[Bug c++/61636] generic lambda: segfault / "cannot call member function without object"

2016-08-24 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61636 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug fortran/77327] AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free gcc-trunk-239276/gcc/fortran/interface.c:403 in compare_components

2016-08-24 Thread zeccav at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77327 --- Comment #6 from Vittorio Zecca --- After applying the proposed patch the asan memory checker did not report any memory fault, in particular the heap-use-after-free in interface.c Fritz, do you have a -fsanitize=address version of gfortran, i

[Bug tree-optimization/67886] Incomplete optimization for virtual function call into freshly constructed object

2016-08-24 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67886 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/67886] Incomplete optimization for virtual function call into freshly constructed object

2016-08-24 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67886 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Severity|m

[Bug c++/77376] GCC segfaults/returns bogus error (depending on version) when calling a member function from a generic lambda with a captured this without using "this->" explicitly.

2016-08-24 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77376 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/61636] generic lambda "cannot call member function without object"

2016-08-24 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61636 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tinab at hush dot ai --- Comment #

[Bug c++/77376] GCC segfaults/returns bogus error (depending on version) when calling a member function from a generic lambda with a captured this without using "this->" explicitly.

2016-08-24 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77376 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/69033] [6 regression] many internal compiler errors starting with r231928

2016-08-24 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69033 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Component|c

[Bug tree-optimization/69047] memcpy is not as optimized as union is

2016-08-24 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69047 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target|arm, aarch64| Component|rtl-optimization

[Bug fortran/77327] AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free gcc-trunk-239276/gcc/fortran/interface.c:403 in compare_components

2016-08-24 Thread zeccav at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77327 --- Comment #5 from Vittorio Zecca --- The test case you propose, dec_structure_13.f90, does not trigger the asan memory checker. As I wrote before, the test case gfortran.dg/import4.f90 does trigger the asan memory checker. In your test case I

[Bug c++/66096] Unexpected __gnu_cxx::__concurrence_lock_error with _GLIBCXX_DEBUG

2016-08-24 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66096 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/77327] AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free gcc-trunk-239276/gcc/fortran/interface.c:403 in compare_components

2016-08-24 Thread zeccav at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77327 --- Comment #4 from Vittorio Zecca --- The reproducer I proposed comes from testcase gfortran.dg/import4.f90

[Bug c++/77376] New: GCC segfaults/returns bogus error (depending on version) when calling a member function from a generic lambda with a captured this without using "this->" explicitly.

2016-08-24 Thread tinab at hush dot ai
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77376 Bug ID: 77376 Summary: GCC segfaults/returns bogus error (depending on version) when calling a member function from a generic lambda with a captured this without using "this->"

[Bug driver/50250] Driver documentation on -l does not mention shared libraries

2016-08-24 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50250 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug target/77289] [7 Regression] ICE in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2212 on powerpc64

2016-08-24 Thread bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77289 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/77375] New: constant object with mutable subobject allocated in read-only memory

2016-08-24 Thread Casey at Carter dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77375 Bug ID: 77375 Summary: constant object with mutable subobject allocated in read-only memory Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug driver/50250] Driver documentation on -l does not mention shared libraries

2016-08-24 Thread payerle at umd dot edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50250 --- Comment #4 from Tom Payerle --- In the interest of actually getting this fixed, may I suggest the following revised wording: Search the library named @var{library} when linking. (The second alternative with the library as a

[Bug c/77292] Spurious warning: logical not is only applied to the left hand side of comparison

2016-08-24 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77292 --- Comment #14 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #10) > > t.c:4:13: warning: logical not is only applied to the left hand side of > > comparison [-Wlogical-not-parentheses] > >return !a == (a < b); >

[Bug tree-optimization/71026] Missing division optimizations

2016-08-24 Thread joseph at codesourcery dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71026 --- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- On Wed, 24 Aug 2016, ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > int f4(float x) { return (1.0f / x) < 0.0f; } // -> x < 0.0f Requires -fno-trapping-math, as this could lose an overflow or

[Bug target/77330] __float128 segfaults on 32-bit x86 due to 8-byte malloc alignment

2016-08-24 Thread joseph at codesourcery dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77330 --- Comment #14 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- On Wed, 24 Aug 2016, bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de wrote: > glibc's malloc returns 128-bit aligned on x86-64-linux-gnu. > but what does it return on windows? glibc does not support Wind

