https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67286
--- Comment #6 from weiguo.zhou weiguo.zhou at spreadtrum dot com ---
(In reply to Dmitry Vyukov from comment #4)
Yes, asan should work on android/arm32. There is some ongoing work on arm64.
+eugeni can provide more details.
according to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66425
--- Comment #22 from Filipe Brandenburger filbranden at google dot com ---
(In reply to Jan Engelhardt from comment #20)
Seems like the short route is to add a new attribute
((warn_unused_result_with_void_cancelling)) that exhibits the desired
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67286
Bug ID: 67286
Summary: asan doen't work on Android(32bit ARM)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63176
Ville Voutilainen ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66312
--- Comment #13 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz glaubitz at physik dot
fu-berlin.de ---
Created attachment 36225
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36225action=edit
Diff of the disassembly of the stripped versions of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67285
--- Comment #2 from hs.naveen2u at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 36226
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36226action=edit
Testcase to reproduce the issue
aarch64-thunder-elf-gcc pr67285.c -O2 -funsafe-math-optimizations
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49054
Johannes Pfau johannespfau at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66312
--- Comment #11 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz glaubitz at physik dot
fu-berlin.de ---
Created attachment 36223
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36223action=edit
Stage 2 compiled version of ctfeexpr.dmd.o (unstripped)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66312
--- Comment #12 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz glaubitz at physik dot
fu-berlin.de ---
Created attachment 36224
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36224action=edit
Stage 3 compiled version of ctfeexpr.dmd.o (unstripped)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67287
Bug ID: 67287
Summary: FRE should CSE sqrt() calls even with -ferrno-math
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67287
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67286
--- Comment #8 from weiguo.zhou weiguo.zhou at spreadtrum dot com ---
(In reply to Yury Gribov from comment #5)
(In reply to Dmitry Vyukov from comment #4)
+eugeni can provide more details.
Please! E.g. how do you build compiler and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67286
--- Comment #11 from weiguo.zhou weiguo.zhou at spreadtrum dot com ---
you can got the dynamic libasan.so.2 with following step:
../gcc-4.9.2-sprd/libsanitizer/configure --host=arm-linux-androideabi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67143
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67279
--- Comment #6 from Vittorio Zecca zeccav at gmail dot com ---
On my side it has to do with the C standard.
Compilation with -ansi or -std=c90 is successful.
Compilation with -std=c99 fails.
Compiling with g++ is OK.
The behaviour I would like
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66563
--- Comment #59 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz glaubitz at physik dot
fu-berlin.de ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #58)
Oh, and according to the Debian changelog, it must be a regression that was
introduced somewhere
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66312
--- Comment #15 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz glaubitz at physik dot
fu-berlin.de ---
Oh, and according to the Debian changelog, it must be a regression that was
introduced somewhere between r218987 and r222750 of the gcc-4.9 branch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67286
--- Comment #5 from Yury Gribov y.gribov at samsung dot com ---
(In reply to Dmitry Vyukov from comment #4)
+eugeni can provide more details.
Please! E.g. how do you build compiler and runtime?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67286
--- Comment #9 from weiguo.zhou weiguo.zhou at spreadtrum dot com ---
(In reply to Yury Gribov from comment #7)
(In reply to weiguo.zhou from comment #6)
It seems Google's official docs indicate the asan only supported on Android
with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67286
--- Comment #10 from Yury Gribov y.gribov at samsung dot com ---
(In reply to weiguo.zhou from comment #9)
as I explained just now, after generate the final cross-compile toolchain
for android/arm32 successfully, the last step is generate the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67286
--- Comment #1 from zhouweiguo2008 at gmail dot com ---
this bug had been fixed and validated with gcc 4.9.2 and gcc 5.2.0.
and the testcases (from external/compiler-rt/test/asan/TestCases) could be
running
normally on the 32-bit Android 5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67280
cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67279
--- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Yeah, I think I'll change this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67286
--- Comment #7 from Yury Gribov y.gribov at samsung dot com ---
(In reply to weiguo.zhou from comment #6)
It seems Google's official docs indicate the asan only supported on Android
with LLVM-based clang toolchain.
That was my impression as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67286
Yury Gribov y.gribov at samsung dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||y.gribov at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66563
--- Comment #58 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz glaubitz at physik dot
fu-berlin.de ---
Oh, and according to the Debian changelog, it must be a regression that was
introduced somewhere between r218987 and r222750 of the gcc-4.9 branch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67285
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67286
--- Comment #4 from Dmitry Vyukov dvyukov at google dot com ---
Yes, asan should work on android/arm32. There is some ongoing work on arm64.
