[Bug fortran/69455] [5/6/7 Regression] [F08] Assembler error(s) when using intrinsic modules in two BLOCK

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69455 --- Comment #11 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > A two line patch (or one rather long line) is sufficient to work > around the brokeness of the intrinsics modules. "Un qui sait vaut mieux que dix qui cherchent!" Could you please be kind enough

[Bug target/48551] Following source code crashes the c++ compiler on coldfire platform.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48551 --- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Mon Nov 21 05:29:36 2016 New Revision: 242648 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242648=gcc=rev Log: 2016-11-20 Jeff Law PR target/48551 * reload.h

[Bug target/48551] Following source code crashes the c++ compiler on coldfire platform.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48551 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug objc++/78418] [7 Regression] Several failures in the obj-c++ test suite after revision r242377 on x86_64-apple-darwin16

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78418 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug objc++/78418] [7 Regression] Several failures in the obj-c++ test suite after revision r242377 on x86_64-apple-darwin16

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78418 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug objc++/78418] [7 Regression] Several failures in the obj-c++ test suite after revision r242377 on x86_64-apple-darwin16

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78418 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Mon Nov 21 04:41:21 2016 New Revision: 242647 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242647=gcc=rev Log: PR objc++/78418 - ICE in string tests on darwin * tree.c

[Bug libstdc++/78442] New: [variant] std::get<...>(Variant) is not constexpr.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78442 Bug ID: 78442 Summary: [variant] std::get<...>(Variant) is not constexpr. Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug libstdc++/78441] New: [variant] variant_alternative doesn't allow cv qualifiers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78441 Bug ID: 78441 Summary: [variant] variant_alternative doesn't allow cv qualifiers Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/78360] [C++1z] missing throw()s in explicit instantiation declarations for has_facet()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78360 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/78440] [7 Regression] [c++17] Incompatible exception-specification not diagnosed in explicit instantiation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78440 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/78440] [7 Regression] [c++17] Incompatible exception-specification not diagnosed in explicit instantiation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78440 --- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- except.spec/5: »If any declaration of a function has an exception-specification that is not a noexcept-specification allowing all exceptions, all declarations, including the definition and any

[Bug c++/78440] New: [7 Regression] [c++17] Incompatible exception-specification not diagnosed in explicit instantiation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78440 Bug ID: 78440 Summary: [7 Regression] [c++17] Incompatible exception-specification not diagnosed in explicit instantiation Product: gcc Version: 7.0

copy_n should result in a one past the end input iterator

/* gcc -Wall -Wextra -std=c++11 copy_n_vs_copy.cpp -lstdc++ -o copy_n_vs_copy One Past the End https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/manual/iterators.html#iterators.predefined.end BUG location: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/5.1.0/include/g++-v5/bits/stl_algo.h */ #include #include

[Bug c++/38522] -Wconversion does not handle complex bitwise expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38522 Florian J. Weber changed: What|Removed |Added CC||oss at florianjw dot de --- Comment

[Bug go/78432] [7 Regression] -fdump-go-spec ICEs for aligned causing x32 libgo library to fail to build

, ||s390-linux-gnu --- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose --- seen on s390x-linux-gnu as well, when building the m31/32 multilib variant https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gcc-snapshot=s390x=20161120-1=1479682317

[Bug target/78439] New: [7 Regression] error: insn does not satisfy its constraints (arm-linux-gnueabihf)

: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: doko at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- seen with current trunk, complete build log at https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gcc-snapshot=armhf=20161120

[Bug target/78438] New: incorrect comparison optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78438 Bug ID: 78438 Summary: incorrect comparison optimization Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug rtl-optimization/78437] New: [7 Regression]: Invalid sign-extend conversion in REE pass

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78437 Bug ID: 78437 Summary: [7 Regression]: Invalid sign-extend conversion in REE pass Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/78436] New: incorrect write to larger-than-type bitfield (signed char x:9)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78436 Bug ID: 78436 Summary: incorrect write to larger-than-type bitfield (signed char x:9) Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libfortran/78379] Processor-specific versions for matmul

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78379 --- Comment #17 from Jerry DeLisle --- On a hunch, this brings it back. $(patsubst %.c,%.lo,$(notdir $(i_matmul_c))): AM_CFLAGS += -ffast-math -ftree-vectorize -funroll-loops --param max-unroll-times=4 -march=native So -march=native fixes it.

[Bug libfortran/78379] Processor-specific versions for matmul

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78379 --- Comment #16 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #15) > OMG, the world of processors is more complicated than I thought. > So, these rather modern AMD chips support AVX, but suck at it. > > Two questions: > > -

[Bug fortran/69741] Bad error in forall with array loop counters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69741 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/69741] Bad error in forall with array loop counters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69741 --- Comment #14 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Sun Nov 20 20:14:18 2016 New Revision: 242643 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242643=gcc=rev Log: 2016-11-20 Harald Anlauf PR fortran/69741

[Bug fortran/69741] Bad error in forall with array loop counters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69741 --- Comment #13 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Sun Nov 20 20:12:18 2016 New Revision: 242642 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242642=gcc=rev Log: 2016-11-20 Harald Anlauf PR fortran/69741

[Bug fortran/69741] Bad error in forall with array loop counters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69741 --- Comment #12 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Sun Nov 20 18:43:16 2016 New Revision: 242641 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242641=gcc=rev Log: 2016-11-20 Harald Anlauf PR fortran/69741

[Bug middle-end/61409] [5/6 regression] -Wmaybe-uninitialized false-positive with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61409 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[5/6/7 regression] |[5/6 regression]

[Bug driver/49726] [4.4/5/6/7 Regression] -g0 file.S -g does not produce debug info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49726 Jan Kratochvil changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|-g0 file.S -g does not |[4.4/5/6/7 Regression] -g0

[Bug middle-end/61409] [5/6/7 regression] -Wmaybe-uninitialized false-positive with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61409 --- Comment #25 from Aldy Hernandez --- Author: aldyh Date: Sun Nov 20 18:34:06 2016 New Revision: 242639 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242639=gcc=rev Log: PR middle-end/61409 * tree-ssa-uninit.c: Define new global

[Bug middle-end/78433] [7 Regression] glibc posix/execvpe.c gets miscompiled with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78433 --- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- On X86_64: --- good2016-11-20 19:12:27.353412333 +0100 +++ bad 2016-11-20 19:13:37.738531151 +0100 @@ -892,7 +892,7 @@ leaq1(%rax), %rdx cmpq$0, -8(%r12,%rdx,8)

[Bug middle-end/78433] [7 Regression] glibc posix/execvpe.c gets miscompiled with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78433 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc | Component|target

[Bug go/78432] [7 Regression] -fdump-go-spec ICEs for aligned causing x32 libgo library to fail to build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78432 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- PR 78431 might be the same issue and has the revision ranges where this might be introduced too.

[Bug go/78431] [7 regression] ICE in go_append_padding, at godump.c:636

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78431 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- PR 78432 might be the same issue even with a reduced testcase.

[Bug go/78432] [7 Regression] -fdump-go-spec ICEs for aligned causing x32 libgo library to fail to build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78432 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build

[Bug middle-end/78433] [7 Regression] glibc posix/execvpe.c gets miscompiled with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78433 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug libstdc++/58638] libstdc++ builds as non-PIC when --with-pic is specified

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58638 Alec Ari changed: What|Removed |Added CC||neotheuser at ymail dot com --- Comment #11

[Bug libstdc++/28811] --with-pic vs static libraries and libstdc++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28811 --- Comment #26 from Alec Ari --- To avoid fully recompiling GCC, I modified libstdc++-v3/configure (not .ac) and made the following change: --- a/libstdc++-v3/configure +++ b/libstdc++-v3/configure @@ -15014,8 +15014,8 @@ if test

[Bug libgcc/77813] __TMC_END__ - __TMC_LIST__ == 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77813 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/78435] New: bogus array subscript warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78435 Bug ID: 78435 Summary: bogus array subscript warning Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end

[Bug c++/78434] Incorrect warning about missing align_val_t for placement new

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78434 --- Comment #1 from Marc Mutz --- Created attachment 40089 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40089=edit Testcase, compile with g++ -Wall -o 78434{,.cpp} Actual Output: 78434.cpp:11:30: warning: ‘new’ of type ‘Align128’

[Bug c++/78434] New: Incorrect warning about missing align_val_t for placement new

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78434 Bug ID: 78434 Summary: Incorrect warning about missing align_val_t for placement new Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/78395] [OOP] error on polymorphic assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78395 --- Comment #9 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vehre Date: Sun Nov 20 14:21:43 2016 New Revision: 242637 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242637=gcc=rev Log: gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2016-11-20 Andre Vehreschild

[Bug libgcc/77813] __TMC_END__ - __TMC_LIST__ == 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77813 --- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse --- Author: glisse Date: Sun Nov 20 13:35:27 2016 New Revision: 242635 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242635=gcc=rev Log: Protect __TMC_END__ - __TMC_LIST__ == 0 2016-11-20 Marc Glisse

[Bug tree-optimization/78433] [7 Regression] glibc posix/execvpe.c gets miscompiled with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78433 --- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- On pcc64le this is the assembly diff: --- good2016-11-20 12:43:40.318860969 + +++ bad 2016-11-20 12:42:57.277928999 + @@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ sldi 9,9,3 ld 10,0(1)

[Bug tree-optimization/78433] [7 Regression] glibc posix/execvpe.c gets miscompiled with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78433 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Bug c++/47877] -fvisibility-inlines-hidden does not hide member template functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47877 Jan Engelhardt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jengelh at inai dot de,

[Bug tree-optimization/78433] New: [7 Regression] glibc posix/execvpe.c gets miscompiled with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78433 Bug ID: 78433 Summary: [7 Regression] glibc posix/execvpe.c gets miscompiled with -O3 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug bootstrap/78432] New: [7 Regression] bootstrap broken on x86_64-linux-gnu (libgo x32 multilibs)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78432 Bug ID: 78432 Summary: [7 Regression] bootstrap broken on x86_64-linux-gnu (libgo x32 multilibs) Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug go/78431] [7 regression] ICE in go_append_padding, at godump.c:636

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78431 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug go/78431] New: [7 regression] ICE in go_append_padding, at godump.c:636

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78431 Bug ID: 78431 Summary: [7 regression] ICE in go_append_padding, at godump.c:636 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug sanitizer/78267] [7 Regression] libsanitizer breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin16 at r241977

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78267 --- Comment #55 from Rainer Orth --- Author: ro Date: Sun Nov 20 10:51:53 2016 New Revision: 242634 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242634=gcc=rev Log: Add PR sanitizer/78267 patch to libsanitizer/LOCAL_PATCHES Modified:

[Bug sanitizer/78267] [7 Regression] libsanitizer breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin16 at r241977

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78267 --- Comment #54 from Rainer Orth --- Author: ro Date: Sun Nov 20 10:49:47 2016 New Revision: 242633 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242633=gcc=rev Log: Fix libsanitizer build on OS X 10.1[01], macOS 10.12 (PR sanitizer/78267)

[Bug libstdc++/78430] libstc++-v3 Build failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78430 --- Comment #1 from Armleo --- System: Ubuntu server 16.04 x64 Azure

[Bug libfortran/78379] Processor-specific versions for matmul

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78379 --- Comment #15 from Thomas Koenig --- OMG, the world of processors is more complicated than I thought. So, these rather modern AMD chips support AVX, but suck at it. Two questions: - Can you check if -mfma3 and/or -mfma4 make any difference?

[Bug libstdc++/78430] New: libstc++-v3 Build failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78430 Bug ID: 78430 Summary: libstc++-v3 Build failed Product: gcc Version: 6.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++

[Bug c/78429] New: ice on valid C code on x86_64-linux-gnu at -O3 in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes (internal compiler error: in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:361)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78429 Bug ID: 78429 Summary: ice on valid C code on x86_64-linux-gnu at -O3 in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes (internal compiler error: in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:361)