[Bug fortran/66227] [5/6/7 Regression] [OOP] EXTENDS_TYPE_OF n returns wrong result for polymorphic variable allocated to extended type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66227 --- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: janus Date: Thu Nov 17 07:52:24 2016 New Revision: 242535 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242535=gcc=rev Log: 2016-11-17 Janus Weil PR fortran/66227

[Bug tree-optimization/78386] Optimization -O2 and higher cause math inconsistency

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78386 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- Does -ffp-contract=off help?

[Bug fortran/78387] OpenMP segfault/stack size exceeded writing to internal file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78387 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/78357] nios2 uses non-standard atomic functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78357 --- Comment #11 from Sebastian Huber --- Thanks for your kind help. Would it be possible to back port this to GCC 6 also?

[Bug target/78357] nios2 uses non-standard atomic functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78357 --- Comment #10 from Chung-Lin Tang --- Author: cltang Date: Thu Nov 17 06:26:56 2016 New Revision: 242534 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242534=gcc=rev Log: 2016-11-17 Chung-Lin Tang PR target/78357

[Bug c/78304] [7 Regression] -Wformat doesn't warn anymore for inttypes.h format string argument type mismatches

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78304 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- Even though that with my patch we expansion_point_location_if_in_system_header the caret location, it still points to the location in the system header, so the diagnostics is suppressed.

[Bug fortran/78351] comma not terminating READ of formatted input field - ok in 4.1.7, not 4.4.7- maybe related to 25419?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78351 --- Comment #20 from Steve Kargl --- On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 01:44:45AM +, sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu wrote: > > In the above, you are hitting an end-of-record. I would need > to go read the Standard to see what happens in

[Bug c/78304] [7 Regression] -Wformat doesn't warn anymore for inttypes.h format string argument type mismatches

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78304 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/78351] comma not terminating READ of formatted input field - ok in 4.1.7, not 4.4.7- maybe related to 25419?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78351 --- Comment #19 from Steve Kargl --- On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 12:43:40AM +, kevin.b.beard at nasa dot gov wrote: > Many thanks to Jerry DeLisle [jvdeli...@charter.net]; he made us realize > that an internal record is now not treated the

[Bug c/78285] error on duplicate switch label where a note should be

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78285 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/78285] error on duplicate switch label where a note should be

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78285 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Thu Nov 17 01:23:19 2016 New Revision: 242532 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242532=gcc=rev Log: PR c/78285 * c-common.c (c_add_case_label): Turn error_at calls

[Bug fortran/78387] OpenMP segfault/stack size exceeded writing to internal file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78387 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Benson --- I couldn't find anything in the OpenMP specifications which addresses this issue - so presumably it's undefined behavior as far as OpenMP is concerned. But it seems that internal file writes were intended to

[Bug other/78390] New: Bootstrap failure: match.pd: cannot determine type of operand

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78390 Bug ID: 78390 Summary: Bootstrap failure: match.pd: cannot determine type of operand Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug other/78252] C++ demangler crashes with infinite recursion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78252 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug other/78252] C++ demangler crashes with infinite recursion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78252 --- Comment #2 from Nathan Sidwell --- Created attachment 40062 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40062=edit reduced source code I've reduced the original source to the attached. This emits 4 function symbols, 2 of which are

[Bug fortran/58001] Make it possible to silence "Extension: Tab character in format" warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58001 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/78351] comma not terminating READ of formatted input field - ok in 4.1.7, not 4.4.7- maybe related to 25419?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78351 --- Comment #17 from Dr. Kevin B. Beard --- Hi, Many thanks to Jerry DeLisle ‎[jvdeli...@charter.net]‎; he made us realize that an internal record is now not treated the same as an external record! I didn't think of that. In the

[Bug fortran/78351] comma not terminating READ of formatted input field - ok in 4.1.7, not 4.4.7- maybe related to 25419?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78351 --- Comment #18 from Dr. Kevin B. Beard --- Created attachment 40061 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40061=edit x2.dat

[Bug fortran/58001] Make it possible to silence "Extension: Tab character in format" warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58001 --- Comment #14 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Thu Nov 17 00:18:18 2016 New Revision: 242530 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242530=gcc=rev Log: 2016-11-16 Steven G. Kargl PR

[Bug libstdc++/70548] gdb pretty printers hang and spin cpu in gdb session.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70548 Henrique Andrade changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hcma at unscrambl dot com ---

[Bug fortran/78387] OpenMP segfault/stack size exceeded writing to internal file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78387 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug middle-end/78355] LRA generates unaligned accesses when SLOW_UNALIGNED_ACCESS is 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78355 --- Comment #7 from pipcet at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #6) > > The analysis looks right for me. Although this code had a lot of troubles > > until it was stabilized and came to the current state. So the change

[Bug tree-optimization/78386] Optimization -O2 and higher cause math inconsistency

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78386 --- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- On Wed, 16 Nov 2016, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > Most likely the use of fma. Which applies with current x86_64 just as it does with powerpc. It should be possible to reduce such

[Bug c++/78373] [7 Regression] error: constant not recomputed when ADDR_EXPR changed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78373 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/78378] [5/6 Regression] wrong code when combining shift + mult + zero_extend

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78378 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[5/6/7 Regression] wrong|[5/6 Regression] wrong code

[Bug rtl-optimization/78378] [5/6/7 Regression] wrong code when combining shift + mult + zero_extend

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78378 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Nov 16 23:22:16 2016 New Revision: 242526 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242526=gcc=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/78378 * combine.c (make_extraction): Use

[Bug rtl-optimization/78325] [7 regression] r235825 causes gcc.target/mips/call-5.c, gcc.target/mips/call-6.c R_MIPS_JALR failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78325 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/70890] [7 regression] r235660 miscompiles stage2 compiler on ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70890 --- Comment #10 from Alan Modra --- Author: amodra Date: Wed Nov 16 23:10:55 2016 New Revision: 242525 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242525=gcc=rev Log: R_MIPS_JALR failures This is a fix for my PR70890 patch, which incorrectly removed

[Bug rtl-optimization/78325] [7 regression] r235825 causes gcc.target/mips/call-5.c, gcc.target/mips/call-6.c R_MIPS_JALR failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78325 --- Comment #4 from Alan Modra --- Author: amodra Date: Wed Nov 16 23:10:55 2016 New Revision: 242525 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242525=gcc=rev Log: R_MIPS_JALR failures This is a fix for my PR70890 patch, which incorrectly removed

[Bug c++/78373] [7 Regression] error: constant not recomputed when ADDR_EXPR changed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78373 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Nov 16 22:42:24 2016 New Revision: 242523 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242523=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/78373 - ICE with TREE_CONSTANT reference * decl.c

[Bug libstdc++/78389] New: list::merge and list::sort are not exception safe

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78389 Bug ID: 78389 Summary: list::merge and list::sort are not exception safe Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/77848] Gimple if-conversion results in redundant comparisons

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77848 --- Comment #24 from Bill Schmidt --- The above commit doesn't yet solve the problem, but enables more outer-loop vectorization in preparation for the fix.

[Bug tree-optimization/77848] Gimple if-conversion results in redundant comparisons

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77848 --- Comment #23 from Bill Schmidt --- Author: wschmidt Date: Wed Nov 16 22:17:10 2016 New Revision: 242520 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242520=gcc=rev Log: 2016-11-16 Bill Schmidt PR

[Bug libstdc++/66742] abort on sorting list with custom allocator that is not stateless

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66742 --- Comment #9 from TC --- The ugly fix in Comment #6 should be performant, if, well, ugly. It may be worth considering holding the nodes via a different type. There's no real reason why the temporary holders need to be a `list` or have a copy

[Bug preprocessor/78324] Valgrind issues seen with gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf-2.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78324 --- Comment #1 from David Malcolm --- Root cause is that the substring loc code isn't set up to cope with -ftrack-macro-expansion=0, and attempts to handle this location: ../../src/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf-2.c:95:1: note:

[Bug libfortran/51119] MATMUL slow for large matrices

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51119 --- Comment #47 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Wed Nov 16 21:54:25 2016 New Revision: 242518 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242518=gcc=rev Log: 2016-11-16 Jerry DeLisle PR

[Bug middle-end/78355] LRA generates unaligned accesses when SLOW_UNALIGNED_ACCESS is 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78355 --- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou --- > The analysis looks right for me. Although this code had a lot of troubles > until it was stabilized and came to the current state. So the change might > create some new failures but I hope it will not.

[Bug fortran/58001] Make it possible to silence "Extension: Tab character in format" warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58001 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/78388] New: Bogus "declaration shadows template parameter" error with parenthesized function-style casts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78388 Bug ID: 78388 Summary: Bogus "declaration shadows template parameter" error with parenthesized function-style casts Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/78386] Optimization -O2 and higher cause math inconsistency

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78386 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc64le-unknown-linux-g

[Bug fortran/68778] [F03] Missing default initialization of finalized derived types type(C_PTR) component in subroutines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68778 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Bug c/78285] error on duplicate switch label where a note should be

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78285 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/78383] label as values ICE with C++ lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78383 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- I mean r160122 or r160124.

[Bug tree-optimization/78386] Powerpc64le: optimization -O2 and higher cause math inconsistency

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78386 --- Comment #2 from Breno Leitao --- I did further tests with older versions, and the problem is also reproducible, so, this is not a regression. These are the versions I tested also: * gcc-5 (Debian 5.4.1-3) 5.4.1 20161019 * gcc-4 (Debian

[Bug c++/68377] [c++17] unary right fold fails to compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68377 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/78387] OpenMP segfault/stack size exceeded writing to internal file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78387 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- I thought they are supposed to be, at least that is what we had unit_lock, u->lock etc. for. So has something in libgfortran changed so that it doesn't properly lock the units anymore?

[Bug tree-optimization/78383] label as values ICE with C++ lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78383 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/78387] OpenMP segfault/stack size exceeded writing to internal file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78387 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Benson --- OK - thanks. I hadn't realized that the internal I/O operations weren't threadsafe - I guess I've just been fortunate to avoid this with previous versions of gfortran. I'll update my code to use critical

[Bug fortran/78387] OpenMP segfault/stack size exceeded writing to internal file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78387 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/78387] New: OpenMP segfault/stack size exceeded writing to internal file

us/Tools/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/7.0.0/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: ../gcc-trunk/configure --prefix=/home/abenson/Galacticus/Tools --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran --disable-multilib Thread model: posix gcc version 7.0.0 20161116 (experimental) (GCC) $ gfortran t

[Bug bootstrap/72823] [7 Regression] r239175 causes build failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72823 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/78386] Powerpc64le: optimization -O2 and higher cause math inconsitency

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78386 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Most likely the use of fma.

[Bug c/78386] New: Powerpc64le: optimization -O2 and higher cause math inconsitency

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78386 Bug ID: 78386 Summary: Powerpc64le: optimization -O2 and higher cause math inconsitency Product: gcc Version: 6.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug bootstrap/72823] [7 Regression] r239175 causes build failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72823 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Nov 16 20:10:27 2016 New Revision: 242510 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242510=gcc=rev Log: PR bootstrap/72823 * configure.ac (ENABLE_ASSERT_CHECKING): Define

[Bug fortran/78299] [6 Regression] ICE in expand_omp_for_static_nochunk, at omp-low.c:9622

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78299 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[6/7 Regression] ICE in |[6 Regression] ICE in

[Bug middle-end/61409] [5/6/7 regression] -Wmaybe-uninitialized false-positive with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61409 --- Comment #24 from Jeffrey A. Law --- OK. It's coming back to me now. And yes, Aldy, it was the edge 9->6 :-) So we have a PHI argument that references an uninitialized variable. There is a control predicate for that PHI argument, call it

[Bug fortran/69298] [OOP] Array finalisers seem to be given the wrong array when the array is a member variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69298 --- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Here is a further reduced test case, based on Dominique's variant in comment #2, which (I think) runs into the same runtime-segfault when calling stuff_1d_finaliser ... module stuff_mod

[Bug bootstrap/78385] New: Build of libgcc2 for target arm-eabi fails, if configuration --with-abi=apcs-gnu is used (in GCC-Build)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78385 Bug ID: 78385 Summary: Build of libgcc2 for target arm-eabi fails, if configuration --with-abi=apcs-gnu is used (in GCC-Build) Product: gcc Version: 6.2.0

[Bug fortran/78351] comma not terminating READ of formatted input field - ok in 4.1.7, not 4.4.7- maybe related to 25419?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78351 --- Comment #16 from Steve Kargl --- On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 06:36:58PM +, kevin.b.beard at nasa dot gov wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78351 > > --- Comment #13 from Dr. Kevin B. Beard --- > Hi, > > Thanks for

[Bug fortran/78351] comma not terminating READ of formatted input field - ok in 4.1.7, not 4.4.7- maybe related to 25419?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78351 --- Comment #15 from Jerry DeLisle --- Well, on further investigation I see that we do have a flag in read_sf to signal a comma. It does not have this flag in read_sf_internal, So definitely does not work on strings. My bet is that when we/I

[Bug rtl-optimization/78374] Segfault in cc1 (arm-eabi) on -O1 (or better)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78374 Markus Eisenmann changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/78384] New: [7 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: wrong outgoing edge flags at end of bb 15)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78384 Bug ID: 78384 Summary: [7 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: wrong outgoing edge flags at end of bb 15) Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/78351] comma not terminating READ of formatted input field - ok in 4.1.7, not 4.4.7- maybe related to 25419?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78351 --- Comment #14 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Try to find what you want in http://www.fortran.com/F77_std/rjcnf0001.html. Good luck!

[Bug rtl-optimization/78378] [5/6/7 Regression] wrong code when combining shift + mult + zero_extend

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78378 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug middle-end/61409] [5/6/7 regression] -Wmaybe-uninitialized false-positive with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61409 --- Comment #23 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Sorry, I can't remember if I meant 9->5 or 9->6 at this point :-) I need to refamiliarize myself with this stuff again to make sure I've got the basic concepts before reviewing the patch. But you can

[Bug fortran/78351] comma not terminating READ of formatted input field - ok in 4.1.7, not 4.4.7- maybe related to 25419?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78351 --- Comment #13 from Dr. Kevin B. Beard --- Hi, Thanks for looking at this. I'm sorry to say I don't have access to the official F77 standards, perhaps you could send me a copy of the whole? The section you quoted doesn't seems to to exclude

[Bug preprocessor/78324] Valgrind issues seen with gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf-2.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78324 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug rtl-optimization/50217] combine pass generated wrong code for unsigned char comparison on MIPS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50217 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/78299] [6/7 Regression] ICE in expand_omp_for_static_nochunk, at omp-low.c:9622

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78299 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Nov 16 18:19:09 2016 New Revision: 242507 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242507=gcc=rev Log: PR fortran/78299 * omp-low.c (expand_omp_for_static_nochunk): Don't

[Bug libfortran/51119] MATMUL slow for large matrices

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51119 --- Comment #46 from Thomas Koenig --- (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #44) > Yes I am aware of these. I was willing to live with them, but if it is a > problem, we can remove those options easy enough. I think it is no big deal, but

[Bug rtl-optimization/78378] [5/6/7 Regression] wrong code when combining shift + mult + zero_extend

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78378 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Scratch that, I've missed there the 8 SUBREG_BYTE. That one is fine. What is wrong is combine_simplify_rtx turning (set (reg:SI 99 [ x ]) (and:SI (subreg:SI (truncate:HI (lshiftrt:TI (mult:TI

[Bug fortran/41539] [OOP] Calling function which takes CLASS: Rank comparison does not work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41539 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug fortran/44131] [OOP] Using polymorphism in modules unware of derived types fails at run-time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44131 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/44863] [OOP] Fortran runtime error: internal error: bad hash value in dynamic dispatch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44863 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0

[Bug fortran/44864] [OOP] ICE: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44864 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0

[Bug fortran/45795] [OOP] ICE in in gfc_add_component_ref plus bogus error message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45795 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/49961] [OOP] type-bound function can not return a pointer of a array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49961 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0

[Bug fortran/51791] [OOP] Failure to resolve typebound function call with base object in parentheses.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51791 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/51207] [OOP] Mark __def_init_... as FL_PARAMETER

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51207 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug fortran/51943] [OOP] ICE in conv_function_val

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51943 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/55935] [OOP] Fortran fronted has ADDR_EXPRs of FUNCTION_DECLs with bogus BLOCK

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55935 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug fortran/56929] [OOP] [F08] ICE on dummy argument child class with coarray inside parent

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56929 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0

[Bug fortran/56845] [OOP] _vptr not set to declared type for CLASS + SAVE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56845 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0

[Bug fortran/57145] [OOP] Faulty "Actual argument must be polymorphic" error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57145 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/57456] [OOP] CLASS + CHARACTER ALLOCATE with typespec: For arrays, the typespec is ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57456 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/57922] [OOP] Memory leak with allocatable polymorphics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57922 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0

[Bug tree-optimization/78383] New: label as values ICE with C++ lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78383 Bug ID: 78383 Summary: label as values ICE with C++ lambda Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/58947] [OOP] ICE on select type with non-polymorphic selector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58947 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.1

[Bug fortran/58658] [OOP] Pointer assignment to allocatable unlimited polymorphic accepted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58658 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/60834] [OOP] ICE with ASSOCIATE construct (gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:1721)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60834 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/60255] [OOP] Deferred character length variable at (1) cannot yet be associated with unlimited polymorphic entities

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60255 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.3

[Bug fortran/60322] [OOP] Incorrect bounds on polymorphic dummy array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60322 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug fortran/60550] [OOP] ICE on factory design pattern

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60550 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.1

[Bug fortran/63553] [OOP] Wrong code when assigning a CLASS to a TYPE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63553 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libfortran/78314] [aarch64] ieee_support_halting does not report unsupported fpu traps correctly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78314 nsz at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0 Known to fail|

[Bug fortran/64589] [OOP] Linking error due to undefined integer symbol with unlimited polymorphism

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64589 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug fortran/64674] [OOP] ICE in ASSOCIATE with class array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64674 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug fortran/67091] [OOP] Bad result for type-bound procedures returning pointers to the intrinsic function ASSOCIATED

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67091 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug libfortran/78314] [aarch64] ieee_support_halting does not report unsupported fpu traps correctly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78314 --- Comment #3 from nsz at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: nsz Date: Wed Nov 16 17:27:04 2016 New Revision: 242505 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242505=gcc=rev Log: [PR libgfortran/78314] Fix ieee_support_halting ieee_support_halting only

[Bug fortran/64209] [OOP] runtime segfault with CLASS(*), INTENT(OUT) dummy argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64209 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.0

  1   2   3   4   5   >