[Bug target/67573] [SH] wrong code generated for libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/cxx11-shim_facets.cc at -mlra

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67573 --- Comment #5 from Kazumoto Kojima --- (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #4) > Maybe FPSCR_STAT_REG should be in the clobber list, too? Otherwise stores > of FP exception bits etc (get_fpscr builtin) could be wrongly CSE'd across > function

[Bug c++/67595] concepts code causes segfault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67595 --- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- template concept bool allocatable = requires{ { new X }->X * }; template concept bool semiregular = allocatable; template concept bool readable = requires{ requires semiregular }; template int

[Bug tree-optimization/67253] [6 Regression] ICE at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (verify_gimple failed)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67253 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug fortran/67588] module.c heap use after free

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67588 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug tree-optimization/67253] [6 Regression] ICE at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (verify_gimple failed)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67253 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Ok... so the issue is we have "invalid" tree sharing of in both fn4.constprop and fn2.constprop. Correctly without BLOCK on the location. But then we expand fn4.constprop and do expand_gimple_stmt_1

[Bug middle-end/59812] Missing aggressive loop optimization warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59812 Peter VARGA changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/67596] /usr/include/c++/4.7/bits/stl_list.h error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67596 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libfortran/67585] Retry system calls failing with EINTR

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67585 Janne Blomqvist changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #2 from Janne

[Bug middle-end/67442] [5 Regression] GCC 5.2.0 on x86_64 creates invalid address on specific array index calculation through pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67442 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||6.0 Summary|[5/6

[Bug c++/67595] concepts code causes segfault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67595 --- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Or even more: template concept bool allocatable = requires{{new X}->X * }; template concept bool semiregular = allocatable; template concept bool readable = requires{requires semiregular}; template

[Bug bootstrap/67598] New: [6 Regression] Target powerpc-e500v2-linux-gnuspe failed to bootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67598 Bug ID: 67598 Summary: [6 Regression] Target powerpc-e500v2-linux-gnuspe failed to bootstrap Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/67442] [5/6 Regression] GCC 5.2.0 on x86_64 creates invalid address on specific array index calculation through pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67442 --- Comment #12 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Sep 16 07:25:15 2015 New Revision: 227818 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227818=gcc=rev Log: 2015-09-16 Richard Biener PR middle-end/67442

[Bug bootstrap/67597] [6 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67597 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/66785] internal compiler error in record_operand_use

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66785 James Greenhalgh changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug target/66785] internal compiler error in record_operand_use

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66785 James Greenhalgh changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #35920|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug middle-end/67241] [6 Regression] FAIL: 23_containers/unordered_set/insert/hash_policy.cc execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67241 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/67239] [6 Regression] FAIL: 23_containers/unordered_set/insert/hash_policy.cc execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67239 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- *** Bug 67241 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug libstdc++/59603] std::random_shuffle tries to swap element with itself

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59603 Tony E Lewis changed: What|Removed |Added CC||TonyELewis at hotmail dot com ---

[Bug ipa/67600] [5/6 Regression] Segfault when assigning only one char to ostreambuf_iterator compiled with -O2 or -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67600 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- It must conclude that : std::basic_ostringstream::basic_ostringstream (, 16); _52 = MEM[(char_type * *) + 48B]; _53 = MEM[(char_type * *) + 56B]; if (_52 < _53) goto ; else goto ; :

[Bug bootstrap/67598] [6 Regression] Target powerpc-e500v2-linux-gnuspe failed to bootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67598 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug c/67599] New: linux build fails for openrisc compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67599 Bug ID: 67599 Summary: linux build fails for openrisc compiler Product: gcc Version: 4.5.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blocker Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug c/67570] comparison rules fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67570 --- Comment #2 from BENAÏSSA --- Thank you for your reply.   A.BENAÏSSA Post scriptum: Please can you confirm if you have time that the following positive floating point values are correct. --  

[Bug tree-optimization/67601] Vectorization of loop causes aligned access to possibly unaligned address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67601 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug bootstrap/67597] [6 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67597 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug tree-optimization/67601] Vectorization of loop causes aligned access to possibly unaligned address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67601 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- You are invoking undefined behavior because you are dereferencing table in table[i]+=fTracksPointer; and table is not aligned according to its type (Long64_t).

[Bug rtl-optimization/66790] Invalid uninitialized register handling in REE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66790 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/67599] linux build fails for openrisc compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67599 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- 4.5 is no longer supported, try a newer version like 4.9.

