https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66652
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
Bug ID: 66701
Summary: __cxxabiv1::__cxa_pure_virtual - can it take an
argument of the pointer to the function that was
called, please?
Product: gcc
Version:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66678
--- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 35878
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35878action=edit
tentative patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66652
--- Comment #5 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vries
Date: Tue Jun 30 08:35:57 2015
New Revision: 225162
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225162root=gccview=rev
Log:
Use max_loop_iterations in transform_to_exit_first_loop_alt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66678
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to vries from comment #2)
Created attachment 35878 [details]
tentative patch
That single-use case is awfully special ... just add an unrelated use
to the function and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64833
--- Comment #21 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kkojima
Date: Wed Jul 1 01:02:48 2015
New Revision: 225219
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225219root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/64833
* [SH] Set length of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
But this isn't the place to propose changes to the ABI, because it's used by
several different compilers and if G++ started emitting a call to a different
version of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66618
--- Comment #3 from Keith Thompson Keith.S.Thompson at gmail dot com ---
It would be easier to argue that gcc accepts other forms of constant
expressions if (a) those other forms were documented and (b) they were
accepted at all optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66686
--- Comment #7 from Patrick Palka ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ppalka
Date: Wed Jul 1 01:07:35 2015
New Revision: 225220
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225220root=gccview=rev
Log:
Fix PR c++/66686 (dependent template template
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66563
--- Comment #41 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz glaubitz at physik dot
fu-berlin.de ---
(In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #40)
with my 4.9 native compiler built with 4.9 cross compiler for svn
gcc-4_9-branch. I hope that miscompilation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66703
Bug ID: 66703
Summary: [4.9] gcc.target/i386/readeflags-1.c aborts on
-march=i586
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66702
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jun 30 12:16:01 2015
New Revision: 225180
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225180root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/66702
* omp-low.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66704
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jun 30 12:52:55 2015
New Revision: 225182
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225182root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-06-30 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66704
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66702
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jun 30 12:12:42 2015
New Revision: 225179
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225179root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/66702
* omp-low.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66704
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Index: gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.c
===
--- gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.c (revision 225163)
+++ gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66704
Bug ID: 66704
Summary: [6 Regression] ICE in tree-vectorizer at
tree-ssanames.c:457
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66702
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66705
Bug ID: 66705
Summary: [5/6 Regression] section is missing linker error with
-flto -fipa-pta
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66704
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66136
--- Comment #14 from nsz at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: nsz
Date: Tue Jun 30 10:07:03 2015
New Revision: 225170
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225170root=gccview=rev
Log:
Backport of r224031 from mainline
2015-06-29 Szabolcs Nagy
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65686
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65779
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65821
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65844
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65867
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65874
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Bootstrap also works for me on the GCC 5 branch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65931
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65886
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66178
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6
--- Comment #12 from Antonio Poggiali antonio.poggiali at datalogic dot com
---
Created attachment 35879
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35879action=edit
Temporary patch for gcc 4.9.3
A temporary patch masking the problem on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66705
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(gdb) p debug_tree (decl)
var_decl 0x768d7900 a
type integer_type 0x768d0690 int public SI
size integer_cst 0x768ccdf8 constant 32
unit size
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66705
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
trippels@gcc75 ~ % cat tramp3d-v4.ii
class A {
public:
A();
};
int a = 0;
void foo() {
a = 0;
A b;
for (; a;)
;
}
trippels@gcc75 ~ % g++ -r -nostdlib -O2 -flto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66705
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60364
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66652
--- Comment #7 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vries
Date: Tue Jun 30 09:57:20 2015
New Revision: 225166
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225166root=gccview=rev
Log:
Backport transform_to_exit_first_loop_alt-related patches
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66642
--- Comment #5 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vries
Date: Tue Jun 30 09:57:40 2015
New Revision: 225167
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225167root=gccview=rev
Log:
Add empty loop exit block in transform_to_exit_first_loop_alt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65742
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65797
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66432
--- Comment #4 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Testing tentative patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66706
Segher Boessenkool segher at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66653
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Jun 30 15:40:38 2015
New Revision: 225193
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225193root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR debug/66653
* decl2.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66552
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor msebor at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #2)
I opened bug 66706.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66691
--- Comment #5 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Thanks for reporting this. I've started work on it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66706
Bug ID: 66706
Summary: Redundant shift instruction on x (n 32)
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66653
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Jun 30 14:31:36 2015
New Revision: 225192
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225192root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR debug/66653
* cp-tree.h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66708
Bug ID: 66708
Summary: Possible (minor) improvement on formatted io with
format too short
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66686
Martin Sebor msebor at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66708
Gerhard Steinmetz gerhard.steinmetz.fort...@t-online.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66699
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6
James Greenhalgh jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66691
--- Comment #6 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Tue Jun 30 17:40:55 2015
New Revision: 225200
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225200root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-06-30 Vladimir Makarov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66710
Bug ID: 66710
Summary: Unhelpful error message with unbalanced parenthesis
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66709
Bug ID: 66709
Summary: ICE on formatted io with parameter array specifier fmt
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66707
Bug ID: 66707
Summary: Endless compilation on wrong usage of common
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66699
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
And that's not even what similar means anyway.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66575
--- Comment #3 from Gerhard Steinmetz gerhard.steinmetz.fort...@t-online.de
---
Playing around, I've found other cases (wrong code with procedure)
causing endless compilation on my environment, e.g.
$ cat zlctp_1.f90
program p
procedure(g)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66699
--- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor msebor at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Being described as similar doesn't imply they are identical in every detail.
std::pair and std::tuple are distinct classes with different requirements on
each. If you believe the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66709
--- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz gerhard.steinmetz.fort...@t-online.de
---
Whereas versions without parameter compile and run fine :
$ cat z_wr_fmt_ice_4.f90
program p
character(4) :: fmt(1) = '(i8)'
integer :: n
read (*,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66686
--- Comment #2 from Patrick Palka ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #1)
The code doesn't look valid to me: Y is not a valid template argument for
the template template parameter C.
But once struct X gets
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66691
--- Comment #7 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I'll commit the same patch into gcc-5 branch on next week after some testing
the patch on trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60365
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66711
--- Comment #1 from Steffen Müthing steffen.muething at iwr dot
uni-heidelberg.de ---
I just noticed the wrong filename (error.cc) and driver (cc1plus) in the first
two outputs: I compiled those with g++ instead of gcc, but the same problem is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66628
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Tue Jun 30 19:27:19 2015
New Revision: 225205
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225205root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR jit/66628: add
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66686
--- Comment #3 from Patrick Palka ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #2)
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #1)
The code doesn't look valid to me: Y is not a valid template argument for
the template
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66713
Bug ID: 66713
Summary: atomic compare_excahnge_strong create spurious store
for x86-64 at -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66626
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
ix86_function_regparm has
/* We don't want to use regparm(3) for nested functions as
these use a static chain pointer in the third argument. */
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66685
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66546
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Tue Jun 30 19:38:12 2015
New Revision: 225206
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225206root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR jit/66546: Add
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66686
--- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor msebor at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Y takes a non-type template argument which isn't provided and can't be deduced
in the instantiation (i.e., what would the value of N be in YN?)
Modifying the test case a bit to see
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66626
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 35882
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35882action=edit
A patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66686
--- Comment #5 from Patrick Palka ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #4)
Y takes a non-type template argument which isn't provided and can't be
deduced in the instantiation (i.e., what would the value of N be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66624
Richard Kettlewell richard+gcc at sfere dot greenend.org.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66711
Bug ID: 66711
Summary: GCC does not correctly restore diagnostic state after
pragma GCC diagnostic pop with -Werror
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66712
Bug ID: 66712
Summary: [concepts] variadic concepts cause havoc
Product: gcc
Version: c++-concepts
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 35881
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35881action=edit
A patch
This patch fixes -mtune=i686 and -mtune=i586.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65732
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
492e19d098f4 in binutils is r205292 in gcc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6
--- Comment #11 from Antonio Poggiali antonio.poggiali at datalogic dot com
---
(In reply to Mikael Pettersson from comment #10)
(In reply to Antonio Poggiali from comment #9)
Sorry, this code:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66702
Bug ID: 66702
Summary: #pragma omp declare simd uniform and linear issues
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62258
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62258
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66137
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7
Mikhail Maltsev miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66121
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66263
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59967
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bdeyal at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66621
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.9/5/6 Regression]|[4.9/5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66626
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66648
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60364
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66522
--- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to vries from comment #2)
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-06/msg00965.html
Unproposing patch, as discussed here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-06/msg02086.html
New
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66686
--- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor msebor at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The misunderstanding was mine -- I had forgotten that a template template can
be instantiated on a template without providing or deducing the arguments for
the latter. Please
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66715
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |6.0
--- Comment #1 from vries
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66563
--- Comment #40 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #39)
Can we close this PR as fixed?
I've got
Testsuite summary
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66714
Bug ID: 66714
Summary: gomp4: libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/atomic_capture-1.c -g
ICE
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66714
--- Comment #1 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
For c.exp, at -Ofast/-g, this failure looks similar:
...
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/reduction-1.c
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host_nonshm=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=0 (internal compiler error)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66716
Bug ID: 66716
Summary: gomp4:
libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/kernels-lo
op.c -g ICE
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo