[Bug target/71670] powerpc64le ICE in extract_constrain_insn with -mcpu=power9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71670 --- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Tue Jun 28 05:56:41 2016 New Revision: 237813 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237813=gcc=rev Log: rs6000: Fix split of ashdi3_extswsli_dot for memory (PR71670) The splitter

[Bug libstdc++/71640] [7 Regression] include/c++/7.0.0/bits/hashtable.h:293:7: error: too many template parameters in template redeclaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71640 --- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- See: PR71679

[Bug c++/71679] New: gcc silently accepts parameter number mismatch in template redeclaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71679 Bug ID: 71679 Summary: gcc silently accepts parameter number mismatch in template redeclaration Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/71640] [7 Regression] include/c++/7.0.0/bits/hashtable.h:293:7: error: too many template parameters in template redeclaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71640 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/30417] Section .data cannot be moved with -mmcu=atmega88

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30417 --- Comment #14 from Senthil Kumar Selvaraj --- Filed https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20302 to have the linker treat -T like all other options - i.e. consider the last occurrence of an option rather than the first one.

[Bug fortran/71544] gfortran compiler optimization bug when dealing with c-style pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71544 --- Comment #7 from fortranbug at gmail dot com --- (In reply to fortranbug from comment #6) > Thank you for the suggested workaround. This can certainly be helpful in the > short term. However, we would not want to rely on tuning compiler >

[Bug c++/71675] __atomic_compare_exchange_n returns wrong type for typed enum

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71675 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||documentation

[Bug target/71656] ICE in reload when generating code for -mcpu=power9 -mpower9-dform-vector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71656 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/71656] ICE in reload when generating code for -mcpu=power9 -mpower9-dform-vector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71656 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/71656] ICE in reload when generating code for -mcpu=power9 -mpower9-dform-vector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71656 --- Comment #2 from Peter Bergner --- Author: bergner Date: Tue Jun 28 01:28:28 2016 New Revision: 237811 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237811=gcc=rev Log: gcc/ PR target/71656 * config/rs6000/rs6000-cpus.def

[Bug target/71670] powerpc64le ICE in extract_constrain_insn with -mcpu=power9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71670 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc64le-linux |powerpc*-*-*

[Bug c/71567] Incorrect loop optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71567 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/71567] Incorrect loop optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71567 Artem changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|INVALID

[Bug other/71627] AVR error: unable to find a register to spill in class 'POINTER_X_REGS'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71627 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Target|AVR |avr Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/71627] AVR error: unable to find a register to spill in class 'POINTER_X_REGS'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71627 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/70673] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE with module containing functions with allocatable character scalars

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70673 --- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Mon Jun 27 20:57:13 2016 New Revision: 237805 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237805=gcc=rev Log: 2016-06-27 Paul Thomas PR fortran/70673 *

[Bug fortran/70673] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE with module containing functions with allocatable character scalars

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70673 --- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Mon Jun 27 20:54:56 2016 New Revision: 237804 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237804=gcc=rev Log: 2016-06-27 Paul Thomas PR fortran/70673 *

[Bug libstdc++/71640] [7 Regression] include/c++/7.0.0/bits/hashtable.h:293:7: error: too many template parameters in template redeclaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71640 --- Comment #2 from François Dumont --- Author: fdumont Date: Mon Jun 27 20:41:59 2016 New Revision: 237803 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237803=gcc=rev Log: 2016-06-27 François Dumont PR libstdc++/71640

[Bug target/71678] New: [avr] ICE from switch / case on long long (casesi + DImode)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71678 Bug ID: 71678 Summary: [avr] ICE from switch / case on long long (casesi + DImode) Product: gcc Version: 5.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code

[Bug target/71677] PowerPC ISA 3.0 DImode load/store needs a fix

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71677 --- Comment #1 from Michael Meissner --- Created attachment 38777 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38777=edit -save-temps file that generates the wrong input with -O3 -mcpu=power9

[Bug target/71677] New: PowerPC ISA 3.0 DImode load/store needs a fix

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71677 Bug ID: 71677 Summary: PowerPC ISA 3.0 DImode load/store needs a fix Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/70673] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE with module containing functions with allocatable character scalars

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70673 --- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Mon Jun 27 19:18:21 2016 New Revision: 237802 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237802=gcc=rev Log: 2016-06-27 Paul Thomas PR fortran/70673 *

[Bug tree-optimization/61502] == comparison on "one-past" pointer gives wrong result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61502 --- Comment #19 from Alexander Cherepanov --- (In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #3) > Except within a larger object, I'm not aware of any reason the cases of > two objects following or not following each other in memory must be

[Bug c++/71639] [5.2.0] c++11 list initializer and std::transform - error?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71639 Frank Bergemann changed: What|Removed |Added CC||FBergemann at web dot de --- Comment

[Bug target/71676] New: [avr] casesi won't handle switch values larger than 16 bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71676 Bug ID: 71676 Summary: [avr] casesi won't handle switch values larger than 16 bits Product: gcc Version: 5.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code

[Bug rtl-optimization/71673] [7 Regression] FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/builtin-arith-overflow-p-19.c -O2 (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71673 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target|arm, sparc |arm*-*, sparc*-*, |

[Bug c/71613] Useful warnings silenced when macros from system headers are used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71613 --- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- Rather than piecemeal fixes with no evidence of completeness, I think we should disable the smarts around system header macro locations determining whether diagnostics appear (i.e., the

[Bug c/71613] Useful warnings silenced when macros from system headers are used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71613 --- Comment #5 from Alexander Cherepanov --- This bug also affects -pedantic-errors, i.e. it's not merely a cosmetic bug but also a conformance issue. I don't know how -std=c11 can ignore constraint violations but -pedantic-errors is supposed

[Bug c++/71675] New: __atomic_compare_exchange_n returns wrong type for typed enum

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71675 Bug ID: 71675 Summary: __atomic_compare_exchange_n returns wrong type for typed enum Product: gcc Version: 5.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/36550] Wrong "may be used uninitialized" warning (conditional PHIs)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36550 --- Comment #14 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- Predicate analysis is not able to figure out this case because it cannot see that the default def is also conditional on cond1_8(D) != 0, thus warn_15 is never warn_5(D)(13). (The callgraph is also

[Bug c++/41437] No access control for classes in template functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41437 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #9

[Bug target/71655] [7 Regression] GCC trunk ICE on westmere target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71655 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Target

[Bug tree-optimization/71488] [6 Regression] Wrong code for vector comparisons with ivybridge and westmere targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71488 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/71658] User-defined conversion operator from a wrapper class to the wrapped type does not compile.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71658 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/71655] GCC trunk ICE on westmere target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71655 Ilya Enkovich changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/71350] [4.8/4.9/5/6/7 regression] ICE on trailing return type declaration with initializer list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71350 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/71664] valid C++11 code with qualified enumerator lookup rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71664 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/36550] Wrong "may be used uninitialized" warning (conditional PHIs)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36550 rootkit85 at yahoo dot it changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rootkit85 at yahoo dot it

[Bug libstdc++/71660] [5/6/7 regression] alignment of std::atomic<8 byte primitive type> (long long, double) is wrong on x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71660 --- Comment #3 from Thiago Macieira --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1) > Foir double-word compare and exchange you need double-word alignment, so I > think the current alignment is correct. The instruction manual says that

[Bug rtl-optimization/71673] [7 Regression] FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/builtin-arith-overflow-p-19.c -O2 (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71673 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/69526] ivopts candidate strangeness

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69526 --- Comment #24 from rdapp at linux dot vnet.ibm.com --- Created attachment 38775 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38775=edit Updated patch and test, match.pd/VRP (In reply to amker from comment #23) > Hmm, not sure if I

[Bug libstdc++/71660] [5/6/7 regression] alignment of std::atomic<8 byte primitive type> (long long, double) is wrong on x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71660 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ada/71674] New: An exception is thrown on a valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71674 Bug ID: 71674 Summary: An exception is thrown on a valid code Product: gcc Version: 6.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: ada

[Bug rtl-optimization/71673] [7 Regression] FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/builtin-arith-overflow-p-19.c -O2 (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71673 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target|arm |arm, sparc CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/71673] [7 Regression] FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/builtin-arith-overflow-p-19.c -O2 (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71673 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/71626] [4.9/5/6/7 regression] ICE at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu (in output_constant_pool_2, at varasm.c:3837)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71626 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 38773 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38773=edit gcc7-pr71626.patch Untested fix.

[Bug c++/71671] g++: internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1plus)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71671 --- Comment #9 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Well, we need to full gcc invocation of: CXX graph_blockmodel.lo So please run "make VERBOSE=1" and post the full gcc command line and the preprocessed testcase. All other output is useless.

[Bug middle-end/71626] [4.9/5/6/7 regression] ICE at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu (in output_constant_pool_2, at varasm.c:3837)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71626 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- One possibility would be to allow SUBREG of constant for the V1XXmode vectors like: --- gcc/varasm.c.jj 2016-06-10 20:24:03.0 +0200 +++ gcc/varasm.c2016-06-27 11:43:25.330955071 +0200 @@

[Bug c++/71671] g++: internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1plus)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71671 vineeshvs changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|WAITING Resolution|INVALID

[Bug c++/71671] g++: internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1plus)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71671 --- Comment #7 from vineeshvs --- Created attachment 38772 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38772=edit Results of 'make' command in terminal (without any other arguments)

[Bug rtl-optimization/71673] [7 Regression] FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/builtin-arith-overflow-p-19.c -O2 (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71673 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0 Known to fail|

[Bug rtl-optimization/71673] New: [7 Regression] FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/builtin-arith-overflow-p-19.c -O2 (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71673 Bug ID: 71673 Summary: [7 Regression] FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/builtin-arith-overflow-p-19.c -O2 (internal compiler error) Product: gcc Version: 7.0

[Bug c++/71671] g++: internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1plus)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71671 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/71667] [7 Regression] ICE in as_a, at is-a.h:192 w/ -g -O2 -ftree-vectorize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71667 alahay01 at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug debug/71667] [7 Regression] ICE in as_a, at is-a.h:192 w/ -g -O2 -ftree-vectorize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71667 alahay01 at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |alahay01 at gcc dot

[Bug c++/71671] g++: internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1plus)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71671 --- Comment #5 from vineeshvs --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #4) > > RAM: 3.7 GiB > > Well, you probably just need more RAM. > Look for OOM killer messages in your system log. > > And please attach the preprocessed

[Bug tree-optimization/71661] [7 Regression] wrong code at -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71661 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/71662] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] ICE on invalid C++11 code with unqualified name look up: in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:14010

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71662 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/71665] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] ICE on invalid C++ code with non-integral constant enumerator value: in cxx_eval_constant_expression, at cp/constexpr.c:3918

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71665 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug debug/71667] [7 Regression] ICE in as_a, at is-a.h:192 w/ -g -O2 -ftree-vectorize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71667 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alahay01 at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug libstdc++/71660] [5/6/7 regression] alignment of std::atomic<8 byte primitive type> (long long, double) is wrong on x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71660 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/71671] g++: internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1plus)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71671 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug gcov-profile/71672] New: inlining indirect calls does not work with autofdo

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71672 Bug ID: 71672 Summary: inlining indirect calls does not work with autofdo Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: