[Bug tree-optimization/71077] [7 Regression] gcc -lto raises ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71077 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/69675] [6/7 Regression] [graphite] ICE: verify_ssa failed (definition in block 42 does not dominate use in block 34)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69675 --- Comment #3 from Arseny Solokha --- Can someone confirm this still fails on 6.1 and trunk w/ newer isl? I cannot reproduce it any more w/ isl 0.17.1.

[Bug target/54882] build fails for rl78-elf building libstdc++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54882 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug libstdc++/71337] New: temp_directory_path(error_code&) shouldn't throw from !exists(p) || !is_directory(p)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71337 Bug ID: 71337 Summary: temp_directory_path(error_code&) shouldn't throw from !exists(p) || !is_directory(p) Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/71314] test case gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-thread-14.c fails starting with its introduction in r235653

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71314 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/71336] New: Suboptimal x86 code generated for "(a & 1) ? (CST1 + CST2) : CST1"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71336 Bug ID: 71336 Summary: Suboptimal x86 code generated for "(a & 1) ? (CST1 + CST2) : CST1" Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/71335] New: wrong code at -O2 and -O3 in 32-bit and 64-bit modes on x86_64-linux-gnu

/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/7.0.0/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 7.0.0 20160529 (experimental) [trunk revision 236861] (GCC) $: gcc-trunk

[Bug target/67310] [PATCH] gcc 4.8.4 fails to compile with -march=native on VIA nano CPU

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67310 --- Comment #7 from jol_indien at yahoo dot fr --- Created attachment 38595 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38595=edit patch to properly detect VIA nano CPU against gcc git repository as for Sun May 29 17:29:42 2016 +

[Bug c++/71099] Misleading diagnostic message with 'virtual' used in out-of-line definitions of class template member functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71099 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/71252] [7 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed : definition in block 7 does not dominate use in block 6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71252 --- Comment #20 from H.J. Lu --- As of r236857, on x86-64, I still got Error with make 'specmake -j `/usr/bin/getconf _NPROCESSORS_ONLN` build': check file

[Bug jit/71334] gccjit's sized integers have different underlying types than stdint.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71334 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- I don't see why this is an issue. for LP64 targets, long unsigned int and long long unsigned int are the same size. For gccjit, just uses the GCC internal definition of compatible. That is long unsigned

[Bug jit/71334] New: gccjit's sized integers have different underlying types than stdint.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71334 Bug ID: 71334 Summary: gccjit's sized integers have different underlying types than stdint.h Product: gcc Version: 6.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug inline-asm/71086] miscompiled inline-asm + alternative constraints + __builtin_expect + always_inline

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71086 --- Comment #2 from Mikael Pettersson --- This was fixed by r218623.

[Bug target/71245] std::atomic load/store bounces the data to the stack using fild/fistp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71245 --- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Sun May 29 20:50:32 2016 New Revision: 236863 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236863=gcc=rev Log: PR target/71245 * config/i386/sync.md (define_peephole2

[Bug sanitizer/71291] Firefox with GCC reports stack-buffer-overflow but clang does not

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71291 --- Comment #8 from Georg Koppen --- Looking at the stack trace again. It says "Memory access at offset 112 underflows this variable" yet ASan reports stack-buffer-overflow. I am confused. Shouldn't it report a stack-buffer-underflow then?

[Bug c++/71215] Compile error when using in-class initialization of template class attributes (c++11)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71215 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/71333] Broken Python extension produced

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71333 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/70824] [6/7 Regression] cc1plus consumes all available memory on specific template code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70824 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug c++/70824] [6/7 Regression] cc1plus consumes all available memory on specific template code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70824 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/71332] Passing non-copyable type by reference to variadic generic lambda after a copyable type by value results in a compile-time error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71332 TC changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rs2740 at gmail dot com --- Comment #1 from TC

[Bug inline-asm/71086] miscompiled inline-asm + alternative constraints + __builtin_expect + always_inline

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71086 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com ---

[Bug tree-optimization/69067] [6/7 Regression] ICE in get_def_bb_for_const, at graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c:1995

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69067 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #3 from

[Bug c++/71333] New: Broken Python extension produced

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71333 Bug ID: 71333 Summary: Broken Python extension produced Product: gcc Version: 5.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug target/71331] target-tilegx: nested-function-4.c: r10 is conflict which is both in function frame and in parameter.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71331 --- Comment #1 from Chen Gang --- Oh, lucky enough! The diff below should be OK for this issue. diff --git a/gcc/config/tilegx/tilegx.c b/gcc/config/tilegx/tilegx.c index 06c832c..bc41105 100644 --- a/gcc/config/tilegx/tilegx.c +++

[Bug c++/71332] New: Passing non-copyable type by reference to variadic generic lambda after a copyable type by value results in a compile-time error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71332 Bug ID: 71332 Summary: Passing non-copyable type by reference to variadic generic lambda after a copyable type by value results in a compile-time error Product: gcc

[Bug c++/54367] [meta-bug] lambda expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367 Bug 54367 depends on bug 71105, which changed state. Bug 71105 Summary: [6/7 regression] lambdas with default captures improperly have function pointer conversions https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71105 What|Removed

[Bug c++/71105] [6/7 regression] lambdas with default captures improperly have function pointer conversions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71105 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/71105] [6/7 regression] lambdas with default captures improperly have function pointer conversions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71105 --- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Sun May 29 08:29:46 2016 New Revision: 236861 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236861=gcc=rev Log: /cp 2016-05-29 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug c++/71105] [6/7 regression] lambdas with default captures improperly have function pointer conversions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71105 --- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Sun May 29 08:27:07 2016 New Revision: 236860 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236860=gcc=rev Log: /cp 2016-05-29 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug c++/71105] [6/7 regression] lambdas with default captures improperly have function pointer conversions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71105 --- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Sun May 29 08:05:30 2016 New Revision: 236859 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236859=gcc=rev Log: /cp 2016-05-29 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug target/71331] New: target-tilegx: nested-function-4.c: r10 is conflict which is both in function frame and in parameter.

lr, r52 107 addir28, r52, -8 108 ld r29, r28 109 110 movesp, r52 111 mover52, r29 112 jrp lr 113 .size main, .-main 114 .ident "GCC: (GNU) 7.0.0 20160529 (experimental)" 115 .section.note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits