https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67025
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54366
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70229
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||6.1.0
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65070
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Nadav Har'El from comment #4)
> *That* is the Linux ABI, not the x86-64 instruction.
Actually the Linux ABI is just the syscall ABI, nothing more and nothing less.
The GNU/Linux ABI (glibc) is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66278
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||6.1.0
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71867
--- Comment #8 from asmwarrior ---
Hi, I just build wx2.8.12 under TDM-GCC 5.1 with
-fno-delete-null-pointer-checks enabled. But the bad thing is that I still see
the same crash here. The whole command is below:
mingw32-make -f makefile.gcc USE_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71680
--- Comment #13 from Alan Modra ---
The e500 issue is quite different, and is not fixed by my lra patch. From the
lra dump,
Creating newreg=436, assigning class NO_REGS to save r436
536: r192:SI=0x1
REG_EQUAL 0x1
Add reg<-save
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72780
Bug ID: 72780
Summary: public `using` directive exposes protected base-class
constructor
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71952
--- Comment #4 from Damian Rouson ---
Additional demonstrations of related unsupported syntax are below. I also
removed "implicit none" and one unused variable because these are not needed
to generate the error message:
$ cat additional-exampl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71824
Aric Belsito changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lluixhi at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60782
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63243
Bug 63243 depends on bug 60782, which changed state.
Bug 60782 Summary: DWARF does not represent _Atomic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60782
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72779
--- Comment #5 from Samuel Just ---
To clarify, this bug is present on 4.8.4, but not 5.3.1 suggesting that it may
not be present in any currently supported versions.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70895
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72779
--- Comment #4 from Samuel Just ---
Seems to be ok on 5.3.1. I guess I should bother the ubuntu maintainers about
a backport?
~/Downloads [pondermatic●] » g++ -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=g++
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72779
--- Comment #3 from Samuel Just ---
I have not, let me rustle up a newer version and get back to you.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72779
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
--- Comment #2 from An
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72779
--- Comment #1 from Samuel Just ---
Created attachment 39049
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39049&action=edit
Shorter reproducer
I simplified the reproducer a bit more, same stuff included.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72779
Bug ID: 72779
Summary: ice when compiling included lambda pattern (internal
compiler error: in is_base_type, at dwarf2out.c:9968)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.4
Status: UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72778
--- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Tue Aug 2 20:57:04 2016
New Revision: 239000
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239000&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-08-02 Vladimir Makarov
PR middle-end/72778
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71815
--- Comment #6 from Bill Schmidt ---
Actually, it looks like a similar problem for the unknown stride case. Again
there is logic that relies on single-reached-use for determining what
expressions go dead. We need to factor in expressions that g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68048
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72773
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72773
--- Comment #3 from Wenzel Jakob ---
It looks like it is an LLVM issue (see
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=28810)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72775
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|UN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72771
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72778
Vladimir Makarov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72778
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72778
Bug ID: 72778
Summary: [7 Regression] internal compiler error: in
create_pre_exit, at mode-switching.c:451
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69847
--- Comment #20 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Bill Schmidt from comment #17)
> Vlad, the patch checks out very well on powerpc64le. 403.gcc no longer
> degrades. We are seeing some very nice improvements from LRA over reload on
> a few
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69848
--- Comment #11 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I am also investigating as Alan suggested in comment #3 to see how to fix the
reduction issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69847
--- Comment #19 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Tue Aug 2 16:07:36 2016
New Revision: 238991
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238991&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-08-02 Vladimir Makarov
PR rtl-optimization/69847
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70783
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andreas.G.JHOSS from comment #2)
> Hmm?
> So but how can I add and change implicitely a substitute rule then?
> I want to add certain libraries to build process permanently for certain
> platform
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71815
--- Comment #5 from Bill Schmidt ---
I'll note that in the case where the stride is known (slsr-35.c), SLSR is
making at least a somewhat rational decision based on cost not to
strength-reduce the phi candidate. In this case the stride is a powe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72777
--- Comment #1 from bloerwald at googlemail dot com ---
Note: compiles fine in c++11 mode of clang 3.8, so not sure if it actually is
forbidden by the standard.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72777
Bug ID: 72777
Summary: broken error message with reference in constexpr
arguments in c++11 mode
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69004
--- Comment #19 from PeteVine ---
Here's what I've been doing to arrive at that profile-use crash:
In the unpacked archive's top-level directory (see URL), edit premake4.lua to
point to your SDL2 includes (instead of /opt) and add `-fprofile-gen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72768
--- Comment #8 from lh_mouse ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #7)
> It *could* check, but that doesn't mean it should.
