[Bug c++/69775] thread_local extern variable causes linkage error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69775 felix.esch.42+dev at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/70617] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70617 --- Comment #5 from Jan Smets <jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.com> --- Reduced test case by creduce struct UINT; typedef struct { UINT TYPES } eType; fn1(eType) { gcc version 5.3.1 20160411 (GCC) = gcc-5-

[Bug c++/70635] New: ICE on (and rejects) valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus)

-wrapper Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 6.0.0 20160411 (experimental) [trunk revision 234874] (GCC) $ $ g++-trunk -c small.cpp small.cpp:11:37: error

[Bug rtl-optimization/70625] [4.9/5 Regression] Memory exhaustion when building specific snippet at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70625 --- Comment #4 from Arseny Solokha --- 1. % armv7a-hardfloat-linux-gnueabihf-gcc-4.9.3 -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=armv7a-hardfloat-linux-gnueabihf-gcc-4.9.3

[Bug tree-optimization/70357] [openacc][gomp4] ICE on reduction (+:sum) private (sum)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70357 cesar at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/70357] [openacc][gomp4] ICE on reduction (+:sum) private (sum)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70357 --- Comment #2 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: cesar Date: Mon Apr 11 23:21:28 2016 New Revision: 234889 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234889=gcc=rev Log: gcc/ PR tree-optimization/70357 * gimplify.c

[Bug c++/70634] New: ICE on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus)

=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 6.0.0 20160411 (experimental) [trunk revision 234874] (GCC) $ $ g++-5.3 -c small.cpp $ clang++ -c small.cpp $ $ g++-trunk -c small.cpp g++-trunk: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus) Please submit

[Bug target/70630] [6 regression] sparc bootstrap failure: sparc.c:4919:6: error: suggest explicit braces to avoid ambiguous 'else'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70630 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/70594] [6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70594 --- Comment #19 from Nathan Sidwell --- (In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #17) > I still don't understand why/how this is causing problems, if > -fcompare-debug only cares about the order of decls. The copied decls > shouldn't appear

[Bug c++/70610] [6 regression] error: invalid initialization of non-const reference of type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70610 --- Comment #6 from Patrick Palka --- uhhh... here: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-04/msg00482.html

[Bug c++/70610] [6 regression] error: invalid initialization of non-const reference of type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70610 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/70627] [6 Regression] internal compiler error: verify_type failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70627 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug c++/70594] [6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70594 --- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek --- For the testcases in this PR probably: --- gcc/tree-sra.c 2016-04-09 13:21:06.111510703 +0200 +++ gcc/tree-sra.c 2016-04-11 23:11:41.253126047 +0200 @@ -1537,17 +1537,12 @@

[Bug c++/70594] [6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70594 --- Comment #17 from Jason Merrill --- I still don't understand why/how this is causing problems, if -fcompare-debug only cares about the order of decls. The copied decls shouldn't appear anywhere in the output, and other decls should still

[Bug c/70633] New: ICE on valid code at -Os (in 32-bit mode) on x86_64-linux-gnu: output_operand: invalid expression as operand

-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 6.0.0 20160411 (experimental) [trunk revision 234874] (GCC) $ $ gcc-trunk -m32 -O0 small.c $ gcc-4.9 -m32 -Os small.c $ $ gcc-trunk -m32 -Os small.c small.c: In function

[Bug target/70630] [6 regression] sparc bootstrap failure: sparc.c:4919:6: error: suggest explicit braces to avoid ambiguous 'else'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70630 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/70632] New: Wrong function name resolution using variadic template and additional template parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70632 Bug ID: 70632 Summary: Wrong function name resolution using variadic template and additional template parameters Product: gcc Version: 5.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/70381] On powerpc, -mfloat128 is on by default for all VSX systems

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70381 --- Comment #7 from Michael Meissner --- Author: meissner Date: Mon Apr 11 19:45:35 2016 New Revision: 234884 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234884=gcc=rev Log: [gcc] 2016-04-11 Michael Meissner PR

[Bug c++/70631] New: Warn about redundant comparisons with -Wlogical-op

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70631 Bug ID: 70631 Summary: Warn about redundant comparisons with -Wlogical-op Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3

[Bug target/70630] New: [6 regression] sparc bootstrap failure: sparc.c:4919:6: error: suggest explicit braces to avoid ambiguous 'else'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70630 Bug ID: 70630 Summary: [6 regression] sparc bootstrap failure: sparc.c:4919:6: error: suggest explicit braces to avoid ambiguous 'else' Product: gcc Version: 6.0

[Bug c++/70613] -fabi-version docs don't match implementation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70613 --- Comment #1 from Jim Wilson --- I see that the patch for bug 65945 was back ported to the gcc-5 branch, which required a partial backport of the patch for bug 44282, which added abi version 9. The original patch for 44282 is missing the doc

[Bug c/69197] Can't compile older

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69197 prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||prathamesh3492 at gcc

[Bug lto/70629] 176.gcc fails to build with -O0 -flto with undefined reference to is_reserved_word

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70629 prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug lto/70629] 176.gcc fails to build with -O0 -flto with undefined reference to is_reserved_word

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70629 --- Comment #3 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Compiling with -std=gnu89 worked, thanks! Regards, Prathamesh

[Bug c++/70620] possible wrong code at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu for C++ code with multiple inheritance and casting

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70620 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- FYI, the change in behavior is that ipa-devirt or what changes the destructor call into __builtin_unreachable () and anything can happen then.

[Bug c++/70620] possible wrong code at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu for C++ code with multiple inheritance and casting

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70620 --- Comment #3 from Zhendong Su --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2) > Your code is equivalent to: > > delete reinterpret_cast(static_cast(new E)); > > which means the conversion is not done safely, and you get a D* that doesn't

[Bug sanitizer/65479] sanitizer stack trace missing frames past #0 on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65479 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug debug/70628] [5/6 regression] ICE in get_reg_rtx, at emit-rtl.c:1025

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70628 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org Target

[Bug lto/70629] 176.gcc fails to build with -O0 -flto with undefined reference to is_reserved_word

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70629 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/70629] 176.gcc fails to build with -O0 -flto with undefined reference to is_reserved_word

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70629 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- See https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69197#c4 also.

[Bug lto/70629] 176.gcc fails to build with -O0 -flto with undefined reference to is_reserved_word

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70629 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Are you compiling 176.gcc with -std=gnu89 also?

[Bug lto/70629] New: 176.gcc fails to build with -O0 -flto with undefined reference to is_reserved_word

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70629 Bug ID: 70629 Summary: 176.gcc fails to build with -O0 -flto with undefined reference to is_reserved_word Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/68756] [6 Regression] ICE w/ -O1 -floop-nest-optimize and isl 0.15: isl-0.15/isl_id.c:213: unable to find id

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68756 --- Comment #8 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 38240 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38240=edit tentative patch for second snippet

[Bug tree-optimization/68756] [6 Regression] ICE w/ -O1 -floop-nest-optimize and isl 0.15: isl-0.15/isl_id.c:213: unable to find id

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68756 --- Comment #7 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Arseny Solokha from comment #6) > (In reply to vries from comment #5) > > Failure no longer reproducible after r232812, "new scop schedule for > > isl-0.15" > > There are four

[Bug sanitizer/70624] [6 Regression] Several hundred asan failures with 6.0 on x86_64-apple-darwin10.8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70624 Jack Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||howarth.at.gcc at gmail dot com ---

[Bug debug/70628] [5/6 regression] ICE in get_reg_rtx, at emit-rtl.c:1025

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70628 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/70545] [openacc] gfortran.dg/goacc/kernels-loop-n.f95 not parallelized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70545 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug debug/70628] [5/6 regression] ICE in get_reg_rtx, at emit-rtl.c:1025

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70628 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab --- Created attachment 38239 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38239=edit auto-host.h

[Bug debug/70628] [5/6 regression] ICE in get_reg_rtx, at emit-rtl.c:1025

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70628 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mkuvyrkov at gcc

[Bug debug/70628] [5/6 regression] ICE in get_reg_rtx, at emit-rtl.c:1025

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70628 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug middle-end/70626] bogus results in 'acc parallel loop' reductions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70626 --- Comment #2 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 38238 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38238=edit counter example I looked at the standard again, and it says that the reduction clause should be associated

[Bug testsuite/70150] Additonal test failures with --enable-default-pie

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70150 --- Comment #13 from psturm at computervoice dot com --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #12) > Patches are posted at > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-03/msg00929.html > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-03/msg00995.html

[Bug c++/70620] possible wrong code at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu for C++ code with multiple inheritance and casting

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70620 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/70628] New: [5/6 regression] ICE in get_reg_rtx, at emit-rtl.c:1025

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70628 Bug ID: 70628 Summary: [5/6 regression] ICE in get_reg_rtx, at emit-rtl.c:1025 Product: gcc Version: 5.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug lto/65950] Loop is not vectorized with lto.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65950 Gian-Carlo Pascutto changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gcp at sjeng dot org --- Comment

[Bug c++/70627] [6 Regression] internal compiler error: verify_type failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70627 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/70626] bogus results in 'acc parallel loop' reductions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70626 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/70627] [6 Regression] internal compiler error: verify_type failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70627 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Reducing now (at 4.5MB right now).