+eugeni can provide more details.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67286
weiguo.zhou zhouweiguo2008 at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67288
Bug ID: 67288
Summary: [4.9 regression] non optimal simple function (useless
additional shift/remove/shift/add)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67301
Bug ID: 67301
Summary: Unable to compile program using extended assembly and
asmSymbolicName
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67301
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Try:
int main(int argc, char* argv[])
{
__asm__ __volatile__ (
\t movl %[__ARGC], %%eax \n
:
: [__ARGC] r (argc)
);
return
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67284
Mikhail Maltsev miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc64le-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67065
--- Comment #5 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Aug 20 10:18:03 2015
New Revision: 227027
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227027root=gccview=rev
Log:
/cp
2015-08-20 Paolo Carlini
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61441
--- Comment #10 from Sujoy ssaraswati at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #9)
There is no need to wait for bugs to move state (rather, if working on a
bug, you may wish to change it to ASSIGNED yourself with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67291
Bug ID: 67291
Summary: error: 'asm' operand has impossible constraints when
compiling gromacs 5.1 testsuite on PPC64 and PPC64LE
with VSX SIMD
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67285
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
There are two issues here - one is side-effects (virtual definition) and one
is dependences (virtual uses). The first one you hit with -fmath-errno,
the second you hit with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67065
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67290
Bug ID: 67290
Summary: powerpc: suboptimal add of u64 with u32
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66728
--- Comment #6 from Ulrich Weigand uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #4)
Testing a patch. It involves tightening the mode of the rtx returned
by rtl_for_decl_location, as well as new asserts, so
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67289
Bug ID: 67289
Summary: ICE in ipa-devirt.c
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48544
--- Comment #1 from Alexandre Duret-Lutz adl at gnu dot org ---
This works OK with 4.8 and 5.1, so not an issue anymore as far as I'm
concerned.
(Might be related to #48968 which is reported as half-fixed -- I haven't
tried.)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67283
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67291
--- Comment #1 from Dominik Mierzejewski dominik at greysector dot net ---
Created attachment 36227
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36227action=edit
Preprocessed source (gzipped)
Preprocessed source generated with:
cd
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67280
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67286
--- Comment #12 from weiguo.zhou weiguo.zhou at spreadtrum dot com ---
(In reply to weiguo.zhou from comment #8)
(In reply to Yury Gribov from comment #5)
(In reply to Dmitry Vyukov from comment #4)
+eugeni can provide more details.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67285
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67288
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63672
Peter Bergner bergner at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bergner at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67291
--- Comment #7 from Dominik Mierzejewski dominik at greysector dot net ---
Thanks a lot, everyone. This was really helpful. I'll bring this back to
gromacs upstream.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67297
Bug ID: 67297
Summary: PowerPC does not support all vector interfaces from
the ELFv2 1.1 ABI
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ABI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67292
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Oops I forgot the command:
./cc1plus -std=c++11 -o /dev/null - -quiet 'class k{int k{4};};'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67295
Bug ID: 67295
Summary: [ARM][6 Regression] FAIL:
gcc.target/arm/builtin-bswap-1.c scan-assembler-times
revshne\\t 1
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67293
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The difference is of course when not optimized out but using only(?)
DW_AT_const_value you can't refer to a in the debugger:
(gdb) p a
Can't take address of a which isn't an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67292
Bug ID: 67292
Summary: valgrind error from cc1plus: search_line_sse2(unsigned
char const*, unsigned char const*) (lex.c:380)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.4
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67291
Peter Bergner bergner at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bergner at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67293
Bug ID: 67293
Summary: Very large DW_AT_const_value produced
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: memory-hog, missed-optimization
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67291
Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67294
Bug ID: 67294
Summary: FAIL: 30_threads/*timed_mutex/unlock/2.cc (test for
excess errors) on x86_64-apple-darwin14
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67301
--- Comment #2 from Jeffrey Walton noloader at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
Try:
int main(int argc, char* argv[])
{
__asm__ __volatile__ (
\t movl %[__ARGC], %%eax \n
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67294
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66728
--- Comment #7 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
(In reply to Ulrich Weigand from comment #6)
(In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #4)
Testing a patch. It involves tightening the mode of the rtx
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67211
Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #36218|0 |1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67211
--- Comment #12 from Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 36231
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36231action=edit
Patch to fix problem for gcc 6.x that was submitted to gcc-patches
[gcc]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67296
Bug ID: 67296
Summary: [HSA] ICE in register allocator (assignment of this
argument in a ctor)
Product: gcc
Version: hsa
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67298
Bug ID: 67298
Summary: [6 Regression] 254.gap in SPEC CPU 2000 is miscompiled
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67299
Bug ID: 67299
Summary: demangler mishandles complex types
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67294
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67294
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu Aug 20 20:36:19 2015
New Revision: 227043
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227043root=gccview=rev
Log:
libstdc++/67294 Don't run timed mutex tests on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67298
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67224
--- Comment #20 from Eric ejolson at unr dot edu ---
I've been looking at the code in lex_identifier as well as what goes on in
forms_identifier_p and so forth. As some point each identifier needs to be
stored in the symbol table using
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66312
--- Comment #14 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz glaubitz at physik dot
fu-berlin.de ---
The issue still reproduces with gcc_4.9_4.9.3-3 in Debian which corresponds to
SVN revision r226107 of the gcc-4.9 branch:
Comparing stages 2 and 3
warning:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67292
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45386
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||redi at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67291
Peter Bergner bergner at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45386
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67292
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This is not a bug.
If you look this is an aligned access so it will never fault. This means we
can read past the array bounds without any issues as long as we don't use those
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67291
--- Comment #4 from Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Ww is the wrong constraint to use for this instruction. The ww constraint is
intended to be used with the VSX scalar single precision floating point
instructions added in ISA
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67291
Peter Bergner bergner at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67300
Bug ID: 67300
Summary: -foffload* undocumented
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openacc
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67224
--- Comment #21 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot
com ---
_cpp_interpret_identifier converts UCNs to UTF-8 which is the canonical
internal form for identifiers - for UTF-8 in identifiers, you just need to
pass in
81 matches
Mail list logo
