing variables of a complex derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59678 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #16 from

[Bug web/64968] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968 --- Comment #9 from Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net --- Created attachment 35354 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35354action=edit GCC extension for 5.0, v2 And the corresponding new extension.

[Bug c++/65799] Allows constexpr coversion from cv void * to other type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65799 Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/65801] New: Allow -Wno-narrowing to silence stricter C++11 narrowing rules

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65801 Bug ID: 65801 Summary: Allow -Wno-narrowing to silence stricter C++11 narrowing rules Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug web/64968] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968 Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #34735|0 |1

[Bug tree-optimization/65802] [6 Regression] ICE in redirect_eh_edge_1, at tree-eh.c:2335

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65802 Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tom at

[Bug c++/65799] Allows constexpr coversion from cv void * to other type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65799 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid

[Bug tree-optimization/65802] New: [6 Regression] ICE in redirect_eh_edge_1, at tree-eh.c:2335

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65802 Bug ID: 65802 Summary: [6 Regression] ICE in redirect_eh_edge_1, at tree-eh.c:2335 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/65801] [5/6 Regression] Allow -Wno-narrowing to silence stricter C++11 narrowing rules

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65801 Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug middle-end/58306] error: corrupted value profile: value profile counter (X out of Y) inconsistent with basic-block count

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58306 --- Comment #5 from Artem S. Tashkinov t.artem at mailcity dot com --- Created attachment 35355 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35355action=edit Sources and Makefile (run make to reproduce) GCC 5.0.1 RC2 is also affected:

[Bug target/65803] New: blackfin: internal compiler error: segment fault linux kernel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65803 Bug ID: 65803 Summary: blackfin: internal compiler error: segment fault linux kernel Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/61135] It seems to be not able to call virtual method of literal object in lambda expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61135 lc289dafd7ybme05se at softbank dot ne.jp changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug fortran/37131] inline matmul for small matrix sizes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37131 --- Comment #18 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 35356 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35356action=edit First attempt that appears to work Well, this seems to work so far, no regressions.

[Bug fortran/37131] inline matmul for small matrix sizes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37131 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc

[Bug c++/61135] It seems to be not able to call virtual method of literal object in lambda expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61135 --- Comment #7 from lc289dafd7ybme05se at softbank dot ne.jp --- 仮想継承の時もエラーになるみたいですね。

[Bug target/65804] New: blackfin: Not support global frame pointer with -fno-omit-frame-pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65804 Bug ID: 65804 Summary: blackfin: Not support global frame pointer with -fno-omit-frame-pointer Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug other/65800] New: gengtype aborts when run with -d (debug dump)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65800 Bug ID: 65800 Summary: gengtype aborts when run with -d (debug dump) Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: other

[Bug fortran/65792] allocation of scalar elemental function with structure constructor fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65792 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- The patch fixes the PR, but causes FAIL: gfortran.dg/class_19.f03 -O0 execution test ... False alarm! The failures are due to a conflict with another patch. The patch

[Bug other/65800] gengtype aborts when run with -d (debug dump)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65800 --- Comment #1 from Mikhail Maltsev maltsevm at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 35350 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35350action=edit Fix Just in case, I also regtested it.

[Bug fortran/65792] allocation of scalar elemental function with structure constructor fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65792 Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/65792] allocation of scalar elemental function with structure constructor fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65792 --- Comment #6 from Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #4) The patch seems to fix also pr49324. Can you post a testcase for the remaining bug there? I have lost sight of what is missing.

[Bug fortran/57957] [F03] Double free with allocatable components

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57957 Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikael at gcc

[Bug fortran/52921] With realloc-lhs: Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52921 Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikael at gcc

[Bug fortran/57957] [F03] Double free with allocatable components

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57957 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- That one seems to be memory-clean with current trunk. FIXED? Confirmed for gcc 5 and trunk (6.0). The test in comment 0 succeeds with 4.9.2, but not the one in comment 2

[Bug fortran/52921] With realloc-lhs: Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52921 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- No error here using the following program; FIXED? I cannot reproduce the problem with 4.8.4 and more recent versions.