https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70307
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70183
--- Comment #5 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to vries from comment #4)
> Approved for stage1:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-03/msg00902.html, conditional on
> successful bootstrap & regtest.
bootstrap & regtest succeeded
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70302
Bug ID: 70302
Summary: crash on valid code at -O2 and -O3 in 32-bit mode on
x86_64-linux-gnu (in convert_op, at
config/i386/i386.c:3414)
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70282
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||compile-time-hog
Component|c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70258
--- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Thu Mar 17 11:07:10 2016
New Revision: 234284
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234284&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Set flag_pic to flag_pie for PIE in LTO
Since PIE implies PIC, we
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70259
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70255
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67114
--- Comment #17 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The point of my patch in comment 6 was to allow the customization to be done in
os_defines.h, not to litter the header. If you're going to add #ifdef
checks for PTW32_VERSION in then there's no point usi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70256
--- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Approved for stage1: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-03/msg00912.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70030
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61198
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||5.1.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70281
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70244
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70232
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Btw, the bswap pass for arm doesn't detect any bswap32 or bswap64 instruction.
There is
(define_expand "bswapsi2"
[(set (match_operand:SI 0 "s_register_operand" "=r")
(bswap:SI (match_operand:SI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70205
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE on |[4.9/5 Regression] ICE on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70265
Bug ID: 70265
Summary: ICE on code with constexpr on x86_64-linux-gnu in tree
check: expected statement_list, have nop_expr in
tsi_start, at tree-iterator.h:42
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70199
--- Comment #6 from Richard Henderson ---
Author: rth
Date: Wed Mar 16 16:50:18 2016
New Revision: 234261
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234261&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/70199
* function.h (struct function): Add has_forced_lab
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70273
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #38003|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70232
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Thomas Preud'homme from comment #9)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #7)
> > The bswap pass could learn to split this up into two loads and bswaps and
> > combine the results with a s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70257
Bug ID: 70257
Summary: #line incorrectly handled in error messages
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67114
--- Comment #15 from Jonathan Wakely ---
--- gcc-5.3.0.old/libstdc++-v3/include/std/thread 2015-03-26
20:59:08.0 +0100
+++ gcc-5.3.0.old/libstdc++-v3/include/std/thread 2016-03-17
06:32:41.124378000 +0100
@@ -83,10 +83,19 @@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70232
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70255
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> We'd likely want to warn in merge_decls for this case.
"this case" == all optimization attributes applied via newdecl to
olddecl with DECL_SAVED_TREE (or DECL_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67114
--- Comment #13 from ralphengels at gmail dot com ---
Also needs a small change in pthread.h to guard against including windows.h
#if defined(PTW32_CONFIG_MINGW) && defined(__cplusplus)
change to
#if defined(PTW32_CONFIG_MINGW) && defined(PTW3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70030
--- Comment #6 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Created attachment 38033
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38033&action=edit
A patch
Here is the patch which might solve the problem.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69739
--- Comment #4 from Harald Anlauf ---
(In reply to Harald Anlauf from comment #3)
> (In reply to John from comment #2)
> > So maybe the automatic-size result is the actual root of the ICE?
>
> If I use
>
> real :: operate(1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70267
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
We ICE in propagate_necessity because it can't digest
# VUSE <.MEM_3>
f.0_4 = (struct Foo *) D.2296;
which is
(gdb) p gimple_code(stmt)
$2 = GIMPLE_ASSIGN
but
(gdb) p gimple_assign_single_p (stmt)
$3 = false
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70292
Bug ID: 70292
Summary: ICE in verify_target_availability, at sel-sched.c:1584
with -fno-inline -fno-dce -fschedule-insns
-fselective-scheduling -fno-tree-dce -O1
Product: gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70233
--- Comment #4 from Harald Anlauf ---
(In reply to Harald Anlauf from comment #2)
> Created attachment 37982 [details]
> Patch to generate error message
This patch leads to serious regressions. Do not
yet understand why. Withdrawing...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70285
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70291
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70265
--- Comment #1 from Zhendong Su ---
A slight variation of the test causes GCC to hang (apparently in evaluating the
infinite loop).
$ timeout -s 9 10 g++-trunk -c small.cpp
Killed
$
$ clang++-trunk -std=c++14 -c small.cpp
small.cpp:2:1: error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70150
Bug 70150 depends on bug 70192, which changed state.
Bug 70192 Summary: -fno-pic doesn't work with --enable-default-pie
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70192
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70260
Harald Anlauf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gmx dot de
--- Comment #4 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70205
--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini ---
Thanks a lot Marek. The patch makes sense to me, I would recommend fully
regression testing it and sending it to the mailing list.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63384
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #7 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70255
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
We'd likely want to warn in merge_decls for this case.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70147
--- Comment #27 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #26)
> I just fail to understand why we cannot just clobber the whole
> object once in the in-charge constructor,
> then if sanitizing vptrs initialize every vptr onc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70294
Bug ID: 70294
Summary: operator< and operator== for std::thread::id only
findable by ADL
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70133
James Greenhalgh changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70238
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70273
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> > Or better yet decide whether to walk the initializers or not based on
> > !gimple_body (fndecl) && !fun->cfg ?
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70238
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68714
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Mar 16 13:34:36 2016
New Revision: 234258
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234258&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/68714
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr68714.c: A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67114
--- Comment #19 from ralphengels at gmail dot com ---
Had problems with the define not being pulled in from os_defines.h (i think a
better place would have been gthr_posix.h since that gets pulled in at build
time) hence the change, also if using
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70235
--- Comment #8 from Jerry DeLisle ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #7)
... snip ...
>
> My gut feeling is that it has something to do with having "precision" == 17
> in that function. In any case, the nafter is too large when nblanks
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69604
--- Comment #7 from Harald Anlauf ---
(In reply to Harald Anlauf from comment #6)
All crashes for case 4 go away after the following change:
Index: gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c
===
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70281
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
Minimized reproducer:
$ cat bug.c
const char *bch_stats_show (unsigned long cache_hits)
{
return (__builtin_types_compatible_p (typeof (cache_hits >> 16), int)
? "%i\n" : "%i\n");
}
Am working o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70133
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Christophe Lyon from comment #6)
> > 3) We should think about whether we need to put out these +no extension
> > strings at all. I don't like that for my older systems I'll need to keep
> > updat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70194
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Thu Mar 17 10:29:36 2016
New Revision: 234281
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234281&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/70194
* typeck.c (warn_for_null_address): New fu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70150
Bug 70150 depends on bug 70258, which changed state.
Bug 70258 Summary: [6 Regression] flag_pic is cleared for PIE in
lto_post_options
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70258
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70245
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Mar 17 11:53:53 2016
New Revision: 234285
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234285&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/70245
* rtl.h (replace_rtx): Add ALL_REGS argum
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70048
--- Comment #20 from Wilco ---
(In reply to Richard Henderson from comment #19)
> I wish that message had been a bit more complete with the description
> of the performance issue. I must guess from this...
>
> > ldr dst1, [reg_base1, reg_ind
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70245
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek ---
See PR70261.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54746
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70121
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|ppalka at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61821
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|i386-pc-solaris2.1[01] |i386-pc-solaris2.1[012]
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70318
Bug ID: 70318
Summary: `std::sqrt(int)` Produces -Wfloat-conversion
Warning, Erroneous After C++11.
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70268
Bug ID: 70268
Summary: add option -ffile-prefix-map to map one directory name
(old) to another (new) in __FILE__, __BASE_FILE__and
__builtin_FILE()
Product: gcc
V
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70008
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70162
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70133
James Greenhalgh changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70224
--- Comment #10 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #9 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
> So I realized that given the nature of this bug a simple bootstrap on sparc
> wasn't going to be particularly interesting -- bootstraps don't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70235
--- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Created attachment 37990
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37990&action=edit
A useful test program
I get correct results using the attached with gcc version 4.6.4 (GCC)
Broken in 4.9, 5,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70162
--- Comment #7 from Nick Clifton ---
Author: nickc
Date: Thu Mar 17 10:16:38 2016
New Revision: 234280
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234280&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/70162
* config/rx/rx.c (rx_print_integer): Print
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67114
ralphengels at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ralphengels at gmail dot c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70252
Ilya Enkovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70303
Bug ID: 70303
Summary: Value-initialized debug iterators
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70289
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70261
--- Comment #3 from Richard Henderson ---
Created attachment 37993
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37993&action=edit
aarch64 pbase_type_info.ii
This will ICE with just cc1plus -O.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68714
--- Comment #11 from Richard Henderson ---
Author: rth
Date: Wed Mar 16 23:53:01 2016
New Revision: 234271
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234271&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Gimplify vec_cond_expr with condition inside
PR middle-end/70240
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70240
--- Comment #11 from Richard Henderson ---
Author: rth
Date: Wed Mar 16 23:53:18 2016
New Revision: 234273
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234273&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/70240
* gcc.c-torture/compile/pr70240.c: New.
Added:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70279
Bug ID: 70279
Summary: Crash duing compilation with NINT and 128 bits integer
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70268
--- Comment #1 from hongxu jia ---
So I suggest gcc could provide a option '-ffile-prefix-map=='
to map directory in __FILE__ and replace it with directory.
It is similar to '-fdebug-prefix-map==', but the latter is used
for DWARF, and the new
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70240
--- Comment #10 from Richard Henderson ---
Author: rth
Date: Wed Mar 16 23:53:10 2016
New Revision: 234272
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234272&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Revert r231575
PR middle-end/70240
PR middle-end/68215
2015-12-1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70024
--- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Wed Mar 16 16:58:12 2016
New Revision: 234262
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234262&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/70024
* reorg.c (relax_delay_slots): Pa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70317
Bug ID: 70317
Summary: [6 Regression] folding x<=x to true for large vectors,
ignoring nans
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70288
Bug ID: 70288
Summary: ICE with -O1 -fno-tree-dominator-opts
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70147
--- Comment #24 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Or do you consider this just harmless? If some ctor throws, even if dtor is
virtual, the dtor will change _vptr to what it expects before the rest of the
dtor body which could call virtual functions etc., a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70121
--- Comment #7 from Patrick Palka ---
But as Jason said in comment #4, (IIUC) the test case never compiled correctly
in any gcc version. It was marked a regression only because
-Wreturn-local-addr now deliberately returns null but arguably that'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70283
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70270
Bug ID: 70270
Summary: Spurious line directive with -g
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: preprocessor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70258
Bug ID: 70258
Summary: -fPIE isn't passed to lto by default when GCC is
configured with --enable-default-pie
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69739
--- Comment #5 from Harald Anlauf ---
You probably hit something that's just not yet implemented:
trans-expr.c:
(gdb) list 4083,4096
4083case GFC_ISYM_LBOUND:
4084case GFC_ISYM_UBOUND:
4085/* TODO These implementatio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70263
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70139
--- Comment #17 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Mar 18 20:16:05 2016
New Revision: 234345
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234345&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/70139
* constexpr.c (cxx_eval_call_expression): Fi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70150
--- Comment #10 from psturm at computervoice dot com ---
Yes, exact same errors when built without --enable-default-pie.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64697
Václav Haisman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.9.2 |5.3.0
--- Comment #16 from Václav Haism
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70235
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #4)
> I will get started on this one. Dominique, if you spot the problem let me
> know.
In determine_precision, one has:
int precision = f->u.real.d; // "3" as "F8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70262
Bug ID: 70262
Summary: Segmentation fault with large stack array, no fault
when alloca the same size
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70256
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70267
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70261
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
Summary|r234265 causes fa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=0
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70147
--- Comment #25 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #20)
> I don't think that's a problem; the clobber only affects the as-base size of
> the class, which doesn't include any virtual bases unless they are primary,
> and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70260
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
ifort says:
t.f90(3): error #6643: This statement is incorrectly positioned.
procedure g
--^
t.f90(3): error #8168: Parentheses are required after the PROCEDURE keyword.
procedure g
--^
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69513
Rainer Emrich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70232
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
But not sure how this became a regression - does GCC 5 really do better here?
With -fno-tree-dominator-opts the warning no longer triggers and we get
sub sp, sp, #428
so it may be another jump
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67728
--- Comment #19 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #18)
> I think this issue was already described in another PR.
Ah, that was PR 69134 for MPFR.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-01/msg00127.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69739
Harald Anlauf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gmx dot de
--- Comment #3 from
1 - 100 of 376 matches
Mail list logo
