https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67269
Bug ID: 67269
Summary: demangler does not handle constructor of substituted
name correctly
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67268
Bug ID: 67268
Summary: demangler does not elide empty argument pack in
operator()
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67267
Bug ID: 67267
Summary: demangler does not handle "sr" correctly
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67262
Mikhail Maltsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66479
Daniel Micay changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danielmicay at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67265
Daniel Micay changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danielmicay at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67266
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67266
--- Comment #2 from W. Michael Petullo ---
This does not seem to be the behavior of cpp without the -P flag:
$ cpp
x
x
outputs
# 1 ""
# 1 ""
# 1 ""
# 1 "/usr/include/stdc-predef.h" 1 3 4
# 1 "" 2
# 1 ""
x
x
Here cpp does not collapse the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67266
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
From
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-5.2.0/cpp/Preprocessor-Output.html#Preprocessor-Output
:
The output from the C preprocessor looks much like the input, except that all
preprocessing directive lines hav
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67264
--- Comment #2 from Mikhail Maltsev ---
Created attachment 36211
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36211&action=edit
Script for testcase reduction
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67265
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |target
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67266
Bug ID: 67266
Summary: Use of "cpp -P ..." collapses multiple blank lines
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67265
--- Comment #1 from Johannes Dewender ---
Created attachment 36210
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36210&action=edit
Makefile with failing, working and workaround flags
I found the bug using gcc 5.2.0 (Arch Linux), but I als
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67265
Bug ID: 67265
Summary: [x86] 'asm' operand has impossible constraints with
-fstack-check
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67264
--- Comment #1 from Mikhail Maltsev ---
Created attachment 36208
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36208&action=edit
More testcases
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67264
Bug ID: 67264
Summary: Infinite recursion of demangler on fuzzed input
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: oth
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67224
--- Comment #19 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Tue, 18 Aug 2015, ejolson at unr dot edu wrote:
> which illustrates that g++ does not process trigraphs inside raw string
> literals. Admittedly I'm looking at the draft standard, but I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67261
Mikhail Maltsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61321
Mikhail Maltsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian at airs dot com
--- Comment #10 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67261
Mikhail Maltsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67224
--- Comment #18 from Eric ---
Thanks Joseph for the clarification about the two different versions of iconv.
I was admittedly confused about this until moments ago. Anyway, I just
discovered that libiconv doesn't support conversions to and from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67263
Bug ID: 67263
Summary: demangler mishandles const qualifier on template
parameter with function type
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67262
Bug ID: 67262
Summary: Massive number of nested SWITCH statements with -O1
causes g++ internal error
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67250
--- Comment #13 from Jeff Hammond ---
This is all fair. I try very hard to fix my own bugs and submit patches, but
in this case I am wholly unqualified. I don't know the first thing about
implementing a production compiler, or any compiler for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67261
Bug ID: 67261
Summary: Demangler infinite recursion
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66919
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Aug 18 21:29:07 2015
New Revision: 226993
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226993&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/66919
* g++.dg/cpp1y/auto-fn27.C: New.
Added:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66425
--- Comment #20 from Jan Engelhardt ---
Seems like the short route is to add a new attribute
((warn_unused_result_with_void_cancelling)) that exhibits the "desired"
behavior of (void) cancelling the warning, and then make glibc use that.
Simple,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67192
--- Comment #10 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #8)
> Does GCC work at all if input_location is saved and restored in
> c_parser_peek_token? I guess not, it seems too much still relies in
> input_locatio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67224
--- Comment #17 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Tue, 18 Aug 2015, ejolson at unr dot edu wrote:
> As iconv was installed on every GNU/Linux system I've tried, I'm not sure what
> is wrong with using the C99 mode present in newer relea
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36757
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36757
--- Comment #3 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Tue Aug 18 20:07:57 2015
New Revision: 226990
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226990&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/36757
* builtins.c (expand_bu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67192
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66936
--- Comment #21 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
Now backported to all active branches.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66936
--- Comment #20 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Tue Aug 18 19:58:15 2015
New Revision: 226989
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226989&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libfortran/66936
* io/unix.c (__MINGW32_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67224
--- Comment #16 from Eric ---
With my second patch the command line must now include the options
-finput-charset=UTF-8 -fextended-identifiers -fexec-charset=UTF-8
or otherwise C99 will also be used for the default execution character set.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66936
--- Comment #19 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Tue Aug 18 19:56:20 2015
New Revision: 226988
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226988&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libfortran/66936
* io/unix.c (__MINGW32_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67192
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67224
--- Comment #15 from Eric ---
Created attachment 36206
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36206&action=edit
Improved UTF-8 identifier patch
Improved patch to support UTF-8 identifiers. This version by default does no
translati
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67224
--- Comment #14 from Eric ---
While there may not be current demand for gcc to accept UTF-8 identifiers, the
fact that clang and Visual Studio support this C99 feature means source code
using Greek and accented characters in variable names is lik
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67218
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolutio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67218
--- Comment #1 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Tue Aug 18 19:04:41 2015
New Revision: 226987
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226987&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR rtl-optimization/67218
* simplif
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67066
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67216
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Aug 18 18:04:48 2015
New Revision: 226986
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226986&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/67216
* testsuite/tr1/2_general_utilities/shared_p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67066
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Aug 18 18:04:32 2015
New Revision: 226984
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226984&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/67066
* doc/xml/manual/configure.xml (manual
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66936
--- Comment #18 from Keith Marshall ---
(In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #17)
> Given the history and reasons, I've committed the patch to restore build on
> mingw32. Marking as fixed on trunk.
Thanks. Looks like a cleaner way
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67259
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67192
--- Comment #7 from Andreas Arnez ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #3)
> The issue seems to be in here in c_parser_for_statement:
>
> warn_for_misleading_indentation (for_loc, body_loc,
> c_parser_p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67104
--- Comment #14 from Moritz Klammler ---
Thank you for taking care of this so quickly.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67243
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67243
--- Comment #11 from Chengnian Sun ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #10)
> *** Bug 67230 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Sorry, Marek.
I did not realize that I had submitted so many duplicate reports. I got gateway
e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67260
Bug ID: 67260
Summary: [sh] Register spill bug for sibcall+complex+softfloat
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67226
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2015-08-17 00:00:00 |2015-8-18
C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67192
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #36203|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67259
Bug ID: 67259
Summary: list-initialization of a reference fails to initialize
char array from string literal
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67192
--- Comment #5 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #3)
> Created attachment 36203 [details]
> Patch
>
> The issue seems to be in here in c_parser_for_statement:
>
> warn_for_misleading_indentation (for_loc, body_loc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67211
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67192
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm ---
Problem also affects while statements; reproduced using example from comment #0
w with "for (;;)" replaced with "while (1)"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61441
--- Comment #9 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Tue, 18 Aug 2015, ssaraswati at gmail dot com wrote:
> Ok, have a further question though. For the current test case, which has the
> following code -
>
> float sNaN = __builtin_nansf ("
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67192
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Created attachment 36203
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36203&action=edit
Patch
The issue seems to be in here in c_parser_for_statement:
warn_for_misleading_indentation (for_loc, bod
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67160
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
And the advantage of the feature-test macro is that users can test for that
specific feature independent of the __cplusplus value.
Of course if it's effected by -pedantic then that means it *isn't* support
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67192
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67160
Casey Carter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Casey at Carter dot net
--- Comment #4 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66957
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Aug 18 14:44:06 2015
New Revision: 226975
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226975&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/66957
* search.c (protected_accessible_p): Revert f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66957
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Aug 18 14:43:44 2015
New Revision: 226974
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226974&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/66957
* search.c (protected_accessible_p): Revert f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58063
--- Comment #16 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Aug 18 14:43:38 2015
New Revision: 226973
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226973&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/58063
* tree.c (bot_manip): Remap SAVE_EXPR.
Adde
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61578
--- Comment #18 from Fredrik Hederstierna
---
Created attachment 36202
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36202&action=edit
Disasm for -mthumb also, code size increase was +48%.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67160
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67160
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Aug 18 14:38:51 2015
New Revision: 226972
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226972&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
c-family/
2015-08-18 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/67160
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67028
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61578
--- Comment #17 from Fredrik Hederstierna
---
Created attachment 36201
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36201&action=edit
Simple example giving +50% code size increase compared gcc-4.8.5 and gcc-5.2.0
Simple example giving +
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67028
--- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Aug 18 14:27:50 2015
New Revision: 226971
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226971&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/67028
* combine.c (simplify_comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67256
--- Comment #3 from Michał Fita ---
Contrary to my expectations #include doesn't work either. I would
expect these not declared in global if standard says unspecified, as my logic
whisper that would be more C++ way. I understand then I shouldn't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67222
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue Aug 18 13:41:27 2015
New Revision: 226969
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226969&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/67222
* gimple-low.c (lower_stmt): Don't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67258
Bug ID: 67258
Summary: "invalid vptr" false positive from ubsan for virtual
inheritance
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67255
Дилян Палаузов changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67257
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
St
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67256
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
N.B. the functions happen to be declared in but they are
standard functions declared in and so your code would already have
failed to compile in C++03 if anyone included (and the same applies
for when t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67255
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
Yeah, I see nothing wrong in GCC source files.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67255
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
GCC uses consistent quotes, but depends on environment variables such as LANG.
Presumably one of the commands you are running sets LANG=C or similar, which
causes GCC to output ASCII apostrophes. If you wan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67255
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67256
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |libstdc++
Severity|major
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67256
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67028
--- Comment #7 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Aug 18 12:21:41 2015
New Revision: 226967
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226967&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/67028
* combine.c (simplify_comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67255
--- Comment #2 from Дилян Палаузов ---
git clone https://cgit.cyrus.foundation/cyrus-imapd
cd cyrus-imapd
libtoolize
autoreconf -i
CFLAGS="-Wpadded" ./configure --with-sqlite
make 2>&1 | grep righ | sort -u
prints:
imap/append.h:62:9: warning:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67257
Bug ID: 67257
Summary: Internal compiler error in retrieve_specialization
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67256
Bug ID: 67256
Summary: [C++11] Global scope contaminated with symbols from
mathcalls.h
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67230
Bug ID: 67230
Summary: Wrong Message of -Wvla on ISO C90 Emitted with
-std=c11
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: RESOLVED
Severity: normal
Priority: P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67243
--- Comment #10 from Marek Polacek ---
*** Bug 67230 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67232
Bug ID: 67232
Summary: Wrong Message of -Wvla on ISO C90 Emitted with
-std=c11
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: RESOLVED
Severity: normal
Priority: P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67231
Bug ID: 67231
Summary: Wrong Message of -Wvla on ISO C90 Emitted with
-std=c11
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: RESOLVED
Severity: normal
Priority: P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67243
--- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek ---
*** Bug 67232 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67243
--- Comment #9 from Marek Polacek ---
*** Bug 67231 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67234
Bug ID: 67234
Summary: Wrong Message of -Wvla for Standard ISO C90 However
Emitted with -std=c11
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: RESOLVED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67233
Bug ID: 67233
Summary: Wrong Message of -Wvla on ISO C90 Emitted with
-std=c11
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: RESOLVED
Severity: normal
Priority: P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67243
--- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek ---
*** Bug 67233 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67243
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
*** Bug 67235 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67243
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
*** Bug 67236 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67243
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
*** Bug 67234 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67236
Bug ID: 67236
Summary: Wrong Message of -Wvla for Standard ISO C90 However
Emitted with -std=c11
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: RESOLVED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67237
Bug ID: 67237
Summary: Wrong Message of -Wvla for Standard ISO C90 However
Emitted with -std=c11
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: RESOLVED
Severity: normal
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
