https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65928
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---
It seems normal to me. There are now several functions called isblank in
namespace std, and the compiler doesn't know which one to pick when you don't
give it a hint (like you do for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65929
--- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 35423
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35423action=edit
gcda file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65476
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65837
--- Comment #25 from ramana.radhakrishnan at arm dot com ramana.radhakrishnan
at arm dot com ---
On 29/04/15 09:09, rguenther at suse dot de wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65837
--- Comment #24 from rguenther at suse dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65924
--- Comment #3 from Yvan Roux yroux at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: yroux
Date: Wed Apr 29 11:31:40 2015
New Revision: 222572
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222572root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/
2015-04-29 Yvan Roux yvan.r...@linaro.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65929
Bug ID: 65929
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr34999.c compilation,
-fprofile-use -D_PROFILE_USE
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65929
--- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com ---
The difference between new (zzz.s) and previous (yyy.s) asm dumps is:
--- yyy.s 2015-04-29 13:44:03.870706031 +0200
+++ zzz.s 2015-04-29 13:26:41.812887199 +0200
@@ -99,7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51996
Stuart Henderson shenders at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||shenders
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65476
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65476
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org ---
When an array of Long_Floats is set to a scalar_storage_order of
High_Order_First, only the two 32 bit words that make up the 64 bit value
are swapped with each other but the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65929
--- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 35422
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35422action=edit
Preprocessed source
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65837
--- Comment #22 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to prathamesh3492 from comment #18)
Created attachment 35420 [details]
patch to override default options by options in object file
Hi,
The following
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65548
--- Comment #33 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I can only work on the issue, not do magic.
When you have issues with svn checkout try the gitmirror:
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GitMirror
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65924
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65917
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65893
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #3 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65902
Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65924
Yvan Roux yroux at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65837
--- Comment #20 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 28 Apr 2015, prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65837
--- Comment #17 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65548
--- Comment #32 from Jürgen Reuter juergen.reuter at desy dot de ---
With gcc-6.0 trunk I cannot test our complete code because of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65894
For gcc 5 trunk I have massive problems in checking out the svn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65917
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Apr 29 08:51:08 2015
New Revision: 222562
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222562root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-04-29 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65917
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65893
--- Comment #4 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vries
Date: Wed Apr 29 09:13:49 2015
New Revision: 222567
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222567root=gccview=rev
Log:
Move pass_stdarg to after pass_dce in pass_all_optimizations
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65837
--- Comment #21 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to prathamesh3492 from comment #18)
Created attachment 35420 [details]
patch to override default options by options in object file
Hi,
The following untested
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65924
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65837
--- Comment #24 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 29 Apr 2015, ramana at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65837
--- Comment #23 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65925
Bug ID: 65925
Summary: Memory leak with source allocation nested inside the
source of another source allocation
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65837
--- Comment #23 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #20)
On Tue, 28 Apr 2015, prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65837
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65926
Bug ID: 65926
Summary: MinGW-W64, xmmintrin.h, error: can't convert between
vector values of different size
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65548
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #31 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65697
--- Comment #44 from mwahab at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to James Greenhalgh from comment #43)
(In reply to torvald from comment #37)
I'm not worried about __sync_lock_release, I think the documentation is
strong enough and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65893
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65927
Bug ID: 65927
Summary: cppcheck: bits/locale_facets_nonio.h
(_M_am_pm_format): Assignment of function parameter
has no effect outside the function
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65791
--- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Hopefully, after implementing this todo we can revert this change in
tree-ssa/stdarg-2.c:
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64835
--- Comment #2 from chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: chrbr
Date: Wed Apr 29 06:52:23 2015
New Revision: 222559
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222559root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-04-29 Christian Bruel christian.br...@st.com
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65924
Bug ID: 65924
Summary: [6.0 Regression] ICE const_int_operand failed on
arm-none-eabi
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65927
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65930
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #25 from Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net ---
Did this problem disappear? Or are there still some bugmails today with a wrong
timestamp?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65928
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
It's unspecified whether any of your headers includes locale, and in our
implementation string includes it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65928
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
More precisely, string includes bits/localefwd.h which declares (but does
not define) the overload of std::isblank.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65931
Bug ID: 65931
Summary: [5/6 regression] dsymutil assertion failure building
libgnat-5.dylib
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65931
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57634
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65928
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65928
--- Comment #3 from david.claessens at tomra dot com ---
To be honest, I would have expected that since only cctype is included and
not locale where the other version of isblank is defined, there would be no
confusion.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61171
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65930
Bug ID: 65930
Summary: Reduction with sign-change not handled
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65697
--- Comment #45 from James Greenhalgh jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to mwahab from comment #44)
(In reply to James Greenhalgh from comment #43)
(In reply to torvald from comment #37)
I'm not worried about
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65923
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65930
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
More correct would be to replace the reduction in sum with one using an
unsigned int type. Not sure where this kind of transform would fit best,
but as it's an enablement for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65928
Bug ID: 65928
Summary: std::find_if compilation errors
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65932
Bug ID: 65932
Summary: [5.1 Regression] Linux-3.10.75 on arm926ej-s does not
boot due to wrong code generation
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #26 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: christian.eggers at kathrein dot de gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
Newsgroups:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65760
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64657
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65697
--- Comment #47 from Andrew Macleod amacleod at redhat dot com ---
Created attachment 35425
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35425action=edit
potential patch to add MEMMODEL_SYNC
I don't know where we've finally settled on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65760
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Apr 29 16:07:47 2015
New Revision: 222581
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222581root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/65760
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65559
Daniel Starke daniel.f.starke at freenet dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65933
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Seems like stor-layout.h needs to be included somewhere.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65934
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65871
--- Comment #5 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Wed Apr 29 18:53:19 2015
New Revision: 222588
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222588root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/65871
* config/i386/i386.md
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65886
--- Comment #22 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 35427
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35427action=edit
A patch to enable -fsymbolic in LTO if -Bsymbolic is used
This patch improves LTO when
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64610
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65933
Bug ID: 65933
Summary: final.c:2239:8: error: 'vector_type_mode' was not
declared in this scope
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65886
--- Comment #21 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #19)
I know it isn't the same. But, IMHO this isn't worth adding another knob
which will be a maintainance nightmare.
Performance difference
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52830
--- Comment #4 from David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com ---
Created attachment 35426
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35426action=edit
gzipped C++ source code
gcc trunk dated 20150427 ices in the same way on the attached
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65934
Bug ID: 65934
Summary: objdump can't print correct DW_AT_encoding name
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64610
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Wed Apr 29 18:13:44 2015
New Revision: 222587
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222587root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c/64610
* c-common.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65559
--- Comment #18 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Does the following patch fixes your problem?
Index: lto-wrapper.c
===
--- lto-wrapper.c (Revision 69)
+++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50800
--- Comment #17 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Apr 29 20:51:05 2015
New Revision: 222591
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222591root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/50800
* tree.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65871
--- Comment #6 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Wed Apr 29 20:58:25 2015
New Revision: 222592
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222592root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/65871
* config/i386/i386.md
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65839
--- Comment #4 from devans at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: devans
Date: Wed Apr 29 22:50:31 2015
New Revision: 222599
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222599root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/65839
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61683
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65928
--- Comment #6 from david.claessens at tomra dot com ---
Apparently it is not (only) included from string.
Changing to a char array and removing that include doesn't change anything.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65928
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The code is invalid. No amount of fiddling about with headers will change that.
Even if you manage to find some combination that works today, it might not work
tomorrow or with a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64667
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55095
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52899
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64667
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Apr 29 14:06:27 2015
New Revision: 222577
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222577root=gccview=rev
Log:
/cp
2015-04-29 Paolo Carlini
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65548
--- Comment #34 from Jürgen Reuter juergen.reuter at desy dot de ---
Andre, I checked your patch with r222305 of the gcc 6.0 trunk. Our complete
code (without workarounds for the two remaining cases reported) compiles, and
our complete testsuite
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65697
--- Comment #46 from mwahab at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to James Greenhalgh from comment #45)
(In reply to mwahab from comment #44)
And this final sentence is buggy by omission of a mention of memory writes:
but following memory
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55080
--- Comment #4 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This should be an easy fix once a solution and the text is agreed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55080
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||easyhack
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65935
Bug ID: 65935
Summary: [6 Regression] 433.milc in SPEC CPU 2006 is
miscompiled
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64835
amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amker at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64657
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Apr 29 15:22:13 2015
New Revision: 222579
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222579root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/64657
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65936
Bug ID: 65936
Summary: [6 Regression] ICE building libboost_log.so.1.58.0
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65935
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65337
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2015-03-13 00:00:00 |2015-4-30
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62234
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-04/msg01538.html has a testcase that
should be added once this is fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51513
--- Comment #8 from Peter Bergner bergner at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Steven Bosscher from comment #4)
This should be solved by allowing labels in trivially_empty_bb_p.
I tried the following, but it doesn't fix the problem.
---
92 matches
Mail list logo