[Bug c++/67159] [c++concepts] Segfault while diagnosing constraint violation

2015-08-09 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67159 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Casey Carter from comment #3) Thanks once again, Jason. Procedural question: now that c++-concepts has landed on trunk, should I be tagging bug reports differently?

[Bug c++/67164] ICE: tree check: expected class ‘expression’, have ‘exceptional’ (argument_pack_select) in tree_operand_check, at tree.h:3356

2015-08-09 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67164 Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/67164] ICE: tree check: expected class ‘expression’, have ‘exceptional’ (argument_pack_select) in tree_operand_check, at tree.h:3356

2015-08-09 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67164 Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[6 Regression] ICE: tree|ICE:

[Bug debug/67163] New: g2 generates incorrect decl_line

2015-08-09 Thread dehao at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67163 Bug ID: 67163 Summary: g2 generates incorrect decl_line Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: debug

[Bug debug/67162] New: g2 generates incorrect decl_line

2015-08-09 Thread dehao at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67162 Bug ID: 67162 Summary: g2 generates incorrect decl_line Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: RESOLVED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: debug

[Bug debug/67163] g2 generates incorrect decl_line

2015-08-09 Thread dehao at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67163 --- Comment #1 from dehao at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 36157 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36157action=edit preprocessed file

[Bug debug/67163] g2 generates incorrect decl_line

2015-08-09 Thread dehao at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67163 --- Comment #2 from dehao at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 36158 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36158action=edit preprocessed file

[Bug c++/67161] [6 Regression] ICE with a static_assert using our internal __not/__or/__and traits

2015-08-09 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67161 Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug debug/67163] g2 generates incorrect decl_line

2015-08-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67163 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- g2 generates incorrect decl_line (150 is the decl_line for another function: addValue) You did paste the full debug info as the file numbers are way different between the two.

[Bug c++/67161] [6 Regression] ICE with a static_assert using our internal __not/__or/__and traits

2015-08-09 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67161 --- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org --- Started with r226642.

[Bug c++/67161] [5/6 Regression] ICE with a static_assert using our internal __not/__or/__and traits

2015-08-09 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67161 Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work|5.1.1 |

[Bug c++/54430] [C++11] For-Loop: Scope of iterating variable begins too early

2015-08-09 Thread akim.demaille at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54430 Akim Demaille akim.demaille at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/54430] [C++11] For-Loop: Scope of iterating variable begins too early

2015-08-09 Thread akim.demaille at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54430 --- Comment #5 from Akim Demaille akim.demaille at gmail dot com --- FWIW, it's on StackOverflow since May 2013. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16407212/identifier-with-the-same-name-in-both-expression-and-declaration-of-range-based

[Bug bootstrap/67158] ICE dwarf2out.c:19910/gen_inlined_subroutine_die, at : Compiling gcc6.0 with gcc6.0 -flto

2015-08-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67158 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at

[Bug libfortran/66936] io/unix.c gratuitously uses S_IRWXG and S_IRWXO on the basis that umask() is available

2015-08-09 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66936 Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/67164] New: [6 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected class ‘expression’, have ‘exceptional’ (argument_pack_select) in tree_operand_check, at tree.h:3356

2015-08-09 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67164 Bug ID: 67164 Summary: [6 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected class ‘expression’, have ‘exceptional’ (argument_pack_select) in tree_operand_check, at tree.h:3356

[Bug c++/67166] New: Inconsistency between static data members and static functions when using multiple inheritance

2015-08-09 Thread anders.granlund.0 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67166 Bug ID: 67166 Summary: Inconsistency between static data members and static functions when using multiple inheritance Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug debug/67163] g2 generates incorrect decl_line

2015-08-09 Thread dehao at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67163 --- Comment #4 from dehao at gcc dot gnu.org --- Right, in -g2 binary debug info, the decl_file is pointing to the header file in which the function is declared. However, if the definition is available, it makes more sense to point decl_file and

[Bug other/67165] please enable libbacktrace to work with compressed debug sections

2015-08-09 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67165 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug libfortran/66936] io/unix.c gratuitously uses S_IRWXG and S_IRWXO on the basis that umask() is available

2015-08-09 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66936 --- Comment #16 from Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: fxcoudert Date: Sun Aug 9 16:43:42 2015 New Revision: 226750 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226750root=gccview=rev Log: PR libfortran/66936

[Bug libfortran/66936] io/unix.c gratuitously uses S_IRWXG and S_IRWXO on the basis that umask() is available

2015-08-09 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66936 --- Comment #15 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Sun, Aug 09, 2015 at 08:53:36AM +, fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: Kai, as mingw maintainer, can you comment? Why did this issue appear recently? And does

[Bug other/67165] New: please enable libbacktrace to work with compressed debug sections

2015-08-09 Thread doko at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67165 Bug ID: 67165 Summary: please enable libbacktrace to work with compressed debug sections Product: gcc Version: 5.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/67153] [5/6 Regression] integer optimizations 53% slower than std::bitset

2015-08-09 Thread ncm at cantrip dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67153 --- Comment #3 from ncm at cantrip dot org --- Created attachment 36159 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36159action=edit bitset, but using an inlined container adapter, not lambdas, and slow This version compiles just as

[Bug rtl-optimization/67145] [6 Regression] associativity from psuedo-reg ordering

2015-08-09 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67145 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug rtl-optimization/67145] [6 Regression] associativity from psuedo-reg ordering

2015-08-09 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67145 --- Comment #2 from Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com --- Note that r224768 was specifically about keeping register order (association and commutation) when simplify_plus_minus does not simplify an expression, because ordering matters for

[Bug fortran/64022] [F2003][IEEE] ieee_support_flag does not handle kind=10 and kind=16 REAL variables

2015-08-09 Thread uros at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64022 --- Comment #12 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Mon Aug 10 05:13:01 2015 New Revision: 226755 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226755root=gccview=rev Log: PR fortran/64022 * gfortran.dg/ieee/large_4.f90:

[Bug c/39121] strange behavior in chained operations

2015-08-09 Thread frankhb1989 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39121 frankhb1989 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||frankhb1989 at gmail dot

[Bug libfortran/66936] io/unix.c gratuitously uses S_IRWXG and S_IRWXO on the basis that umask() is available

2015-08-09 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66936 Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW