[Bug driver/69805] [6 Regression] ICE in greater_than_spec_func, at gcc.c:9722

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69805 --- Comment #6 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to vries from comment #3) > I'll follow up with a documentation patch. https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-02/msg01136.html

[Bug driver/69849] New: Some spec functions are undocumented in doc/invoke.texi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69849 Bug ID: 69849 Summary: Some spec functions are undocumented in doc/invoke.texi Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: trivial

[Bug target/69040] cris allmodconfig fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69040 --- Comment #3 from Sudip --- (In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #2) > Thanks for the holiday gift. :) > (Thanks for entering a report.) A gentle ping.. Any idea when this might get resolved. regards sudip

[Bug target/67599] linux build fails for openrisc compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67599 Sudip changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/69794] [5/6 Regression] std::regex_search match failure with regex object with flags grep|icase

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69794 Tim Shen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug libstdc++/69794] [5/6 Regression] std::regex_search match failure with regex object with flags grep|icase

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69794 --- Comment #4 from Tim Shen --- Author: timshen Date: Wed Feb 17 04:38:15 2016 New Revision: 233483 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233483=gcc=rev Log: Backport from mainline 2016-02-16 Tim Shen

[Bug target/68959] Test case ICEs with -mlra -mvsx-timode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68959 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/69461] [6 Regression] ICE in lra_set_insn_recog_data, at lra.c:964

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69461 --- Comment #17 from Alan Modra --- *** Bug 68959 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug libstdc++/69794] [5/6 Regression] std::regex_search match failure with regex object with flags grep|icase

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69794 --- Comment #3 from Tim Shen --- Author: timshen Date: Wed Feb 17 03:33:02 2016 New Revision: 233482 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233482=gcc=rev Log: 2016-02-16 Tim Shen PR libstdc++/69794 *

[Bug target/68959] Test case ICEs with -mlra -mvsx-timode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68959 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gmail dot com --- Comment #7

[Bug tree-optimization/69848] poor vectorization of a loop from SPEC2006 464.h264ref

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69848 --- Comment #2 from Jim Wilson --- Created attachment 37717 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37717=edit better code from hand optimizing the gcc output

[Bug tree-optimization/69848] poor vectorization of a loop from SPEC2006 464.h264ref

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69848 --- Comment #1 from Jim Wilson --- Created attachment 37716 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37716=edit code generated by -O2 -ftree-vectorize

[Bug tree-optimization/69848] New: poor vectorization of a loop from SPEC2006 464.h264ref

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69848 Bug ID: 69848 Summary: poor vectorization of a loop from SPEC2006 464.h264ref Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/48344] powerpc ICE with -fstack-limit-register=r2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48344 kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/10200] [6 Regression] Weird clash with same names in different scopes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10200 --- Comment #37 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Feb 17 00:50:23 2016 New Revision: 233481 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233481=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/10200 PR c++/69753 * call.c, cp-tree.h,

[Bug c++/69753] [6 Regression] bogus: expected primary-expression before ‘>’ token

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69753 --- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Feb 17 00:50:23 2016 New Revision: 233481 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233481=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/10200 PR c++/69753 * call.c, cp-tree.h,

[Bug target/69645] powerpc -ffixed- ignored when saving and restoring regs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69645 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/69710] performance issue with SP Linpack with Autovectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69710 --- Comment #12 from Doug Gilmore --- > Yes, I proposed some cleanup passess after vectorization but richi > thinks it's genrally expensive. So what's implmentation complexity > of pass_dominator? One thing we might consider is only enable it

[Bug target/48344] powerpc ICE with -fstack-limit-register=r2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48344 --- Comment #5 from kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kelvin Date: Tue Feb 16 23:12:19 2016 New Revision: 233477 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233477=gcc=rev Log: [gcc] 2016-02-16 Kelvin Nilsen PR

[Bug ipa/69241] [6 Regression] ICE with noreturn and function that return non-POD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69241 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug debug/65821] [4.9/5/6 regression] incorrect debug line # info for main

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65821 --- Comment #9 from Jan Kratochvil --- -O2 -g does not show this problem so I am testing it with -O0 -g below: g++ (GCC) 4.7.3 20130221 (prerelease) 0x00400748 <+4>: sub$0x10,%rsp => 0x0040074c <+8>: mov

[Bug target/60818] ICE in validate_condition_mode on powerpc*-linux-gnu*

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60818 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED URL|

[Bug rtl-optimization/68730] [5 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (in 32-bit mode)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68730 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/69845] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Expression getting incorrectly optimized after being rewritten by compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69845 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4) > regressed at -O2 with r204454. That just points to the -O2 regression, -O1 would have happened at a different point as VRP is enabled at -O2 and above. I

[Bug rtl-optimization/69847] Spec 2006 403.gcc slows down with -mlra vs. reload on PowerPC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69847 --- Comment #7 from Michael Meissner --- The following options were used for LRA code generation: -DSPEC_CPU -DNDEBUG -I. -g -mlittle -save-temps=obj -ffast-math -O3 -mveclibabi=mass -mcpu=power8 -mrecip=rsqrt -fpeel-loops -funroll-loops

[Bug rtl-optimization/69847] Spec 2006 403.gcc slows down with -mlra vs. reload on PowerPC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69847 --- Comment #6 from Michael Meissner --- Created attachment 37715 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37715=edit operf output showing hotspots for reload

[Bug rtl-optimization/69847] Spec 2006 403.gcc slows down with -mlra vs. reload on PowerPC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69847 --- Comment #5 from Michael Meissner --- Created attachment 37714 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37714=edit operf output showing hotspots for LRA

[Bug rtl-optimization/69847] Spec 2006 403.gcc slows down with -mlra vs. reload on PowerPC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69847 --- Comment #4 from Michael Meissner --- Created attachment 37713 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37713=edit Assembler code produced by reload of the two hot functions

[Bug rtl-optimization/69847] Spec 2006 403.gcc slows down with -mlra vs. reload on PowerPC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69847 --- Comment #3 from Michael Meissner --- Created attachment 37712 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37712=edit Assembler code produced by LRA of the two hot functions

[Bug rtl-optimization/69847] Spec 2006 403.gcc slows down with -mlra vs. reload on PowerPC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69847 --- Comment #2 from Michael Meissner --- Created attachment 37711 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37711=edit Reduced preprocessed file containing just the two hot functions

[Bug rtl-optimization/69847] Spec 2006 403.gcc slows down with -mlra vs. reload on PowerPC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69847 --- Comment #1 from Michael Meissner --- Created attachment 37710 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37710=edit Bitmap.i file that contains the two hot functions.

[Bug rtl-optimization/69752] Reload removing instruction with side-effect

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69752 --- Comment #4 from Bernd Schmidt --- Author: bernds Date: Tue Feb 16 21:37:01 2016 New Revision: 233476 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233476=gcc=rev Log: Backport PR69752 fix. PR rtl-optimization/69752 * ira.c

[Bug rtl-optimization/69847] New: Spec 2006 403.gcc slows down with -mlra vs. reload on PowerPC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69847 Bug ID: 69847 Summary: Spec 2006 403.gcc slows down with -mlra vs. reload on PowerPC Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/69845] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Expression getting incorrectly optimized after being rewritten by compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69845 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Target

[Bug c/28901] -Wunused-variable ignores unused const initialised variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28901 --- Comment #25 from Mark Wielaard --- (In reply to Josh Triplett from comment #23) > (In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #21) > > Although in C a static const is not really like a #define > > Why not? Many C projects try to avoid the

[Bug rtl-optimization/68730] [5 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (in 32-bit mode)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68730 --- Comment #19 from Bernd Schmidt --- Author: bernds Date: Tue Feb 16 21:13:59 2016 New Revision: 233475 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233475=gcc=rev Log: Backport lra-remat fix from mainline, PR68730 PR rtl-optimization/68730

[Bug fortran/69742] [4.9/5 Regression] ICE with -O3 and ASSOCIATE containing repeated expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69742 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE|[4.9/5 Regression] ICE with

[Bug tree-optimization/69714] [5/6 Regression] ffmpeg crc.c test miscompiled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69714 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/69742] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE with -O3 and ASSOCIATE containing repeated expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69742 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Tue Feb 16 21:10:00 2016 New Revision: 233474 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233474=gcc=rev Log: 2015-02-16 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/69742

[Bug tree-optimization/69714] [5/6 Regression] ffmpeg crc.c test miscompiled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69714 --- Comment #26 from Bernd Schmidt --- Author: bernds Date: Tue Feb 16 21:09:43 2016 New Revision: 233473 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233473=gcc=rev Log: Fix bswap optimization on big-endian (PR69714, 67781). PR

[Bug middle-end/69845] [5/6 Regression] Expression getting incorrectly optimized after being rewritten by compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69845 --- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse --- Probably extract_muldiv... It does check TREE_OVERFLOW, but for some reason only aborts if the result is INT_MIN.

[Bug target/69846] empty struct value fails to pass properly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69846 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- For C++98, this is undefined code because dummy is not a POD. For C++11, I don't know if it is undefined or not.

[Bug middle-end/69845] [5/6 Regression] Expression getting incorrectly optimized after being rewritten by compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69845 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/69845] Expression getting incorrectly optimized after being rewritten by compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69845 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Bug target/69846] New: empty struct value fails to pass properly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69846 Bug ID: 69846 Summary: empty struct value fails to pass properly Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug c/69835] [6 Regression] -Wnonnull diagnoses parameter comparisons with NULL even when those could have changed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69835 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/69835] [6 Regression] -Wnonnull diagnoses parameter comparisons with NULL even when those could have changed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69835 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Feb 16 20:46:17 2016 New Revision: 233472 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233472=gcc=rev Log: PR c/69835 * common.opt (Wnonnull-compare): New warning. *

[Bug fortran/68147] Potential incorrect code generation for string self-assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68147 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/69845] New: Expression getting incorrectly optimized after being rewritten by compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69845 Bug ID: 69845 Summary: Expression getting incorrectly optimized after being rewritten by compiler Product: gcc Version: 5.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug fortran/68147] Potential incorrect code generation for string self-assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68147 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig --- Here's a patch: Index: frontend-passes.c === --- frontend-passes.c (Revision 233410) +++ frontend-passes.c (Arbeitskopie) @@ -153,7 +153,7

[Bug fortran/68147] Potential incorrect code generation for string self-assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68147 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig --- This is seriously strange. Looking into this...

[Bug tree-optimization/69714] [5/6 Regression] ffmpeg crc.c test miscompiled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69714 --- Comment #25 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- Is Bend's fix okay for gcc-5 branch? -- John David Anglin dave.ang...@bell.net

[Bug target/69706] internal compiler error: in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2246

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69706 --- Comment #7 from davem at gcc dot gnu.org --- I'm leaning towards fixing both the ICE and the ABI bug.

[Bug c++/69843] C++: Inconsistent treatment of may_alias attribute and forward declarations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69843 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- For struct sockaddr; struct sockaddr *foo (void); struct __attribute__ ((may_alias)) sockaddr { }; struct sockaddr * foo (void) { return (struct sockaddr *) 0; } we reject it in C and ICE in C++:

[Bug tree-optimization/69714] [5/6 Regression] ffmpeg crc.c test miscompiled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69714 --- Comment #24 from Jakub Jelinek --- So, is this fixed now, or are we waiting for a different fix from Thomas?

[Bug c++/69657] [6 Regression] abs() not inlined after including math.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69657 --- Comment #13 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Tue Feb 16 19:01:49 2016 New Revision: 233470 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233470=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/69657 * name-lookup.c (lookup_qualified_name): Add

[Bug c++/69843] C++: Inconsistent treatment of may_alias attribute and forward declarations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69843 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Note, while there can't be dereferences, there can be pointers to the struct, the question is if we can fix them all up to make them ref-all afterwards.

[Bug c++/69843] C++: Inconsistent treatment of may_alias attribute and forward declarations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69843 --- Comment #2 from Florian Weimer --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1) > Is the forward declaration here in glibc headers? > If yes, using __attribute__((may_alias)) there too wouldn't hurt. > Or do you mean users forward declare

[Bug objc/69844] New: Possibly bogus error: unknown type name in ObjC code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69844 Bug ID: 69844 Summary: Possibly bogus error: unknown type name in ObjC code Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/69843] C++: Inconsistent treatment of may_alias attribute and forward declarations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69843 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug fortran/69456] Namelist value with trailing sign is ignored without error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69456 --- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle --- Created attachment 37707 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37707=edit A patch to fix this. This patch enables the error message. It regression tests OK.

