[Bug c++/71885] Incorrect code generated with -01, memset() function call is missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71885 --- Comment #4 from Eric Bollengier --- I don't know exactly when someone decided that a doing memset(buf, 0, sizeof(buf)); leads to an "undefined behavior", but it's how C and C++ work since quite long time. And it's also why the operator new()

[Bug c/71889] New: [5.4 Regression] [MIPS] python: "insn does not satisfy its constraints"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71889 Bug ID: 71889 Summary: [5.4 Regression] [MIPS] python: "insn does not satisfy its constraints" Product: gcc Version: 5.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/71889] [5.4 Regression] [MIPS] python: "insn does not satisfy its constraints"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71889 Marek Behun changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kabel at blackhole dot sk --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/71888] New: internal compiler error: in force_type_die, at dwarf2out.c:23236

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71888 Bug ID: 71888 Summary: internal compiler error: in force_type_die, at dwarf2out.c:23236 Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/71867] Optimizer generates code dereferencing a null pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71867 --- Comment #4 from asmwarrior --- It looks like the code is called from an inline function, you can see this code snippet in the prepossessed file. inline wxObject *wxCheckDynamicCast(wxObject *obj, wxClassInfo *classInfo) { return obj &&

[Bug tree-optimization/71867] Optimizer generates code dereferencing a null pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71867 asmwarrior changed: What|Removed |Added CC||asmwarrior at gmail dot com --- Comment #3

[Bug rtl-optimization/71887] New: wrong code (SIGFPE) at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu (in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes)

-languages=c,c++,lto --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 7.0.0 20160714 (experimental) [trunk revision 238331] (GCC) $ $ gcc-trunk -O0 small.c; ./a.out $ gcc-6.1 -O1 small.c; ./a.out $ $ gcc-trunk -O1 small.c $ ./a.out Floating point exception (core dumped

[Bug c++/71463] [6/7 regression] unexpected warning: ignoring function return attributes on template argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71463 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug c++/67650] undef reference with -fdevirtualize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67650 --- Comment #14 from Vincent --- The bug is still in 6.1.0.

[Bug c++/71117] [6/7 Regression] Overeager application of conversion to function pointer during overload resolution of call to function object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71117 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/71886] Incorrect error on operator() being an member in template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71886 Ville Voutilainen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com

[Bug c++/71886] Incorrect error on operator() being an member in template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71886 --- Comment #1 from Tomasz Kamiński --- Such code is useful, for example in case of variant universal constructor from U&&, where there is a need to determine best candidate among the function taking parameter each type be value.

[Bug c++/71886] New: Incorrect error on operator() being an member in template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71886 Bug ID: 71886 Summary: Incorrect error on operator() being an member in template Product: gcc Version: 5.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/71865] [7 regression] test case gcc.dg/diagnostic-token-ranges.c fails starting with r237714

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71865 --- Comment #4 from Bill Seurer --- Thanks, that fixed things up.

[Bug fortran/29819] Error/warning message should ignore comments for "1" in %C output

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29819 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/29819] Error/warning message should ignore comments for "1" in %C output

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29819 --- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Thu Jul 14 20:54:40 2016 New Revision: 238354 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238354=gcc=rev Log: 2016-07-14 Steven G. Kargl PR

[Bug c++/56856] the location of Wformat warnings points *after* the format string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56856 --- Comment #8 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #7) > Thanks for the background and the pointer. Is this report then a duplicate > of bug 43486? It may be possible to fix this one imperfectly without fixing

[Bug middle-end/50060] intrinsics not folded by the middle-end

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50060 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Shouldn't this be solvable in C++14 and later? We still reject it: error: ‘((y = 1), 6.2e-1)’ is not a constant expression but I suppose with some hacking of cp/constexpr.c this could be handled. constexpr

[Bug c++/71712] Redundant ABI tags for conversion operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71712 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/71885] Incorrect code generated with -01, memset() function call is missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71885 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug testsuite/71865] [7 regression] test case gcc.dg/diagnostic-token-ranges.c fails starting with r237714

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71865 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jul 14 18:42:53 2016 New Revision: 238353 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238353=gcc=rev Log: PR testsuite/71865 * gcc.dg/diagnostic-token-ranges.c: Add -std=c11

[Bug c/71858] Surprising suggestions for misspellings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71858 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jul 14 18:34:00 2016 New Revision: 238352 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238352=gcc=rev Log: PR c/71858 * c-decl.c (lookup_name_fuzzy): Ignore

[Bug tree-optimization/71872] [7 Regression] ICE in inchash::add_expr, at tree.c:7782 - OEP_ADDRESS_OF asserted for ADDR_EXPR applied to constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71872 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jul 14 18:30:38 2016 New Revision: 238351 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238351=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/71872 * tree-data-ref.c

[Bug tree-optimization/71881] [4.9/6/7 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 with -g enabled on x86_64-linux-gnu: cannot update SSA form

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71881 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- This is during ldist, destroy_loop removes a loop which contains a PHI that is used by a debug stmt used after the loop, and during rewrite_into_loop_closed_ssa this is detected and ICEs.

[Bug tree-optimization/71881] [4.9/6/7 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 with -g enabled on x86_64-linux-gnu: cannot update SSA form

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71881 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Target

[Bug c++/71164] [6/7 Regression] tree check fail at cp/pt.c:12961

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71164 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/71839] undefined reference to `_gfortran_caf_stop_str'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71839 --- Comment #7 from Anton Shterenlikht --- submitted as OCA ticket 207: https://github.com/sourceryinstitute/opencoarrays/issues/207 hope to close this ticket when there is some clarity from OCA people

[Bug c++/71495] [6/7 Regression] Spurious "note: initializing argument ... of ..." without any warning/error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71495 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c++/71511] [6/7 Regression] ICE on valid C++11 code (with decltype) on x86_64-linux-gnu: in cxx_incomplete_type_diagnostic, at cp/typeck2.c:567

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71511 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug fortran/70842] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] internal compiler error with character members within a polymorphic pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70842 --- Comment #10 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vehre Date: Thu Jul 14 17:07:47 2016 New Revision: 238347 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238347=gcc=rev Log: gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2016-07-14 Andre Vehreschild

[Bug c++/71885] Incorrect code generated with -01, function calls are missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71885 --- Comment #2 from Eric Bollengier --- Created attachment 38907 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38907=edit c++ file that reproduces the issue

[Bug c++/71885] Incorrect code generated with -01, function calls are missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71885 --- Comment #1 from Eric Bollengier --- Created attachment 38906 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38906=edit ii file generated with -O0

[Bug c++/71885] New: Incorrect code generated with -01, function calls are missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71885 Bug ID: 71885 Summary: Incorrect code generated with -01, function calls are missing Product: gcc Version: 6.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/71883] ICE in identical_array_ref, at fortran/dependency.c:104

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71883 --- Comment #2 from Gerhard Steinmetz --- Runtime behavior : $ cat y1.f90 program p character(3), allocatable :: z(:,:) z(1:2,1:2) = 'abc' z(2,1) = z(1,2) z(2,1) = z(1,2) end $ gfortran-6

[Bug fortran/71883] ICE in identical_array_ref, at fortran/dependency.c:104

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71883 --- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz --- Backup tests, analogous backtrace : $ cat z2.f90 program p character(:), allocatable :: z(:,:) z(1:2,1:2) = 'abc' z(2,1) = z(12) z(21) = z(1,2) end

[Bug fortran/71884] ICE in gfc_trans_allocate, at fortran/trans-stmt.c:5582 and :5698

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71884 --- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz --- Another source position with obviously invalid code : $ cat za.f90 program p character(:), allocatable :: z allocate (character(*) :: z) end $

[Bug fortran/71884] New: ICE in gfc_trans_allocate, at fortran/trans-stmt.c:5582 and :5698

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71884 Bug ID: 71884 Summary: ICE in gfc_trans_allocate, at fortran/trans-stmt.c:5582 and :5698 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/70977] [6/7 Regression] Out of memory during compilation of facebook/wangle (flag c++0x works, flag c++14 fails).

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70977 Romain Geissler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||romain.geissler at amadeus dot com

[Bug rtl-optimization/71878] ICE in cselib_record_set

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71878 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Preud'homme --- Author: thopre01 Date: Thu Jul 14 16:41:06 2016 New Revision: 238346 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238346=gcc=rev Log: 2016-07-14 Thomas Preud'homme gcc/

[Bug fortran/71883] New: ICE in identical_array_ref, at fortran/dependency.c:104

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71883 Bug ID: 71883 Summary: ICE in identical_array_ref, at fortran/dependency.c:104 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/58796] throw nullptr not caught by catch(type*)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58796 --- Comment #15 from Jason Merrill --- (In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #12) > For a pointer to member function that's still problematic because the > exception object for 'throw nullptr' is currently one word, and a pointer to > member

[Bug fortran/71807] [5/6/7 Regression] Internal compiler error with NULL() reference in structure constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71807 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING

[Bug target/71869] __builtin_isgreater raises an invalid exception on PPC64 using __float128 inputs.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71869 --- Comment #1 from Paul E. Murphy --- __builtin_isfinite also has a similar issue.

[Bug tree-optimization/71881] [4.9/6/7 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 with -g enabled on x86_64-linux-gnu: cannot update SSA form

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71881 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug c++/71882] New: elaborated-type-specifier friend not looked up in unnamed namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71882 Bug ID: 71882 Summary: elaborated-type-specifier friend not looked up in unnamed namespace Product: gcc Version: 6.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/71881] New: ICE on valid code at -O3 with -g enabled on x86_64-linux-gnu: cannot update SSA form

/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 7.0.0 20160714 (experimental) [trunk revision 238331] (GCC) $ $ gcc-trunk -O3 -c small.c $ gcc-trunk -O2 -g -c small.c $ gcc-6.1 -O3 -g -c small.c $ $ gcc-trunk -O3 -g -c small.c

[Bug driver/69028] ICE on *any* valid Cilk+ code C/C++: Invalid read of size 2 in cp_dump_tree(void*, tree_node*) (dump.c:318)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69028 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 38904 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38904=edit Candidate patch for the profiling issue Following cilk function has no location, if it's a valid that a function does

[Bug driver/69028] ICE on *any* valid Cilk+ code C/C++: -fcilkplus is incompatible with -fprofile-arcs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69028 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- Ok, the problem comes from r224161: Author: aldyh Date: Fri Jun 5 18:44:53 2015 + Merge debug-early branch into mainline. where running: ./xg++ -B.

[Bug c++/63875] Bogus unused-but-set-parameter warning when expanding a variadic template argument pack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63875 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug fortran/70842] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] internal compiler error with character members within a polymorphic pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70842 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #9 from

[Bug middle-end/50060] intrinsics not folded by the middle-end

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50060 Paul A. Bristow changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pbristow at hetp dot u-net.com ---

[Bug tree-optimization/71872] [7 Regression] ICE in inchash::add_expr, at tree.c:7782 - OEP_ADDRESS_OF asserted for ADDR_EXPR applied to constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71872 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Will change. While: /* PR tree-optimization/71872 */ struct __attribute__((may_alias)) S { int *a; }; int b; void foo (int *x, struct S *y) { int i; for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) { int *a =

[Bug tree-optimization/53947] [meta-bug] vectorizer missed-optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947 Bug 53947 depends on bug 65951, which changed state. Bug 65951 Summary: [AArch64] Will not vectorize 64bit integer multiplication https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65951 What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/65952] [AArch64] Will not vectorize storing induction of pointer addresses for LP64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65952 Bug 65952 depends on bug 65951, which changed state. Bug 65951 Summary: [AArch64] Will not vectorize 64bit integer multiplication https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65951 What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/59833] ARM soft-float extendsfdf2 fails to quiet signaling NaN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59833 --- Comment #8 from ramana.radhakrishnan at foss dot arm.com --- On 14/07/16 12:15, aurelien at aurel32 dot net wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59833 > > --- Comment #7 from Aurelien Jarno --- > (In reply to Ramana

[Bug tree-optimization/70923] [7 regression] gcc.dg/vect/pr60092.c etc. FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70923 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug target/65951] [AArch64] Will not vectorize 64bit integer multiplication

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65951 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/71872] [7 Regression] ICE in inchash::add_expr, at tree.c:7782 - OEP_ADDRESS_OF asserted for ADDR_EXPR applied to constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71872 --- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On July 14, 2016 2:33:12 PM GMT+02:00, "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" wrote: >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71872 > >Jakub Jelinek changed: > >