[Bug libstdc++/67600] New: [5/6] Segfault when assigning only one char to ostreambuf_iterator compiled with -O2 or -O3

= 'x'" statement, but -O0, -O1 or -Os are O.K. If I add the "*iter++ = 'Y'" statement and compile it with -O2 or -O3, it can print "XY" successfully. gcc versions: Fails on gcc-5 (x86_64-redhat-linux on Fedora-22) and gcc-6.0.0 (20150916 (experimental)). Pass on gcc-4.8 and gcc-4.9

[Bug fortran/67170] PRE can't hoist out a readonly argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67170 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- We can do what the FE should do at gimplification time as well I guess.

[Bug ipa/67600] [5/6 Regression] Segfault when assigning only one char to ostreambuf_iterator compiled with -O2 or -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67600 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/67601] New: Vectorization of loop causes aligned access to possibly unaligned address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67601 Bug ID: 67601 Summary: Vectorization of loop causes aligned access to possibly unaligned address Product: gcc Version: 4.8.5 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/67599] linux build fails for openrisc compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67599 --- Comment #2 from Sudip --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > 4.5 is no longer supported, try a newer version like 4.9. I download from https://www.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/files/bin , can you please guide me where can i get

[Bug bootstrap/67597] [6 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67597 --- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Can be reproduced with: % CC="/home/trippels/gcc_test/usr/local/bin/gcc -fprofile-generate" CXX="/home/trippels/gcc_test/usr/local/bin/g++ -fprofile-generate" ../gcc/configure --with-cpu=power8

[Bug bootstrap/67597] [6 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67597 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/67253] [6 Regression] ICE at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (verify_gimple failed)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67253 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/67587] [6 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure with --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67587 --- Comment #13 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Wed Sep 16 15:02:32 2015 New Revision: 227827 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227827=gcc=rev Log: shrink-wrap: Fix up partitions (PR67587) With the new shrink-wrap

[Bug c++/67064] Register asm variable broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67064 --- Comment #27 from Andrés Agustín Tiraboschi --- I forgot to say that the patch is for gcc 5.2

[Bug tree-optimization/67253] [6 Regression] ICE at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (verify_gimple failed)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67253 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Sep 16 14:27:52 2015 New Revision: 227826 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227826=gcc=rev Log: 2015-09-16 Richard Biener PR middle-end/67253

[Bug middle-end/67271] [5 Regression] ICE with -O1,2,3 on darwin14.5 x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67271 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||6.0 Summary|[5/6

[Bug middle-end/67271] [5/6 Regression] ICE with -O1,2,3 on darwin14.5 x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67271 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Sep 16 14:26:04 2015 New Revision: 227825 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227825=gcc=rev Log: 2015-09-16 Richard Biener PR middle-end/67271

[Bug c++/67571] Error: open CFI at the end of file; missing .cfi_endproc directive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67571 --- Comment #9 from werner at beroux dot com --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #7) > Can you please attach the preprocessed JSBindingsAllInOne.ii file (by > adding -save-temps to the compiler invocation)? I added that flag (at

[Bug c++/67064] Register asm variable broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67064 --- Comment #28 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- (In reply to Andrés Agustín Tiraboschi from comment #26) > Hi, I've read the bug report and I've made a patch in order to fix it. > I've ran all the gcc tests and I have only one fail, but that fail

[Bug c++/67571] Error: open CFI at the end of file; missing .cfi_endproc directive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67571 --- Comment #10 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to werner from comment #9) > (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #7) > > Can you please attach the preprocessed JSBindingsAllInOne.ii file (by > > adding -save-temps to the

[Bug c/67570] comparison rules fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67570 --- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- I advise looking at __FLT_MAX__, __FLT_MIN__, __FLT_DENORM_MIN__ etc. as predefined by the compiler to see the appropriate values of various constants. > Multiplying (float)MIN_NORMALIZED

[Bug bootstrap/67587] [6 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure with --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67587 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/67484] options-save.c sanitizer asan detects freed storage referenced heap-use-after-free

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67484 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|ubizjak at gmail

[Bug c/64249] Missing warning for if (A) else if (A)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64249 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-09/msg01200.html

[Bug c++/67602] unsigned left-shift overflow should not be undefined in c++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67602 --- Comment #3 from Brad Huntting --- Oops. I missed that part. Thanks. brad On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 12:56 PM, miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org < gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67602 > > --- Comment

[Bug rtl-optimization/66790] Invalid uninitialized register handling in REE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66790 --- Comment #15 from Eric Botcazou --- > I've looked at this for a while now. I agree that this is a bug in REE that > needs to be fixed in a manner similar to this patch. Thanks for looking into it. > I think ideally we would figure out

