[Bug c++/71217] New: [concepts] Incorrect recursive concept evaluation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71217 Bug ID: 71217 Summary: [concepts] Incorrect recursive concept evaluation Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/71216] New: Incorrect PPC assembly due to inserted .machine pseudo-op

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71216 Bug ID: 71216 Summary: Incorrect PPC assembly due to inserted .machine pseudo-op Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/71215] New: Compile error when using in-class initialization of template class attributes (c++11)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71215 Bug ID: 71215 Summary: Compile error when using in-class initialization of template class attributes (c++11) Product: gcc Version: 5.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/71115] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Missing warning: excess elements in struct initializer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71115 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Known to work|

[Bug c/71115] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] Missing warning: excess elements in struct initializer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71115 --- Comment #10 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Fri May 20 22:23:10 2016 New Revision: 236549 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236549=gcc=rev Log: PR c/71115 - [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] Missing warning: excess elements in struct

[Bug tree-optimization/70884] [6 regression] 2nd SRA pass confused by load from constant pool

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70884 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[6/7 regression] 2nd SRA|[6 regression] 2nd SRA pass

[Bug other/71212] Compilation of gcc (libstdc++) for foreign target platform problem.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71212 --- Comment #5 from Petr Ovtchenkov --- Created attachment 38537 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38537=edit patch that fix issue This changes fix issue for me. But I know nothing what CANADIAN ad-hoc workaround intended

[Bug libstdc++/55917] Impossible to find/debug unhandled exceptions in an std::thread

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55917 Howard Hinnant changed: What|Removed |Added CC||howard.hinnant at gmail dot com ---

[Bug tree-optimization/70884] [6/7 regression] 2nd SRA pass confused by load from constant pool

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70884 --- Comment #7 from Martin Jambor --- Author: jamborm Date: Fri May 20 21:04:31 2016 New Revision: 236544 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236544=gcc=rev Log: [PR 70884] Constant pool SRA fix 2016-05-20 Martin Jambor

[Bug fortran/66461] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] ICE on missing end program in fixed source

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66461 --- Comment #14 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #13) --- snip --- > > Although I partially agree with that, I don't understand why > > if ( x(1) < 0 .or. & > x(2) < 0 ) print

[Bug c++/71214] New: Typo in feature test macro for rvalue references

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71214 Bug ID: 71214 Summary: Typo in feature test macro for rvalue references Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/70466] [ICE on invalid code in tree check: expected constructor, have parm_decl in convert_like_real, at cp/call.c:6371 with -std=c++11

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70466 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Version|6.0

[Bug sanitizer/70712] False positive from AddressSanitizer with use of 'alignas'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70712 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/71210] [6/7 Regression] internal compiler error: in assign_temp, at function.c:961

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71210 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/70466] [ICE on invalid code in tree check: expected constructor, have parm_decl in convert_like_real, at cp/call.c:6371 with -std=c++11

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70466 --- Comment #8 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Fri May 20 19:09:59 2016 New Revision: 236530 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236530=gcc=rev Log: /cp 2016-05-20 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug c++/71210] [6/7 Regression] internal compiler error: in assign_temp, at function.c:961

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71210 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri May 20 19:06:09 2016 New Revision: 236529 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236529=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/71210 * gimple-fold.c (gimple_fold_call): Do not remove lhs

[Bug fortran/71204] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE with -O0 in expand_expr_real_1, at expr.c:9651

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71204 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/71204] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE with -O0 in expand_expr_real_1, at expr.c:9651

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71204 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri May 20 19:00:54 2016 New Revision: 236528 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236528=gcc=rev Log: PR fortran/71204 * frontend-passes.c (realloc_string_callback):

[Bug fortran/71204] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE with -O0 in expand_expr_real_1, at expr.c:9651

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71204 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri May 20 18:52:38 2016 New Revision: 236526 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236526=gcc=rev Log: PR fortran/71204 * frontend-passes.c (realloc_string_callback):

[Bug fortran/71204] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE with -O0 in expand_expr_real_1, at expr.c:9651

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71204 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri May 20 18:49:24 2016 New Revision: 236525 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236525=gcc=rev Log: PR fortran/71204 * frontend-passes.c (realloc_string_callback):

[Bug fortran/69368] [6 Regression] spec2006 test case 416.gamess fails with the g++ 6.0 compiler starting with r232508

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69368 --- Comment #92 from Mike Vermeulen --- Passes with snapshot: gcc-7-20160501 Fails with snapshot: gcc-7-20160508

[Bug c++/51488] ICE on infinite template recursion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51488 --- Comment #8 from Paolo Carlini --- Frankly I didn't have high expectations ;) But certainly we should do something about all these pretty old bugs about infinite template recursions which we are not catching.

[Bug fortran/69368] [6 Regression] spec2006 test case 416.gamess fails with the g++ 6.0 compiler starting with r232508

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69368 Mike Vermeulen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mike at vermeulen dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/71213] New: ICE on invalid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71213 Bug ID: 71213 Summary: ICE on invalid code Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee:

[Bug c++/51488] ICE on infinite template recursion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51488 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7

[Bug c++/70528] [5 Regression] bogus error: constructor required before non-static data member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70528 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #15

[Bug testsuite/52563] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-[3,4].c scan-tree-dump-times optimized "" 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52563 --- Comment #17 from Andre Vieira --- Ah yes my bad, its not sccp doing it... got a bit confused there... It is indeed sink that moves that sequence down. Sorry for the noise. Question remains on how to clean this up though. Ideally you would

[Bug c++/70572] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE on code with decltype (auto) in digest_init_r, at cp/typeck2.c:1103 with -std=c++14

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70572 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.9/5/6/7 Regression] ICE |[4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE on

[Bug c++/70572] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] ICE on code with decltype (auto) on x86_64-linux-gnu in digest_init_r, at cp/typeck2.c:1103 with -std=c++14

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70572 --- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Fri May 20 16:24:58 2016 New Revision: 236522 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236522=gcc=rev Log: /cp 2016-05-20 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug target/71070] MPX gives a false positive when allocating a string longer than 16 bytes on the stack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71070 --- Comment #2 from Oleksii Oleksenko --- Sorry, I guess, I had a wrong configuration. I had the CHKP_RT_BNDPRESERVE variable set to '1', and after I tried setting it to '0', the problem dissipated.

[Bug target/70738] Add -mgeneral-regs-only option

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70738 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/70738] Add -mgeneral-regs-only option

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70738 --- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Fri May 20 16:06:39 2016 New Revision: 236520 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236520=gcc=rev Log: Add -mgeneral-regs-only option X86 Linux kernel is compiled only with

[Bug testsuite/52563] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-[3,4].c scan-tree-dump-times optimized "" 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52563 --- Comment #16 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Andre Vieira from comment #15) > So the code change for sccp moves the following sequence out of the loop: > > _2 = (sizetype) i_30; > _3 = _2 * 8; > _10 = _3 + 4; > _1 = +

[Bug c++/70634] [4.9/5 Regression] ICE on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70634 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- No objections from me.

[Bug testsuite/52563] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-[3,4].c scan-tree-dump-times optimized "" 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52563 --- Comment #15 from Andre Vieira --- So the code change for sccp moves the following sequence out of the loop: _2 = (sizetype) i_30; _3 = _2 * 8; _10 = _3 + 4; _1 = + _10; a_p = _1; This is basically: *a_p = [last_i].y; I agree

[Bug testsuite/52563] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-[3,4].c scan-tree-dump-times optimized "" 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52563 amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/70634] [4.9/5 Regression] ICE on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70634 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill --- Created attachment 38536 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38536=edit patch for gcc 5 Here's the patch if anyone wants to build their own gcc 5 with this fixed.

[Bug c++/70634] [4.9/5 Regression] ICE on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70634 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #5 from Jason

[Bug tree-optimization/68030] Redundant address calculations in vectorized loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68030 --- Comment #9 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- I had a patch for this, will send for review.

[Bug target/71208] [6 regression] mmix: C++ code fails to link

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71208 Yaakov Selkowitz changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug c++/71192] Coredump - SIGSEGV exception handling on GCC 4.8.2 in Solaris 11.3, Solaris 11.2 works with same GCC version

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71192 user1172464 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |major --- Comment #1 from

[Bug gcov-profile/67937] gcov gives wrong results when negative counts are involved

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67937 --- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka --- We can have negative counters on fake edges in case the code uses abnormal edges that we can't instrument correctly. setjmp/longjmp is one of examples. If you profile kernel, you will have inconsistencies in

[Bug gcov-profile/67992] GCOV takes an absurdly long time to process a file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67992 --- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka --- Joshua: gcov is seriously old tool. There is quite some need to handle profile in more generic matter (for autoFDO/LTO and other cases). So if you have more flexible implementation, it would make sense to

[Bug gcov-profile/67992] GCOV takes an absurdly long time to process a file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67992 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug gcov-profile/67937] gcov gives wrong results when negative counts are involved

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67937 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/71070] MPX gives a false positive when allocating a string longer than 16 bytes on the stack

--- Comment #1 from Ilya Enkovich --- Couldn't reproduce with these versions: gcc version 7.0.0 20160520 gcc version 6.1.1 20160520 gcc version 5.3.1 20160520 I always get output: short string: short string Allocated a big object long string: I'm a long string. My size is bigger than 16 bytes Compilation

[Bug middle-end/69526] ivopts candidate strangeness

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69526 --- Comment #13 from rdapp at linux dot vnet.ibm.com --- Created attachment 38535 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38535=edit VRP/match.pd patch Found some time again and hacked together a fix for match.pd and VRP. The patch

[Bug c++/71166] [6/7 Regression] ICE with nested constexpr/initializer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71166 --- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell --- build_vec_init_elt (tree.c) says: /* Subroutine of build_vec_init_expr: Build up a single element intialization as a proxy for the full array initialization to get things marked as used and any

[Bug target/67278] [4.9/5 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed on darwin 14.5 x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67278 --- Comment #14 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri May 20 13:24:29 2016 New Revision: 236512 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236512=gcc=rev Log: 2016-05-20 Richard Biener Backport from mainline

[Bug tree-optimization/69720] [4.9/5 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69720 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri May 20 13:03:19 2016 New Revision: 236510 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236510=gcc=rev Log: 2016-05-20 Richard Biener Backport from mainline

[Bug fortran/71196] f951: internal compiler error: in gfc_conv_string_init, at fortran/trans-const.c:149

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71196 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Related to pr67804 (ICE at the same line) and pr68569 (ICE at the next line).

[Bug other/71212] Compilation of gcc (libstdc++) for foreign target platform problem.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71212 --- Comment #4 from Petr Ovtchenkov --- (In reply to Petr Ovtchenkov from comment #3) > > ... Is following still actual? # This lets us hard-code the functionality we know we'll have in the cross # target environment. "Let" is a

[Bug tree-optimization/70729] Loop marked with omp simd pragma is not vectorized

FAIL: gfortran.dg/graphite/pr68279.f90 -O (internal compiler error) > > /opt/gcc/gcc-20160520/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/graphite/pr68279.f90:8:0: > internal compiler error: Aborted > 0xb9e487 crash_signal > ../../gcc/toplev.c:333 > 0x10f4473 extract_affine_chrec >

[Bug testsuite/52563] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-[3,4].c scan-tree-dump-times optimized "" 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52563 --- Comment #13 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Fri, 20 May 2016, andre.simoesdiasvieira at arm dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52563 > > Andre Vieira changed: > >What|Removed

[Bug fortran/66461] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] ICE on missing end program in fixed source

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66461 --- Comment #13 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > I have a patch testing for this. I am not sure this is a regression. > I see it as far back as 4.5. I don't have any earlier builds. Gcc-4.3.1 and 4.4.7 give the errors pr66461.f:4.27:

[Bug tree-optimization/70729] Loop marked with omp simd pragma is not vectorized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70729 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libstdc++/71081] experimental/memory_resource/1.cc run for targets without atomics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71081 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Preud'homme --- Author: thopre01 Date: Fri May 20 12:36:57 2016 New Revision: 236507 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236507=gcc=rev Log: 2016-05-20 Thomas Preud'homme PR

[Bug tree-optimization/70729] Loop marked with omp simd pragma is not vectorized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70729 --- Comment #18 from Andreas Schwab <sch...@linux-m68k.org> --- FAIL: gfortran.dg/graphite/pr68279.f90 -O (internal compiler error) /opt/gcc/gcc-20160520/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/graphite/pr68279.f90:8:0: internal compiler error: A

[Bug other/71212] Compilation of gcc (libstdc++) for foreign target platform problem.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71212 --- Comment #3 from Petr Ovtchenkov --- (In reply to Petr Ovtchenkov from comment #2) > ... Mmm, may be this line is origin of problem: libstdc++-v3/configure:GLIBCXX_INCLUDES="$GLIBCXX_INCLUDES -I\${includedir}" (missed ${DESTDIR} in

[Bug testsuite/52563] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-[3,4].c scan-tree-dump-times optimized "" 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52563 Andre Vieira changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andre.simoesdiasvieira@arm.

[Bug c++/71210] [6/7 Regression] internal compiler error: in assign_temp, at function.c:961

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71210 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri May 20 11:58:49 2016 New Revision: 236506 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236506=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/71210 * gimple-fold.c (gimple_fold_call): Do not remove lhs

[Bug other/71212] Compilation of gcc (libstdc++) for foreign target platform problem.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71212 --- Comment #2 from Petr Ovtchenkov --- No, adding --with-sysroot=/export/staging/ptr/continuous/development/../arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi \

[Bug middle-end/29756] SSE intrinsics hard to use without redundant temporaries appearing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29756 --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri May 20 11:55:58 2016 New Revision: 236505 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236505=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/29756 gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vector-6.c: Add

[Bug fortran/71196] f951: internal compiler error: in gfc_conv_string_init, at fortran/trans-const.c:149

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71196 --- Comment #2 from georg.bugzilla at gmx dot at --- Thanks for the feedback! I can confirm that workaround 1 (reversing order in substructure_)works. Workaround 2 also works, but it is not applicable in my case (auto generated code - arbitrary

[Bug tree-optimization/71206] [7 Regression] ICE on valid code at all optimization levels in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes on x86_64-linux-gnu. (verify_gimple failed)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71206 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/71079] ICE on valid code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu: verify_gimple failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71079 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/71079] ICE on valid code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu: verify_gimple failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71079 --- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse --- Author: glisse Date: Fri May 20 09:44:50 2016 New Revision: 236504 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236504=gcc=rev Log: PR71206: inconsistent types after match.pd transformation 2016-05-20 Marc Glisse

[Bug tree-optimization/71206] [7 Regression] ICE on valid code at all optimization levels in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes on x86_64-linux-gnu. (verify_gimple failed)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71206 --- Comment #7 from Marc Glisse --- Author: glisse Date: Fri May 20 09:44:50 2016 New Revision: 236504 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236504=gcc=rev Log: PR71206: inconsistent types after match.pd transformation 2016-05-20 Marc Glisse

[Bug ipa/71207] [5/6/7 Regression] gcc 5.3 and 6.1 generates wrong code with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71207 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Priority|P3

[Bug target/71208] [6 regression] mmix: C++ code fails to link

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71208 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/71210] [6/7 Regression] internal compiler error: in assign_temp, at function.c:961

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71210 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug rtl-optimization/71148] [7 Regression] Compile time hog w/ -O3 -funroll-loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71148 --- Comment #10 from Ilya Enkovich --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #9) > > I did add PR reference but it didn't work for some reason. > > No, you didn't in the commit message, which is where it is needed: >

[Bug rtl-optimization/71148] [7 Regression] Compile time hog w/ -O3 -funroll-loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71148 --- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou --- > I did add PR reference but it didn't work for some reason. No, you didn't in the commit message, which is where it is needed: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2016-05/msg00780.html

[Bug target/71191] aarch64 and others: __atomic_load;arithmetic;__atomic_compare_exchange loops should be able to generate better code with LL/SC-type constructs than a CAS loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71191 --- Comment #6 from dhowells at redhat dot com --- There are a couple of ways the problem could be reduced in scope. Most of the constructs that the kernel has that fall into this category are conditional adds/subtracts: typedef struct {

[Bug middle-end/29756] SSE intrinsics hard to use without redundant temporaries appearing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29756 --- Comment #14 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri May 20 09:17:16 2016 New Revision: 236501 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236501=gcc=rev Log: 2016-05-20 Richard Guenther PR

[Bug target/70809] [AArch64] aarch64_vmls pattern should be rejected if -ffp-contract=off

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70809 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/71185] [7 Regression] ice in gimplify_modify_expr, at gimplify.c:4873

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71185 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/70809] [AArch64] aarch64_vmls pattern should be rejected if -ffp-contract=off

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70809 --- Comment #6 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Fri May 20 09:12:59 2016 New Revision: 236500 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236500=gcc=rev Log: [AArch64] PR target/70809: Delete aarch64_vmls pattern

[Bug target/71185] [7 Regression] ice in gimplify_modify_expr, at gimplify.c:4873

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71185 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri May 20 09:09:28 2016 New Revision: 236499 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236499=gcc=rev Log: 2016-05-20 Richard Biener PR

[Bug tree-optimization/71206] [7 Regression] ICE on valid code at all optimization levels in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes on x86_64-linux-gnu. (verify_gimple failed)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71206 --- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Ilya Enkovich from comment #5) > Could you please also check if it is a dup of PR71079? Cf https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-05/msg01598.html ;-)

[Bug c++/71207] [5/6/7 Regression] gcc 5.3 and 6.1 generates wrong code with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71207 --- Comment #3 from Vladimir Simonov --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2) > Started with r229859, -fno-devirtualize -O2 works. Thank you for hint with workaround

[Bug target/70941] [5 Regression] Test miscompiled with -O2.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70941 --- Comment #15 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri May 20 08:51:06 2016 New Revision: 236497 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236497=gcc=rev Log: 2016-05-20 Richard Biener Backport from mainline

[Bug target/70941] [5 Regression] Test miscompiled with -O2.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70941 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/70623] [4.9 Regression] ICE in compute_antic at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70623 --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri May 20 08:51:06 2016 New Revision: 236497 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236497=gcc=rev Log: 2016-05-20 Richard Biener Backport from mainline

[Bug tree-optimization/70780] [6/7 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70780 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri May 20 08:51:06 2016 New Revision: 236497 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236497=gcc=rev Log: 2016-05-20 Richard Biener Backport from mainline

[Bug tree-optimization/67921] [6 Regression] "internal compiler error: in build_polynomial_chrec, at tree-chrec.h:147" when using -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67921 --- Comment #12 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri May 20 08:51:06 2016 New Revision: 236497 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236497=gcc=rev Log: 2016-05-20 Richard Biener Backport from mainline

[Bug fortran/70931] [4.9/5 Regression] ICE with -g in native_encode_initializer, bei dwarf2out.c:17768

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70931 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri May 20 08:51:06 2016 New Revision: 236497 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236497=gcc=rev Log: 2016-05-20 Richard Biener Backport from mainline

[Bug fortran/71204] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE with -O0 in expand_expr_real_1, at expr.c:9651

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71204 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/71206] [7 Regression] ICE on valid code at all optimization levels in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes on x86_64-linux-gnu. (verify_gimple failed)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71206 Ilya Enkovich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug rtl-optimization/71148] [7 Regression] Compile time hog w/ -O3 -funroll-loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71148 --- Comment #8 from Ilya Enkovich --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #7) > Thanks. Please add a reference to the PR in the ChangeLog next time, this > will automatically add a cross-reference in the audit trail. I did add PR reference

[Bug other/71212] Compilation of gcc (libstdc++) for foreign target platform problem.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71212 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- Shouldn't you be using --with-sysroot to tell GCC where to find the target libs for the cross-compiler?

[Bug c++/71210] [6/7 Regression] internal compiler error: in assign_temp, at function.c:961

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71210 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/71210] [6/7 Regression] internal compiler error: in assign_temp, at function.c:961

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71210 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/71207] [5/6/7 Regression] gcc 5.3 and 6.1 generates wrong code with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71207 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/71079] ICE on valid code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu: verify_gimple failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71079 Arseny Solokha changed: What|Removed |Added CC||asolokha at gmx dot com --- Comment #1