[Bug fortran/70842] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] internal compiler error with character members within a polymorphic pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70842 --- Comment #8 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to vehre from comment #7) > Hi Karl, > > (In reply to kargl from comment #5) > > With the patch I posted earlier today and code in comment #1, I see > > which patch are you referring

[Bug tree-optimization/70923] [7 regression] gcc.dg/vect/pr60092.c etc. FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70923 --- Comment #10 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Thu Jul 14 14:32:39 2016 New Revision: 238340 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238340=gcc=rev Log: [vectorizer][2/2] Hook up mult synthesis logic into vectorisation

[Bug target/65951] [AArch64] Will not vectorize 64bit integer multiplication

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65951 --- Comment #12 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Thu Jul 14 14:32:39 2016 New Revision: 238340 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238340=gcc=rev Log: [vectorizer][2/2] Hook up mult synthesis logic into vectorisation

[Bug c++/58796] throw nullptr not caught by catch(type*)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58796 --- Comment #14 from Jason Merrill --- Also note that a null pointer to data member is represented as -1, not 0, so you'll want *(ptrdiff_t*)thrown_ptr = -1; for that case. A null pointer to member function is { nullptr, 0 }. You might

[Bug c++/58796] throw nullptr not caught by catch(type*)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58796 --- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #12) > (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4) > > However with that patch the caught pointer is not null, so it's not right. > > For a pointer, you just

[Bug middle-end/71876] longjmp is miscompiled with -ffreestanding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71876 --- Comment #6 from Bernd Edlinger --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5) > Perhaps ECF_MAY_BE_ALLOCA too? But ECF_NORETURN and ECF_LEAF are not > conservative, sure. Yes. That's right. alloca can not return null. See

[Bug c++/58796] throw nullptr not caught by catch(type*)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58796 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/71880] pointer to allocatable character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71880 --- Comment #1 from Valery Weber --- what about this one? cat gcc-6.1b.f90 program t character(:), dimension(:), allocatable, target :: c character(:), dimension(:), pointer :: p allocate(c(10),source='X') p=>c(:) write(*,*) 'p=<',p(1),'>

[Bug go/71396] "use of undefined type" error in gccgo-6 when go (1.6.1) is perfectly happy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71396 Than McIntosh changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thanm at google dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug fortran/71880] New: pointer to allocatable character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71880 Bug ID: 71880 Summary: pointer to allocatable character Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug c++/71879] Error in unevaluated context breaks SFINAE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71879 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- Taking the address of Foo::foo instantiates it, which results in an error outside the immediate context, so you get an error not a substitution failure. http://stackoverflow.com/a/15261234/981959

[Bug c++/71879] New: Error in unevaluated context breaks SFINAE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71879 Bug ID: 71879 Summary: Error in unevaluated context breaks SFINAE Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug bootstrap/66319] [6 Regression] gcov-tool.c:84:65: error: invalid conversion from 'int (*)(const c har*, const stat*, int, FTW*)' to 'int (*)(const char*, const stat*, int, FTW)'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66319 --- Comment #19 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2016-07-12 10:38 AM, danglin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > Patch looks reasonable but needs to be sent to gcc-patches with cc's. Further, the patch needs to be submitted by someone with a gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/71867] Optimizer generates code dereferencing a null pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71867 --- Comment #2 from Vadim Zeitlin --- I'll try to add the preprocessed code a bit later, but, FWIW, I can already say that there is no macro trickery whatsoever in this code itself.

[Bug middle-end/71876] longjmp is miscompiled with -ffreestanding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71876 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug tree-optimization/71872] [7 Regression] ICE in inchash::add_expr, at tree.c:7782 - OEP_ADDRESS_OF asserted for ADDR_EXPR applied to constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71872 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug middle-end/71876] longjmp is miscompiled with -ffreestanding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71876 --- Comment #4 from Bernd Edlinger --- And, what is "qsetjmp" ? Also "setjmp_syscall", "savectx" are also completely new to me. And why is the prefix "__x" discarded?

[Bug target/71652] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] ICE in in ix86_target_macros_internal, at config/i386/i386-c.c:187

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71652 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug middle-end/71876] longjmp is miscompiled with -ffreestanding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71876 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Bug tree-optimization/71866] [7 Regression] gcc locks up after fix for PR70159

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71866 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/71878] ICE in cselib_record_set

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71878 Thomas Preud'homme changed: What|Removed |Added Target||arm-none-eabi

[Bug rtl-optimization/71878] ICE in

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71878 --- Comment #1 from Thomas Preud'homme --- Created attachment 38902 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38902=edit Testcase allowing to reproduce ICE in cselib

[Bug c/71876] longjmp is miscompiled with -ffreestanding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71876 --- Comment #2 from Bernd Edlinger --- test case for the ECF_LEAF: test.c: int setjmp(void); static int x; void foo(int z) { x = z; } int bar(void) { int z = x; setjmp(); z += x; return z; } gcc -O3 -S -ffreestanding test.c bar:

[Bug tree-optimization/71866] [7 Regression] gcc locks up after fix for PR70159

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71866 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Jul 14 12:15:38 2016 New Revision: 238334 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238334=gcc=rev Log: 2016-07-14 Richard Biener PR

[Bug rtl-optimization/71878] New: ICE in

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71878 Bug ID: 71878 Summary: ICE in Product: gcc Version: 5.4.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization Assignee:

[Bug tree-optimization/71872] [7 Regression] ICE in inchash::add_expr, at tree.c:7782 - OEP_ADDRESS_OF asserted for ADDR_EXPR applied to constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71872 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0 Summary|ICE in

[Bug tree-optimization/71872] ICE in inchash::add_expr, at tree.c:7782 - OEP_ADDRESS_OF asserted for ADDR_EXPR applied to constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71872 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Reduced testcase: struct __attribute__((may_alias)) S { int a; }; void foo (int *x, struct S *y) { int i; for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) { int a = 0; if (*x) *(struct S *) y =

[Bug libgomp/71877] -fdump-tree-ompexp is generating incomplete code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71877 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libgomp/71877] New: -fdump-tree-ompexp is generating incomplete code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71877 Bug ID: 71877 Summary: -fdump-tree-ompexp is generating incomplete code Product: gcc Version: 5.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c/71876] longjmp is miscompiled with -ffreestanding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71876 --- Comment #1 from Bernd Edlinger --- I'm unsure, if ECF_LEAF is also unsafe: /* The function does not lead to calls within current function unit. */ #define ECF_LEAF (1 << 10) I couldn't guarantee for that in a freestanding

[Bug tree-optimization/71104] [7 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed (with vfork / error: definition in block 3 does not dominate use in block 7 )

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71104 --- Comment #18 from Bernd Edlinger --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #17) > Can you open a separate bug please? sure: pr71876

[Bug target/59833] ARM soft-float extendsfdf2 fails to quiet signaling NaN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59833 --- Comment #7 from Aurelien Jarno --- (In reply to Ramana Radhakrishnan from comment #6) > (In reply to Aurelien Jarno from comment #5) > > (In reply to Ramana Radhakrishnan from comment #4) > > > Need to apply Aurelien's patch - looks like

[Bug c/71876] New: longjmp is miscompiled with -ffreestanding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71876 Bug ID: 71876 Summary: longjmp is miscompiled with -ffreestanding Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug c++/71871] ICE on mixing templates and vector extensions ternary operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71871 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/71875] [5 Regression] template specialization compile error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71875 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[6 Regression] template |[5 Regression] template

[Bug c++/71875] [6 Regression] template specialization compile error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71875 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.2 Summary|[5/6 Regression]

[Bug c++/63875] Bogus unused-but-set-parameter warning when expanding a variadic template argument pack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63875 Roman Perepelitsa changed: What|Removed |Added CC||roman.perepelitsa at gmail dot com

[Bug c++/71875] [5/6 Regression] template specialization compile error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71875 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid CC|

[Bug c++/71875] [5/6 Regression] template specialization compile error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71875 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/71104] [7 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed (with vfork / error: definition in block 3 does not dominate use in block 7 )

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71104 --- Comment #17 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 14 Jul 2016, bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71104 > > --- Comment #16 from Bernd Edlinger --- > (In reply to rguent...@suse.de

[Bug libstdc++/70716] Doxygen comments on std containers need updating for C++11 allocators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70716 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/70716] Doxygen comments on std containers need updating for C++11 allocators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70716 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Thu Jul 14 10:02:10 2016 New Revision: 238332 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238332=gcc=rev Log: Improve doxygen comments for allocators in containers PR libstdc++/70716

  1   2   >