[Bug tree-optimization/62171] restrict pointer to struct with restrict pointers parm doesn't prevent aliases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62171 ncahill_alt at yahoo dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ncahill_alt at yahoo dot

[Bug target/71776] relocation truncated to fit: R_ARM_THM_JUMP11 against symbol `__gnu_h2f_internal'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71776 --- Comment #5 from malithyapa at gmail dot com --- On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 1:39 PM ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org < gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71776 > > ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: > >

[Bug middle-end/77294] New: __builtin_object_size inconsistent for member arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77294 Bug ID: 77294 Summary: __builtin_object_size inconsistent for member arrays Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug middle-end/44384] builtin_object_size_ treatment of multidimensional arrays is unexpected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44384 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Bug middle-end/77293] New: __builtin_object_size inconsistent for multidimensional arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77293 Bug ID: 77293 Summary: __builtin_object_size inconsistent for multidimensional arrays Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/77292] New: Spurious "warning: logical not is only applied to the left hand side of comparison"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77292 Bug ID: 77292 Summary: Spurious "warning: logical not is only applied to the left hand side of comparison" Product: gcc Version: 5.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/77291] New: False positive for -Warray-bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77291 Bug ID: 77291 Summary: False positive for -Warray-bounds Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/71973] c++ handles built-in functions inconsistently

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71973 --- Comment #3 from Bernd Edlinger --- Created attachment 39472 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39472=edit possible patch Oh, yeah! Boot-strap OK. The eh-code is OK. BUT: the warning triggers a few hundred times, within

[Bug libstdc++/77288] Std::experimental::optional::operator= implementation is broken in gcc 6.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77288 --- Comment #5 from Ville Voutilainen --- Ah. That would indeed mean that every converting assignment introduces a temporary. Design-wise I'd rather have it so that optional doesn't convert at all in the assignment. :)

[Bug tree-optimization/77290] New: [7 regression] test case gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr71347.c fails starting with r239565

l(8) 37,38d37 < lfd 0,0(9) < addi 9,9,8 40c39,40 < stfd 0,0(9) --- > addi 9,9,8 > stfd 0,-8(9) 61c61 < .ident "GCC: (GNU) 7.0.0 20160818 (experimental) [trunk revision 239565]" --- > .ident "GCC: (GNU) 7.0.0 20160818 (experimen

[Bug libstdc++/37986] std::tr1::variate_generator does not conform to TR1.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37986 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Manuel Holtgrewe from comment #0) > std::tr1::variate_generator< > std::tr1::mt19937&, > std::tr1::uniform_real > > g(mt, dist); This case is only fixed for -std=gnu++98 mode.

[Bug fortran/71936] [6/7 Regression] ICE in wide_int_to_tree, at tree.c:1487

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71936 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/72698] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE in lhd_incomplete_type_error, at langhooks.c:205

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72698 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/77288] Std::experimental::optional::operator= implementation is broken in gcc 6.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77288 --- Comment #4 from dawid_jurek at vp dot pl --- After applying my patch code snippet you provided compile, run and works as expected. To be more precise I'm talking about such snippet: std::experimental::optional os; os = "meow";

[Bug c/71514] ICE on C11 code with atomic exchange at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu: in copy_reference_ops_from_ref, at tree-ssa-sccvn.c:879

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71514 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/71514] ICE on C11 code with atomic exchange at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu: in copy_reference_ops_from_ref, at tree-ssa-sccvn.c:879

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71514 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/71514] ICE on C11 code with atomic exchange at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu: in copy_reference_ops_from_ref, at tree-ssa-sccvn.c:879

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71514 --- Comment #14 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Thu Aug 18 16:38:49 2016 New Revision: 239581 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239581=gcc=rev Log: PR c/71514 * c-common.c (get_atomic_generic_size): Disallow

[Bug middle-end/70895] OpenACC: loop reduction does not work. Output is zero.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70895 --- Comment #8 from Chung-Lin Tang --- Author: cltang Date: Thu Aug 18 15:01:50 2016 New Revision: 239579 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239579=gcc=rev Log: Backport from mainline: 2016-08-18 Chung-Lin Tang

[Bug target/72839] MOVE_RATIO is too small for Lakemont

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72839 --- Comment #1 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Thu Aug 18 14:59:46 2016 New Revision: 239578 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239578=gcc=rev Log: Increase MOVE_RATIO to 17 for Lakemont Larger MOVE_RATIO will always make

[Bug middle-end/70895] OpenACC: loop reduction does not work. Output is zero.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70895 --- Comment #7 from Chung-Lin Tang --- Author: cltang Date: Thu Aug 18 14:56:11 2016 New Revision: 239577 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239577=gcc=rev Log: Backport from mainline: 2016-08-18 Chung-Lin Tang

[Bug tree-optimization/77282] [7 regression] test case gcc.dg/autopar/pr46193.c fails starting with r239414

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77282 --- Comment #5 from Bill Seurer --- Just did a test run and it works. Thanks!

[Bug middle-end/70895] OpenACC: loop reduction does not work. Output is zero.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70895 --- Comment #6 from Chung-Lin Tang --- Author: cltang Date: Thu Aug 18 14:46:19 2016 New Revision: 239576 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239576=gcc=rev Log: 2016-08-18 Chung-Lin Tang PR

[Bug rtl-optimization/77289] New: ICE in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2212 on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77289 Bug ID: 77289 Summary: ICE in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2212 on powerpc64 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/77288] Std::experimental::optional::operator= implementation is broken in gcc 6.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77288 --- Comment #3 from Ville Voutilainen --- >Now behaviour is the same as in gcc 5.1 - operator=(_Up&& __u) is chosen in 2 >situations: >1. _Up is NOT optional >2. _Up is optional AND _Up is same as _Tp modulo cv-qualifiers, references etc. How

[Bug libstdc++/77288] Std::experimental::optional::operator= implementation is broken in gcc 6.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77288 Ville Voutilainen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/77288] Std::experimental::optional::operator= implementation is broken in gcc 6.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77288 --- Comment #1 from dawid_jurek at vp dot pl --- Created attachment 39471 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39471=edit Fix bug in operator=

[Bug libstdc++/77288] New: Std::experimental::optional::operator= implementation is broken in gcc 6.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77288 Bug ID: 77288 Summary: Std::experimental::optional::operator= implementation is broken in gcc 6.1 Product: gcc Version: 6.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug tree-optimization/50419] Casts to restrict pointers have no effect

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50419 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||alias, missed-optimization

[Bug middle-end/49774] [meta-bug] restrict qualification aliasing issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49774 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/71338] [RL78] mulu instruction not used on G10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71338 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/59980] Diagnostics relating to template-specialisations using enums.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59980 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/71338] [RL78] mulu instruction not used on G10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71338 --- Comment #7 from Oleg Endo --- Author: olegendo Date: Thu Aug 18 12:25:47 2016 New Revision: 239569 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239569=gcc=rev Log: gcc/ Backport from mainline 2016-06-17 DJ Delorie

[Bug tree-optimization/77283] [7 Regression] Revision 238005 disables loop unrolling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77283 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #7) > Also my adjustment of gcc.dg/tree-ssa/split-path-7.c was only good in my dev > tree for some reason. Otherwise bootstrapped / tested on >

[Bug target/71338] [RL78] mulu instruction not used on G10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71338 --- Comment #6 from Oleg Endo --- Author: olegendo Date: Thu Aug 18 12:14:33 2016 New Revision: 239568 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239568=gcc=rev Log: gcc/ Backport from mainline 2016-06-17 DJ Delorie

[Bug tree-optimization/77283] [7 Regression] Revision 238005 disables loop unrolling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77283 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 39469 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39469=edit patch Ok, causes FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr69270.c scan-tree-dump-not dom3 "bit_xor" FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr69270.c

[Bug tree-optimization/71077] [7 Regression] gcc -lto raises ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71077 --- Comment #7 from Yuri Rumyantsev --- I checked that proposed patch fixed RF for 176.gcc. Please, go ahead and commit your patch to trunk. Thanks. Yuri. 2016-08-12 20:14 GMT+03:00 patrick at parcs dot ath.cx : >

[Bug rtl-optimization/77287] Much worse code generated compared to clang (stack alignment and spills)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77287 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ra Target|

[Bug target/62180] (RX600) - compiler doesn't honor -fstrict-volatile-bitfields and generates incorrect machine code for I/O register access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62180 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug tree-optimization/77286] [7 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2248 building 435.gromacs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77286 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Ok, again slpeels incredibly fragile manual SSA updating which relies on PHI nodes to appear in exactly the same order... which is AFAIK why I at some point removed that lc-PHI handling bail-out I

[Bug target/77287] Much worse code generated compared to clang (stack alignment and spills)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77287 --- Comment #2 from Petr --- With '-mtune=intel' the push/pop sequence is gone, but YMM register management remains the same - 24 memory accesses more than clang.

[Bug tree-optimization/77286] [7 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2248 building 435.gromacs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77286 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener

[Bug target/77287] Much worse code generated compared to clang (stack alignment and spills)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77287 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c++ |target --- Comment #1 from Andrew

[Bug tree-optimization/77286] [7 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2248 building 435.gromacs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77286 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/77285] [5/6/7 Regression] extern thread_local linkage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77285 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- The examples only work with GCC 4.9.4 because the abi_tag doesn't have any effect before GCC 5, but it's still a regression because of the effect on std::string variables, which are now tagged.

[Bug c++/77287] New: Much worse code generated compared to clang (stack alignment and spills)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77287 Bug ID: 77287 Summary: Much worse code generated compared to clang (stack alignment and spills) Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/77285] [5/6/7 Regression] extern thread_local linkage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77285 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- Oops, sorry that's the nm output for the wrong objects, the output for the reduced examples is: nm a.o U _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ B _Z13gFeelingLuckyB3tag

[Bug c/7652] -Wswitch-break : Warn if a switch case falls through

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7652 --- Comment #59 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Thu Aug 18 10:28:03 2016 New Revision: 239566 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239566=gcc=rev Log: PR c/7652 gcc/cp/ * call.c (add_builtin_candidate): Add

[Bug tree-optimization/77286] [7 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2248 building 435.gromacs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77286 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Ok, looks like my if-conversion patch is at least partly responsible for the current TOT fallout.

[Bug c++/77285] [5/6/7 Regression] extern thread_local linkage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77285 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- Reduced: cat >a.cpp

[Bug tree-optimization/77286] [7 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2248 building 435.gromacs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77286 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- Seen with r239549 and checking disabled. Current TOT leads to coupling.c: In function ‘nosehoover_tcoupl’: coupling.c:364:6: error: invalid operands in binary operation void nosehoover_tcoupl(t_grpopts

[Bug c++/77285] [5/6/7 Regression] extern thread_local linkage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77285 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/77286] New: [7 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2248 building 435.gromacs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77286 Bug ID: 77286 Summary: [7 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2248 building 435.gromacs Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/77285] [5/6/7 Regression] extern thread_local linkage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77285 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- Without the header: cat > a.cpp < thread_local std::string gFeelingLucky; EOF cat > main.cpp < extern thread_local std::string gFeelingLucky; int main() { return gFeelingLucky.length(); } EOF g++11

[Bug c++/77285] [5/6/7 Regression] extern thread_local linkage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77285 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- No, using header guards makes no difference.

[Bug tree-optimization/77282] [7 regression] test case gcc.dg/autopar/pr46193.c fails starting with r239414

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77282 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/77282] [7 regression] test case gcc.dg/autopar/pr46193.c fails starting with r239414

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77282 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/77282] [7 regression] test case gcc.dg/autopar/pr46193.c fails starting with r239414

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77282 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Ok, so autopar is limited by the same issues as vectorization (loop carried dependences via non-reduction PHIs) and thus should enable the PRE code that inhibits such transforms. Would the testcase have

[Bug tree-optimization/77283] [7 Regression] Revision 238005 disables loop unrolling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77283 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- I'm reasonably happy with the PHI logic so I am going to test it. It's quite on the do-more-duplicating side for memory references (just uses the virtual operand PHI to see if there are any loads/stores in

[Bug tree-optimization/77282] [7 regression] test case gcc.dg/autopar/pr46193.c fails starting with r239414

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77282 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug c++/77285] [5/6/7 Regression] extern thread_local linkage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77285 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.5 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener

[Bug bootstrap/77279] build error in isl/ctx.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77279 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Component|c++

[Bug tree-optimization/77283] [7 Regression] Revision 238005 disables loop unrolling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77283 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Patch to fix the testcase, but will eventually regress the path-splitting testcase again. The IV increment may be combined with a stmt in the path thus more analysis would be required here. I guess if

[Bug c++/77285] [5/6/7 Regression] extern thread_local linkage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77285 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Bug fortran/71687] ICE in omp_add_variable, at gimplify.c:5821

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71687 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/77283] [7 Regression] Revision 238005 disables loop unrolling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77283 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug fortran/49792] OpenMP workshare: Wrong result with array assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49792 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/77284] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE on valid C++11 code using initializer list: in potential_constant_expression_1, at cp/constexpr.c:5480

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77284 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/77285] New: extern thread_local linkage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77285 Bug ID: 77285 Summary: extern thread_local linkage Product: gcc Version: 5.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug other/68783] Improve verification of loop->latch in verify_loop_structure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68783 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/77283] [7 Regression] Revision 238005 disables loop unrolling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77283 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization