[Bug c++/69095] internal compiler error: in dependent_type_p, at cp/pt.c:19399

2015-12-31 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69095 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/69100] ICE in final_scan_insn with -msoft-float and __builtin_apply ()

2015-12-31 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69100 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/69089] C++11: alignas(0) causes an error

2015-12-31 Thread vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69089 --- Comment #3 from Dominik Vogt --- A tested patch with a test case is available here: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-12/msg02228.html

[Bug sanitizer/69055] Internal compiler error -fsanitize=float-cast-overflow

2015-12-31 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69055 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Created attachment 37174 [details] > gcc6-pr69055.patch > > Untested fix. All the failures seen with gfortran are gone with the patch without regression. > The c11-atomic* ICE is completely

[Bug tree-optimization/68522] [6 Regression] SPEC CPU2006 435.gromacs miscomparison

2015-12-31 Thread ysrumyan at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68522 Yuri Rumyantsev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ysrumyan at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug target/69100] ICE in final_scan_insn with -msoft-float and __builtin_apply ()

2015-12-31 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69100 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Target|sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu |sparc64-*-*

[Bug fortran/67779] Strange ordering with strings in extended object

2015-12-31 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67779 --- Comment #19 from Paul Thomas --- Created attachment 37198 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37198=edit Patch to fix the problem The attached fixes all versions of the problem and regtests OK on FC21/x86_64. I would

[Bug sanitizer/69099] New: ICE when compiling gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-2.c with -fsanitize=float-cast-overflow

2015-12-31 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69099 Bug ID: 69099 Summary: ICE when compiling gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-2.c with -fsanitize=float-cast-overflow Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/69100] New: ICE: in final_scan_insn, at final.c:2920 with -msoft-float and __builtin_apply()

2015-12-31 Thread zsojka at seznam dot cz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69100 Bug ID: 69100 Summary: ICE: in final_scan_insn, at final.c:2920 with -msoft-float and __builtin_apply() Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug tree-optimization/69069] missing phi argument with -ftree-parallelize-loops=2

2015-12-31 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69069 --- Comment #1 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 37199 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37199=edit tentative patch

[Bug fortran/69101] New: ICE when compiling some tests in gfortran.dg/ieee/ with -fdefault-integer-8 or -finteger-4-integer-8

2015-12-31 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69101 Bug ID: 69101 Summary: ICE when compiling some tests in gfortran.dg/ieee/ with -fdefault-integer-8 or -finteger-4-integer-8 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/67779] Strange ordering with strings in extended object

2015-12-31 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67779 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #37198|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/34191] Using gcc with -mptr64 option on Solaris 5.9 produces the following message: the internal compiler error: in sparc_emit_set_const64, at config/sparc/sparc.c:1669

2015-12-31 Thread zsojka at seznam dot cz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34191 --- Comment #8 from Zdenek Sojka --- And also when using -mcmodel=32 with a 64bit target: $ sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc -mcmodel=32 tmp.i -w /repo/gcc-trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/2403-1.c: In function 'main':

[Bug target/34191] Using gcc with -mptr64 option on Solaris 5.9 produces the following message: the internal compiler error: in sparc_emit_set_const64, at config/sparc/sparc.c:1669

2015-12-31 Thread zsojka at seznam dot cz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34191 Zdenek Sojka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zsojka at seznam dot cz --- Comment #7

[Bug c++/68071] Generic lambda variadic argument pack cannot be empty

2015-12-31 Thread rs2740 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68071 --- Comment #3 from TC --- This looks like a duplicate of https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64095

[Bug tree-optimization/69058] segfault with ftree-parallelize-loops=2 in libgo/go/strconv/decimal.go

2015-12-31 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69058 --- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 37200 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37200=edit tentative patch

[Bug rtl-optimization/69102] New: [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE: in move_op_ascend, at sel-sched.c:6138 with -fselective-scheduling2

2015-12-31 Thread zsojka at seznam dot cz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69102 Bug ID: 69102 Summary: [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE: in move_op_ascend, at sel-sched.c:6138 with -fselective-scheduling2 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/69101] ICE when compiling some tests in gfortran.dg/ieee/ with -fdefault-integer-8 or -finteger-4-integer-8

2015-12-31 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69101 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/69101] ICE when compiling some tests in gfortran.dg/ieee/ with -fdefault-integer-8 or -finteger-4-integer-8

2015-12-31 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69101 --- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to kargl from comment #1) > This has nothing to do with either -fdefault-integer-8 or > -finteger-4-integer-8. The IEEE module is not implemented > correctly. F2003: 14.10

[Bug fortran/67779] Strange ordering with strings in extended object

2015-12-31 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67779 --- Comment #20 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Created attachment 37198 [details] > Patch to fix the problem > > The attached fixes all versions of the problem and regtests OK on FC21/x86_64. Are you sure you attached the right patch to the

[Bug rtl-optimization/68991] -O3 generates misaligned xorv4si3

2015-12-31 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68991 --- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu --- Another testcase: [hjl@gnu-tools-1 pr68991]$ cat add.cc typedef unsigned int size_type; #define _GLIBCXX_BITSET_BITS_PER_WORD (__CHAR_BIT__ * __SIZEOF_INT__) #define _GLIBCXX_BITSET_WORDS(__n) \ ((__n) /

[Bug fortran/69101] ICE when compiling some tests in gfortran.dg/ieee/ with -fdefault-integer-8 or -finteger-4-integer-8

2015-12-31 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69101 --- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- This has nothing to do with either -fdefault-integer-8 or -finteger-4-integer-8. The IEEE module is not implemented correctly. program foo use ieee_arithmetic implicit none integer(8) n

[Bug c++/69103] New: Misleading diagnostic for invalid constexpr initialization

2015-12-31 Thread rs2740 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69103 Bug ID: 69103 Summary: Misleading diagnostic for invalid constexpr initialization Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/34191] Using gcc with -mptr64 option on Solaris 5.9 produces the following message: the internal compiler error: in sparc_emit_set_const64, at config/sparc/sparc.c:1669

2015-12-31 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34191 --- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou --- > This switch is undocumented as well. Exactly, so please do not try to fiddle with it.

[Bug c++/69103] Misleading diagnostic for invalid constexpr initialization

2015-12-31 Thread miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69103 Mikhail Maltsev changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic CC|

[Bug fortran/67779] Strange ordering with strings in extended object

2015-12-31 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67779 --- Comment #22 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Created attachment 37201 [details] > the right patch this time Works as expected without regression!

[Bug target/69015] ICE: RTL check: expected code 'code_label', have 'return' in find_cond_trap, at ifcvt.c:3715 with -fno-if-conversion and __builtin_trap()

2015-12-31 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69015 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Dec 31 23:51:50 2015 New Revision: 232020 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232020=gcc=rev Log: PR target/69015 * ifcvt.c (find_cond_trap): Give up if returnjump_p

[Bug c/69104] New: invalid atomic memory order not diagnosed

2015-12-31 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69104 Bug ID: 69104 Summary: invalid atomic memory order not diagnosed Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug libstdc++/69106] New: std::promise should tolerate overloaded

2015-12-31 Thread rs2740 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69106 Bug ID: 69106 Summary: std::promise should tolerate overloaded & Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug libstdc++/69105] New: front_/back_/insert_iterator should use addressof

2015-12-31 Thread rs2740 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69105 Bug ID: 69105 Summary: front_/back_/insert_iterator should use addressof Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: