[Bug c++/67702] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67702 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/67680] Seg Fault in gcc 4.9.3 compiling libiberty/floatformat.c when building gcc 5.2.1 on Cygwin 64 on Windows

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67680 --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek --- Hmm, I couldn't reproduce this on Linux.

[Bug other/66887] trunk/libmpx/mpxrt/mpxrt.c:158: possible performance problem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66887 --- Comment #1 from David Binderman --- sizeof (struct xsave_struct) is about 900 bytes, so there is plenty of time to be saved.

[Bug libgcc/67624] arm/fp16.c __gnu_f2h_internal has wrong pattern for INF/NAN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67624 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/67708] New: ambiguous overload for user-defined conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67708 Bug ID: 67708 Summary: ambiguous overload for user-defined conversion Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3

[Bug other/66887] trunk/libmpx/mpxrt/mpxrt.c:158: possible performance problem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66887 Ilya Enkovich changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/67537] [6 Regression] r225189 breaks building boost hana

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67537 --- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- The issue got fixed in clang, so there is no pressing need for a library fix anymore.

[Bug libgcc/67624] arm/fp16.c __gnu_f2h_internal has wrong pattern for INF/NAN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67624 --- Comment #3 from Richard Earnshaw --- Author: rearnsha Date: Thu Sep 24 09:40:06 2015 New Revision: 228082 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228082=gcc=rev Log: ARM: fp16 Fix PR 67624 - Incorrect conversion of float Infinity to __fp16

[Bug libstdc++/67707] Regression in std::move of std::deque with non-is_always_equal allocator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67707 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/67699] [4.9/5 Regression] ICE (segfault) compiling a const array with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67699 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/67705] incorrect restrict interpretation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67705 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/67708] ambiguous overload for user-defined conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67708 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug lto/67699] ICE (segfault) compiling a const array with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67699 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Sep 24 11:01:14 2015 New Revision: 228084 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228084=gcc=rev Log: 2015-09-24 Richard Biener PR lto/67699 *

[Bug tree-optimization/67690] [5/6 Regression] wrong code with -O2 on x86_64/Linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67690 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c/67661] Wrong warning when declare VLAs: operation on 'x' may be undefined [-Wsequence-point]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67661 frankhb1989 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||frankhb1989 at gmail dot

[Bug ada/67706] New: Recursive Ghost expression function confuses the compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67706 Bug ID: 67706 Summary: Recursive Ghost expression function confuses the compiler Product: gcc Version: 4.9.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/48885] missed optimization with restrict qualifier?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48885 --- Comment #15 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to vries from comment #14) > (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #13) > > On Wed, 23 Sep 2015, vries at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > > > >

[Bug c++/67702] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67702 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Known to work|

[Bug lto/67699] ICE (segfault) compiling a const array with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67699 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- #2 0x0070544c in symtab_node::get (decl=0x768d9b40) at /space/rguenther/src/svn/gcc-5-branch/gcc/cgraph.h:365 365 gcc_checking_assert (TREE_CODE (decl) == FUNCTION_DECL (gdb) l 360

[Bug tree-optimization/67705] New: incorrect restrict interpretation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67705 Bug ID: 67705 Summary: incorrect restrict interpretation Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c/48885] missed optimization with restrict qualifier?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48885 --- Comment #16 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Sep 24 07:34:47 2015 New Revision: 228073 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228073=gcc=rev Log: 2015-09-24 Richard Biener PR

[Bug tree-optimization/67705] incorrect restrict interpretation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67705 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse --- Isn't that an old document? At least, I don't reach the same conclusions as you do using the C11 wording: 1 Let D be a declaration of an ordinary identifier that provides a means of designating an object P as

[Bug c++/67703] assert after placement new

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67703 Piotr Padlewski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/67699] ICE (segfault) compiling a const array with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67699 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/67661] Wrong warning when declare VLAs: operation on 'x' may be undefined [-Wsequence-point]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67661 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/49774] [meta-bug] restrict qualification aliasing issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49774 Bug 49774 depends on bug 48885, which changed state. Bug 48885 Summary: missed optimization with restrict qualifier? https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48885 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c/67680] Seg Fault in gcc 4.9.3 compiling libiberty/floatformat.c when building gcc 5.2.1 on Cygwin 64 on Windows

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67680 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- Where did you get gmp/mpfr from? The crash looks like either one of those two are crashing? If you compiled them yourself, did you run make check and was there any failures?

[Bug c++/67704] New: [concepts] requirements not being applied to aliases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67704 Bug ID: 67704 Summary: [concepts] requirements not being applied to aliases Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/67701] Unnecessary/bad instructions for u32-casted access to external symbol (assumes misaligned, superfluous load)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67701 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug sanitizer/64888] ubsan doesn't work with openmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64888 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- But these *.Lubsan_data0 are read-only I think, so I don't think there's a problem if multiple threads read such a variable.