[Bug target/69841] Wrong template instantiation in C++11 on armv7l

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69841 --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill --- (In reply to James Greenhalgh from comment #5) > I don't know enough about the C++ standard to know whether this patch is > reasonable to backport to GCC 5. Jason, do you have an opinion? I'd be pretty

[Bug sanitizer/65479] sanitizer stack trace missing frames past #0 on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65479 --- Comment #15 from Bill Schmidt --- Yes, it seems likely that this is due to this patch being missing from GCC 5.3: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11552 The fix is present in trunk, so this should be fixed with a backport.

[Bug c++/70627] internal compiler error: verify_type failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70627 --- Comment #2 from jseward at acm dot org --- Created attachment 38236 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38236=edit Unified_cpp_dom_animation0.ii.bz2 Testcase .ii.bz2, compressed so as to get it under the 1MB limit :-(

[Bug c++/70627] internal compiler error: verify_type failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70627 --- Comment #1 from jseward at acm dot org --- sewardj@dundee[6X]:~/MOZ$ c++ -c Unified_cpp_dom_animation0.ii -Wall -Wc++11-compat -Wempty-body -Wignored-qualifiers -Woverloaded-virtual -Wpointer-arith -Wsign-compare -Wtype-limits

[Bug libstdc++/70609] std::experimental::filesystem::copy fails if the file size is 0 bytes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70609 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- The problem is due to my lazy approach to copying the file: __gnu_cxx::stdio_filebuf sbin(in.fd, std::ios::in); __gnu_cxx::stdio_filebuf sbout(out.fd, std::ios::out); if (

[Bug middle-end/70626] New: bogus results in 'acc parallel loop' reductions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70626 Bug ID: 70626 Summary: bogus results in 'acc parallel loop' reductions Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: openacc Severity: normal

[Bug c++/70627] New: internal compiler error: verify_type failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70627 Bug ID: 70627 Summary: internal compiler error: verify_type failed Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/70117] ppc long double isinf() is wrong?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70117 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/70625] [4.9/5 Regression] Memory exhaustion when building specific snippet at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70625 --- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Arseny Solokha from comment #2) > (In reply to ktkachov from comment #1) > > I see the PR70623 ICE with 4.9 and 5 at -O2 on arm-none-eabi. > > Do you have any other relevant gcc

[Bug rtl-optimization/70625] [4.9/5 Regression] Memory exhaustion when building specific snippet at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70625 --- Comment #2 from Arseny Solokha --- (In reply to ktkachov from comment #1) > I see the PR70623 ICE with 4.9 and 5 at -O2 on arm-none-eabi. > Do you have any other relevant gcc configure options that trigger this? Talking about this

[Bug target/70117] ppc long double isinf() is wrong?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70117 --- Comment #19 from Alan Modra --- Author: amodra Date: Mon Apr 11 13:47:40 2016 New Revision: 234881 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234881=gcc=rev Log: PR70117, ppc long double isinf gcc/ PR target/70117 * builtins.c

[Bug target/70117] ppc long double isinf() is wrong?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70117 --- Comment #18 from Alan Modra --- Author: amodra Date: Mon Apr 11 13:46:51 2016 New Revision: 234880 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234880=gcc=rev Log: PR70117, ppc long double isinf gcc/ PR target/70117 * builtins.c

[Bug preprocessor/69650] [6 Regression] ICE in linemap_line_start, at libcpp/line-map.c:803

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69650 --- Comment #57 from Roger Orr --- Created attachment 38232 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38232=edit Stripped down intermediate file I've managed to reproduce the problem without including any proprietary code - code

[Bug preprocessor/69650] [6 Regression] ICE in linemap_line_start, at libcpp/line-map.c:803

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69650 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug rtl-optimization/70398] [6 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/slp-multitypes-9.c FAILs with -fno-tree-loop-optimize -fno-tree-ter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70398 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/70614] [4.9/5/6 Regression] GCC gets stuck with -O

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70614 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||spop at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug libstdc++/70609] std::experimental::filesystem::copy fails if the file size is 0 bytes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70609 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/70607] The return type of std::conj must be std::complex

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70607 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target|GNU/Linux x86_64| Host|GNU/Linux x86_64

[Bug libstdc++/70607] The return type of std::conj must be std::complex

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70607 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- I think Marc's point is that GCC is doing what DR 1137 says ... but it looks as though the DR resolution never made it into C++11.

[Bug preprocessor/69650] [6 Regression] ICE in linemap_line_start, at libcpp/line-map.c:803

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69650 --- Comment #55 from Roger Orr --- Note - I should have added that I am not at all sure the fix above is *correct*, simply that it prevents accessing the freed entry. I don't know enough about how the code works to know whether the value

[Bug target/70133] AArch64 -mtune=native generates improperly formatted -march parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70133 --- Comment #13 from davidwillmore at gmail dot com --- Thank you very much!

[Bug preprocessor/69650] [6 Regression] ICE in linemap_line_start, at libcpp/line-map.c:803

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69650 --- Comment #54 from Roger Orr --- Unfortunately the patch does not help: the cached 'from' pointer is a pointer into the old maps entry -- the one which has now been deallocated. The first test, main_file_p, now (correctly) fails. The second

[Bug rtl-optimization/70625] [4.9/5 Regression] Memory exhaustion when building specific snippet at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70625 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug rtl-optimization/70625] New: [4.9/5 Regression] Memory exhaustion when building specific snippet at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70625 Bug ID: 70625 Summary: [4.9/5 Regression] Memory exhaustion when building specific snippet at -O2 Product: gcc Version: 4.9.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug c++/70621] [6 Regression] ICE on invalid code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu in record_reference, at cgraphbuild.c:64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70621 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/70615] [6 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu in add_expr, at tree.c:7870

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70615 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- This is another case of PTRMEM_CST leaking from the FE to the gimplifier (the other is PR70621, but in this case it is not even during error-recovery).

[Bug target/69841] Wrong template instantiation in C++11 on armv7l

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69841 James Greenhalgh changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at redhat dot com --- Comment

[Bug target/70133] AArch64 -mtune=native generates improperly formatted -march parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70133 James Greenhalgh changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/70133] AArch64 -mtune=native generates improperly formatted -march parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70133 --- Comment #11 from James Greenhalgh --- Author: jgreenhalgh Date: Mon Apr 11 10:16:26 2016 New Revision: 234877 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234877=gcc=rev Log: [Patch AArch64 3/3] Fix up for pr70133 gcc/ PR target/70133

[Bug target/70133] AArch64 -mtune=native generates improperly formatted -march parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70133 --- Comment #10 from James Greenhalgh --- Author: jgreenhalgh Date: Mon Apr 11 10:14:59 2016 New Revision: 234876 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234876=gcc=rev Log: [Patch AArch64 2/3] Rework the code to print extension strings (pr70133)

[Bug sanitizer/70624] [6 Regression] Several hundred asan failures with 6.0 on x86_64-apple-darwin10.8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70624 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/70624] [6 Regression] Several hundred asan failures with 6.0 on x86_64-apple-darwin10.8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70624 Maxim Ostapenko changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m.ostapenko at samsung dot com ---

[Bug sanitizer/70624] [6 Regression] Several hundred asan failures with 6.0 on x86_64-apple-darwin10.8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70624 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- That is not very recent change. Has Darwin itself changed incompatibly?

[Bug c++/70610] [6 regression] error: invalid initialization of non-const reference of type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70610 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug tree-optimization/70614] [4.9/5/6 Regression] GCC gets stuck with -O

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70614 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Target

[Bug sanitizer/70624] New: [6 Regression] Several hundred asan failures with 6.0 on x86_64-apple-darwin10.8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70624 Bug ID: 70624 Summary: [6 Regression] Several hundred asan failures with 6.0 on x86_64-apple-darwin10.8 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug tree-optimization/70577] [6 regression] tree-ssa/prefetch-5.c scan-tree-dump-times aprefetch failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70577 Kirill Yukhin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kyukhin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/70577] [6 regression] tree-ssa/prefetch-5.c scan-tree-dump-times aprefetch failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70577 --- Comment #7 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6) > I think -1 is the right answer, these are flexible array-like arrays, > where one could e.g. > struct tail0 *p = malloc (sizeof (struct tail0) + 131072 * sizeof

[Bug c++/70615] [6 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu in add_expr, at tree.c:7870

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70615 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/70616] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in build_base_path, at cp/class.c:303

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70616 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/70620] possible wrong code at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu for C++ code with multiple inheritance and casting

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70620 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/70621] [6 Regression] ICE on invalid code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu in record_reference, at cgraphbuild.c:64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70621 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/70622] [6 Regression] auto specifier don't deduce value type and its pointer type within single declaration.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70622 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug tree-optimization/70623] [6 Regression] ICE in compute_antic at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70623 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/70173] make distclean: leaves stage_final and libcc1/compiler-name.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70173 --- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Mon Apr 11 07:26:36 2016 New Revision: 234874 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234874=gcc=rev Log: libcc1: Clean compiler-name.h (PR70173) Since the file is generated from a