[Bug target/69706] internal compiler error: in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2246

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69706 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||davem at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/69833] Warning during bootstrap of --with-build-config=bootstrap-asan

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69833 --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5) > Something like: > #!/bin/sh > .../cc1plus -quiet ...opts... -fsanitize=address -Werror=maybe-uninitialized > pr69833.ii 2>&1 | awk '/may be used uninitialized in

[Bug c++/69843] New: C++: Inconsistent treatment of may_alias attribute and forward declarations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69843 Bug ID: 69843 Summary: C++: Inconsistent treatment of may_alias attribute and forward declarations Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/62254] [4.9/5/6 Regression] gcc-4.9 ICEs on linux kernel zlib for armv3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62254 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c++/69842] [6 Regression] Parameter deduction in polymorphic lambdas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69842 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Target

[Bug target/69833] Warning during bootstrap of --with-build-config=bootstrap-asan

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69833 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3) > Can you delta reduce or creduce tree-vect-patterns.ii with a test that it > emits > this warning with -fsanitize=address and does not without it? I've just done,

[Bug target/69833] Warning during bootstrap of --with-build-config=bootstrap-asan

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69833 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Something like: #!/bin/sh .../cc1plus -quiet ...opts... -fsanitize=address -Werror=maybe-uninitialized pr69833.ii 2>&1 | awk '/may be used uninitialized in this function/{seen=seen+1;next}/error:/{exit

[Bug lto/67709] ICE: in estimate_function_body_sizes, at ipa-inline-analysis.c:2489 on x86_64-apple-darwin*

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67709 --- Comment #16 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Marking resolved-fixed. Thanks!

[Bug c/64748] OpenACC: "is not a variable" error with deviceptr()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64748 --- Comment #7 from jnorris at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jnorris Date: Tue Feb 16 16:27:11 2016 New Revision: 233466 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233466=gcc=rev Log: Backport from trunk: PR c/64748 gcc/cp/

[Bug lto/67709] ICE: in estimate_function_body_sizes, at ipa-inline-analysis.c:2489 on x86_64-apple-darwin*

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67709 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug lto/67709] ICE: in estimate_function_body_sizes, at ipa-inline-analysis.c:2489 on x86_64-apple-darwin*

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67709 --- Comment #14 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vries Date: Tue Feb 16 16:22:28 2016 New Revision: 233465 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233465=gcc=rev Log: backport "Don't call call_cgraph_insertion_hooks in simd_clone_create"

[Bug c++/69842] New: Parameter deduction in polymorphic lambdas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69842 Bug ID: 69842 Summary: Parameter deduction in polymorphic lambdas Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug tree-optimization/69801] [6 Regression] gcc ICE on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in "operand_equal_p"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69801 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Feb 16 15:34:07 2016 New Revision: 233459 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233459=gcc=rev Log: PR middle-end/69801 * gcc.dg/pr69801.c: Add empty dg-options.

[Bug c/64748] OpenACC: "is not a variable" error with deviceptr()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64748 --- Comment #6 from jnorris at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jnorris Date: Tue Feb 16 15:29:04 2016 New Revision: 233458 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233458=gcc=rev Log: PR c/64748 gcc/c/ * c-parser.c

[Bug tree-optimization/69820] [6 Regression] Test miscompiled with -O3 option

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69820 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Feb 16 15:16:48 2016 New Revision: 233457 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233457=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/69820 * tree-vect-patterns.c

[Bug middle-end/69553] [6 Regression] Optimizations O1/O2 makes std::array value incorrect when passed to function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69553 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- Exposes a similar issue in stmt_kills_ref_p which does 2248 /* Just compare the outermost handled component, if 2249 they are equal we have found a possible

[Bug tree-optimization/69820] [6 Regression] Test miscompiled with -O3 option

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69820 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- Wrong-code issue fixed, the ICE fix is still pending review.

[Bug rtl-optimization/69764] [5 Regression] ICE on x86_64-linux-gnu at -O0 (in decompose, at rtl.h:2107)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69764 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Feb 16 15:15:40 2016 New Revision: 233456 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233456=gcc=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/69764 PR rtl-optimization/69771 *

[Bug rtl-optimization/69771] [6 Regression] ICE on x86_64-linux-gnu at -O0 (in extract_insn, at recog.c:2287)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69771 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Feb 16 15:15:40 2016 New Revision: 233456 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233456=gcc=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/69764 PR rtl-optimization/69771 *

[Bug rtl-optimization/65932] [5 Regression] Linux-3.10.75 on arm926ej-s does not boot due to wrong code generation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65932 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/65932] [5 Regression] Linux-3.10.75 on arm926ej-s does not boot due to wrong code generation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65932 --- Comment #32 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Tue Feb 16 15:13:05 2016 New Revision: 233455 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233455=gcc=rev Log: [ARM] Adjust tests after fix for PR 65932 PR target/65932

[Bug target/67714] [6 Regression] signed char is zero-extended instead of sign-extended

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67714 --- Comment #19 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Tue Feb 16 15:11:26 2016 New Revision: 233454 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233454=gcc=rev Log: [ARM] PR target/65932: stop changing signedness in PROMOTE_MODE

[Bug rtl-optimization/65932] [5 Regression] Linux-3.10.75 on arm926ej-s does not boot due to wrong code generation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65932 --- Comment #31 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Tue Feb 16 15:11:26 2016 New Revision: 233454 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233454=gcc=rev Log: [ARM] PR target/65932: stop changing signedness in PROMOTE_MODE

[Bug tree-optimization/69776] [4.9/5 Regression] Wrong optimization with aliasing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69776 --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Feb 16 15:00:45 2016 New Revision: 233453 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233453=gcc=rev Log: 2016-02-16 Richard Biener PR

[Bug middle-end/69553] [6 Regression] Optimizations O1/O2 makes std::array value incorrect when passed to function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69553 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- So the issue is that [(const struct B[2] &)p1_2(D)][1] and [(const int[2] &)p1_2(D)][1] are considered equal even though we have int[] vs. B[] and thus different element sizes and different offsets (but

[Bug c/69796] [6 Regression] ICE on invalid code in useless_type_conversion_p, at gimple-expr.c:83

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69796 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/69714] [5/6 Regression] ffmpeg crc.c test miscompiled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69714 --- Comment #23 from Bernd Schmidt --- Author: bernds Date: Tue Feb 16 14:42:59 2016 New Revision: 233452 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233452=gcc=rev Log: Fix bswap optimization on big-endian (PR69714, 67781). PR

[Bug target/69841] New: Wrong template instantiation in C++11 on armv7l

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69841 Bug ID: 69841 Summary: Wrong template instantiation in C++11 on armv7l Product: gcc Version: 5.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug sanitizer/69840] New: two ASAN help nits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69840 Bug ID: 69840 Summary: two ASAN help nits Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: sanitizer

[Bug middle-end/69553] [6 Regression] Optimizations O1/O2 makes std::array value incorrect when passed to function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69553 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|NEW

[Bug debug/65821] [4.9/5/6 regression] incorrect debug line # info for main

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65821 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c/69839] New: cross-compiling programs w/-fsanitize=address fails: ld: warning: libstdc++.so.6, needed by libasan.so, not found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69839 Bug ID: 69839 Summary: cross-compiling programs w/-fsanitize=address fails: ld: warning: libstdc++.so.6, needed by libasan.so, not found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link)

[Bug lto/67709] ICE: in estimate_function_body_sizes, at ipa-inline-analysis.c:2489 on x86_64-apple-darwin*

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67709 --- Comment #13 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vries Date: Tue Feb 16 13:49:22 2016 New Revision: 233450 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233450=gcc=rev Log: backport "Don't call call_cgraph_insertion_hooks in simd_clone_create"

[Bug regression/69838] [regression] Lra deletes EH_REGION

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69838 --- Comment #1 from Dominik Vogt --- Created attachment 37705 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37705=edit Reload dump (broken)

[Bug regression/69838] New: [regression] Lra deletes EH_REGION

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69838 Bug ID: 69838 Summary: [regression] Lra deletes EH_REGION Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: regression

[Bug middle-end/22141] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Missing optimization when storing structures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22141 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|jakub at gcc dot

[Bug tree-optimization/69802] [4.9/5 Regression] gcc ICE at -O1 and above on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu with “seg fault”

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69802 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.9/5/6 Regression] gcc|[4.9/5 Regression] gcc ICE

[Bug fortran/68147] Potential incorrect code generation for string self-assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68147 --- Comment #4 from Martin Reinecke --- Any progress on this? I fear that this might affect quite many people once strings of allocatable length become more popular in Fortran ... and I sure hope they will!

[Bug target/69161] [6 Regression] ICE in simplify_const_unary_operation, at simplify-rtx.c:1633

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69161 --- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek --- Any progress with this? If the aarch64 part is approved and arm approval is not coming soon, please consider applying at least the aarch64 part.

  1   2   >