[Bug target/77330] __float128 segfaults on 32-bit x86 due to 8-byte malloc alignment

2016-08-24 Thread joseph at codesourcery dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77330 --- Comment #13 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- On Wed, 24 Aug 2016, bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de wrote: > It is only necessary if __float128 is declared a base type. > But __m512 is no base type, right? It's clear that __m512 shoul

[Bug fortran/77327] AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free gcc-trunk-239276/gcc/fortran/interface.c:403 in compare_components

2016-08-24 Thread fritzoreese at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77327 --- Comment #3 from Fritz Reese --- > interface.c:403 is > if ( (d1 && (d1->attr.flavor == FL_STRUCT || d1->attr.flavor == FL_UNION) > > and I believe d->attr.flavor is the item used after freed. This is correct, and the reason is clear when y

[Bug libfortran/74755] libgfortran: build breaks if localtime_r prototype is present, but definition is not

2016-08-24 Thread cesar at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74755 --- Comment #2 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org --- The target is nvptx-none, specifically when it is built as an offloaded target for OpenACC. Thomas thinks the problem is in newlib rather than gcc though.

[Bug libfortran/74755] libgfortran: build breaks if localtime_r prototype is present, but definition is not

2016-08-24 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74755 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/77371] [6/7 Regression] ICE in force_constant_size, at gimplify.c:671 (... and others)

2016-08-24 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77371 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/77358] [F08] deferred-length character function returns zero-length string

2016-08-24 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77358 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/77358] [F08] deferred-length character function returns zero-length string

2016-08-24 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77358 --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Wed Aug 24 19:45:56 2016 New Revision: 239741 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239741&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-08-24 Paul Thomas PR fortran/77358 * resolve.c (res

[Bug fortran/77372] ICE in simplify_ieee_selected_real_kind, at fortran/simplify.c:7049

2016-08-24 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77372 --- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Thous shalt dereference NULL pointers. Index: simplify.c === --- simplify.c (revision 239737) +++ simplify.c (working copy) @@ -704

[Bug fortran/77358] [F08] deferred-length character function returns zero-length string

2016-08-24 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77358 --- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Wed Aug 24 19:33:14 2016 New Revision: 239740 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239740&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-08-24 Paul Thomas PR fortran/77358 * resolve.c (res

[Bug fortran/77372] ICE in simplify_ieee_selected_real_kind, at fortran/simplify.c:7049

2016-08-24 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77372 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/77374] [6/7 Regression] ICE in resolve_omp_atomic, at fortran/openmp.c:3949

2016-08-24 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77374 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug lto/70955] [6/7 Regression] Wrong code generation for __builtin_ms_va_list with -flto

2016-08-24 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70955 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #25 from Tom de Vries

[Bug fortran/77374] New: ICE in resolve_omp_atomic, at fortran/openmp.c:3949

2016-08-24 Thread gerhard.steinmetz.fort...@t-online.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77374 Bug ID: 77374 Summary: ICE in resolve_omp_atomic, at fortran/openmp.c:3949 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/77373] __attribute__((vector_size(N))) fails on AIX

2016-08-24 Thread dje at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77373 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/77373] New: __attribute__((vector_size(N))) fails on AIX

2016-08-24 Thread dje at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77373 Bug ID: 77373 Summary: __attribute__((vector_size(N))) fails on AIX Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug fortran/77372] New: ICE in simplify_ieee_selected_real_kind, at fortran/simplify.c:7049

2016-08-24 Thread gerhard.steinmetz.fort...@t-online.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77372 Bug ID: 77372 Summary: ICE in simplify_ieee_selected_real_kind, at fortran/simplify.c:7049 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/77371] ICE in force_constant_size, at gimplify.c:671 (... and others)

2016-08-24 Thread gerhard.steinmetz.fort...@t-online.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77371 --- Comment #2 from Gerhard Steinmetz --- Related : $ cat z6.f90 program p integer, allocatable :: n !$acc parallel reduction (+:n) private(n) !$acc end parallel end $ gfortran-7-20160821 -fopenacc z6.f90 z6.f90:3:0: !$acc parallel redu

[Bug fortran/77371] ICE in force_constant_size, at gimplify.c:671 (... and others)

2016-08-24 Thread gerhard.steinmetz.fort...@t-online.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77371 --- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz --- $ cat z2.f90 program p integer, allocatable :: z !$acc parallel z = 1 !$acc end parallel print *, z end $ gfortran-7-20160821 -fopenacc z2.f90 z2.f90:2:0: integer, allocatable :: z

[Bug fortran/77371] New: ICE in force_constant_size, at gimplify.c:671 (... and others)

2016-08-24 Thread gerhard.steinmetz.fort...@t-online.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77371 Bug ID: 77371 Summary: ICE in force_constant_size, at gimplify.c:671 (... and others) Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug c++/77370] New: missing -Wignored-qualiifiers on a bogus const reference

2016-08-24 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77370 Bug ID: 77370 Summary: missing -Wignored-qualiifiers on a bogus const reference Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priorit

[Bug fortran/77360] Self-assignment of allocatable character array yields erroneous result

2016-08-24 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77360 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/77289] [7 Regression] ICE in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2212 on powerpc64

2016-08-24 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77289 --- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool --- And this 208 vs. sfp is created by combine: Trying 76 -> 77: Successfully matched this instruction: (parallel [ (set (reg:SF 33 1) (mem:SF (plus:SI (reg/f:SI 113 sfp)

[Bug target/77289] [7 Regression] ICE in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2212 on powerpc64

2016-08-24 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77289 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug testsuite/77317] x86_64 --target_board=''unix/ unix/-m32'' parallel testrun gives inconsistent results in gcc.dg/vect

2016-08-24 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77317 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/77368] Private static member visible to templated subclass

2016-08-24 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77368 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/58993] incorrectly accept access of protected member method from derived class template

2016-08-24 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58993 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||albin.olsson at volvocars dot com ---

[Bug c++/77368] Private static member visible to templated subclass

2016-08-24 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77368 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- There are several bugs related to access checking in templates, this is a dup of one of them.

[Bug c++/77369] incorrect noexcept specification deduction

2016-08-24 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77369 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/77369] New: incorrect noexcept specification deduction

2016-08-24 Thread aaron.ballman+gcc at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77369 Bug ID: 77369 Summary: incorrect noexcept specification deduction Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug rtl-optimization/70134] combine misses jump optimization on powerpc64le

2016-08-24 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70134 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- The reason why it is missed on the tree level is due to the code being undefined. In that it uses uninitialized variables like: if (iter_5(D) >= itmx_6(D)) goto ; else goto ;

[Bug target/77270] Flag -mprftchw is shared with 3dnow for -march=k8

2016-08-24 Thread uros at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77270 --- Comment #10 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Wed Aug 24 14:59:43 2016 New Revision: 239737 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239737&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/77270 * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-28.c: Also

[Bug c++/77368] New: Private static member visible to templated subclass

2016-08-24 Thread albin.olsson at volvocars dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77368 Bug ID: 77368 Summary: Private static member visible to templated subclass Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug tree-optimization/71026] Missing division optimizations

2016-08-24 Thread wdijkstr at arm dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71026 --- Comment #3 from Wilco --- (In reply to ktkachov from comment #2) > The transforms > > int f4(float x) { return (1.0f / x) < 0.0f; } // -> x < 0.0f > int f5(float x) { return (x / 2.0f) <= 0.0f; }// -> x <= 0.0f > > can be do

[Bug c++/77367] Duck-typing error not detected when using CRTP

2016-08-24 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77367 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |INVALID --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinsk

[Bug c++/77364] -fnon-call-exceptions does not work

2016-08-24 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77364 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/77357] strlen of constant strings not folded

2016-08-24 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77357 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---

[Bug tree-optimization/77283] [7 Regression] Revision 238005 disables loop unrolling

2016-08-24 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77283 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc64*-*-*, s390x-*-* --- Comment #

[Bug c++/77367] Duck-typing error not detected when using CRTP

2016-08-24 Thread yuhang_tang at brown dot edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77367 Yu-Hang Tang changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/77366] Rev. 2ac4967 prevents loop unrolling for s390

2016-08-24 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77366 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/77283] [7 Regression] Revision 238005 disables loop unrolling

2016-08-24 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77283 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rdapp at linux dot vnet.ibm.com --- Com

[Bug tree-optimization/71026] Missing division optimizations

2016-08-24 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71026 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/77367] New: Duck-typing error not detected when using CRTP

2016-08-24 Thread yuhang_tang at brown dot edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77367 Bug ID: 77367 Summary: Duck-typing error not detected when using CRTP Product: gcc Version: 6.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c+

[Bug middle-end/77366] New: Rev. 2ac4967 prevents loop unrolling for s390

2016-08-24 Thread rdapp at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77366 Bug ID: 77366 Summary: Rev. 2ac4967 prevents loop unrolling for s390 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middl

[Bug c/77365] Wrong result with -fcaller-saves on i386

2016-08-24 Thread olebole at debian dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77365 --- Comment #4 from Ole Streicher --- Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/i686-linux-gnu/6/lto-wrapper Target: i686-linux-gnu Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Debian 6.2.0-1' --with-bugurl

[Bug c/77365] Wrong result with -fcaller-saves on i386

2016-08-24 Thread olebole at debian dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77365 --- Comment #3 from Ole Streicher --- # gcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/i686-linux-gnu/6/lto-wrapper Target: i686-linux-gnu Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Debian 6.2.0-1' --wi

[Bug c/77365] Wrong result with -fcaller-saves on i386

2016-08-24 Thread olebole at debian dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77365 --- Comment #2 from Ole Streicher --- Created attachment 39497 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39497&action=edit Preprocessed source file

[Bug c/77365] Wrong result with -fcaller-saves on i386

2016-08-24 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77365 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||i?86-*-* Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/77365] New: Wrong result with -fcaller-saves on i386

2016-08-24 Thread olebole at debian dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77365 Bug ID: 77365 Summary: Wrong result with -fcaller-saves on i386 Product: gcc Version: 6.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug c++/77364] New: -fnon-call-exceptions does not work

2016-08-24 Thread theubik at mail dot ru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77364 Bug ID: 77364 Summary: -fnon-call-exceptions does not work Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug fortran/77358] [F08] deferred-length character function returns zero-length string

2016-08-24 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77358 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/77362] [6/7 Regression] [graphite] ICE in sese_build_liveouts_use w/ -O2 -floop-nest-optimize

2016-08-24 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77362 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/77363] [5/6/7 Regression] Missing debug information in DWARF

2016-08-24 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77363 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to work|

[Bug target/77353] [AVR] uint16_t instead uint8_t comparison

2016-08-24 Thread bseifert at gmx dot at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77353 --- Comment #8 from Berni --- With GCC 5.4.0 comparison is done between two 8-bit registers r24 and r25, as expected. With GCC 6.2.0 additionally registers r19 and r25 are loaded with 0 and 16-bit comparison between register pairs (r18, r19) an

[Bug target/77353] [AVR] uint16_t instead uint8_t comparison

2016-08-24 Thread bseifert at gmx dot at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77353 --- Comment #6 from Berni --- Created attachment 39493 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39493&action=edit GCC 6.2.0 build output

[Bug target/77353] [AVR] uint16_t instead uint8_t comparison

2016-08-24 Thread bseifert at gmx dot at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77353 --- Comment #7 from Berni --- Created attachment 39494 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39494&action=edit GCC 6.2.0 listing

[Bug target/77353] [AVR] uint16_t instead uint8_t comparison

2016-08-24 Thread bseifert at gmx dot at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77353 --- Comment #5 from Berni --- Created attachment 39492 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39492&action=edit GCC 5.4.0 listing

[Bug target/77353] [AVR] uint16_t instead uint8_t comparison

2016-08-24 Thread bseifert at gmx dot at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77353 --- Comment #4 from Berni --- Created attachment 39491 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39491&action=edit GCC 5.4.0 build output

[Bug target/77353] [AVR] uint16_t instead uint8_t comparison

2016-08-24 Thread bseifert at gmx dot at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77353 --- Comment #3 from Berni --- Created attachment 39490 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39490&action=edit main.cpp

[Bug bootstrap/77359] [7 Regression] AIX bootstrap failure due to alignment of stack pointer + STACK_DYNAMIC_OFFSET

2016-08-24 Thread vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77359 --- Comment #2 from Dominik Vogt --- It's a bit awkward because I don't have access to an AIX machine right now. What's the "configure" line fron config.log, please?

[Bug middle-end/64971] [5 Regression] gcc.c-torture/compile/pr37433.c ICEs with -mabi=ilp32

2016-08-24 Thread ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64971 --- Comment #18 from Ramana Radhakrishnan --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #16) > GCC 5.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. This is still open on GCC-5 - Do we want to take Renlin's fix into GCC-5 or do we want to push t

[Bug tree-optimization/65068] Improve rewriting for address type induction variables in IVOPT

2016-08-24 Thread ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65068 --- Comment #2 from Ramana Radhakrishnan --- And by default we see this .L4: add x3, x5, x1 add x1, x1, 1 ldr w2, [x4, x3, lsl 2] cmp w0, w1 add w2, w2, 1 str w2, [x4, x3, l

[Bug c++/77363] New: Missing debug information in DWARF

2016-08-24 Thread EngyCZ at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77363 Bug ID: 77363 Summary: Missing debug information in DWARF Product: gcc Version: 5.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: c++ A

[Bug libfortran/77261] gfortran.dg/random_3.f90 FAILs

2016-08-24 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77261 --- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #4 from Janne Blomqvist --- > Patch here: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-08/msg01630.html > > Could you Rainer verify that it works on Solaris/SPARC? It *should* d

[Bug tree-optimization/77362] New: [7 Regression] [graphite] ICE in sese_build_liveouts_use w/ -O2 -floop-nest-optimize

2016-08-24 Thread asolokha at gmx dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77362 Bug ID: 77362 Summary: [7 Regression] [graphite] ICE in sese_build_liveouts_use w/ -O2 -floop-nest-optimize Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywor

[Bug libgcc/77361] sparc - unrecognizable insn in __fixsfdi

2016-08-24 Thread wigyori at uid0 dot hu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77361 --- Comment #1 from Zoltan HERPAI --- (In reply to Zoltan HERPAI from comment #0) > Hi, > > I'm trying to build a cross-compiler for sparc, however libgcc build fails > with the following error: > > - > /openwrt/build_dir/toolchain-

[Bug libgcc/77361] New: sparc - unrecognizable insn in __fixsfdi

2016-08-24 Thread wigyori at uid0 dot hu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77361 Bug ID: 77361 Summary: sparc - unrecognizable insn in __fixsfdi Product: gcc Version: 5.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libgcc

[Bug libstdc++/77356] regex error for a ECMAScript syntax string

2016-08-24 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77356 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/72817] [7 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes)

2016-08-24 Thread amker at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72817 amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--

[Bug testsuite/77317] x86_64 --target_board=''unix/ unix/-m32'' parallel testrun gives inconsistent results in gcc.dg/vect

2016-08-24 Thread rts at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77317 --- Comment #2 from rts at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rts Date: Wed Aug 24 07:53:07 2016 New Revision: 239730 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239730&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix PR testsuite/77317 gcc/testsuite/ * lib/target-supports

[Bug tree-optimization/69848] poor vectorization of a loop from SPEC2006 464.h264ref

2016-08-24 Thread amker at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69848 amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--

[Bug tree-optimization/53947] [meta-bug] vectorizer missed-optimizations

2016-08-24 Thread amker at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947 Bug 53947 depends on bug 69848, which changed state. Bug 69848 Summary: poor vectorization of a loop from SPEC2006 464.h264ref https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69848 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug target/77353] [AVR] uint16_t instead uint8_t comparison

2016-08-24 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77353 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Please always provide complete testcases that can be compiled.

[Bug tree-optimization/34114] Missed optimization: cannot determine loop termination

2016-08-24 Thread amker at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34114 amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug middle-end/77357] strlen of constant strings not folded

2016-08-24 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77357 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/77332] ICE when building gcc 6.2 (with gcc 6.1.0)

2016-08-24 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77332 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/76490] [5 Regression] when use -O2 -fcheck-founds compiler appears to hang and consumes all memory

2016-08-24 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76490 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Aug 24 07:39:42 2016 New Revision: 239729 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239729&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-08-24 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 20

[Bug lto/70955] [6/7 Regression] Wrong code generation for __builtin_ms_va_list with -flto

2016-08-24 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70955 --- Comment #24 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 23 Aug 2016, vries at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70955 > > --- Comment #23 from Tom de Vries --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2

[Bug tree-optimization/33244] Missed opportunities for vectorization

2016-08-24 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33244 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- The only loop I see in this file now is one which contains a call to sqrt and logf.