[Bug libstdc++/65928] std::find_if compilation errors

2015-04-29 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65928 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org --- It seems normal to me. There are now several functions called isblank in namespace std, and the compiler doesn't know which one to pick when you don't give it a hint (like you do for

[Bug gcov-profile/65929] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr34999.c compilation, -fprofile-use -D_PROFILE_USE

2015-04-29 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65929 --- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 35423 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35423action=edit gcda file

[Bug ada/65476] Long_Float array does not byte-swap correctly with reverse Scalar_Storage_Order

2015-04-29 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65476 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug target/65837] [arm-linux-gnueabihf] lto1 target specific builtin not available

2015-04-29 Thread ramana.radhakrishnan at arm dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65837 --- Comment #25 from ramana.radhakrishnan at arm dot com ramana.radhakrishnan at arm dot com --- On 29/04/15 09:09, rguenther at suse dot de wrote: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65837 --- Comment #24 from rguenther at suse dot

[Bug target/65924] [6 Regression] ICE const_int_operand failed on arm-none-eabi

2015-04-29 Thread yroux at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65924 --- Comment #3 from Yvan Roux yroux at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: yroux Date: Wed Apr 29 11:31:40 2015 New Revision: 222572 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222572root=gccview=rev Log: gcc/ 2015-04-29 Yvan Roux yvan.r...@linaro.org

[Bug gcov-profile/65929] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr34999.c compilation, -fprofile-use -D_PROFILE_USE

2015-04-29 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65929 Bug ID: 65929 Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr34999.c compilation, -fprofile-use -D_PROFILE_USE Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug gcov-profile/65929] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr34999.c compilation, -fprofile-use -D_PROFILE_USE

2015-04-29 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65929 --- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com --- The difference between new (zzz.s) and previous (yyy.s) asm dumps is: --- yyy.s 2015-04-29 13:44:03.870706031 +0200 +++ zzz.s 2015-04-29 13:26:41.812887199 +0200 @@ -99,7

[Bug target/51996] ICE in extract_insn gcc.dg/pr48335-5.c

2015-04-29 Thread shenders at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51996 Stuart Henderson shenders at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||shenders

[Bug ada/65476] Long_Float array does not byte-swap correctly with reverse Scalar_Storage_Order

2015-04-29 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65476 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug ada/65476] Long_Float array does not byte-swap correctly with reverse Scalar_Storage_Order

2015-04-29 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65476 --- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org --- When an array of Long_Floats is set to a scalar_storage_order of High_Order_First, only the two 32 bit words that make up the 64 bit value are swapped with each other but the

[Bug gcov-profile/65929] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr34999.c compilation, -fprofile-use -D_PROFILE_USE

2015-04-29 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65929 --- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 35422 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35422action=edit Preprocessed source

[Bug target/65837] [arm-linux-gnueabihf] lto1 target specific builtin not available

2015-04-29 Thread ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65837 --- Comment #22 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to prathamesh3492 from comment #18) Created attachment 35420 [details] patch to override default options by options in object file Hi, The following

[Bug fortran/65548] [5/6 Regression] gfc_conv_procedure_call

2015-04-29 Thread vehre at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65548 --- Comment #33 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- I can only work on the issue, not do magic. When you have issues with svn checkout try the gitmirror: https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GitMirror

[Bug target/65924] [6 Regression] ICE const_int_operand failed on arm-none-eabi

2015-04-29 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65924 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/65917] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20030922-2.c scan-tree-dump-times dom1 if 2

2015-04-29 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65917 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/65893] ifcombine not done anymore on expansion of va_arg

2015-04-29 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65893 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #3 from

[Bug libgcc/65902] GCC-5.1 fails to bootstrap for eCos/arm-eabi

2015-04-29 Thread rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65902 Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/65924] [6.0 Regression] ICE const_int_operand failed on arm-none-eabi

2015-04-29 Thread yroux at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65924 Yvan Roux yroux at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug target/65837] [arm-linux-gnueabihf] lto1 target specific builtin not available

