[Bug target/67716] [5] [SH]: Miscompiles libraw: Assembler: unaligned opcodes detected in executable segment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67716 --- Comment #17 from Kazumoto Kojima --- Author: kkojima Date: Tue Sep 29 05:36:01 2015 New Revision: 228228 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228228=gcc=rev Log: PR target/67716 * [SH] Implement targetm.override_options_after_change hook

[Bug tree-optimization/67755] Bad edge probability/block freqency for tree jump threading

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67755 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/66697] Feature request: -mstackrealign and force_align_arg_pointer for x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66697 --- Comment #1 from austinenglish at gmail dot com --- We're now up to at least 9 bugs reported in Wine's bugzilla about this issue, it does not appear to be an isolated problem. E.g., Unity and for some applications, like Planetside 2, there is

[Bug target/67716] [5] [SH]: Miscompiles libraw: Assembler: unaligned opcodes detected in executable segment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67716 --- Comment #18 from Kazumoto Kojima --- (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #16) > Regardless of those, Kaz, can you please commit attachment 36397 [details]? > Then I can handle the other cases on top of that. Done.

[Bug target/67750] undefined local label

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67750 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc-abc-linuxeabispe

[Bug target/67750] undefined local label

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67750 --- Comment #4 from baoshan --- > the "set r0, rx" also has been moved after debug instruction, it would > result the undefined local label issue. Sorry, it should be "It would NOT result the undefined local label issue."

[Bug rtl-optimization/67751] New: redundant zero extension

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67751 Bug ID: 67751 Summary: redundant zero extension Product: gcc Version: 5.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization

[Bug c/67730] [5/6 Regression] No warning when returning NULL in void function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67730 --- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- Probably caused by: r211978 | mpolacek | 2014-06-25 12:43:05 + (Wed, 25 Jun 2014) | 7 lines PR c/61162 * c-parser.c (c_parser_statement_after_labels): Pass the

[Bug middle-end/32667] block copy with exact overlap is expanded as memcpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32667 D. Hugh Redelmeier changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hugh at mimosa dot com --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/67700] [graphite] miscompile due to wrong codegen

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67700 Sebastian Pop changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/67737] [C++1z] ICE in make_decl_rtl, at varasm.c:1299

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67737 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/67748] generate wrong code with -02 in 32bits only

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67748 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/67737] ICE in make_decl_rtl, at varasm.c:1299

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67737 ryan.burn at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #36403|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug middle-end/67748] generate wrong code with -02 in 32bits only

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67748 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug rtl-optimization/67750] New: undefined local label

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67750 Bug ID: 67750 Summary: undefined local label Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: critical Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization

[Bug middle-end/67748] generate wrong code with -02 in 32bits only

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67748 --- Comment #2 from renaud lepere --- I tried to do it but I failed with bin/ld.exe: cannot find -lubsan apparently mingw64 does not yet provide it (http://sourceforge.net/p/mingw-w64/bugs/442/)

[Bug bootstrap/67728] Build fails when cross-compiling with in-tree GMP and ISL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67728 --- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- GMP does, or did, select an ABI at configuration time that may not be the same as that used by default by the compiler used to build it. For example, if building on an x86_64 processor it

[Bug middle-end/67748] generate wrong code with -02 in 32bits only

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67748 --- Comment #4 from renaud lepere --- Thanks for your help. I have sent also the bug on boost mailing list to see if someone can reproduce or reduce the problem. Not easy since for the moment it is really in the middle..

[Bug c/67730] [5/6 Regression] No warning when returning NULL in void function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67730 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/67737] ICE in make_decl_rtl, at varasm.c:1299

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67737 ryan.burn at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/67737] ICE in make_decl_rtl, at varasm.c:1299

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67737 --- Comment #4 from ryan.burn at gmail dot com --- yes, sorry. I attached the wrong file.

[Bug c/67730] [5/6 Regression] No warning when returning NULL in void function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67730 --- Comment #3 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- Or perhaps we need to a new function (and a new entry in the guidelines) for the case that we always want the expansion point.

[Bug libstdc++/67726] std::condition_variable::wait can throw, but should terminate.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67726 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- For --enable-threads=posix the current code is probably OK, as __gthread_cond_wait should never return an error when used correctly, so will only throw when the program already has UB. We should fix it

[Bug libstdc++/67726] std::condition_variable::wait can throw, but should terminate.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67726 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/67747] experimental/filesystem/iterators/recursive_directory_iterator.cc FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67747 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- Ah, I need to ensure space for the dirent::d_name field.

[Bug rtl-optimization/67750] undefined local label

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67750 --- Comment #1 from baoshan --- I think the problem is at shrink wrap optimization, and I also verified the problem would disappear with option "-fno-shrink-wrap".

[Bug tree-optimization/67700] [graphite] miscompile due to wrong codegen

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67700 --- Comment #2 from Sebastian Pop --- Author: spop Date: Mon Sep 28 17:29:59 2015 New Revision: 228214 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228214=gcc=rev Log: fix PR67700 The patch makes the detection of scop parameters in

[Bug target/67750] undefined local label

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67750 --- Comment #3 from baoshan --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > Can you try 5.x? With the test case this issue can not be reproduced. But I still think the same problem is also existed in 5.x， it works by coincidence: In 4.9.0,

[Bug c++/67739] name clash between builtin functions and local variables when optimization is on

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67739 --- Comment #3 from Milan Durovic --- I think a warning is the right answer. You can't expect people to be aware of all built-in functions. I wasn't aware that there was such a function called 'sincos'. And even more importantly, the name clash

[Bug fortran/40054] [F08] Pointer functions as lvalue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40054 --- Comment #13 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Mon Sep 28 21:18:38 2015 New Revision: 228222 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228222=gcc=rev Log: 2015-09-28 Paul Thomas PR fortran/40054 PR

[Bug fortran/63921] [F08] pointer function as lvalue doesn't work when the function is a type bound function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63921 --- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Mon Sep 28 21:18:38 2015 New Revision: 228222 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228222=gcc=rev Log: 2015-09-28 Paul Thomas PR fortran/40054 PR

[Bug fortran/39627] [meta-bug] Fortran 2008 support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39627 Bug 39627 depends on bug 63921, which changed state. Bug 63921 Summary: [F08] pointer function as lvalue doesn't work when the function is a type bound function https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63921 What|Removed

[Bug c++/67739] name clash between builtin functions and local variables when optimization is on

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67739 --- Comment #4 from Milan Durovic --- Richard Biener: I've tried your suggestion. The problem is still there, although it does help with 4.8.1, when local variable is called sincosf. But the core problem is still there: the compiler generates

[Bug target/67305] [6 Regression] gcc.c-torture/compile/20121027-1.c ICE on arm-none-eabi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67305 Jim Wilson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wilson at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8

[Bug fortran/63921] [F08] pointer function as lvalue doesn't work when the function is a type bound function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63921 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/39627] [meta-bug] Fortran 2008 support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39627 Bug 39627 depends on bug 40054, which changed state. Bug 40054 Summary: [F08] Pointer functions as lvalue https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40054 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/40054] [F08] Pointer functions as lvalue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40054 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/52994] [OOP] [F08] internal compiler error: in gfc_trans_assignment_1, at fortran/trans-expr.c:6881

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52994 Bug 52994 depends on bug 40054, which changed state. Bug 40054 Summary: [F08] Pointer functions as lvalue https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40054 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/67752] New: In a template instantiation containing sizeof...(ArgPack), the mangling for sizeof(ArgPack...) is emitted instead

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67752 Bug ID: 67752 Summary: In a template instantiation containing sizeof...(ArgPack), the mangling for sizeof(ArgPack...) is emitted instead Product: gcc Version:

[Bug debug/66068] [6 Regression] error: type variant has different TYPE_VFIELD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66068 Jim Wilson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wilson at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug rtl-optimization/67731] Combine of OR'ed bitfields should use bit-test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67731 --- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > Ok, so usually this gets optimized by fold-const.c > optimize_bit_field_compare but > appearantly that doesn't work here. Not that I like this function very >

[Bug rtl-optimization/67731] Combine of OR'ed bitfields should use bit-test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67731 --- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 28 Sep 2015, olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67731 > > --- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)

[Bug other/67652] liboffloadmic/runtime/offload_engine.cpp:176: strange expression in sizeof ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67652 --- Comment #3 from iverbin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: iverbin Date: Mon Sep 28 16:10:16 2015 New Revision: 228210 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228210=gcc=rev Log: PR other/67652 liboffloadmic/ *

[Bug target/54236] [SH] Improve addc and subc insn utilization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54236 --- Comment #17 from Oleg Endo --- Author: olegendo Date: Mon Sep 28 14:00:44 2015 New Revision: 228202 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228202=gcc=rev Log: gcc/ PR target/54236 * config/sh/predicates.md (t_reg_operand,

[Bug target/67391] [SH] Convert clrt addc to normal add insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67391 --- Comment #33 from Oleg Endo --- Maybe we should leave this one open for a little bit longer...

[Bug libstdc++/67747] experimental/filesystem/iterators/recursive_directory_iterator.cc FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67747 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug libstdc++/67747] New: experimental/filesystem/iterators/recursive_directory_iterator.cc FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67747 Bug ID: 67747 Summary: experimental/filesystem/iterators/recursive_directory_ iterator.cc FAILs Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/67748] New: generate wrong code with -02 in 32bits only

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67748 Bug ID: 67748 Summary: generate wrong code with -02 in 32bits only Product: gcc Version: 5.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug libstdc++/67747] experimental/filesystem/iterators/recursive_directory_iterator.cc FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67747 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/67747] experimental/filesystem/iterators/recursive_directory_iterator.cc FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67747 --- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- > Could you modify the test to print the values of iter->path() and p/"d1" to > stdout before the assertion on line 52? > > e.g. > >

[Bug rtl-optimization/67749] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/ifcvt-2.c scan-rtl-dump ce1 "3 true changes made"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67749 Bug ID: 67749 Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/ifcvt-2.c scan-rtl-dump ce1 "3 true changes made" Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/67748] generate wrong code with -02 in 32bits only

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67748 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c++ |middle-end Severity|major

[Bug tree-optimization/67742] 3rd-level restrict ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67742 --- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- This code pattern is generated for the proposed option -foffload-alias= https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-09/msg02122.html .

[Bug target/67716] [5] [SH]: Miscompiles libraw: Assembler: unaligned opcodes detected in executable segment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67716 --- Comment #16 from Oleg Endo --- (In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #15) > (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #14) > > Yes, there are issues. I've created PR 67723. > > Ah, you are right. I forgot -m optimization options at all.

[Bug libstdc++/67747] experimental/filesystem/iterators/recursive_directory_iterator.cc FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67747 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- Could you modify the test to print the values of iter->path() and p/"d1" to stdout before the assertion on line 52? e.g. __builtin_puts( iter->path().native().c_str() ); __builtin_puts(

[Bug target/64331] regcprop propagates registers noted as REG_DEAD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64331 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added Target|avr |avr sh*-*-* CC|

[Bug other/67738] infinite recursion in libiberty/cp-demangle.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67738 Mikhail Maltsev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/67673] support restrict pointer to restrict pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67673 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/67737] ICE in make_decl_rtl, at varasm.c:1299

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67737 --- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- The attached testcase is identical to that of PR67686. If you accidentally attached the wrong file, feel free to reopen this bug.

[Bug rtl-optimization/67456] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67456 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/67740] New: Wrong association status of allocatable character pointer in derived types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67740 Bug ID: 67740 Summary: Wrong association status of allocatable character pointer in derived types Product: gcc Version: 5.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/67739] name clash between builtin functions and local variables when optimization is on

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67739 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c/67741] New: Invalid built-in usage should not cause segmentation fault in compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67741 Bug ID: 67741 Summary: Invalid built-in usage should not cause segmentation fault in compiler Product: gcc Version: 5.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/67464] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67464 --- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Mon Sep 28 08:23:47 2015 New Revision: 228194 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228194=gcc=rev Log: [RTL-ifcvt] PR rtl-optimization/67465: Handle pairs of

[Bug rtl-optimization/67481] [6 regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/20071216-1.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67481 --- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Mon Sep 28 08:25:36 2015 New Revision: 228195 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228195=gcc=rev Log: [RTL-ifcvt] PR rtl-optimization/67481: Look more deeply for CCmode

[Bug other/67738] infinite recursion in libiberty/cp-demangle.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67738 --- Comment #2 from Mikhail Maltsev --- Oops, sorry, did not notice your comment about PR 61321

[Bug other/67738] infinite recursion in libiberty/cp-demangle.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67738 Mikhail Maltsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/67686] [concepts] segfault in finish_call_expr function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67686 --- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- *** Bug 67737 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/67737] ICE in make_decl_rtl, at varasm.c:1299

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67737 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/67456] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67456 --- Comment #5 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Mon Sep 28 08:23:47 2015 New Revision: 228194 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228194=gcc=rev Log: [RTL-ifcvt] PR rtl-optimization/67465: Handle pairs of

[Bug rtl-optimization/67465] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67465 --- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Mon Sep 28 08:23:47 2015 New Revision: 228194 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228194=gcc=rev Log: [RTL-ifcvt] PR rtl-optimization/67465: Handle pairs of

[Bug rtl-optimization/67465] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67465 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/67464] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67464 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/67481] [6 regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/20071216-1.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67481 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/67739] New: name clash between builtin functions and local variables when optimization is on

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67739 Bug ID: 67739 Summary: name clash between builtin functions and local variables when optimization is on Product: gcc Version: 4.9.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/67731] Combine of OR'ed bitfields should use bit-test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67731 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/67743] New: Associating entity is not auto-typed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67743 Bug ID: 67743 Summary: Associating entity is not auto-typed Product: gcc Version: 5.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug fortran/67744] New: polymorphic associating entity is refused TBP invocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67744 Bug ID: 67744 Summary: polymorphic associating entity is refused TBP invocation Product: gcc Version: 5.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/67726] std::condition_variable::wait can throw, but should terminate.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67726 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/67728] Build fails when cross-compiling with in-tree GMP and ISL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67728 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Is __gmpn_invert_limb supposed to be exported? Or is ISL using private APIs here?

[Bug c++/67746] New: Mangled name is accepted for variables in namespace-scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67746 Bug ID: 67746 Summary: Mangled name is accepted for variables in namespace-scope Product: gcc Version: 5.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/67730] [5/6 Regression] No warning when returning NULL in void function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67730 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.3 Summary|[5.2

[Bug tree-optimization/67742] 3rd-level restrict ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67742 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/67745] New: [ARM] wrong alignments when __attribute__ ((optimize,target,align) is used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67745 Bug ID: 67745 Summary: [ARM] wrong alignments when __attribute__ ((optimize,target,align) is used Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/67745] [ARM] wrong alignments when __attribute__ ((optimize,target,align) is used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67745 --- Comment #1 from chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org --- the problems are three folds: - FUNCTION_BOUNDARY should not test optimize_size, that should be tested in override_options_internal instead to be carried by invoke_set_current_function_hook -

[Bug tree-optimization/66917] [4.9/5 regression] ARM: NEON: memcpy compiles to vst1 with incorrect alignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66917 --- Comment #22 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Sep 28 10:45:55 2015 New Revision: 228199 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228199=gcc=rev Log: 2015-09-28 Richard Biener Backport from mainline

[Bug middle-end/67442] [5 Regression] GCC 5.2.0 on x86_64 creates invalid address on specific array index calculation through pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67442 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/67442] [5 Regression] GCC 5.2.0 on x86_64 creates invalid address on specific array index calculation through pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67442 --- Comment #15 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Sep 28 10:45:55 2015 New Revision: 228199 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228199=gcc=rev Log: 2015-09-28 Richard Biener Backport from mainline

[Bug tree-optimization/62171] restrict pointer to struct with restrict pointers parm doesn't prevent aliases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62171 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c/67741] Invalid built-in usage should not cause segmentation fault in compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67741 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/62171] restrict pointer to struct with restrict pointers parm doesn't prevent aliases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62171 --- Comment #12 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Committed test-case: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2015-09/msg01335.html : Author: vries Date: Mon Sep 28 08:19:42 2015 New Revision: 228193 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228193=gcc=rev

[Bug c/48885] missed optimization with restrict qualifier?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48885 --- Comment #23 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #22) > On Fri, 25 Sep 2015, vries at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > > Standard: "Let D be a declaration of an ordinary identifier that provides a > >

[Bug tree-optimization/67742] New: 3rd-level restrict ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67742 Bug ID: 67742 Summary: 3rd-level restrict ignored Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization

[Bug target/61578] [4.9 regression] Code size increase for ARM thumb compared to 4.8.x when compiling with -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61578 --- Comment #34 from Dominik Vogt --- The patch in comment 33 fixes the s390 regression. Thanks!

[Bug c++/67739] name clash between builtin functions and local variables when optimization is on

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67739 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- You are using -std=gnu89 by default and thus adhering to GNU extensions where sincos is a known identifier. We're missing to warn about this maybe(?). Using -std=c89 should fix this as well (not verified).

[Bug ada/67753] New: [6 Regression] FAIL: cxg1005, cxg2002, cxg2006, cxg2007, cxg2008, cxg2018, cxg2019 and cxg2020

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67753 Bug ID: 67753 Summary: [6 Regression] FAIL: cxg1005, cxg2002, cxg2006, cxg2007, cxg2008, cxg2018, cxg2019 and cxg2020 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/67752] In a template instantiation containing sizeof...(ArgPack), the mangling for sizeof(ArgPack...) is emitted instead

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67752 --- Comment #1 from Andrey V --- Affects Linux ppc64le and Linux x86_64

[Bug tree-optimization/67742] 3rd-level restrict ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67742 --- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > Confirmed. Richard, any ideas or hints how this can be implemented in tree-ssa-structalias.c? Thanks, - Tom

[Bug bootstrap/60946] Current 4.9 branch does not boot strap on FC20 with systemtap-devel installed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60946 Andi Kleen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/66068] [6 Regression] error: type variant has different TYPE_VFIELD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66068 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- gombk in SPEC 2k6 has a similar issue.

  1   2   >