https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66533
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Aug 6 16:33:14 2015
New Revision: 226684
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226684root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/66533
* parser.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66533
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Aug 6 16:36:58 2015
New Revision: 226685
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226685root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/66533
* parser.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67140
Bug ID: 67140
Summary: undefined reference to _gfortran_mvbits_i16
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67124
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56309
--- Comment #34 from Yuri Rumyantsev ysrumyan at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 36138
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36138action=edit
simple reproducer
Use -O3 -std=c++14 options to compile and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67123
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #2 from vehre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58381
Martin Husemann martin at netbsd dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.8.1 |5.2.0
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66896
--- Comment #14 from Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Vittorio Zecca from comment #13)
I see only two NULL dereferencing in ipa-prop.c my lines 2479 and 2545
same statement
dst_ctx-combine_with (ctx);
Did you take
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64022
--- Comment #9 from Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Thu Aug 6 08:38:59 2015
New Revision: 226665
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226665root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR fortran/64022
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67134
Bug ID: 67134
Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67133
--- Comment #6 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #5)
Well, it is a 5MB testcase and reducing isn't instantaneous unfortunately.
No problem, I'm not in a hurry. I need to bootstrap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66927
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67129
--- Comment #3 from Dominik Vogt vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com ---
Sorry, the expample with t2() in the code snippet above should have the pragmas
in the opposite order:
-- snip --
#pragma GCC target (no-sse)
#pragma GCC target (fpmath=sse)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67129
--- Comment #2 from Dominik Vogt vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com ---
Created attachment 36136
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36136action=edit
warning
Code that produces the warning.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66303
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64022
Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67141
Bug ID: 67141
Summary: wrong libgomp mutex initialisation order
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libgomp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66937
--- Comment #3 from Roland B rbock at eudoxos dot de ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #1)
Author: jason
Date: Thu Aug 6 17:42:25 2015
New Revision: 226687
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226687root=gccview=rev
Log:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67138
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66937
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67139
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67002
--- Comment #22 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #21)
Yes, it works. I'm uncomfortable with it because the current use of
crtl-emit.x_cur_insn_uid aka cur_insn_uid is limitted to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67140
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 36144
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36144action=edit
patch
Patched built and tested with OP's code.
Regression test passed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67140
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67002
--- Comment #21 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #20)
Yes, that looks OK. treg_set_expr-something recog matching is actually only
required during combine. The simpler forms like (reg:SI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66896
--- Comment #13 from Vittorio Zecca zeccav at gmail dot com ---
I see only two NULL dereferencing in ipa-prop.c my lines 2479 and 2545
same statement
dst_ctx-combine_with (ctx);
Did you take care of both of them?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66303
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66363
Dominik Vogt vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |ipa
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67129
Bug ID: 67129
Summary: x86: erratic parsing of #pragma GCC target (...)
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67129
--- Comment #1 from Dominik Vogt vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com ---
Created attachment 36135
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36135action=edit
no warning
Code that does not produce the warning.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66303
--- Comment #13 from Dominik Vogt vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com ---
Can this be closed? It's not a Gcc bug but a Glibc problem.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67130
Bug ID: 67130
Summary: [6 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected
identifier_node, have template_decl in
write_unqualified_id, at cp/mangle.c:1218
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67135
Bug ID: 67135
Summary: [thread_local] heap-use-after-free (OS X 10.10.4)
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67131
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67002
--- Comment #20 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #19)
(In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #18)
In the problematic situation, get_max_insn_count returns the false
value after
if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67002
--- Comment #19 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #18)
In the problematic situation, get_max_insn_count returns the false
value after
if (MAY_HAVE_DEBUG_INSNS)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67129
--- Comment #5 from Dominik Vogt vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com ---
Created attachment 36139
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36139action=edit
experimental fix
The attached patch fixes the problem for me (on x86), but it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67136
Bug ID: 67136
Summary: sanitizer reports member access within null pointer
for correct C++ code
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66936
Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66936
--- Comment #13 from Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #12)
Aren't there enough occurences of __MINGW32__ in io/unix.c?
Why add yet another kludge? Put the #undef at line 48.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65886
--- Comment #34 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Thiago Macieira from comment #33)
gcc 5.2.1 can no longer reproduce the testcase.
Has the situation changed?
GCC 5 r226650 still fails for me.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67133
--- Comment #10 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #9)
trippels@gcc2-power8 llvm_build % cat AnalysisConsumer.ii
It is also latent in r226635, just compile with options:
-O2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67133
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66870
--- Comment #21 from boger at us dot ibm.com ---
Created attachment 36142
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36142action=edit
Configure gold with split stack based on binutils version
This is an updated version of the previous
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67139
Eric Niebler eric.niebler at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[concepts] ICE on checking |[concepts]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67138
Bug ID: 67138
Summary: [concepts] bogus not more constrained error for more
constrained partial specialization
Product: gcc
Version: c++-concepts
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66458
--- Comment #5 from Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The comment in the front-end confirms the original intent, which is that FPU
shouldn't be messed with if the user didn't explicitly request it:
/* If -ffpe-trap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65886
--- Comment #33 from Thiago Macieira thiago at kde dot org ---
gcc 5.2.1 can no longer reproduce the testcase.
Has the situation changed?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67133
--- Comment #9 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
trippels@gcc2-power8 llvm_build % cat AnalysisConsumer.ii
class A;
struct B {
typedef A type;
};
template typename struct I : B {};
class C {
public:
C(char *);
int
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67139
--- Comment #2 from Eric Niebler eric.niebler at gmail dot com ---
Thanks, except that that is invalid code, and this bug is an ICE-on-valid.
Here's the equivalent valid repro case:
template class T
constexpr typename T::type::value_type _v =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66533
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66538
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66936
--- Comment #12 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu ---
On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 04:57:15PM +, fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
Index: io/unix.c
===
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67133
--- Comment #8 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Or even with options: -O2 -fisolate-erroneous-paths-attribute
(why is the latter not enabled by default?)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66260
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Aug 6 18:45:05 2015
New Revision: 226696
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226696root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/67130
PR c++/67131
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67131
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Aug 6 18:45:05 2015
New Revision: 226696
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226696root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/67130
PR c++/67131
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67130
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Aug 6 18:45:05 2015
New Revision: 226696
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226696root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/67130
PR c++/67131
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66937
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Aug 6 17:42:25 2015
New Revision: 226687
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226687root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/66937
* pt.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67139
Bug ID: 67139
Summary: [concepts] ICE on checking concepts with void
Product: gcc
Version: c++-concepts
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65886
--- Comment #35 from Thiago Macieira thiago at kde dot org ---
I've only tried with SUSE's distro build, as my own GCC build is now GCC 6.
However, I can reproduce it with my GCC 6 build. Let me investigate if OpenSUSE
applied a patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67139
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67124
--- Comment #6 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #5)
Wrong expansion, adding CC.
The expand code looks OK to me. Assigning to one DImode word
of a TImode isn't supposed to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67130
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66260
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Aug 6 14:28:26 2015
New Revision: 226677
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226677root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/67130
PR c++/67131
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67131
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Aug 6 14:28:26 2015
New Revision: 226677
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226677root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/67130
PR c++/67131
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67130
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Aug 6 14:28:26 2015
New Revision: 226677
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226677root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/67130
PR c++/67131
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67131
--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #1)
What version of clang compiles that with no errors?
Latest trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66260
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Aug 6 14:26:18 2015
New Revision: 226676
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226676root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/67130
PR c++/67131
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67130
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Aug 6 14:26:18 2015
New Revision: 226676
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226676root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/67130
PR c++/67131
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67131
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Aug 6 14:26:18 2015
New Revision: 226676
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226676root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/67130
PR c++/67131
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67132
Bug ID: 67132
Summary: gcc -D__WCHAR_TYPE__='unsigned int' should not
complain about built-in types redefined
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67133
Bug ID: 67133
Summary: ICE at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu in gimple_op,
at gimple.h:2274
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67133
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67133
--- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #4)
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67124
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|uros at gcc dot gnu.org|rsandifo at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64022
--- Comment #10 from Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Thu Aug 6 09:22:30 2015
New Revision: 226670
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226670root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR fortran/64022
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56309
--- Comment #33 from Yuri Rumyantsev ysrumyan at gmail dot com ---
With current compiler there is not performance difference for by-ref and by-val
test-cases, but if we turn off if-convert transformation we will get ~2X
speed-up:
on Intel(R)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67133
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67124
--- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
Hmm, looks like a target issue. We expand from
Not this time. It looks to me that generic code is at fault, performing DImode
move from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58381
--- Comment #5 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Martin Husemann from comment #3)
This still applies to recent versions and is an obvious fix. Please apply!
Points #7 and #8 in https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Community
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58381
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58397
Martin Husemann martin at netbsd dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #30803|0 |1
is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58397
Martin Husemann martin at netbsd dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.8.1 |5.2.0
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67133
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67134
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67131
Bug ID: 67131
Summary: [6 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67130
--- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Fixed. Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67137
Bug ID: 67137
Summary: --enable-languages=jit and --disable-shared
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67131
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67130
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67129
--- Comment #4 from Dominik Vogt vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com ---
Also, it is a bad idea to pass global_options_set in this call
ix86_valid_target_attribute_tree (args, global_options,
global_options_set);
because it may be modified (via
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67133
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lopezibanez
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67131
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67133
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.0 |---
94 matches
Mail list logo