2015-04-29 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65837 --- Comment #20 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 28 Apr 2015, prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65837 --- Comment #17 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/65548] [5/6 Regression] gfc_conv_procedure_call

2015-04-29 Thread juergen.reuter at desy dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65548 --- Comment #32 from Jürgen Reuter juergen.reuter at desy dot de --- With gcc-6.0 trunk I cannot test our complete code because of https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65894 For gcc 5 trunk I have massive problems in checking out the svn

[Bug tree-optimization/65917] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20030922-2.c scan-tree-dump-times dom1 if 2

2015-04-29 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65917 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Apr 29 08:51:08 2015 New Revision: 222562 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222562root=gccview=rev Log: 2015-04-29 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de

[Bug tree-optimization/65917] [6 Regression] XFAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20030922-2.c scan-tree-dump-times dom1 if 2

2015-04-29 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65917 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug tree-optimization/65893] ifcombine not done anymore on expansion of va_arg

2015-04-29 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65893 --- Comment #4 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vries Date: Wed Apr 29 09:13:49 2015 New Revision: 222567 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222567root=gccview=rev Log: Move pass_stdarg to after pass_dce in pass_all_optimizations

[Bug target/65837] [arm-linux-gnueabihf] lto1 target specific builtin not available

2015-04-29 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65837 --- Comment #21 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to prathamesh3492 from comment #18) Created attachment 35420 [details] patch to override default options by options in object file Hi, The following untested

[Bug target/65924] [6 Regression] ICE const_int_operand failed on arm-none-eabi

2015-04-29 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65924 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug target/65837] [arm-linux-gnueabihf] lto1 target specific builtin not available

2015-04-29 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65837 --- Comment #24 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 29 Apr 2015, ramana at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65837 --- Comment #23 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/65925] New: Memory leak with source allocation nested inside the source of another source allocation

2015-04-29 Thread damian at sourceryinstitute dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65925 Bug ID: 65925 Summary: Memory leak with source allocation nested inside the source of another source allocation Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/65837] [arm-linux-gnueabihf] lto1 target specific builtin not available

2015-04-29 Thread ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65837 --- Comment #23 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #20) On Tue, 28 Apr 2015, prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65837

[Bug c/65926] New: MinGW-W64, xmmintrin.h, error: can't convert between vector values of different size

2015-04-29 Thread i.nixman at autistici dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65926 Bug ID: 65926 Summary: MinGW-W64, xmmintrin.h, error: can't convert between vector values of different size Product: gcc Version: 5.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/65548] [5/6 Regression] gfc_conv_procedure_call

2015-04-29 Thread vehre at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65548 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #31 from

[Bug target/65697] __atomic memory barriers not strong enough for __sync builtins

2015-04-29 Thread mwahab at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65697 --- Comment #44 from mwahab at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to James Greenhalgh from comment #43) (In reply to torvald from comment #37) I'm not worried about __sync_lock_release, I think the documentation is strong enough and

[Bug tree-optimization/65893] ifcombine not done anymore on expansion of va_arg

2015-04-29 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65893 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/65927] New: cppcheck: bits/locale_facets_nonio.h (_M_am_pm_format): Assignment of function parameter has no effect outside the function

2015-04-29 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65927 Bug ID: 65927 Summary: cppcheck: bits/locale_facets_nonio.h (_M_am_pm_format): Assignment of function parameter has no effect outside the function Product: gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/65791] Postpone expand_ifn_va_arg till after optimize_va_list_gpr_fpr_size

2015-04-29 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65791 --- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Hopefully, after implementing this todo we can revert this change in tree-ssa/stdarg-2.c: -

[Bug target/64835] -fno-ipa-cp is inconsitently supported when attributes optimize or target are used

2015-04-29 Thread chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64835 --- Comment #2 from chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: chrbr Date: Wed Apr 29 06:52:23 2015 New Revision: 222559 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222559root=gccview=rev Log: 2015-04-29 Christian Bruel christian.br...@st.com PR

[Bug target/65924] New: [6.0 Regression] ICE const_int_operand failed on arm-none-eabi

2015-04-29 Thread yroux at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65924 Bug ID: 65924 Summary: [6.0 Regression] ICE const_int_operand failed on arm-none-eabi Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/65927] cppcheck: bits/locale_facets_nonio.h (_M_am_pm_format): Assignment of function parameter has no effect outside the function

2015-04-29 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65927 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug tree-optimization/65930] Reduction with sign-change not handled

2015-04-29 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65930 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug web/64968] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0

2015-04-29 Thread LpSolit at netscape dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968 --- Comment #25 from Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net --- Did this problem disappear? Or are there still some bugmails today with a wrong timestamp?

[Bug libstdc++/65928] std::find_if compilation errors

2015-04-29 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65928 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- It's unspecified whether any of your headers includes locale, and in our implementation string includes it.

[Bug libstdc++/65928] std::find_if compilation errors

2015-04-29 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65928 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- More precisely, string includes bits/localefwd.h which declares (but does not define) the overload of std::isblank.

[Bug target/65931] New: [5/6 regression] dsymutil assertion failure building libgnat-5.dylib

2015-04-29 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65931 Bug ID: 65931 Summary: [5/6 regression] dsymutil assertion failure building libgnat-5.dylib Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/65931] [5/6 regression] dsymutil assertion failure building libgnat-5.dylib

2015-04-29 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65931 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.2

[Bug tree-optimization/57634] Missed vectorization for a fixed point multiplication reduction

2015-04-29 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57634 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug libstdc++/65928] std::find_if compilation errors

2015-04-29 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65928 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/65928] std::find_if compilation errors

2015-04-29 Thread david.claessens at tomra dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65928 --- Comment #3 from david.claessens at tomra dot com --- To be honest, I would have expected that since only cctype is included and not locale where the other version of isblank is defined, there would be no confusion.

[Bug tree-optimization/61171] vectorization fails for a reduction in presence of subtraction

2015-04-29 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61171 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug tree-optimization/65930] New: Reduction with sign-change not handled

2015-04-29 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65930 Bug ID: 65930 Summary: Reduction with sign-change not handled Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: normal

[Bug target/65697] __atomic memory barriers not strong enough for __sync builtins

2015-04-29 Thread jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65697 --- Comment #45 from James Greenhalgh jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to mwahab from comment #44) (In reply to James Greenhalgh from comment #43) (In reply to torvald from comment #37) I'm not worried about

[Bug c++/65923] False positive for warning about literal operator suffix and using

2015-04-29 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65923 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug tree-optimization/65930] Reduction with sign-change not handled

2015-04-29 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65930 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- More correct would be to replace the reduction in sum with one using an unsigned int type. Not sure where this kind of transform would fit best, but as it's an enablement for

[Bug libstdc++/65928] New: std::find_if compilation errors

2015-04-29 Thread david.claessens at tomra dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65928 Bug ID: 65928 Summary: std::find_if compilation errors Product: gcc Version: 5.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++

[Bug target/65932] New: [5.1 Regression] Linux-3.10.75 on arm926ej-s does not boot due to wrong code generation

2015-04-29 Thread christian.eggers at kathrein dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65932 Bug ID: 65932 Summary: [5.1 Regression] Linux-3.10.75 on arm926ej-s does not boot due to wrong code generation Product: gcc Version: 5.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug web/64968] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0

2015-04-29 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968 --- Comment #26 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org --- Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: christian.eggers at kathrein dot de gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org Newsgroups:

[Bug libstdc++/65760] invalid use of incomplete type with std::is_convertibleC, C

2015-04-29 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65760 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/64657] Support iterators with overloaded operator-comma

2015-04-29 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64657 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/65697] __atomic memory barriers not strong enough for __sync builtins

2015-04-29 Thread amacleod at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65697 --- Comment #47 from Andrew Macleod amacleod at redhat dot com --- Created attachment 35425 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35425action=edit potential patch to add MEMMODEL_SYNC I don't know where we've finally settled on

[Bug libstdc++/65760] invalid use of incomplete type with std::is_convertibleC, C

2015-04-29 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65760 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: redi Date: Wed Apr 29 16:07:47 2015 New Revision: 222581 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222581root=gccview=rev Log: PR libstdc++/65760 *

[Bug lto/65559] [5/6 Regression] lto1.exe: internal compiler error: in read_cgraph_and_symbols, at lto/lto.c:2947

2015-04-29 Thread daniel.f.starke at freenet dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65559 Daniel Starke daniel.f.starke at freenet dot de changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug other/65933] final.c:2239:8: error: 'vector_type_mode' was not declared in this scope

2015-04-29 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65933 --- Comment #1 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Seems like stor-layout.h needs to be included somewhere.

[Bug debug/65934] objdump can't print correct DW_AT_encoding name

2015-04-29 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65934 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/65871] bzhi builtin/intrinsic wrongly assumes bzhi instruction doesn't set the ZF flag

2015-04-29 Thread uros at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65871 --- Comment #5 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Wed Apr 29 18:53:19 2015 New Revision: 222588 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222588root=gccview=rev Log: PR target/65871 * config/i386/i386.md

[Bug target/65886] [5/6 Regression] Copy reloc in PIE incompatible with DSO created by -Wl,-Bsymbolic

2015-04-29 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65886 --- Comment #22 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 35427 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35427action=edit A patch to enable -fsymbolic in LTO if -Bsymbolic is used This patch improves LTO when

[Bug c/64610] No -Wbool-compare warning on (0 != a) = 0

2015-04-29 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64610 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug other/65933] New: final.c:2239:8: error: 'vector_type_mode' was not declared in this scope

2015-04-29 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65933 Bug ID: 65933 Summary: final.c:2239:8: error: 'vector_type_mode' was not declared in this scope Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/65886] [5/6 Regression] Copy reloc in PIE incompatible with DSO created by -Wl,-Bsymbolic

2015-04-29 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65886 --- Comment #21 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #19) I know it isn't the same. But, IMHO this isn't worth adding another knob which will be a maintainance nightmare. Performance difference

[Bug c++/52830] ICE: canonical types differ for identity types ... when attempting SFINAE with member type

2015-04-29 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52830 --- Comment #4 from David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com --- Created attachment 35426 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35426action=edit gzipped C++ source code gcc trunk dated 20150427 ices in the same way on the attached

[Bug debug/65934] New: objdump can't print correct DW_AT_encoding name

2015-04-29 Thread jamesgua at ca dot ibm.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65934 Bug ID: 65934 Summary: objdump can't print correct DW_AT_encoding name Product: gcc Version: 4.8.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3

[Bug c/64610] No -Wbool-compare warning on (0 != a) = 0

2015-04-29 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64610 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: mpolacek Date: Wed Apr 29 18:13:44 2015 New Revision: 222587 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222587root=gccview=rev Log: PR c/64610 * c-common.c

[Bug lto/65559] [5/6 Regression] lto1.exe: internal compiler error: in read_cgraph_and_symbols, at lto/lto.c:2947

2015-04-29 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65559 --- Comment #18 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org --- Does the following patch fixes your problem? Index: lto-wrapper.c === --- lto-wrapper.c (Revision 69) +++

[Bug c++/50800] Internal compiler error in finish_member_declarations, possibly related to may_alias attribute

2015-04-29 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50800 --- Comment #17 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Wed Apr 29 20:51:05 2015 New Revision: 222591 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222591root=gccview=rev Log: PR c++/50800 * tree.c

[Bug target/65871] bzhi builtin/intrinsic wrongly assumes bzhi instruction doesn't set the ZF flag

2015-04-29 Thread uros at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65871 --- Comment #6 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Wed Apr 29 20:58:25 2015 New Revision: 222592 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222592root=gccview=rev Log: PR target/65871 * config/i386/i386.md

[Bug libstdc++/65839] xmethods need updating once gdb decides how to fix 18285

2015-04-29 Thread devans at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65839 --- Comment #4 from devans at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: devans Date: Wed Apr 29 22:50:31 2015 New Revision: 222599 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222599root=gccview=rev Log: PR libstdc++/65839 *

[Bug c++/61683] decltype-specifier not accepted as mem-initializer-id

2015-04-29 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61683 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug libstdc++/65928] std::find_if compilation errors

2015-04-29 Thread david.claessens at tomra dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65928 --- Comment #6 from david.claessens at tomra dot com --- Apparently it is not (only) included from string. Changing to a char array and removing that include doesn't change anything.

[Bug libstdc++/65928] std::find_if compilation errors

2015-04-29 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65928 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- The code is invalid. No amount of fiddling about with headers will change that. Even if you manage to find some combination that works today, it might not work tomorrow or with a

[Bug c++/64667] -Winit-self ignored for reference fields

2015-04-29 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64667 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/55095] Wshift-overflow

2015-04-29 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55095 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at

[Bug preprocessor/52899] tabstop has no effect

2015-04-29 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52899 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalcolm at

[Bug c++/64667] -Winit-self ignored for reference fields

2015-04-29 Thread paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64667 --- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Wed Apr 29 14:06:27 2015 New Revision: 222577 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222577root=gccview=rev Log: /cp 2015-04-29 Paolo Carlini

[Bug fortran/65548] [5/6 Regression] gfc_conv_procedure_call

2015-04-29 Thread juergen.reuter at desy dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65548 --- Comment #34 from Jürgen Reuter juergen.reuter at desy dot de --- Andre, I checked your patch with r222305 of the gcc 6.0 trunk. Our complete code (without workarounds for the two remaining cases reported) compiles, and our complete testsuite

[Bug target/65697] __atomic memory barriers not strong enough for __sync builtins

2015-04-29 Thread mwahab at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65697 --- Comment #46 from mwahab at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to James Greenhalgh from comment #45) (In reply to mwahab from comment #44) And this final sentence is buggy by omission of a mention of memory writes: but following memory

[Bug c++/55080] -pedantic produces error: floating-point literal cannot appear in a constant-expression

2015-04-29 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55080 --- Comment #4 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- This should be an easy fix once a solution and the text is agreed.

[Bug c++/55080] -pedantic produces error: floating-point literal cannot appear in a constant-expression

2015-04-29 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55080 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||easyhack

[Bug tree-optimization/65935] New: [6 Regression] 433.milc in SPEC CPU 2006 is miscompiled

2015-04-29 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65935 Bug ID: 65935 Summary: [6 Regression] 433.milc in SPEC CPU 2006 is miscompiled Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/64835] -fno-ipa-cp is inconsitently supported when attributes optimize or target are used

2015-04-29 Thread amker at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64835 amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug libstdc++/64657] Support iterators with overloaded operator-comma

2015-04-29 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64657 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: redi Date: Wed Apr 29 15:22:13 2015 New Revision: 222579 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222579root=gccview=rev Log: PR libstdc++/64657 *

[Bug c++/65936] New: [6 Regression] ICE building libboost_log.so.1.58.0

2015-04-29 Thread jamrial at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65936 Bug ID: 65936 Summary: [6 Regression] ICE building libboost_log.so.1.58.0 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/65935] [6 Regression] 433.milc in SPEC CPU 2006 is miscompiled

2015-04-29 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65935 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug tree-optimization/65337] [5/6 Regression] bootstrap-lto gnat1 linktime ICE: gcc/ada/exp_aggr.adb:6570:0: internal compiler error: in forward_edge_to_pdom, at tree-ssa-dce.c:1086

2015-04-29 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65337 Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2015-03-13 00:00:00 |2015-4-30 ---

[Bug testsuite/62234] warnings/errors from LTO cannot be tested

2015-04-29 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62234 --- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-04/msg01538.html has a testcase that should be added once this is fixed.

[Bug tree-optimization/51513] Only partially optimizes away __builtin_unreachable switch default case

2015-04-29 Thread bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51513 --- Comment #8 from Peter Bergner bergner at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Steven Bosscher from comment #4) This should be solved by allowing labels in trivially_empty_bb_p. I tried the following, but it doesn't fix the problem. ---