[Bug c++/67707] New: Regression in std::move of std::deque with non-is_always_equal allocator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67707 Bug ID: 67707 Summary: Regression in std::move of std::deque with non-is_always_equal allocator Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c/67661] Wrong warning when declare VLAs: operation on 'x' may be undefined [-Wsequence-point]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67661 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c/48885] missed optimization with restrict qualifier?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48885 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug rtl-optimization/66790] Invalid uninitialized register handling in REE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66790 --- Comment #38 from Pierre-Marie de Rodat --- (In reply to Paolo Bonzini from comment #35) > Is this comment obsolete? The IN bitmap is all set at first. Yes, indeed: I removed the part you quoted. (In reply to Paolo Bonzini from comment #35)

[Bug rtl-optimization/66790] Invalid uninitialized register handling in REE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66790 Pierre-Marie de Rodat changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #36377|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/67710] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/darwin-*version-*.c (test for excess errors) with Xcode 7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67710 Bug ID: 67710 Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/darwin-*version-*.c (test for excess errors) with Xcode 7 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/67690] [5/6 Regression] wrong code with -O2 on x86_64/Linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67690 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- It's tail-merging. Eventually we can fix this in replace_block_by by walking over all defs in bb2 calling reset_flow_sensitive_info.

[Bug target/67712] New: [SH] __builtin_strncmp causes code bloat

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67712 Bug ID: 67712 Summary: [SH] __builtin_strncmp causes code bloat Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/67690] [5/6 Regression] wrong code with -O2 on x86_64/Linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67690 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/67711] New: Memory corruption when reassigning value to initializer_list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67711 Bug ID: 67711 Summary: Memory corruption when reassigning value to initializer_list Product: gcc Version: 4.8.5 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug other/67698] internal compiler error: in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2297

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67698 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- I checked a fix: commit c6d616512b2bc429f43c147dcd5cb0c27af8aa47 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Thu Sep 24 05:23:37 2015 -0700 Remove interrupt_return We must pass UNSPEC_INTERRUPT_RETURN

[Bug libstdc++/67707] [5/6 regression] Regression in std::move of std::deque with non-is_always_equal allocator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67707 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/67711] Memory corruption when reassigning value to initializer_list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67711 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/67701] Unnecessary/bad instructions for u32-casted access to external symbol (assumes misaligned, superfluous load)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67701 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/67709] New: ICE: in estimate_function_body_sizes, at ipa-inline-analysis.c:2489 on x86_64-apple-darwin*

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67709 Bug ID: 67709 Summary: ICE: in estimate_function_body_sizes, at ipa-inline-analysis.c:2489 on x86_64-apple-darwin* Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libgomp/67141] wrong libgomp mutex initialisation order

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67141 --- Comment #8 from Chung-Lin Tang --- Can the MinGW folks confirm if the reported problem was fixed? Thanks.

[Bug libstdc++/67707] [5/6 regression] Regression in std::move of std::deque with non-is_always_equal allocator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67707 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Ugh, I hate allocators. I probably should have added a completely new std::__cxx11::deque for gcc-5 with nothrow move and full allocator support, instead of trying to bolt it on to our existing

[Bug tree-optimization/67713] New: builtin cmpstrn not used if not one of the inputs is not a string literal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67713 Bug ID: 67713 Summary: builtin cmpstrn not used if not one of the inputs is not a string literal Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/67701] Unnecessary/bad instructions for u32-casted access to external symbol (assumes misaligned, superfluous load)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67701 --- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 24 Sep 2015, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67701 > > Eric Botcazou changed: > >What|Removed

[Bug fortran/67614] ICE on using arithmetic if with null

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67614 --- Comment #4 from Gerhard Steinmetz --- In general, a future extension to check pointer status looks promising (at compile time and runtime). With a tiny and simple source the problem is clear and

[Bug tree-optimization/67705] incorrect restrict interpretation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67705 --- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > Indeed the wording contains "and X is also modified (by any means)." thus > fp == fp2 are valid even though they are marked restrict. Btw, lets forgo

[Bug fortran/67614] ICE on using arithmetic if with null

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67614 --- Comment #5 from Gerhard Steinmetz --- For comparison, a logical if (assumes scalar-logical-expr instead of scalar-numeric-expr in arithmetic if) "avoids" an ICE. Analogous examples : $ cat y1.f90

[Bug middle-end/67714] New: [6 Regression] char is zero-extended instead of sign-extended

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67714 Bug ID: 67714 Summary: [6 Regression] char is zero-extended instead of sign-extended Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code

[Bug target/67701] Unnecessary/bad instructions for u32-casted access to external symbol (assumes misaligned, superfluous load)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67701 --- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou --- > Yes, AFAIK this was some obscure situation with SSE on x86. IIRC > code doing unaligned scalar accesses (which is ok on x86) but then > vectorized using peeling for alignment (which cannot succeed if the

[Bug libstdc++/67707] [5/6 regression] Regression in std::move of std::deque with non-is_always_equal allocator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67707 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Thu Sep 24 15:46:24 2015 New Revision: 228090 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228090=gcc=rev Log: Leave moved-from std::deque in a valid state PR libstdc++/67707 *

[Bug c/67680] Seg Fault in gcc 4.9.3 compiling libiberty/floatformat.c when building gcc 5.2.1 on Cygwin 64 on Windows

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67680 --- Comment #7 from Brian Plummer --- Regarding gmp/mpfr. I built them myself and I thought I was careful about the make checks...but maybe not. But I think you are correct about this. It's almost certainly gmp or mpfr. I went ahead and

[Bug target/67391] [SH] Convert clrt addc to normal add insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67391 --- Comment #13 from Oleg Endo --- (In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #11) > > /exp/ldroot/dodes/INTEST/trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/matmul_6.f90:19:0: > Error: could not split insn > (insn 2778 2779 94 (set (reg:SI 3 r3) >

[Bug rtl-optimization/67715] New: [6 Regression][ARM] ICE in cselib.c during reload_cse_regs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67715 Bug ID: 67715 Summary: [6 Regression][ARM] ICE in cselib.c during reload_cse_regs Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code

[Bug middle-end/67714] [6 Regression] signed char is zero-extended instead of sign-extended

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67714 kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c/67661] Wrong warning when declare VLAs: operation on 'x' may be undefined [-Wsequence-point]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67661 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug driver/67640] driver passes -fdiagnostics-color= always last

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67640 --- Comment #1 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- Author: manu Date: Thu Sep 24 16:37:43 2015 New Revision: 228094 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228094=gcc=rev Log: fdiagnostics-color=never does not disable color for some diagnostics

[Bug driver/67640] driver passes -fdiagnostics-color= always last

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67640 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/67661] Wrong warning when declare VLAs: operation on 'x' may be undefined [-Wsequence-point]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67661 --- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- The warning is bogus. It appears even if separate declarations are used for the three variables; maybe it's something to do with the printf call?

[Bug tree-optimization/67705] incorrect restrict interpretation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67705 --- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- Regarding multiple levels of restricted pointers, please see my annotations of the C99 wording at , in particular as regards the

[Bug rtl-optimization/66790] Invalid uninitialized register handling in REE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66790 --- Comment #40 from Bernd Schmidt --- (In reply to Pierre-Marie de Rodat from comment #38) > Besides, Eric told me live that instead of artificially clearing the > entry basic block’s IN set, we could use the confluence_0 for that. I > did this

[Bug tree-optimization/67705] incorrect restrict interpretation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67705 --- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On September 24, 2015 6:28:16 PM GMT+02:00, joseph at codesourcery dot com wrote: >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67705 > >--- Comment #4 from joseph at

[Bug target/61578] [4.9 regression] Code size increase for ARM thumb compared to 4.8.x when compiling with -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61578 --- Comment #31 from Vladimir Makarov --- Author: vmakarov Date: Thu Sep 24 20:40:30 2015 New Revision: 228097 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228097=gcc=rev Log: 2015-09-24 Vladimir Makarov PR target/61578

[Bug target/67391] [SH] Convert clrt addc to normal add insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67391 --- Comment #14 from Kazumoto Kojima --- Created attachment 36387 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36387=edit a trial Although a bit ugly, how about adding pattern using scratch reg? Does it get the original clrt+addc issue

[Bug target/61578] [4.9 regression] Code size increase for ARM thumb compared to 4.8.x when compiling with -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61578 --- Comment #30 from Vladimir Makarov --- (In reply to Dominik Vogt from comment #29) > I think I understand what's going on: > > Consider the patched code in match_reloads(): > > + = (ins[1] < 0 && REG_P (in_rtx) > + && (int)

[Bug libstdc++/66017] Undefined behaviour in std::set

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66017 --- Comment #8 from ctice at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ctice Date: Thu Sep 24 20:53:27 2015 New Revision: 228098 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228098=gcc=rev Log: Backport r223811 from gcc-5-branch: PR libstdc++/66017 *

[Bug other/57195] Mode attributes with specific mode iterator can not be used as mode iterators in *.md files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57195 --- Comment #7 from collison at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: collison Date: Thu Sep 24 23:26:50 2015 New Revision: 228102 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228102=gcc=rev Log: 2015-09-24 Michael Collison

[Bug tree-optimization/66917] [4.9/5 regression] ARM: NEON: memcpy compiles to vst1 with incorrect alignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66917 --- Comment #21 from ctice at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ctice Date: Thu Sep 24 20:56:29 2015 New Revision: 228099 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228099=gcc=rev Log: Backport r226487 from GCC FSF mainline: r226487 | rguenth | 2015-08-03

[Bug middle-end/67714] [6 Regression] signed char is zero-extended instead of sign-extended

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67714 --- Comment #2 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org --- It is the same issue and the patch posted in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-09/msg00403.html fixes this test-case too.

[Bug tree-optimization/67659] [5 regression] ICE: segfault: Linux kernel/rcu/tree.c:3261:6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67659 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/67705] incorrect restrict interpretation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67705 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED