[Bug c++/68352] [Cygwin] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault max() _GLIBCXX_USE_NOEXCEPT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68352 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/68528] [5 Only] Wrong constant folding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68528 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.5 Summary|Wrong constant

[Bug libgcc/68720] libgcc build failure on AIX 5.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68720 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug testsuite/68972] g++.dg/cpp1y/vla-initlist1.C test case fails on powerpc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68972 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|target |testsuite --- Comment #7 from Andrew

[Bug libfortran/69788] FAIL: gfortran.dg/derived_constructor_comps_6.f90 -O0 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69788 --- Comment #6 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to dave.anglin from comment #5) > On 2016-08-28, at 6:54 PM, vries at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > > Does the failure reproduce with 4.9? > > It's not present in 4.9.4: >

[Bug tree-optimization/59967] [5/6/7 Regression] Performance regression from 4.7.x to 4.8.x (loop not unrolled)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59967 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||26163 --- Comment #13 from Andrew

[Bug target/65208] Floats sometimes rounded up instead of being truncated on mips

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65208 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|major |normal --- Comment #1 from Andrew

[Bug lto/65274] Internal compiler error: should die in combat

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65274 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/77324] [7 regression] ICE in push_reload, at reload.c:1350

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77324 --- Comment #9 from Alan Modra --- Eric, I think the condition should be "!strict" rather than "reload_in_progress". I'm not certain about that, but I think the patch might fail if reload needs to iterate over insns more than once. For

[Bug libfortran/69788] FAIL: gfortran.dg/derived_constructor_comps_6.f90 -O0 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69788 --- Comment #5 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2016-08-28, at 6:54 PM, vries at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > Does the failure reproduce with 4.9? It's not present in 4.9.4: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2016-08/msg01665.html --

[Bug tree-optimization/77318] [7 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/graphite/pr68279.f90 -O (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77318 --- Comment #6 from Tom de Vries --- In extract_affine_chrec we have: ... unsigned pos = sese_loop_depth (s->scop_info->region, get_chrec_loop (e)) - 1; isl_aff *loop = isl_aff_set_coefficient_si (isl_aff_zero_on_domain (ls), isl_dim_in,

[Bug libfortran/69788] FAIL: gfortran.dg/derived_constructor_comps_6.f90 -O0 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69788 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug tree-optimization/71506] [5 Regression] ICE with libvpx with -floop-interchange: isl_constraint.c:627: expecting integer value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71506 --- Comment #9 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #8) > (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #7) > > (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #6) > > > Hmm, at r225942 I read: > > > > Patch applies cleanly to 5 branch

[Bug testsuite/77034] [6.2RC regression] g++.dg/init/elide5.C fails on powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu with -m32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77034 --- Comment #4 from Tom de Vries --- Author: vries Date: Sun Aug 28 22:02:07 2016 New Revision: 239811 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239811=gcc=rev Log: 2016-08-28 Tom de Vries PR testsuite/77034

[Bug target/65325] float/interger operation needs cast with 02 switch.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65325 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code --- Comment #10 from Andrew

[Bug c++/65328] GCC perf issue when compiling templates - 120x slower than Clang

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65328 --- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski --- Would be interesting to rerun this again to see if this has been improved.

[Bug target/70359] [6/7 Regression] Code size increase for ARM compared to gcc-5.3.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70359 --- Comment #19 from Fredrik Hederstierna --- Tested GCC-6.2, still same behavior.

[Bug middle-end/67014] builtin_tolower is inefficient.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67014 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug java/71917] [7 regression] libjava.jar/ReturnProxyTest.jar etc. FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71917 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|ebotcazou at gcc

[Bug target/63346] xserver_xorg-server-1.15.1 crash on RaspberryPi when compiled with gcc-4.9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63346 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code --- Comment #4 from Andrew

[Bug target/77270] Flag -mprftchw is shared with 3dnow for -march=k8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77270 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/77270] Flag -mprftchw is shared with 3dnow for -march=k8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77270 --- Comment #11 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Sun Aug 28 16:30:32 2016 New Revision: 239810 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239810=gcc=rev Log: Backport from mainline 2016-08-23 Venkataramanan Kumar

[Bug target/70341] [5/6/7 Regression] cost model for addresses is incorrect, slsr is using reg + reg + CST for arm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70341 --- Comment #7 from Fredrik Hederstierna --- Tested with GCC 6.2 and still same behaviour.

[Bug ada/71911] [Cygwin] "gnatclean program" will remove the standard package .ali file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71911 --- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou --- > I use the administrator user and administrator permissions in Windows host, > so, normally I use the same permission map to root permissions in Cygwin > host. Please double check the permissions of the

[Bug c++/77397] New: function initializing global static variables not optimized again fully

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77397 Bug ID: 77397 Summary: function initializing global static variables not optimized again fully Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/77396] New: address sanitizer crashes if all static global variables are optimized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77396 Bug ID: 77396 Summary: address sanitizer crashes if all static global variables are optimized Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug ada/71911] [Cygwin] "gnatclean program" will remove the standard package .ali file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71911 --- Comment #2 from 鍾 --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #1) > How was the compiler configured? Which permissions have the ALI files? 使用内建 specs。 COLLECT_GCC=gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-cygwin/5.4.0/lto-wrapper.exe

[Bug tree-optimization/71506] [5 Regression] ICE with libvpx with -floop-interchange: isl_constraint.c:627: expecting integer value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71506 --- Comment #8 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #7) > (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #6) > > Hmm, at r225942 I read: > > Patch applies cleanly to 5 branch and fixes ICEs for original and minimal > test-cases.

[Bug target/77324] [7 regression] ICE in push_reload, at reload.c:1350

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77324 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/77324] [7 regression] ICE in push_reload, at reload.c:1350

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77324 --- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Sun Aug 28 08:50:09 2016 New Revision: 239807 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239807=gcc=rev Log: PR target/77324 * config/sparc/sparc.c

[Bug libstdc++/77395] New: std::is_constructible is false for type constructible via implicit conversion operator affecting std::tuple

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77395 Bug ID: 77395 Summary: std::is_constructible is false for type constructible via implicit conversion operator affecting std::tuple Product: gcc Version: 6.2.0 Status:

[Bug target/50818] va_list is filled incorrectly in functions with ms_abi attribute on amd64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50818 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #10

[Bug lto/70955] [6 Regression] Wrong code generation for __builtin_ms_va_list with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70955 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/70955] [6 Regression] Wrong code generation for __builtin_ms_va_list with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70955 --- Comment #27 from Tom de Vries --- Author: vries Date: Sun Aug 28 07:41:52 2016 New Revision: 239806 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239806=gcc=rev Log: Backport "Tag {ms,sysv}_va_list_type_node with '{ms,sysv}_abi va_list' attribute"

[Bug preprocessor/68854] isystem and ansi cause assembly preprocessing problem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68854 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/77324] [7 regression] ICE in push_reload, at reload.c:1350

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77324 --- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou --- > I expect you'll find that sparc_legitimate_address_p when non-strict is > rejecting the output of sparc_legitimize_reload_address, or you have a > constraint that is rejecting the same. Thanks for the