[Bug fortran/67779] Strange ordering with strings in extended object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67779 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres --- The problem is not limited to strings. If I add the following lines array(1)%value = 2 array(9)%value = 10 write( string_array(1)%value, '(a,i0)' ) "String = ", 2

[Bug target/67366] Poor assembly generation for unaligned memory accesses on ARM v6 & v7 cpus

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67366 Fredrik Hederstierna changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/67864] [6 Regression] CSiBE size regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67864 --- Comment #1 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Sun Oct 11 09:03:09 2015 New Revision: 228692 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228692=gcc=rev Log: bb-reorder: Improve the simple algorithm for -Os (PR67864) As the PR points

[Bug lto/67923] New: [6 Regression] ICEs in the gfortran test suite with -flto after r228680

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67923 Bug ID: 67923 Summary: [6 Regression] ICEs in the gfortran test suite with -flto after r228680 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug gcov-profile/67924] New: Gcov statistics branches error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67924 Bug ID: 67924 Summary: Gcov statistics branches error Product: gcc Version: 5.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: gcov-profile

[Bug boehm-gc/66848] boehm-gc fails test suite on x86_64-apple-darwin15

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66848 --- Comment #10 from Jack Howarth --- FYI, the earliest upstream boehm-gc which builds and passes make check on 10.11 under the Apple clang 7.0 compiled system unwinder is gc-7.2alpha6.

[Bug rtl-optimization/67814] cmp instruction register allocation error (x86)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67814 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/67912] [6 regression] ICE in gen_lowpart_common, at emit-rtl.c:1399

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67912 --- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > I think this bug affects all platforms, see the thread > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-10/msg01013.html. Right, I've since

[Bug c++/58566] [c++11] ICE with invalid expression in lambda body

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58566 --- Comment #4 from Ville Voutilainen --- Patch available: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-10/msg01075.html

[Bug c++/58566] [c++11] ICE with invalid expression in lambda body

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58566 Ville Voutilainen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/67921] "internal compiler error: in build_polynomial_chrec, at tree-chrec.h:147" when using -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67921 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/58566] [c++11] ICE with invalid expression in lambda body

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58566 --- Comment #5 from Ville Voutilainen --- Ahem, make that https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-10/msg01076.html

[Bug c/67925] New: docs lie about being unable to inline function call before definition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67925 Bug ID: 67925 Summary: docs lie about being unable to inline function call before definition Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/67925] docs lie about being unable to inline function call before definition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67925 --- Comment #1 from Arkadiusz Drabczyk --- BTW, the same incorrect wording is repeated in doc/extend.texi in GCC source tarball.

[Bug target/67896] Inconsistent behaviour between C and C++ for types poly8x8_t and poly16x8_t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67896 --- Comment #1 from Roger Ferrer Ibanez --- Hi, after some debugging I think I understand what happens but I'm not sure I can provide an acceptable fix for that. When comparing __Poly8x8_t and __Poly16x8_t types (these are the builtin types

[Bug c++/67926] New: Using folding expressions in a constexpr context ice's

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67926 Bug ID: 67926 Summary: Using folding expressions in a constexpr context ice's Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/33483] New warning suggestion (for -Wall): sizeof() with non-lvalue has side effects that will not execute at runtime

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33483 --- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor --- It might makes sense to provide the functionality under the -Wunevaluated-expression option for compatibility with clang: $ cat u.c && clang -Wall -c u.c int foo (int i) { int a [i]; return sizeof (a

[Bug c++/67927] New: array new expression with excessive number of elements not diagnosed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67927 Bug ID: 67927 Summary: array new expression with excessive number of elements not diagnosed Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/61362] g++ (Ubuntu 4.8.2-19ubuntu1) 4.8.2 does not compile lambda with template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61362 Ville Voutilainen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com

[Bug boehm-gc/66848] boehm-gc fails test suite on x86_64-apple-darwin15

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66848 --- Comment #11 from Jack Howarth --- Changing... --- gcc-5.2.0.orig/boehm-gc/include/private/gcconfig.h 2013-12-21 15:42:39.0 -0500 +++ gcc-5.2.0/boehm-gc/include/private/gcconfig.h 2015-10-11 15:41:26.0 -0400 @@

[Bug middle-end/67912] [6 regression] ICE in gen_lowpart_common, at emit-rtl.c:1399

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67912 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug c++/67834] [5 Regression] Local references inside comdat groups

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67834 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/61362] g++ (Ubuntu 4.8.2-19ubuntu1) 4.8.2 does not compile lambda with template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61362 --- Comment #5 from Ville Voutilainen --- Oh, some crash with -std=c++1z but not with the current default of -std=c++14.

[Bug c/67925] docs lie about being unable to inline function call before definition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67925 Mikhail Maltsev changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||documentation

[Bug c++/67888] Compiling clang 3.7.0 results in is used but never defined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67888 Dimitry Andric changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dimitry at andric dot com,

[Bug fortran/50069] FORALL fails on a character array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50069 zmi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zmi007 at gmail dot com --- Comment #6 from zmi

[Bug c/67919] GCC Compiler failed with "gcc-5.2.0/gcc/expr.c:6529:1: internal compiler error: output_operand: invalid shift operand"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67919 Xinus changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |blocker