https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71801
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71813
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 7.0.0 20160707 (experimental) [trunk revision 238117] (GCC)
$
$ g++-5.4 -std=c++11 -c small.cpp
$ clang++-3.8 -std=c++11 -c small.cpp
$
$ g++-trunk -std=c++11 -c small.cpp
small.cpp: In instantiation of ‘void foo(int
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71813
Bug ID: 71813
Summary: fprintf/printf function exception
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Ass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71812
--- Comment #1 from Jeffrey Walton ---
> I can't submit pubkey_pkcs8.ii.zip. It appears to be causing Gateway
> Timeouts.
The preprocessed source file is available at
https://trac.macports.org/ticket/51796#no1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71812
Bug ID: 71812
Summary: gcc6/c++/functional:1726:40: internal compiler error:
in assign_temp, at function.c:961
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71801
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71811
Bug ID: 71811
Summary: gcc6/c++/functional:1726:40: internal compiler error:
in assign_temp, at function.c:961
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
I have just find strange answer, 10 x 1036778084 = 1777846248??
I'm using gcc (Ubuntu 4.8.4-2ubuntu1~14.04.3) 4.8.4 and gcc (GCC) 4.8.5
20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-4).
These are same results, 10 x 1036778084 = 1777846248
C Lang:
printf("%d \n", atoi("10367780849"));
1777846248
Result is 1777846
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71764
--- Comment #9 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Jul 8 04:36:16 2016
New Revision: 238156
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238156&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-07-07 Jerry DeLisle
PR fortran/71764
* trans-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71809
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2016-March/047761.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71809
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=964143
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66338
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
--- Comment #14 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71009
--- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager ---
I rebuilt with debugging info and got a better backtrace:
Breakpoint 1, internal_error (gmsgid=0x15ee807 "in %s, at %s:%d") at
../../gcc/diagnostic.c:1337
1337 va_start (ap, gmsgid);
(gdb) bt
#0 intern
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71809
Bug ID: 71809
Summary: compile llvm3.8.0 failed by the libstdc++ of gcc6.1.0
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71804
--- Comment #3 from Guille ---
Sorry, this was silly. I'll try to get some sleep before posting something at
5am.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71808
Bug ID: 71808
Summary: [concepts] ICE in finish_member_declaration
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71779
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
Ok, the one which I was looking into did the correct thing for reload which is
why I was confused. Anyways reload is where the problem is. It is doing a
store of SI mode but then loading it via DI mode with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71764
--- Comment #8 from Jerry DeLisle ---
I have regression tested the fix and tried some various manipulations of test
code and it all seems to be fine. So I will commit this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71779
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> Is an invalid combine. GCC must be thinking the upper bits of reg 419 (aka
> 487) was zero for some reason.
No that is fine. In fact reg 487 was done using add
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71807
Bug ID: 71807
Summary: Internal compiler error with NULL() reference in
structure constructor
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71779
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
That is the following (I am using ubuntu's 5.3.1 in 1604 right now):
Trying 944, 945 -> 946:
Successfully matched this instruction:
(set (reg:DI 1 x1)
(ior:DI (ashift:DI (reg/f:DI 110 [ obj1$4 ])
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71779
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |rtl-optimization
--- Comment #4 from And
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71779
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71804
--- Comment #2 from Guille ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #1)
> This is not the right place to learn about C++. Before filing a bug report
> about a compiler, please find another compiler that behaves differently. If
> all compilers be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71720
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71806
--- Comment #1 from Michael Meissner ---
Created attachment 38860
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38860&action=edit
Proposed patch to fix the problem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71806
Bug ID: 71806
Summary: PowerPC -mcpu=power9 enables __float128 without an
explicit -mfloat128
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71720
--- Comment #4 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Thu Jul 7 22:44:15 2016
New Revision: 238151
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238151&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Back port from trunk
[gcc]
2016-07-01 Michael Meissner
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71677
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71802
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71717
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jul 7 21:55:37 2016
New Revision: 238148
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238148&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-07-01 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71803
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71704
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jul 7 21:54:34 2016
New Revision: 238147
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238147&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-06-30 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71705
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jul 7 21:53:53 2016
New Revision: 238146
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238146&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-06-30 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71626
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jul 7 21:53:12 2016
New Revision: 238145
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238145&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-06-28 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71588
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jul 7 21:52:31 2016
New Revision: 238144
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238144&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-06-21 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71494
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jul 7 21:51:57 2016
New Revision: 238143
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238143&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-06-10 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71160
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jul 7 21:51:21 2016
New Revision: 238142
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238142&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-05-17 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70429
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jul 7 21:50:41 2016
New Revision: 238141
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238141&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-03-29 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70222
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jul 7 21:49:58 2016
New Revision: 238140
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238140&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-03-15 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70152
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jul 7 21:48:25 2016
New Revision: 238138
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238138&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-03-09 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71805
Bug ID: 71805
Summary: incorrect code for test pr45752.c with -mcpu=power9
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70169
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jul 7 21:49:12 2016
New Revision: 238139
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238139&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-03-11 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69891
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jul 7 21:47:40 2016
New Revision: 238137
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238137&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-02-26 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67767
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jul 7 21:46:54 2016
New Revision: 238136
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238136&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-02-19 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69802
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jul 7 21:46:16 2016
New Revision: 238135
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238135&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-02-16 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69797
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jul 7 21:45:11 2016
New Revision: 238134
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238134&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-02-15 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70022
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jul 7 21:44:11 2016
New Revision: 238133
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238133&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-03-02 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71804
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64280
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jul 7 21:43:34 2016
New Revision: 238132
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238132&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2014-12-12 Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71804
Bug ID: 71804
Summary: Default-generated constructor does not construct base
class
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71786
--- Comment #5 from Guille ---
Sorry for the confusion, I'll post as a separate report for clarity.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71803
Bug ID: 71803
Summary: Wpedantic: enumerator value is not an integer constant
expression
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
/absozero/trunk/root-gcc
--enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 7.0.0 20160707 (experimental) [trunk revision 238108] (GCC)
$ gcc-trunk -O3 abc.c
abc.c: In function ‘fn1’:
abc.c:26:7: warning: assignment from incompatible pointer type
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71801
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
Summary|ice in fix_debug_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71621
--- Comment #3 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
> Started with r237556, but that just likely made it no longer latent.
Yes, it is a latent bug permitting wrong combination of class and mode for a
reload pseud
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71801
Bug ID: 71801
Summary: ice in fix_debug_reg_uses
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: una
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25287
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71100
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dominik.strasser@onespin-so
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71553
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71786
--- Comment #4 from Guille ---
Hi Marc,
Thank you for your clarification.
I realized my initial problem arose in a slightly more complicated case
(below).
In this case a copy/move ctor of A is used, but this default-generated ctor
does not c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70869
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jul 7 18:45:43 2016
New Revision: 238124
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238124&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/70869
PR c++/71054
* cp-gimplify.c (cp_gen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71054
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jul 7 18:45:43 2016
New Revision: 238124
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238124&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/70869
PR c++/71054
* cp-gimplify.c (cp_gene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67308
Paulo R. Panhoto changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppnht at netscape dot net
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71702
--- Comment #3 from Alexander Monakov ---
On 6/trunk, this issue is fixed or made latent by r230667 that added
+ STRIP_NOPS (t1);
+ STRIP_NOPS (t2);
to tree-vect-data-refs.c:compare_tree (patch submission here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71702
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #38793|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71800
Bug ID: 71800
Summary: GCC generates invalid instruction (stxsiwx) with
-mcpu=power7
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55922
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69019
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Thu Jul 7 17:08:00 2016
New Revision: 238121
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238121&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
rs6000: Fix gcc.target/powerpc/ti_math1.c on GCC 5 (PR69019)
This t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71796
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71795
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71799
--- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Index: resolve.c
===
--- resolve.c (revision 237855)
+++ resolve.c (working copy)
@@ -6515,15 +6515,15 @@ gfc_resolve_iterator (gf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71799
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71799
Bug ID: 71799
Summary: [7 Regression] ICE in DO loop code emission
(gfc_resolve_iterator)
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71297
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71793
--- Comment #2 from DB ---
Thanks Richard! About this -
> RTL expansion expands x as register copy for some reason
- is this person's explanation about this originating in the ABI accurate?
http://stackoverflow.com/a/38248847/2757035
If so - a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71798
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58175
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Hogg ---
It looks like there's already a patch there, if you point me at a list of
what needs doing to get it into the code base, I'm happy to take a look.
Thanks,
Jonathan.
On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 4:14 PM, dominiq
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58175
--- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Still present in 6.1.1, please fix.
You're welcome to do it!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71777
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #4 from Peter Bergner
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71779
--- Comment #2 from James Greenhalgh ---
I'd be surprised if that patch was the real root cause of the issue you're
reporting. Rather it looks like something latent that was exposed by that
patch.
The testcase is a bit too large to easily work w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71763
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58175
Jonathan Hogg changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jhogg41 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71798
Bug ID: 71798
Summary: failure to finalise fortran temporary
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71705
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.9/5 Regression] ICE in |[4.9 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71626
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.9/5/6 regression] ICE at |[4.9 regression] ICE at -O1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71588
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.9/5 Regression] ICE on |[4.9 Regression] ICE on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71581
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71528
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71516
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71494
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.9/5 Regression] label as |[4.9 Regression] label as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71498
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70641
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70633
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70628
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70574
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70336
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71797
Bug ID: 71797
Summary: Spurious unused-variable warning with inline function
and unrelated error
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68062
--- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jul 7 12:59:39 2016
New Revision: 238108
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238108&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-03-02 Jakub Jelinek
1 - 100 of 196 matches
Mail list logo