https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67159
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Casey Carter from comment #3)
Thanks once again, Jason. Procedural question: now that c++-concepts has
landed on trunk, should I be tagging bug reports differently?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67164
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67164
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6 Regression] ICE: tree|ICE:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67163
Bug ID: 67163
Summary: g2 generates incorrect decl_line
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67162
Bug ID: 67162
Summary: g2 generates incorrect decl_line
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: RESOLVED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67163
--- Comment #1 from dehao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 36157
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36157action=edit
preprocessed file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67163
--- Comment #2 from dehao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 36158
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36158action=edit
preprocessed file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67161
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67163
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
g2 generates incorrect decl_line (150 is the decl_line for another function:
addValue)
You did paste the full debug info as the file numbers are way different between
the two.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67161
--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Started with r226642.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67161
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work|5.1.1 |
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54430
Akim Demaille akim.demaille at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54430
--- Comment #5 from Akim Demaille akim.demaille at gmail dot com ---
FWIW, it's on StackOverflow since May 2013.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16407212/identifier-with-the-same-name-in-both-expression-and-declaration-of-range-based
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67158
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66936
Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67164
Bug ID: 67164
Summary: [6 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected class
‘expression’, have ‘exceptional’
(argument_pack_select) in tree_operand_check, at
tree.h:3356
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67166
Bug ID: 67166
Summary: Inconsistency between static data members and static
functions when using multiple inheritance
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67163
--- Comment #4 from dehao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Right, in -g2 binary debug info, the decl_file is pointing to the header file
in which the function is declared. However, if the definition is available, it
makes more sense to point decl_file and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67165
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66936
--- Comment #16 from Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Sun Aug 9 16:43:42 2015
New Revision: 226750
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226750root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR libfortran/66936
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66936
--- Comment #15 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu ---
On Sun, Aug 09, 2015 at 08:53:36AM +, fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
Kai, as mingw maintainer, can you comment? Why did this issue appear recently?
And does
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67165
Bug ID: 67165
Summary: please enable libbacktrace to work with compressed
debug sections
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67153
--- Comment #3 from ncm at cantrip dot org ---
Created attachment 36159
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36159action=edit
bitset, but using an inlined container adapter, not lambdas, and slow
This version compiles just as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67145
Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67145
--- Comment #2 from Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com ---
Note that r224768 was specifically about keeping register order (association
and commutation) when simplify_plus_minus does not simplify an expression,
because ordering matters for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64022
--- Comment #12 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Mon Aug 10 05:13:01 2015
New Revision: 226755
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226755root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR fortran/64022
* gfortran.dg/ieee/large_4.f90:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39121
frankhb1989 at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||frankhb1989 at gmail dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66936
Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
28 matches
Mail list logo