[Bug bootstrap/67728] Build fails when cross-compiling with in-tree GMP and ISL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67728 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Roberts --- The initial bug report was for cross compiling. Bug 70211 is for native builds on ARM. Given the huge growth in ARM development boards, this needs at least documenting. As with the original reporter I spent

[Bug c/70220] [x86] interrupt attribute optionally needs to provide read, write and control the set of saved registers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70220 --- Comment #2 from Wink Saville --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1) > (In reply to Wink Saville from comment #0) > > I have identified one possible problem and with this scheme, what if the > > compiler needs to setup a stack frame by

[Bug c/70220] [x86] interrupt attribute optionally needs to provide read, write and control the set of saved registers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70220 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/41437] No access control for classes in template functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41437 Barry Revzin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||barry.revzin at gmail dot com ---

[Bug tree-optimization/69951] wrong code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69951 Chengnian Sun changed: What|Removed |Added CC||chengniansun at gmail dot com ---

[Bug c/70220] New: [x86] interrupt attribute optionally needs to provide read, write and control the set of saved registers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70220 Bug ID: 70220 Summary: [x86] interrupt attribute optionally needs to provide read, write and control the set of saved registers Product: gcc Version: unknown Status:

[Bug c++/70205] ICE on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu: tree check: expected tree_binfo, have error_mark in add_candidates, at cp/call.c:5283

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70205 --- Comment #2 from Zhendong Su --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > Confirmed, it ICEs with checking turned on. > > Note this might be invalid code as what GCC is iceing on is an error_mark > node. Andrew, this should be valid

[Bug fortran/45076] [OOP] gfortran.dg/dynamic_dispatch_6.f03 ICEs with -fprofile-use

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45076 --- Comment #9 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: dominiq Date: Sun Mar 13 23:22:15 2016 New Revision: 234172 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234172=gcc=rev Log: 2016-03-13 Dominique d'Humieres PR

[Bug bootstrap/70211] gcc-6-20160306 fails to build on ARM Linux with in tree ISL due to undefined GMP symbol __gmpn_invert_limb in isl_test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70211 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/67728] Build fails when cross-compiling with in-tree GMP and ISL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67728 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andrewm.roberts at sky dot com ---

[Bug c++/70212] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault when compiling easylogging++.h v9.80

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70212 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/70216] [SH] Implement __builtin_trap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70216 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug target/69284] [5.3] SIGSEGV when running 32-bit result on MinGW when linked dynamically

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69284 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- *** Bug 70207 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/70207] use of causes segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70207 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/70205] ICE on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu: tree check: expected tree_binfo, have error_mark in add_candidates, at cp/call.c:5283

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70205 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-checking

[Bug c++/70204] [6 Regression] ICE on x86_64-linux-gnu in non_const_var_error, at cp/constexpr.c:2764

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70204 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to work|

[Bug c++/70217] Cygwin 2.4.1 x86_64/GCC 5.3.0 can no longer compile a program with std=c++03

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70217 --- Comment #5 from Jeffrey Walton --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3) > dup of PR 70176 ? > > My guess is Cygwin uses a new version of newlib which has stricter C headers > that don't define the C99 functions for __cplusplus <

[Bug c++/70202] ICE on invalid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in build_simple_base_path, at cp/class.c:579

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70202 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/70199] [5/6 Regression] Crash at -O2 when using labels.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70199 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/70199] [5/6 Regression] Crash at -O2 when using labels.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70199 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.4.5, 4.8.2 Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/70214] [4.9/5/6 regression] pthread_kill is not considered a barrier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70214 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- Actually it is not a glibc bug either: Note that leaf functions might invoke signals and signal handlers might be defined in the current compilation unit and use static variables. The only compliant way to

[Bug ipa/70188] [4.9/5/6 Regression] gcc 4.9+ miscompiles code on hppa

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70188 --- Comment #6 from deller at gmx dot de --- Hi Dave, On 13.03.2016 21:58, danglin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > Try to find 4.9 regression. So far, range has been reduced to r220635 to > r221480. So, it compiles correctly with r220635 ? Is

[Bug tree-optimization/70214] [4.9/5/6 regression] pthread_kill is not considered a barrier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70214 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/70214] [4.9/5/6 regression] pthread_kill is not considered a barrier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70214 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- extern int pthread_kill (pthread_t __threadid, int __signo) __attribute__ ((__nothrow__ , __leaf__));

[Bug ipa/70188] [4.9/5/6 Regression] gcc 4.9+ miscompiles code on hppa

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70188 --- Comment #5 from John David Anglin --- Created attachment 37952 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37952=edit blk-merge.c preprocessed source I've added the preprocessed for blk-merge.c. Although the wrong code appears to

[Bug tree-optimization/70214] [4.9/5/6 regression] pthread_kill is not considered a barrier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70214 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.4.5 Summary|[6 regression]

[Bug tree-optimization/70214] [6 regression] external call is not considered a barrier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70214 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug ipa/70188] [4.9/5/6 Regression] gcc 4.9+ miscompiles code on hppa

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70188 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/70194] [6 regression] missing -Waddress on constexpr pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70194 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug fortran/69524] [6 Regression] [F08] Compiler segfaults on "module subroutine"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69524 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug lto/69953] [5/6 Regression] Using lto causes gtkmm/gparted and gtkmm/inkscape compile to fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69953 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.4

[Bug fortran/70040] [6 Regression] ICE in gimplify.c with deferred-length strings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70040 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug c++/70121] [5/6 Regression] spurious warning and crash when returning a reference from lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70121 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.4

[Bug c++/70096] [6 Regression] [Invalid codegen] Read of uninitialized value in ref-qualified pointer to member function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70096 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug libstdc++/69782] [6 Regression] defining min() macro causes thousand of lines of error messages

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69782 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug fortran/69739] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE during array result, allocatable assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69739 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.4

[Bug tree-optimization/69728] [6 Regression] internal compiler error: in outer_projection_mupa, at graphite-sese-to-poly.c:1175

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69728 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug fortran/69603] [5/6 Regression] ICE: segfault with -fimplicit-none and proc_ptr_comp_24.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69603 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.4

[Bug target/70208] [6 Regression] Operand size mismatch for `vpextrb' w/ -O3 -mavx -masm=intel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70208 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/70049] [6 Regression] Error: operand size mismatch for `vpextrw' (wrong assembly generated) with -masm=intel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70049 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added CC||asolokha at gmx dot com --- Comment #5

[Bug rtl-optimization/70219] [6 Regression] ICE: in delete_move_and_clobber, at lra-constraints.c:5864 with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70219 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug c++/70218] [5/6 Regression] Illegal access to private fields succeeds with 5/6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70218 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.4 Summary|Illegal access

[Bug c++/70218] Illegal access to private fields succeeds with 5/6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70218 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug rtl-optimization/70219] [6 Regression] ICE: in delete_move_and_clobber, at lra-constraints.c:5864 with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70219 --- Comment #2 from Zdenek Sojka --- Created attachment 37951 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37951=edit testcase that needs only -O1 to reproduce $ gcc -O testcase.c testcase.c: In function 'foo': testcase.c:9:1: note:

[Bug rtl-optimization/70219] [6 Regression] ICE: in delete_move_and_clobber, at lra-constraints.c:5864 with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70219 --- Comment #1 from Zdenek Sojka --- Created attachment 37950 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37950=edit reduced testcase

[Bug rtl-optimization/70219] New: [6 Regression] ICE: in delete_move_and_clobber, at lra-constraints.c:5864 with -O2

es=c,c++ --enable-checking=yes,rtl,df --without-cloog --without-ppl --without-isl --disable-libstdcxx-pch --prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-234167-checking-yes-rtl-df-nographite Thread model: posix gcc version 6.0.0 20160313 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug fortran/69043] Trying to include a directory causes an infinite loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69043 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/70035] [5 Regression] Calling a non-virtual member in base-class constructor call with ubsan causes segfault when superclass has virtual member with same name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70035 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #9) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8) > > Fixed for g++ 6+ so far. > > no. this creates a new problem. > I see now crashes in valid code that uses the

[Bug c++/70217] Cygwin 2.4.1 x86_64/GCC 5.3.0 can no longer compile a program with std=c++03

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70217 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- We can probably do something in os_defines.h like: #if __cplusplus < 201103L && __STRICT_ANSI__ #undef _GLIBCXX_USE_C99_STDIO // etc. #endif

[Bug fortran/69043] Trying to include a directory causes an infinite loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69043 --- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Sun Mar 13 17:38:07 2016 New Revision: 234169 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234169=gcc=rev Log: 2016-03-13 Jerry DeLisle Jim MacArthur

[Bug c++/70217] Cygwin 2.4.1 x86_64/GCC 5.3.0 can no longer compile a program with std=c++03

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70217 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- dup of PR 70176 ? My guess is Cygwin uses a new version of newlib which has stricter C headers that don't define the C99 functions for __cplusplus < 201103L && __STRICT_ANSI__

[Bug c++/70035] [5 Regression] Calling a non-virtual member in base-class constructor call with ubsan causes segfault when superclass has virtual member with same name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70035 Bernd Edlinger changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de ---

[Bug c++/70218] New: Illegal access to private fields succeeds with 5/6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70218 Bug ID: 70218 Summary: Illegal access to private fields succeeds with 5/6 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/70216] [SH] Implement __builtin_trap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70216 --- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo --- (In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #2) > > I think that # less than 0x20 are reserved by kernel, gdb uses 0x20 > and 0xc3 and gcc uses 0x33 for profiling. Perhaps 0x54 (ascii 'T') > or something? If

[Bug target/70216] [SH] Implement __builtin_trap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70216 --- Comment #2 from Kazumoto Kojima --- (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #1) > For sh4-linux this option should be enabled by default with some useful trap > number value. Which trap number should be used in this case? I think that # less

[Bug bootstrap/70211] gcc-6-20160306 fails to build on ARM Linux with in tree ISL due to undefined GMP symbol __gmpn_invert_limb in isl_test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70211 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Roberts --- Looking at the toplevel Makefile.in the gmp targets (maybe-configure-gmp, configure-gmp etc) use: --build=${build_alias} --host=none-${host_vendor}-${host_os} --target=none-${host_vendor}-${host_os} where

[Bug fortran/45076] [OOP] gfortran.dg/dynamic_dispatch_6.f03 ICEs with -fprofile-use

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45076 --- Comment #8 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: dominiq Date: Sun Mar 13 09:48:20 2016 New Revision: 234168 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234168=gcc=rev Log: 2016-03-13 Dominique d'Humieres PR

[Bug c++/70217] Cygwin 2.4.1 x86_64/GCC 5.3.0 can no longer compile a program with std=c++03

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70217 --- Comment #2 from Jeffrey Walton --- Cygwin bug https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19817.

[Bug c++/70217] New: Cygwin 2.4.1 x86_64/GCC 5.3.0 can no longer compile a program with std=c++03

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70217 Bug ID: 70217 Summary: Cygwin 2.4.1 x86_64/GCC 5.3.0 can no longer compile a program with std=c++03 Product: gcc Version: 5.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/70217] Cygwin 2.4.1 x86_64/GCC 5.3.0 can no longer compile a program with std=c++03

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70217 --- Comment #1 from Jeffrey Walton --- Cygwin bug https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19817.

[Bug tree-optimization/70214] [6 regression] external call is not considered a barrier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70214 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Component|c

[Bug c/28901] -Wunused-variable ignores unused const initialised variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28901 --- Comment #37 from Andrew Pinski --- Note this change also introduces some warnings when compiling the arm64 kernel: In file included from arch/arm64/crypto/aes-glue.c:17:0: include/linux/cpufeature.h:48:33: warning: ‘cpu_feature_match_AES’

[Bug fortran/50221] Allocatable string length fails with array assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50221 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||brad.finney at humboldt dot edu

[Bug fortran/68241] [meta-bug] Deferred-length character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68241 Bug 68241 depends on bug 70215, which changed state. Bug 70215 Summary: segmentation fault with allocate on assign; 32 bit version, not 64 bit https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70215 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/70215] segmentation fault with allocate on assign; 32 bit version, not 64 bit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70215 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---