I was merely stating that the twice-destruction problem wasn't unresolvable.
The topic about the C++ standard st
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72776
Bug ID: 72776
Summary: Too large array size not diagnosed properly when
inferred from an initializer
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: dia
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71680
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69847
--- Comment #18 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
(In reply to Bill Schmidt from comment #17)
> Vlad, the patch checks out very well on powerpc64le. 403.gcc no longer
> degrades. We are seeing some very nice improvements from LRA over reload on
> a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72775
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.3
--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72775
Bug ID: 72775
Summary: internal compiler error: in finish_expr_stmt, at
cp/semantics.c:677
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69847
--- Comment #17 from Bill Schmidt ---
Vlad, the patch checks out very well on powerpc64le. 403.gcc no longer
degrades. We are seeing some very nice improvements from LRA over reload on a
few benchmarks (435.gromacs leads the way with +9.5%). E
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72770
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Note this just exposed a latent issue in the FE.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70783
--- Comment #2 from Andreas.G.JHOSS ---
Hmm?
So but how can I add and change implicitely a substitute rule then?
I want to add certain libraries to build process permanently for certain
platforms so I can get platform independent. And clearly I w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72770
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Caused by revision r235817.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34114
--- Comment #8 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: amker
Date: Tue Aug 2 10:13:28 2016
New Revision: 238983
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238983&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/34114
* tree-ssa-loop-niter
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34114
--- Comment #7 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: amker
Date: Tue Aug 2 10:09:33 2016
New Revision: 238982
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238982&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/34114
* fold-const.c (multi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72774
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72772
--- Comment #2 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Note that for some odd reason creating the preheader causes the PHI to appar.
> Fixing that would be appreciated - it's the make_forwarder_block CFG ho
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72770
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
.original has:
case 85893463:;
.__tmp_CHARACTER_0_1 = x->_len;
__tmp_CHARACTER_0_1 = x->_data;
__tmp_CHARACTER_0_1.dtype = ((integer(kind=8)) SAVE_EXPR
<(size
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72770
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72768
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
It *could* check, but that doesn't mean it should.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72772
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69848
--- Comment #10 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Patches @https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-08/msg00058.html and
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-08/msg00059.html implements
vcond_mask/vec_cmp/vcond stuff on AArch64 and fix the targe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72768
--- Comment #6 from lh_mouse ---
> But then if the delegating constructor throws you would run the destructor
> twice e.g.
The `atexit()` callback in question can check the `__cxa_guard` of the object
to determine whether it should call the des
-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 7.0.0 20160802 (experimental) [trunk revision 238976] (GCC)
$ g++-trunk small.C
small.C: In function ‘void bar()’:
small.C:7:19: internal compiler error: tree check: expected tree that contains
‘decl minimal’ structure, have ‘tree_list’ in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68048
--- Comment #2 from Arash Ghasemi ---
Thanks Andrew! How do you compile in a separate obj directory?
mkdir obj; cd obj; ../configure bla bla bla
right?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68048
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67577
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72758
James Greenhalgh changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2016-07-3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67299
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71910
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72768
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4)
> It is necessary for correctness that destructors are run for objects which
> have completed a constructor. It is not necessary for correctness to order
> stat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72768
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
It is necessary for correctness that destructors are run for objects which have
completed a constructor. It is not necessary for correctness to order static
destructors after the destructor for an object st
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70509
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70556
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16994
Bug 16994 depends on bug 70556, which changed state.
Bug 70556 Summary: ICE in cxx_eval_vec_init_1 on a ill-formed lambda capture of
a VLA in a template
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70556
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72773
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
http://marc.info/?l=macports-dev&m=131805731507623
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72773
--- Comment #1 from Wenzel Jakob ---
The LLVM ticket is here: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=28810
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72773
Bug ID: 72773
Summary: AVX512: Invalid operand for vcvttss2siq instruction
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72772
Bug ID: 72772
Summary: Missed SCEV after pass reordering@236440
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optim
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25508
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66646
--- Comment #5 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
After commit reordering passes:
commit 410372fef14173261ce8e547db98eafb3174921f
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu May 19 07:39:52 2016 +
2016-05-19 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimizati
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67545
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||assemble-failure
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64516
--- Comment #9 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 2 Aug 2016, markus at oberhumer dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64516
>
> --- Comment #8 from Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer ---
> Richard, many thanks for finally
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64516
--- Comment #8 from Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer ---
Richard, many thanks for finally fixing this issue.
Will there be a backport to 4.9.4 and/or 5.4 ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63882
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66333
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65950
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
81 matches
Mail list logo