[Bug c++/67602] unsigned left-shift overflow should not be undefined in c++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67602 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/67603] [aarch64] constant folded of floating-point expression at compile-time value does not match run-time value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67603 --- Comment #1 from David Abdurachmanov --- Created attachment 36345 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36345=edit Annotated assembly Shows that one value is computed at run-time, while another one is loaded from literal

[Bug c++/67602] New: unsigned left-shift overflow should not be undefined in c++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67602 Bug ID: 67602 Summary: unsigned left-shift overflow should not be undefined in c++ Product: gcc Version: 4.8.5 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/67602] unsigned left-shift overflow should not be undefined in c++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67602 --- Comment #2 from Mikhail Maltsev --- (In reply to Brad Huntting from comment #0) > It should be noted that the C standard appears to allow for undefined > behavior when E2>=N. And so does the C++ standard: "... The behavior is undefined if

[Bug c++/67605] Compilation errors creating std::pair using templated arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67605 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse --- Spelling it "typename List::template Node*" helps. Note that clang rejects the code as well.

[Bug ada/67604] New: shrink-wrap doesn't allow multiple entries

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67604 Bug ID: 67604 Summary: shrink-wrap doesn't allow multiple entries Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ada

[Bug rtl-optimization/67604] shrink-wrap doesn't allow multiple entries

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67604 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/67603] [aarch64] constant folded of floating-point expression at compile-time value does not match run-time value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67603 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/67605] New: Compilation errors creating std::pair using templated arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67605 Bug ID: 67605 Summary: Compilation errors creating std::pair using templated arguments Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/67573] [SH] wrong code generated for libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/cxx11-shim_facets.cc at -mlra

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67573 Kazumoto Kojima changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/67573] [SH] wrong code generated for libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/cxx11-shim_facets.cc at -mlra

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67573 --- Comment #6 from Kazumoto Kojima --- Author: kkojima Date: Thu Sep 17 00:12:57 2015 New Revision: 227837 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227837=gcc=rev Log: PR target/67573 * config/sh/sh.md: Add early clobber to scratch operand of

[Bug target/55212] [SH] Switch to LRA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212 Bug 55212 depends on bug 67573, which changed state. Bug 67573 Summary: [SH] wrong code generated for libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/cxx11-shim_facets.cc at -mlra https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67573 What|Removed

[Bug libstdc++/67173] experimental/filesystem/operations/current_path.cc FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67173 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Wed Sep 16 22:50:28 2015 New Revision: 227836 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227836=gcc=rev Log: Implement filesystem::canonical() without realpath PR libstdc++/67173

[Bug rtl-optimization/66790] Invalid uninitialized register handling in REE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66790 --- Comment #16 from Bernd Schmidt --- So I think there's three things to solve - which problem should df_live be using, the one it says it's using or the one it actually does - if it's the former, see if passes using the information need

[Bug tree-optimization/47679] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Strange uninitialized warning after SRA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47679 --- Comment #26 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Thu Sep 17 03:01:03 2015 New Revision: 227842 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227842=gcc=rev Log: [PATCH] Pass in avail_expr_stack and setup edge_infos earlier PR

[Bug tree-optimization/66388] [6 Regression] Test gcc.target/i386/pr49781-1.c failed because of recent scev overflow patches.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66388 --- Comment #3 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: amker Date: Thu Sep 17 03:40:18 2015 New Revision: 227844 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227844=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/66388 * tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c

[Bug c++/67571] Error: open CFI at the end of file; missing .cfi_endproc directive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67571 --- Comment #11 from werner at beroux dot com --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #10) > (In reply to werner from comment #9) > > (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #7) > > > Can you please attach the preprocessed

[Bug target/67603] New: [aarch64] constant folded of floating-point expression at compile-time value does not match run-time value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67603 Bug ID: 67603 Summary: [aarch64] constant folded of floating-point expression at compile-time value does not match run-time value Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status:

[Bug target/46942] x86_64 parameter passing unnecessary sign/zero extends

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46942 James Y Knight changed: What|Removed |Added CC||foom at fuhm dot net --- Comment #10

[Bug tree-optimization/47679] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Strange uninitialized warning after SRA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47679 --- Comment #25 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Wed Sep 16 17:25:51 2015 New Revision: 227831 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227831=gcc=rev Log: [PATCH] Move code out of tree-ssa-dom into tree-ssa-scopedtables PR