https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68844
--- Comment #1 from Bill Schmidt ---
Created attachment 36987
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36987=edit
dom1 dump from r228306
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68833
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68835
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68619
--- Comment #7 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Thu Dec 10 17:14:07 2015
New Revision: 231532
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231532=gcc=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/68619
* graphite-scop-detection.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64818
--- Comment #3 from Tejas Belagod ---
Author: belagod
Date: Thu Dec 10 17:13:47 2015
New Revision: 231531
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231531=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/ChangeLog.arm:
2015-12-10 Tejas Belagod
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68473
--- Comment #8 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to Jay Foad from comment #6)
> FYI here's another test case that seems to trigger the same bug. Your
> candidate patch fixes it.
>
> $ cat x.c
> #define P(b) b&&4
> int a[]=0;
> int f() { X||P(d);
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46590
Bug 46590 depends on bug 61515, which changed state.
Bug 61515 Summary: [4.9 Regression] Extremely long compile time for generated
code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61515
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61515
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68840
--- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson ---
Your program invokes undefined behaviour by running off the end of that array.
Your loop termination condition is off by one. It's also the wrong way around:
you must check the index before indexing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68840
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68843
--- Comment #2 from Bernd Edlinger ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #1)
> There are several non-intuitive rules that one has to follow to avoid ICEs
> with x87 asm operands. Just don't go down that path, there is only pain and
> suffer.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46590
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #47
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46590
--- Comment #46 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Thu Dec 10 19:40:23 2015
New Revision: 231542
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231542=gcc=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/61515
PR tree-optimization/46590
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47344
Bug 47344 depends on bug 61515, which changed state.
Bug 61515 Summary: [4.9 Regression] Extremely long compile time for generated
code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61515
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68845
Bug ID: 68845
Summary: -Werror=array-bounds=[12] doesn't turn warning into
error
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68839
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68846
Bug ID: 68846
Summary: Pointer function as LValue doesn't work when the
assignment regards a dummy argument.
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61515
--- Comment #33 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Thu Dec 10 19:40:23 2015
New Revision: 231542
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231542=gcc=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/61515
PR tree-optimization/46590
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68841
Bug ID: 68841
Summary: [6 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/pr59358.c FAILs
with custom compiler flags
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65102
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 10 Dec 2015, kugan at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
>
> kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
>
>What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68819
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #6)
> Tobias: does the attached patch fix the issue for your test case?
Yes, it does - which is not very surprising as I did have a column number of 0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65102
--- Comment #12 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vries
Date: Thu Dec 10 09:19:04 2015
New Revision: 231497
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231497=gcc=rev
Log:
Fix warnings from including fdl.texi into gnat-style.texi
2015-12-10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68331
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Dec 10 09:41:08 2015
New Revision: 231498
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231498=gcc=rev
Log:
2015-12-10 Richard Biener
PR ipa/68331
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65948
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Thu Dec 10 08:38:07 2015
New Revision: 231489
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231489=gcc=rev
Log:
PR lto/65948
Modified:
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68806
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Dec 10 09:00:58 2015
New Revision: 231493
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231493=gcc=rev
Log:
2015-12-10 Richard Biener
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68830
Bug ID: 68830
Summary: internal compiler error: in tree_ssa_phiopt_worker, at
tree-ssa-phiopt.c:322
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68806
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68721
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Dec 10 09:05:58 2015
New Revision: 231494
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231494=gcc=rev
Log:
2015-12-10 Richard Biener
PR ipa/68721
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68829
Bug ID: 68829
Summary: [4.7/4.8/4.9/5.3/6.0 Regression] Segfaults with -Ofast
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68775
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 9 Dec 2015, seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68775
>
> --- Comment #4 from William Seurer ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68825
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66027
--- Comment #13 from Martin Liška ---
Fixed in gcc-5-branch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65948
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68470
Bug 68470 depends on bug 68721, which changed state.
Bug 68721 Summary: [6 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on
x86_64-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68721
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68721
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68543
--- Comment #2 from Michael Collison ---
Great idea I will look into this.
On 12/10/2015 4:02 AM, ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68543
>
> --- Comment #1 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59832
--- Comment #9 from Paul Pluzhnikov ---
Still broken on trunk @r231541. Closing on 2 years now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68849
Bug ID: 68849
Summary: Bug box when using a type with static predicate as
formal parameter of generic procedure
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68376
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Dec 10 22:29:12 2015
New Revision: 231546
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231546=gcc=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/68376
PR rtl-optimization/68670
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68670
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Dec 10 22:29:12 2015
New Revision: 231546
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231546=gcc=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/68376
PR rtl-optimization/68670
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68845
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66551
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ---
Did you retry with a more recent version? What's the linker error exactly?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68847
Bug ID: 68847
Summary: [6 Regression] ICE in cxx_eval_constant_expression on
__atomic_compare_exchange (constexpr.c:3719) in c++
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68449
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68848
Bug ID: 68848
Summary: allow -fdebug-prefix-map to read OLD prefix from
environment (improve reproducibility)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68845
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at redhat dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68775
--- Comment #6 from William Seurer ---
Sorry, I wasn't very clear there. I was adding options to the default set.
Compiling as-is using the default options the run will fail.
Adding -fno-tree-loop-vectorize the run will fail.
Adding
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66305
Daniel Kahn Gillmor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dkg at fifthhorseman dot net
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68670
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||6.0
Summary|[4.9/5/6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68779
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68733
--- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2015-12-10, at 12:31 PM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Has OpenMP ever worked on PA?
Likely not.
Although the issue is not exposed in the libgomp for earlier gcc versions, I
came
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67778
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66551
--- Comment #4 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
Hi!
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #3)
> Did you retry with a more recent version? What's the linker error exactly?
Sorry for not reporting back.
This issue seems to have been
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67550
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61886
--- Comment #51 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Thu Dec 10 23:57:15 2015
New Revision: 231548
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231548=gcc=rev
Log:
PR ipa/61886
* lto-symtab.c (lto_symtab_merge_p): Avoid merging
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67778
--- Comment #14 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Fri Dec 11 00:27:14 2015
New Revision: 231552
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231552=gcc=rev
Log:
Fix shrink-wrapping bug (PR67778, PR68634)
After shrink-wrapping has found
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68634
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Fri Dec 11 00:27:14 2015
New Revision: 231552
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231552=gcc=rev
Log:
Fix shrink-wrapping bug (PR67778, PR68634)
After shrink-wrapping has found
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68820
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68814
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Revision: 231547
Modified property: svn:log
Modified: svn:log at Thu Dec 10 23:57:54 2015
--
--- svn:log
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61886
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #52 from Jan Hubicka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68814
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68829
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68824
Dmitry Vyukov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dvyukov at google dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68831
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68830
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68820
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68831
Bug ID: 68831
Summary: [6 Regression] Superfluous -Waddress warning for C++
delete
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68833
Bug ID: 68833
Summary: -Werror=format issues an error now
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68649
--- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
See also pr68717 for more warnings after r231239.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68835
Bug ID: 68835
Summary: ICE in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:387, with
__int128 bit field
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68824
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ABI
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68829
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68832
Bug ID: 68832
Summary: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/alias-2.c -O1 execution
test
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68730
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 36980
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36980=edit
gcc6-pr68730.patch
Untested fix for the dominator issue. The problem is that the stv pass added
by i386 after
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68834
Bug ID: 68834
Summary: ICE: in decompose_normal_address, at rtlanal.c:6086
with -O2 -fPIC --param=sched-autopref-queue-depth=1
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68707
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #36951|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68543
--- Comment #1 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Maybe we can avoid defining custom expanders if we define
WORD_REGISTER_OPERATIONS for aarch64.
It's defined for arm and the documentation hints that it should be true for
most RISC targets.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68831
--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
[1/1] /home/trippels/gcc_test/usr/local/bin/g++ -DGTEST_HAS_RTTI=0 -D_DEBUG
-D_GNU_SOURCE -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS
-D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -fPIC -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -Wall
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68763
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68785
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Dec 10 10:14:38 2015
New Revision: 231499
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231499=gcc=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/68785
* gimple-fold.c (fold_ctor_reference):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68802
--- Comment #1 from Philip Deegan ---
Also occurs with a 4.9.2 cross compiler.
g++ -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=./g++
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/path/to/gcc_4.9_ARMv7-A/libexec/gcc/arm-linux-gnueabihf/4.9.2/lto-wrapper
Target:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66949
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||regehr at cs dot utah.edu
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68817
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
t.f90:4:0: note: Detected interleaving load *c_14(D)[_13] and *c_14(D)[_27]
t.f90:4:0: note: Detected interleaving load of size 3000 starting with _15 =
*c_14(D)[_13];
t.f90:4:0: note: There is a gap of 999
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68824
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I don't think this is a problem. It would be of course better if the sanitizer
shared libraries were symbol versioned, but in case of libraries that override
versioned libraries it might be interesting to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68831
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
The testcase was reduced from LLVM. Here's an adjusted version:
class DenseMap {
public:
~DenseMap();
};
extern const DenseMap
void foo() { delete }
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68824
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
What I wrote were some approaches how to make symbols that aren't part of the
libtsan.so.* ABI not exported from the library.
If __interceptor_* functions are part of the ABI, as seems to be the case from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68785
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68832
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68835
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68843
Bug ID: 68843
Summary: ICE with "u" input constraint
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: inline-asm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68842
Bug ID: 68842
Summary: Better error output when template needed before
dependent name
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68691
--- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Thu Dec 10 18:00:47 2015
New Revision: 231538
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231538=gcc=rev
Log:
2015-12-10 Vladimir Makarov
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68833
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
Summary|-Werror=format
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68844
Bug ID: 68844
Summary: [6 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-thread-4.c
fails since r228306
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68701
--- Comment #15 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Thu Dec 10 16:43:49 2015
New Revision: 231529
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231529=gcc=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2015-12-08 Uros Bizjak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68701
--- Comment #14 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Thu Dec 10 16:42:05 2015
New Revision: 231528
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231528=gcc=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2015-12-08 Uros Bizjak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68701
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68733
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68843
--- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak ---
There are several non-intuitive rules that one has to follow to avoid ICEs with
x87 asm operands. Just don't go down that path, there is only pain and suffer.
1 - 100 of 153 matches
Mail list logo